Literature DB >> 34415019

Reviewing and assessing existing meta-analysis models and tools.

Funmilayo L Makinde1, Milaine S S Tchamga2, James Jafali3, Segun Fatumo4, Emile R Chimusa5, Nicola Mulder6, Gaston K Mazandu7.   

Abstract

Over the past few years, meta-analysis has become popular among biomedical researchers for detecting biomarkers across multiple cohort studies with increased predictive power. Combining datasets from different sources increases sample size, thus overcoming the issue related to limited sample size from each individual study and boosting the predictive power. This leads to an increased likelihood of more accurately predicting differentially expressed genes/proteins or significant biomarkers underlying the biological condition of interest. Currently, several meta-analysis methods and tools exist, each having its own strengths and limitations. In this paper, we survey existing meta-analysis methods, and assess the performance of different methods based on results from different datasets as well as assessment from prior knowledge of each method. This provides a reference summary of meta-analysis models and tools, which helps to guide end-users on the choice of appropriate models or tools for given types of datasets and enables developers to consider current advances when planning the development of new meta-analysis models and more practical integrative tools.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort study; data integration; experimental study; meta-analysis; predictive power; sample size

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34415019      PMCID: PMC8575034          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   13.994


  47 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting.

Authors:  S L Normand
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Meta-analysis to determine the effects of plant disease management measures: review and case studies on soybean and apple.

Authors:  Henry K Ngugi; Paul D Esker; Harald Scherm
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Random-effects model aimed at discovering associations in meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Buhm Han; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  P-value evaluation, variability index and biomarker categorization for adaptively weighted Fisher's meta-analysis method in omics applications.

Authors:  Zhiguang Huo; Shaowu Tang; Yongseok Park; George Tseng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

6.  Mild Plasmodium falciparum malaria following an episode of severe malaria is associated with induction of the interferon pathway in Malawian children.

Authors:  Malkie Krupka; Karl Seydel; Catherine M Feintuch; Kenny Yee; Ryung Kim; Chang-Yun Lin; R Brent Calder; Christine Petersen; Terrie Taylor; Johanna Daily
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  GWAMA: software for genome-wide association meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reedik Mägi; Andrew P Morris
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Catmap: case-control and TDT meta-analysis package.

Authors:  Kristin K Nicodemus
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies multiple longevity genes.

Authors:  Joris Deelen; Daniel S Evans; Dan E Arking; Niccolò Tesi; Marianne Nygaard; Xiaomin Liu; Mary K Wojczynski; Mary L Biggs; Ashley van der Spek; Gil Atzmon; Erin B Ware; Chloé Sarnowski; Albert V Smith; Ilkka Seppälä; Heather J Cordell; Janina Dose; Najaf Amin; Alice M Arnold; Kristin L Ayers; Nir Barzilai; Elizabeth J Becker; Marian Beekman; Hélène Blanché; Kaare Christensen; Lene Christiansen; Joanna C Collerton; Sarah Cubaynes; Steven R Cummings; Karen Davies; Birgit Debrabant; Jean-François Deleuze; Rachel Duncan; Jessica D Faul; Claudio Franceschi; Pilar Galan; Vilmundur Gudnason; Tamara B Harris; Martijn Huisman; Mikko A Hurme; Carol Jagger; Iris Jansen; Marja Jylhä; Mika Kähönen; David Karasik; Sharon L R Kardia; Andrew Kingston; Thomas B L Kirkwood; Lenore J Launer; Terho Lehtimäki; Wolfgang Lieb; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Carmen Martin-Ruiz; Junxia Min; Almut Nebel; Anne B Newman; Chao Nie; Ellen A Nohr; Eric S Orwoll; Thomas T Perls; Michael A Province; Bruce M Psaty; Olli T Raitakari; Marcel J T Reinders; Jean-Marie Robine; Jerome I Rotter; Paola Sebastiani; Jennifer Smith; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Kent D Taylor; André G Uitterlinden; Wiesje van der Flier; Sven J van der Lee; Cornelia M van Duijn; Diana van Heemst; James W Vaupel; David Weir; Kenny Ye; Yi Zeng; Wanlin Zheng; Henne Holstege; Douglas P Kiel; Kathryn L Lunetta; P Eline Slagboom; Joanne M Murabito
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Heterogeneity in meta-analyses of genome-wide association investigations.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Evangelos Evangelou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.