| Literature DB >> 34416851 |
Yanpeng Zhang1, Bing Fan2, Yong Luo2, Zhiyuan Tao2, Yongbo Nie2, Yongtao Wang3, Fanglin Ding2, Yanwu Li4, Dayong Gu5.
Abstract
AIM: This study has conducted a comparative analysis of common carbapenemases harboring, the expression of resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family efflux pumps, and biofilm formation potential associated with carbapenem resistance among Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) strains with different carbapenem susceptibility.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; Biofilm; Carbapenemases; Efflux pump; Resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34416851 PMCID: PMC8377947 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06529-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Primer sequences of targeting genes and amplicon size
| Target genes | Primer sequence | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|
|
| F: GAGTCTAATGGCGGTGGTTC R: ATTGCTTCATCTGCTGGTTG | 110 |
|
| F:TACAAGGGATTCGGCATCG R:TAATGGCCTGTTCCCATGTG | 570 |
|
| F: GATGGTGTTTGGTCGCATA R: CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG | 390 |
|
| F: GGAATAGAGTGGCTTAAYTC R: TCGGTTTAAYAAAACAACCACC | 232 |
|
| F: GGTTTGGCGATCTGGTTTTC R: CGGAATGGCTCATCACGATC | 621 |
|
| F: GAGTATTCAACATTTCCGTGTC R: TAATCAGTGAGGCACCTATCTC | 850 |
|
| F: GAATATGTGCCAGCCTCTAC R: GCATTACCGAAACCAATACG | 245 |
|
| F: TGGGTGGAGCAAGCTAATGG R: ACGAATAGAACCAGACATTCCTTCT | 81 |
|
| F: TAATGCTTTGATCGGCCTTG R:TGGATTGCACTTCATCTTGG | 353 |
|
| F: GACAATTACACCTATACAAGAAG R: AAACCCACATACCAACCC | 599 |
| IS | F: CACGAATGCAGAAGTTG R: CTTCTGTGGTGGTTGGC | 1200 |
|
| F: GCAGAGCGTACTCGGAATGT R: CCACTGAAACCCCATCCCAA | 101 |
|
| F: GGTGAATTACTTGGTGATGC R: TTTGGTCAGGCGCAGGTATT | 86 |
|
| F: TTCGGTGGCTCATACGCAAT R: GGAGCACCACCTAACTGACC | 137 |
|
| F:AGCTAACGCGATAAGTAGACCG R: TGTCAAGGCCAGGTAAGGTTC | 137 |
Characteristics of 90 isolates of A. baumannii
| Variables | CSAB | CnSAB | Number | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.22 | |||
| < 60 | 7 (58.3 %) | 31 (39.7 %) | 38 (42.2 %) | |
| ≥ 60 | 5 (41.7 %) | 47 (60.3 %) | 52 (57.8 %) | |
| Gender | 0.73 | |||
| Female | 2 (16.7 %) | 16 (21 %) | 18 (20.0 %) | |
| Male | 10 (83.3 %) | 62 (79 %) | 72 (80.0 %) | |
| Specimen types | 0.28 | |||
| Sputum | 8 (66.7 %) | 56 (71.8 %) | 64 (71.1 %) | |
| Urine | 1 (8.3 %) | 4 (5.1 %) | 5 (5.6 %) | |
| Blood | 2 (16.7 %) | 3 (3.8 %) | 5 (5.6 %) | |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid | 0 (0.0 %) | 8 (10.3 %) | 8 (8.9 %) | |
| Nasal secretion | 1 (8.3 %) | 4 (5.1 %) | 5 (5.6 %) | |
| Skin and soft tissue | 0 (0.0 %) | 3 (3.8 %) | 3 (3.3 %) |
Distribution of Carbapenemase in 90 A. baumannii
| Gene | CSAB (n = 12) | CnSAB | p | Total (N/%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Prevalence rate(%) | N | Prevalence rate (%) | |||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 5 | 6.4 | 0.37 | 5 (5.6) |
|
| 4 | 33.3 | 71 | 91 | < 0.001 | 75 (83.3) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.69 | 1 (1.1) |
|
| 12 | 100 | 78 | 100 | – | 90 (100) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.6 | 0.57 | 2 (2.2) |
| IS | 0 | 0 | 22 | 28.2 | 0.034 | 22 (24.4) |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.3 | – | 1 (1.1) | |
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.6 | – | 2 (2.2) | |
| 0 | 0 | 22 | 28.2 | 0.034 | 22 (24.4) | |
Fig. 1Relative expressions of adeB, adeJ and adeG in CSAB and CnSAB strains. The RND family efflux pump expression was determined by the quantitative real-time PCR, and Acinetobacter baumannii strain ATCC 17,978 was taken as a reference. All reactions were carried out in triplicate. The black dot indicates carbapenem susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii (CSAB) strains; the Black square denotes carbapenem non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii (CnSAB) strains. S, significant; NS, not significant
Fig. 2Biofilm formation capacity of CSAB and CnSAB strains. A The biofilm of A. baumannii by violet crystalline dying (under oil lens, 1000x). B Comparison of biofilm production between carbapenem susceptible (CSAB) and carbapenem non-susceptible (CnSAB) groups of A. baumannii. S, significant; NS, not significant
Association between the relative expression of RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation
| Biofilm | Coef. | Std. err. |
| 95 % Conf. interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| − 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.128 | − 0.008 to 0.001 |
|
| − 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.218 | − 0.026 to 0.006 |
|
| − 0.024 | 0.047 | 0.601 | 0.117 to 0.068 |