Literature DB >> 34416044

Two cases of papulo-pustular rosacea-like eruptions following COVID-19 vaccinations.

G Ciccarese1, F Drago1,2, A Rebora2, A Parodi1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34416044      PMCID: PMC8661514          DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


× No keyword cloud information.

Conflict of interest

None. Dear Editor, Cutaneous reactions after COVID‐19 vaccines mainly consisted of delayed inflammatory reactions in the injection site, urticaria, chilblain‐like lesions and pityriasis rosea‐like eruptions. , We describe herein two patients who developed rosacea‐like eruptions following COVID‐19 vaccination. In a 60‐year‐old woman, an itchy skin rash developed 4 days after receiving the first dose of Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) COVID‐19 vaccine. She had no history of dermatological diseases, allergies, recent infections nor contact with COVID‐19 patients. She had not taken any drug except anti‐hypertensives for 2 years. Examination revealed erythema, telangiectasias and papulo‐pustules on the cheeks and nose (Fig. 1a,b). Vaccine‐associated papulo‐pustular rosacea‐like eruption was diagnosed, and sun protection cream was prescribed. Since rosacea can be associated with Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, a stool antigen test for HP detection was performed and proved negative. The cutaneous eruption healed in 30 days, and the second dose of Vaxzevria COVID‐19 vaccine was injected without cutaneous reactions.
Figure 1

(a) Erythema, telangiectasias and papules on the right cheek and nose; (b) erythema, papules and pustules on the left cheek.

(a) Erythema, telangiectasias and papules on the right cheek and nose; (b) erythema, papules and pustules on the left cheek. A 47‐year‐old woman presented with an itchy facial skin eruption that had developed 5 days after the second dose of Pfizer‐BioNTech COVID‐19 vaccine. The patient was previously healthy and denied any drug intake. Examination showed erythema and papulo‐pustules on the cheeks, forehead and temporal‐mandibular regions (Fig. 2a,b,c). A stool antigen test for HP was negative. A diagnosis of vaccine‐associated papulo‐pustular rosacea‐like eruption was made, and sun protection cream was prescribed. The cutaneous lesions completely healed in 20 days. Given the location of the eruptions, both the patients refused a skin biopsy.
Figure 2

Erythema of the face, papules and pustules (a), sometimes confluent in plaques (b), on the cheeks, forehead, temporal and mandibular regions (b, c).

Erythema of the face, papules and pustules (a), sometimes confluent in plaques (b), on the cheeks, forehead, temporal and mandibular regions (b, c). The skin eruptions of our patients resemble the skin toxicity associated with administration of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, targeted therapies that inhibit the tumour cell proliferation in several solid cancers. This condition, manifesting as erythematous papulo‐pustules on the face, as in our patients, and trunk, , may be related to the increase of cutaneous chemokines (CCL2, CCL5 and CXCL10) with CD4+T cells, monocyte/macrophages and polymorphonucleates chemotaxis and skin infiltration. Moreover, inhibition of EGFR signalling increases angiogenic factors, as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), that are overexpressed in these skin lesions. , Such toxicity, however, can be excluded in our patients since they did not receive any EGFR inhibitors. To our knowledge, these are the first described cases of COVID‐19 vaccine‐associated rosacea‐like eruptions. The pathogenetic link between COVID‐19 vaccination and rosacea‐like eruptions is difficult to establish. Both Vaxzevria and Pfizer‐BioNTech vaccines, through different mechanisms, induce the generation of neutralizing antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein and specific T‐cell expansion with cytokine secretion (IFN‐γ, IL‐2 and IL‐10). , Such immune response may play a role in the onset of rosacea‐like eruptions, especially in patients with predisposing factors. Indeed, the pathophysiology of rosacea is multifactorial, implicating a dysregulated innate and adaptive immune system and neurogenic dysregulation favouring excessive inflammation and vasodilation. In all types of rosacea, perivascular and pilosebaceous skin infiltrates show marked expression of innate immune cells, with the additional influx of macrophages and mast cells in papules and of neutrophils in pustules. A recent study showed higher IL‐17 levels in the serum of rosacea patients than in healthy controls, suggesting a pathogenetic role of IL‐17. Other mediators involved in rosacea vasodilatation and angiogenesis are as follows: nitric oxide, cathelicidins and VEGF, the main positive regulator of pathological angiogenesis. Elevated tissue VEGF expression has been found in rosacea, and VEGF receptors serum levels were higher in patients with rosacea than in controls. It could be postulated that COVID‐19 vaccination, as EGFR inhibitors, might trigger the secretion of cytokines and angiogenic factors causing the rosaceiform eruption. Regrettably, extensive investigations could not be performed in our cases. Meanwhile, clinicians should be aware of the possible cutaneous reactions to vaccinations and reassure the patient since most of them are transient and mild.

