| Literature DB >> 34414964 |
Chenggong Zhu1, Wenqing Zhang, Xiuying Wang, Lanzhou Jiao, Liyan Chen, Jiyong Jiang.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: To explore the predictive value of preoperative serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) level for lymph node metastasis (LNM), particularly, in patients surgically treated for early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma.We enrolled 162 patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma stages IB to IIA following the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 classification. The patients had previously undergone radical surgery. Correlation of the SCC-Ag level with clinicopathological features and the predictive value of SCC-Ag for LNM were analyzed.High preoperative SCC-Ag level was correlated with FIGO stage (P = .001), tumor diameter >4 cm (P < .001), stromal infiltration (P < .001), LNM (P < .001) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), (P = .045). However, it was not correlated with age, histological differentiation, parametrial involvement, and positive vaginal margin (P > .05). Univariate analysis revealed that FIGO stage (P = .015), tumor diameter (P = .044), stromal infiltration (χ2 = 10.436, P = .005), SCC-Ag ≧ 2.75 ng/mL (χ2 = 14.339, P < .001), LVSI (χ2 = 12.866, P < .001), parametrial involvement (χ2 = 13.784, P < .001) were correlated with LNM, but not with age, histological differentiation, and positive vaginal margin. Moreover, multivariate analysis demonstrated that SCC-Ag ≧2.75 ng/mL (P = .011, OR = 3.287) and LVSI (P = .009, OR = 7.559) were independent factors affecting LNM. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of SCC-Ag was 0.703 (P < .001), while 2.75 ng/mL was the best cutoff value for predicting LNM. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis were 69.4% and 65.9%, respectively.High SCC-Ag level was revealed to be an independent risk factor for the prognosis of squamous carcinoma of the cervix before an operation. Besides, SCC-Ag (2.75 ng/mL) can be utilized as a potential marker to predict LNM in early stage cervical cancer before an operation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34414964 PMCID: PMC8376392 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Relationship between SCC-Ag level and clinicopathological features (N = 162).
| SCC-Ag (ng/mL) | ||||
| Characteristic | N (%) | Median | Range |
|
| Total | 162 (100%) | 2.35 | 0.4 to 70 | |
| Age (yr) | .598 | |||
| <45 | 26 (16.0%) | 2.2 | 0.5 to 70 | |
| ≥45 | 136 (84.0%) | 2.5 | 0.4 to 42.5 | |
| FIGO stage | .001§ | |||
| IB1 | 119 (73.5%) | 2.1 | 0.5 to 31.2 | |
| IB2 | 8 (4.9%) | 11.7 | 2.5 to 40.5 | |
| IIA1 | 33 (20.4%) | 2.1 | 0.4 to 42.5 | |
| IIA2 | 2 (1.2%) | 39.5 | 8.9 to 70 | |
| Tumor diameter | <.001 | |||
| ≤4 cm | 152 (93.8%) | 2.1 | 0.4 to 42.5 | |
| >4 cm | 10 (6.2%) | 11.7 | 2.5 to 70 | |
| Histological differentiation | .197 | |||
| G1 to 2 | 49 (30.2%) | 2.7 | 0.4 to 31.2 | |
| G3 | 113 (69.8%) | 2.0 | 0.5 to 70 | |
| Stromal infiltration | <.001§ | |||
| Superficial 1/3 | 25 (15.4%) | 1.3 | 0.5 to 13 | |
| Middle 1/3 | 49 (30.3%) | 1.8 | 0.4 to 21.7 | |
| Deep 1/3 | 88 (54.3%) | 3.55 | 0.5 to 70 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | <.001 | |||
| Negative | 126 (77.8) | 1.95 | 0.4 to 42.5 | |
| Positive | 36 (22.2%) | 4.4 | 0.8 to 70 | |
| Lymphovascular space invasion | .045 | |||
| Negative | 48 (29.6%) | 2.1 | 0.4 to 11.2 | |
| Positive | 114 (70.4%) | 2.6 | 0.5 to 70 | |
| Parametrial involvement | .052 | |||
| Negative | 153 (94.4%) | 2.3 | 0.4 to 42.5 | |
| Positive | 9 (5.6) | 8.9 | 0.8 to 70 | |
| Vaginal margin | 0.854 | |||
| Negative | 158 (97.5%) | 2.35 | 0.4 to 70 | |
| Positive | 4 (2.5%) | 5.75 | 0.7 to 40.5 | |
FIGO = International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, SCC-Ag = squamous cell carcinoma antigen.
Mann–Whitney U test.
Kruskal–Wallis H test.
