| Literature DB >> 34415316 |
Arthur J Reynolds1, Suh-Ruu Ou1, Lauren Eales2, Christina F Mondi3, Alison Giovanelli4.
Abstract
Importance: Educational attainment is an underrecognized factor associated with racial disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Early childhood programs providing comprehensive family services can promote educational and socioeconomic success, but few, if any, studies of large-scale programs have assessed their associations with midlife CVD risk and mediating factors. Objective: To examine the association between an early childhood program providing multisystemic services from ages 3 to 9 years with midlife CVD risk and whether years of education mediate these associations. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using a matched-group, quasi-experimental design, a cohort of Black and Hispanic children in the Chicago Longitudinal Study enrolled in an established early childhood program from 1983 to 1989 or the usual services were followed up for 30 years after the end of the intervention. A midlife survey on well-being was administered when the participants were aged 37 years. Analyses were conducted from September 1, 2020, to October 15, 2020. Intervention: The Child-Parent Center (CPC) Education Program provides school-based educational enrichment and comprehensive family services for 6 years, from ages 3 to 9 years (preschool to third grade [P-3]). Main Outcomes and Measures: General and hard Framingham Risk Scores (FRSs) were calculated from self-reported physical health and behavior profiles in the midlife Chicago Longitudinal Study survey. Years of education completed at age 34 years were measured primarily from administrative records.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34415316 PMCID: PMC8379657 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAMA Netw Open ISSN: 2574-3805
Characteristics of CPC Education Program and Comparison Groups in the Chicago Longitudinal Study: Original and Follow-up Sample at Age 37 Years
| Study category | Total sample | Program group | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program participation at start of study, No. of participants | |||
| Original sample | 1539 | 989 | 550 |
| Preschool participation | 1073 | 989 | 84 |
| CPC preschool | 989 | 989 | 0 |
| 2 y of preschool | 534 | 534 | 0 |
| Full-day kindergarten | 1142 | 592 | 550 |
| Part-day kindergarten | 397 | 397 | 0 |
| CPC school-age (1st to 3rd grade) | 850 | 684 | 166 |
| Duration of school-age program, mean (SD), y | 1.16 (1.17) | 1.43 (1.09) | 0.68 (1.16) |
| 4-6 y of CPC (P-3) | 553 | 553 | 0 |
| Total time in CPC program, mean (SD), y | 2.78 (1.97) | 3.95 (1.23) | 0.68 (1.16) |
| Participants lost after program, No. | |||
| Moved or not located | 363 | 215 | 148 |
| Deceased before 2012 | 72 | 49 | 23 |
| Follow-up interview at age 37 y | |||
| Original sample who completed interview or survey, participants, No. (%) | 1104 (71.7) | 725 (73.3) | 379 (68.9) |
| Framingham Risk Score calculated, participants, No. | 1060 | 702 | 358 |
| Tracked (available) sample who completed, No. of participants/total No. (%) | 1104/1401 (78.8) | 725/897 (80.8) | 379/504 (75.2) |
| Select baseline attributes for follow-up sample, participants, No. (%) | |||
| Black | 991 (93.5) | 653 (93.0) | 238 (94.4) |
| Women | 565 (53.3) | 389 (55.4) | 176 (49.2) |
| Men | 495 (46.7) | 313 (44.6) | 182 (50.8) |
| Family risk index, mean (SD) | 4.44 (1.79) | 4.43 (1.75) | 4.47 (1.86) |
| Birth weight, lb, mean (SD) | 6.80 (1.25) | 6.83 (1.25) | 6.74 (1.26) |
| Child welfare services | 37 (3.5) | 22 (3.1) | 15 (4.2) |
| Mother attended some college or more | 131 (12.4) | 93 (13.2) | 38 (10.6) |
| Reside in high poverty neighborhood | 528 (49.8) | 395 (56.3) | 133 (37.2) |
| Family income <130% of federal poverty level | 878 (82.8) | 581 (82.7) | 297 (83.0) |
Abbreviation: CPC, Child-Parent Center.
SI conversion factor: To convert pounds to kilograms, multiply by 0.45.
Cases for program participation cover the 6-year period (1983-1989) that defines enrollment in the CPC program.
The comparison group participated in a full-day kindergarten program, and 84 participated in Head Start preschool; 109 parents in the comparison group reported their child participated in other childcare or education in preschool, and 176 cases in the comparison group received services in CPC kindergarten. They are not part of the original program group. Some cases in the comparison group participated in the school-age program because it was open to any child enrolled in elementary school. Fifteen children in the CPC intervention group were enrolled in the alternative full-day kindergarten.
The duration of the school-age program was 0 to 3 years.
The duration of the CPC program was 0 to 6 years.
These categories account for attrition from the original study sample of 1539. Cases were lost during postprogram years because they moved from Chicago, Illinois, and could not be located, were deceased, or either did not have sufficient identifying information to track, refused to participate or were incarcerated (other). The number of deceased participants by 2019 was 97. Baseline attributes were not weighted by inverse propensity score weighting attrition. Weighting reduced the displayed group differences.
The family risk index refers to parents’ education and income, with a score range of 0 to 8.
A high-poverty neighborhood is one where greater than or equal to 40% residents live in poverty.
P = .04.