Funding sources

None.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Acute skin toxicity management in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitors: Literature review and consensus.

Authors:  Elvio G Russi; Francesco Moretto; Monica Rampino; Marco Benasso; Almalina Bacigalupo; Vitaliana De Sanctis; Gianmauro Numico; Paolo Bossi; Michela Buglione; Antonino Lombardo; Mario Airoldi; Marco C Merlano; Lisa Licitra; Nerina Denaro; Stefano Pergolizzi; Carmine Pinto; Renè-Jean Bensadoun; Giampiero Girolomoni; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.312

2.  Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms in patients with rosacea: A case-control study.

Authors:  Yıldız Hayran; Incilay Lay; Mehmet Cem Mocan; Tuba Bozduman; Sibel Ersoy-Evans
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  The usefulness of investigating the possible underlying conditions in rosacea.

Authors:  G Ciccarese; A Parodi; A Rebora; F Drago
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  Erlotinib-related skin toxicities: treatment strategies in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yoshio Kiyohara; Naoya Yamazaki; Akiko Kishi
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 5.  Rosacea: a wholistic review and update from pathogenesis to diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Justin W Marson; Hilary E Baldwin
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.736

6.  Delayed Localized Hypersensitivity Reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine: A Case Series.

Authors:  Margaret S Johnston; Anjela Galan; Kalman L Watsky; Alicia J Little
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

7.  T cell and antibody responses induced by a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in a phase 1/2 clinical trial.

Authors:  Katie J Ewer; Jordan R Barrett; Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer; Adrian V S Hill; Sarah C Gilbert; Andrew J Pollard; Teresa Lambe; Hannah Sharpe; Rebecca Makinson; Richard Morter; Amy Flaxman; Daniel Wright; Duncan Bellamy; Mustapha Bittaye; Christina Dold; Nicholas M Provine; Jeremy Aboagye; Jamie Fowler; Sarah E Silk; Jennifer Alderson; Parvinder K Aley; Brian Angus; Eleanor Berrie; Sagida Bibi; Paola Cicconi; Elizabeth A Clutterbuck; Irina Chelysheva; Pedro M Folegatti; Michelle Fuskova; Catherine M Green; Daniel Jenkin; Simon Kerridge; Alison Lawrie; Angela M Minassian; Maria Moore; Yama Mujadidi; Emma Plested; Ian Poulton; Maheshi N Ramasamy; Hannah Robinson; Rinn Song; Matthew D Snape; Richard Tarrant; Merryn Voysey; Marion E E Watson; Alexander D Douglas
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Cutaneous adverse reactions after m-RNA COVID-19 vaccine: early reports from Northeast Italy.

Authors:  E Farinazzo; G Ponis; E Zelin; E Errichetti; G Stinco; C Pinzani; A Gambelli; N De Manzini; L Toffoli; A Moret; M Agozzino; C Conforti; N Di Meo; P Schincariol; I Zalaudek
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 9.228

9.  COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell responses.

Authors:  Ugur Sahin; Alexander Muik; Evelyna Derhovanessian; Isabel Vogler; Lena M Kranz; Mathias Vormehr; Alina Baum; Kristen Pascal; Jasmin Quandt; Daniel Maurus; Sebastian Brachtendorf; Verena Lörks; Julian Sikorski; Rolf Hilker; Dirk Becker; Ann-Kathrin Eller; Jan Grützner; Carsten Boesler; Corinna Rosenbaum; Marie-Cristine Kühnle; Ulrich Luxemburger; Alexandra Kemmer-Brück; David Langer; Martin Bexon; Stefanie Bolte; Katalin Karikó; Tania Palanche; Boris Fischer; Armin Schultz; Pei-Yong Shi; Camila Fontes-Garfias; John L Perez; Kena A Swanson; Jakob Loschko; Ingrid L Scully; Mark Cutler; Warren Kalina; Christos A Kyratsous; David Cooper; Philip R Dormitzer; Kathrin U Jansen; Özlem Türeci
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related cutaneous manifestations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianluca Avallone; Pietro Quaglino; Francesco Cavallo; Gabriele Roccuzzo; Simone Ribero; Iris Zalaudek; Claudio Conforti
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.204

2.  Pityriasis lichenoides chronica after BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine: A novel cutaneous reaction after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Authors:  F Drago; G Ciccarese; A Guadagno; A Parodi
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 9.228

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.