Univariate analysis of pelvic lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological features (N = 162).
| Lymph node metastasis | |||||
| Characteristic | N (%) | Negative (%) | Positive (%) | χ2 |
|
| Total | 162 (100) | 126 (77.8) | 36 (22.2) | ||
| Age (yr) | 1.309 | .253 | |||
| <45 | 26 (16.1) | 18 (69.2) | 8 (30.8) | ||
| ≥45 | 136 (83.9) | 108 (79.4) | 28 (20.6) | ||
| FIGO stage | .015$ | ||||
| IB1 | 119 (73.5) | 98 (82.4) | 21 (17.6) | ||
| IB2 | 8 (4.9) | 5 (62.5) | 3 (37.5) | ||
| IIA1 | 33 (20.4) | 23 (69.7) | 10 (30.3) | ||
| IIA2 | 2 (1.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (100) | ||
| Tumor diameter | .044$ | ||||
| ≤4 cm | 152 (93.8) | 121 (79.6) | 31 (20.4) | ||
| >4 cm | 10 (6.2) | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | ||
| Histological differentiation | 1.413 | .235 | |||
| G1 to 2 | 49 (30.2) | 41 (83.7) | 8 (16.3) | ||
| G3 | 113 (69.8) | 85 (75.2) | 28 (24.8) | ||
| Stromal infiltration | 10.436 | .005 | |||
| Superficial 1/3 | 25 (15.4) | 23 (92.0) | 2 (8.0) | ||
| Middle 1/3 | 49 (30.3) | 43 (87.8) | 6 (12.2) | ||
| Deep 1/3 | 88 (54.3) | 60 (68.2) | 28 (31.8) | ||
| SCC-Ag (ng/mL) | 14.339 | <.001 | |||
| <2.75 | 94 (58.0) | 83 (88.3) | 11 (11.7) | ||
| ≥2.75 | 68 (42.0) | 43 (63.2) | 25 (36.8) | ||
| Lymphovascular space invasion | 12.866 | <.001 | |||
| Negative | 48 (29.6) | 46 (95.8) | 2 (4.2) | ||
| Positive | 114 (70.4) | 80 (70.2) | 34 (29.8) | ||
| Parametrial involvement | 13.784 | <.001 | |||
| Negative | 153 (94.4) | 124 (81.0) | 29 (19.0) | ||
| Positive | 9 (5.6) | 2 (22.2) | 7 (77.8) | ||
| Vaginal residual | .214$ | ||||
| Negative | 158 (97.5) | 124 (78.5) | 34 (21.5) | ||
| Positive | 4 (2.5) | 2 (50) | 2 (50) | ||
FIGO = International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, SCC-Ag = squamous cell carcinoma antigen.
Pearson χ2 test.
Fisher exact test.
Multivariate analysis of pelvic lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological features (N = 162).
| Lymph node metastasis | |||||
| Characteristic | N (%) | Negative (%) | Positive (%) |
| OR |
| Total | 162 (100) | 126 (77.8) | 36 (22.2) | ||
| FIGO stage | .361 | ||||
| IB1 | 119 (73.5) | 98 (82.4) | 21 (17.6) | ||
| IB2 | 8 (4.9) | 5 (62.5) | 3 (37.5) | ||
| IIA1 | 33 (20.4) | 23 (69.7) | 10 (30.3) | ||
| IIA2 | 2 (1.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (100) | ||
| Tumor diameter | .806 | ||||
| ≤4 cm | 152 (93.8) | 121 (79.6) | 31 (20.4) | ||
| >4 cm | 10 (6.2) | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | ||
| Stromal infiltration | .186 | ||||
| Superficial 1/3 | 25 (15.4) | 23 (92.0) | 2 (8.0) | ||
| Middle 1/3 | 49 (30.3) | 43 (87.8) | 6 (12.2) | ||
| Deep 1/3 | 88 (54.3) | 60 (68.2) | 28 (31.8) | ||
| SCC-Ag (ng/mL) | .011 | 3.287 | |||
| <2.75 | 94 (58.0) | 83 (88.3) | 11 (11.7) | ||
| ≥2.75 | 68 (42.0) | 43 (63.2) | 25 (36.8) | ||
| Lymphovascular space invasion | .009 | 7.559 | |||
| Negative | 48 (29.6) | 46 (95.8) | 2 (4.2) | ||
| Positive | 114 (70.4) | 80 (70.2) | 34 (29.8) | ||
| Parametrial involvement | .055 | ||||
| Negative | 153 (94.4) | 124 (81.0) | 29 (19.0) | ||
| Positive | 9 (5.6) | 2 (22.2) | 7 (77.8) | ||
FIGO = International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, SCC-Ag = squamous cell carcinoma antigen.
Binary logistic regression analysis.
Figure 1ROC curve of SCC-Ag level prediction lymph node metastasis in the total population (A), in IB1 and IIA1 (B), in IB2 and IIA2 (C). ROC = receiver operator characteristic, SCC-Ag = squamous cell carcinoma antigen.