FRS by Age 37 Years for CPC Preschool, School-Age, and Preschool to Third Grade Groups, Adjusted for Baseline Attributes and IPW Attrition
| Outcome and sample group | FRS, % | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPC preschool groups | CPC school-age groups | CPC P-3 | Dosage partial correlation | ||||||||||
| Intervention (n = 702) | Comparison (n = 358) | Difference | Intervention (n = 606) | Comparison (n = 454) | Difference | Intervention 4-6 y (n = 401) | Comparison <4 y (n = 659) | Difference | |||||
| Total sample (n = 1060) | |||||||||||||
| General FRS | 19.0 | 21.2 | –2.2 | .004 | 19.5 | 19.9 | 0.4 | .54 | 19.1 | 20.3 | –1.2 | .09 | –0.09 |
| Median or higher risk | 48.1 | 59.5 | –11.4 | <.001 | 52.1 | 54.4 | –2.3 | .47 | 46.6 | 54.5 | –7.9 | .007 | –0.12 |
| Top 25% risk | 23.5 | 27.4 | –3.9 | .17 | 26.9 | 24.9 | 2.0 | .43 | 25.0 | 26.0 | –1.0 | .69 | –0.06 |
| Hard FRS | 10.8 | 12.4 | –1.6 | .004 | 11.8 | 11.4 | 0.4 | .43 | 10.9 | 11.7 | –0.8 | .10 | –0.11 |
| Median or higher risk | 50.9 | 60.9 | –10.0 | .003 | 53.4 | 56.8 | –3.4 | .30 | 47.8 | 56.8 | –9.0 | .02 | –0.10 |
| Top 25% risk | 21.0 | 28.2 | –7.2 | .02 | 28.8 | 23.8 | 5.0 | .048 | 24.6 | 26.0 | –1.4 | .59 | 0.08 |
| Women (n = 565) | |||||||||||||
| Full FRS | 14.4 | 17.4 | –3.0 | <.001 | 16.2 | 16.4 | –0.2 | .82 | 14.6 | 16.3 | –1.7 | .02 | –0.13 |
| Median or higher risk | 28.8 | 42.1 | –13.3 | .001 | 35.5 | 36.6 | –1.1 | .78 | 29.6 | 35.6 | –6.0 | .11 | –0.14 |
| Top 25% risk status | 11.7 | 14.2 | –2.5 | .38 | 12.8 | 13.9 | –1.1 | .69 | 11.6 | 13.2 | –1.6 | .56 | –0.06 |
| Hard FRS | 7.1 | 9.0 | –1.9 | .001 | 8.2 | 8.3 | –0.1 | .81 | 7.1 | 8.3 | –1.2 | .02 | –0.13 |
| Median or higher risk | 19.0 | 37.5 | –18.5 | .004 | 30.2 | 32.4 | –2.2 | .56 | 26.3 | 32.1 | –5.8 | .12 | –0.12 |
| Top 25% risk status | 5.2 | 13.1 | –7.9 | .01 | 11.9 | 10.5 | 1.4 | .71 | 7.5 | 10.9 | –3.4 | .18 | –0.10 |
| Men (n = 495) | |||||||||||||
| Full FRS | 23.1 | 24.9 | –1.8 | .11 | 25.1 | 23.9 | 1.2 | .29 | 23.7 | 24.5 | –0.8 | .44 | –0.08 |
| Median or higher risk | 70.6 | 76.4 | –6.0 | .09 | 70.8 | 74.1 | –3.3 | .35 | 67.2 | 74.6 | –7.4 | .03 | –0.10 |
| Top 25% risk status | 35.6 | 40.1 | –4.4 | .30 | 42.6 | 37.0 | 5.6 | .15 | 39.5 | 39.5 | 0 | >.99 | –0.05 |
| Hard FRS | 14.0 | 15.6 | –1.6 | .08 | 15.7 | 14.7 | 1.0 | .23 | 14.7 | 15.3 | –0.6 | .44 | –0.08 |
| Median or higher risk | 81.4 | 83.5 | –2.1 | .50 | 76.0 | 83.8 | –7.8 | .08 | 77.1 | 83.1 | –6.0 | .03 | –0.07 |
| Top 25% risk status | 36.5 | 42.9 | –6.4 | .13 | 47.7 | 38.4 | 9.3 | .02 | 43.2 | 42.1 | 1.1 | .78 | 0.07 |
Abbreviations: CPC, Child-Parent Center; FRS, Framingham Risk Score; IPW, inverse propensity score weighting; P-3, preschool to third grade.
Values are adjusted for 17 baseline covariates (see main text and eAppendix in the Supplement) and IPW attrition. The top rows (general FRS and hard FRS) are probability values converted to percentages for 30-year risk. The difference is the adjusted marginal outcome. Preschool and school-age comparisons were estimated jointly. The CPC P-3 comparison was estimated separately and compares participation in the total program for 4 to 6 years vs lesser or no participation. Comparison group means and rates are unadjusted values. Adjusted sample size counts of CPC groups for selected outcomes were 338 participants for G-FRS (preschool) median or higher risk and 165 participants for top 25% risk. Respective sample sizes for the P-3 group were 187 and 100 participants. To be consistent with continuous outcomes (general or hard FRS), dichotomous outcomes for logit regression were converted to marginal coefficients in percentage points. Partial correlations are polyserial and biserial coefficients for 0 to 6 years (ages 3 to 9 years) adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, family risk index, neighborhood poverty, attrition IPW, and lack of continuous scale properties.
Differences are shown in percentage points.
P < .05.
P < .10.
Figure. Group Differences in Framingham Risk Score (FRS) Before and After Educational Attainment Mediators
Figure shows adjusted group differences in general FRS (G-FRS; main outcomes) for 2 Child-Parent Center (CPC) measures before and after accounting for educational attainment mediators. Assessed separately, the mediators were years of education by age 34 years, high school completion and college attendance (2 dichotomous variables), and earned associate’s or bachelor’s degree (1 dichotomous variable). For example, the inclusion of years of education reduced the preschool group difference in G-FRS from 2.16 percentage points to 1.66 percentage points (a reduction of 23.1%). All baseline covariates and inverse propensity score weighting attrition were included in the models. Results for hard FRSs were nearly identical (data not shown).