Lilia Bouzit1, Susan Malspeis2, Jeffrey A Sparks2, Jing Cui2, Elizabeth W Karlson2, Kazuki Yoshida2, Karen H Costenbader2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: liliabouzit27@gmail.com. 2. Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to improve seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) risk prediction using a novel weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) and preclinical plasma metabolites associated with RA risk. Predictive performance was compared to previously validated models including RA-associated environmental factors. METHODS: This nested case-control study matched incident seropositive RA cases (meeting ACR 1987 or EULAR/ACR 2010 criteria) in the Nurses' Health Studies (NHS) to two controls on age, blood collection features, and post-menopausal hormone use at pre-RA blood draw. Environmental variables were measured at the questionnaire cycle preceding blood draw. Four models were generated and internally validated using a bootstrapped optimism estimate: (a) base with environmental factors (E), (b) environmental, genetic and gene-environment interaction factors (E + G + GEI), c) environmental and metabolic factors (E + M), and d) all factors (E + G + GEI + M). A fifth model including all factors and interaction terms was fit using ridge regression and cross-validation. Models were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: 150 pre-RA cases and 455 matched controls were included. The E model yielded an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.622. The E + M model did not show improvement over the E model (corrected AUC 0.620). Including genetic factors increased prediction, producing corrected AUCs of 0.677 in the E + G + GEI model and 0.674 in the E + G + GEI + M model. Similarly, the performance of the cross-validated ridge regression model yielded an AUC of 0.657. CONCLUSION: Addition of wGRS and gene-environment interaction improved seropositive RA risk prediction models. Preclinical metabolite levels did not significantly contribute to prediction.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to improve seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) risk prediction using a novel weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) and preclinical plasma metabolites associated with RA risk. Predictive performance was compared to previously validated models including RA-associated environmental factors. METHODS: This nested case-control study matched incident seropositive RA cases (meeting ACR 1987 or EULAR/ACR 2010 criteria) in the Nurses' Health Studies (NHS) to two controls on age, blood collection features, and post-menopausal hormone use at pre-RA blood draw. Environmental variables were measured at the questionnaire cycle preceding blood draw. Four models were generated and internally validated using a bootstrapped optimism estimate: (a) base with environmental factors (E), (b) environmental, genetic and gene-environment interaction factors (E + G + GEI), c) environmental and metabolic factors (E + M), and d) all factors (E + G + GEI + M). A fifth model including all factors and interaction terms was fit using ridge regression and cross-validation. Models were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: 150 pre-RA cases and 455 matched controls were included. The E model yielded an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.622. The E + M model did not show improvement over the E model (corrected AUC 0.620). Including genetic factors increased prediction, producing corrected AUCs of 0.677 in the E + G + GEI model and 0.674 in the E + G + GEI + M model. Similarly, the performance of the cross-validated ridge regression model yielded an AUC of 0.657. CONCLUSION: Addition of wGRS and gene-environment interaction improved seropositive RA risk prediction models. Preclinical metabolite levels did not significantly contribute to prediction.
Authors: Jeffrey A Sparks; Chia-Yen Chen; Xia Jiang; Johan Askling; Linda T Hiraki; Susan Malspeis; Lars Klareskog; Lars Alfredsson; Karen H Costenbader; Elizabeth W Karlson Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1988-03
Authors: Elizabeth W Karlson; Bo Ding; Brendan T Keenan; Katherine Liao; Karen H Costenbader; Lars Klareskog; Lars Alfredsson; Lori B Chibnik Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Elizabeth W Karlson; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg; Annette H van der Helm-van Mil Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Ian C Scott; Rachael Tan; Daniel Stahl; Sophia Steer; Cathryn M Lewis; Andrew P Cope Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Lori B Chibnik; Brendan T Keenan; Jing Cui; Katherine P Liao; Karen H Costenbader; Robert M Plenge; Elizabeth W Karlson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Soumya Raychaudhuri; Cynthia Sandor; Eli A Stahl; Jan Freudenberg; Hye-Soon Lee; Xiaoming Jia; Lars Alfredsson; Leonid Padyukov; Lars Klareskog; Jane Worthington; Katherine A Siminovitch; Sang-Cheol Bae; Robert M Plenge; Peter K Gregersen; Paul I W de Bakker Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-01-29 Impact factor: 38.330