Literature DB >> 34414823

Shoulder Range of Motion Deficits in Youth Throwers Presenting With Elbow Pain.

Michael Rosen1,2, Karim Meijer1,2,3, Scott Tucker1,2, C Luke Wilcox1,2, Hillary A Plummer1,2, James R Andrews1,2, Roger V Ostrander1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) and total arc of motion difference (TAMD) have been associated with elbow injuries in throwing athletes. HYPOTHESIS: Youth pitchers with elbow pain will have greater GIRD and TAMD compared with youth pitchers without elbow pain. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
METHODS: Glenohumeral range of motion of 25 consecutive throwing athletes presenting with elbow pain and that of a matched control group of 18 asymptomatic throwing athletes were compared. Bilateral glenohumeral internal rotation, external rotation, and horizontal adduction at 90° were measured and GIRD and TAMD were then calculated. An analysis of variance was performed to compare range of motion between throwers with and without elbow pain.
RESULTS: The average GIRD of the elbow pain group was 32.7° compared with 14.5° in the control group (P < 0.05). The average TAMD in the elbow pain group was 28.3° compared with 6.7° in the control group (P < 0.05). GIRD and TAMD were present in 88% (22 of 25) and 96% (24 of 25) of the elbow pain group versus 33.3% (6 of 18) and 55.6% (10 of 18) of the control group, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Compared with asymptomatic youth pitchers, those presenting with elbow pain have a statistically significant GIRD and TAMD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that a GIRD and TAMD may predispose youth pitchers to present with symptomatic elbow pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; baseball players; elbow pain; glenohumeral joint

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34414823      PMCID: PMC9214911          DOI: 10.1177/19417381211036387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Health        ISSN: 1941-0921            Impact factor:   4.355


  26 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in the rehabilitation of the overhead throwing athlete.

Authors:  Kevin E Wilk; Keith Meister; James R Andrews
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The development of humeral head retroversion.

Authors:  G Edelson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Rotational motion changes in the glenohumeral joint of the adolescent/Little League baseball player.

Authors:  Keith Meister; Timothy Day; MaryBeth Horodyski; Thomas W Kaminski; Michael P Wasik; Susan Tillman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Biomechanics of the shoulder in youth baseball pitchers: implications for the development of proximal humeral epiphysiolysis and humeral retrotorsion.

Authors:  Michelle B Sabick; Young-Kyu Kim; Michael R Torry; Michael A Keirns; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Why is the humeral retroversion of throwing athletes greater in dominant shoulders than in nondominant shoulders?

Authors:  Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Eiji Itoi; Hiroshi Minagawa; Masakazu Urayama; Hidetomo Saito; Nobutoshi Seki; Takenobu Iwase; Shinji Kashiwaguchi; Tetsuya Matsuura
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Shoulder range of motion measures as risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in high school softball and baseball players.

Authors:  Ellen Shanley; Mitchell J Rauh; Lori A Michener; Todd S Ellenbecker; J Craig Garrison; Charles A Thigpen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Increase in humeral retrotorsion accounts for age-related increase in glenohumeral internal rotation deficit in youth and adolescent baseball players.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hibberd; Sakiko Oyama; Joseph B Myers
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Flexibility comparisons of junior elite tennis players to other athletes.

Authors:  T J Chandler; W B Kibler; T L Uhl; B Wooten; A Kiser; E Stone
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Stephen Lyman; Glenn S Fleisig; James R Andrews; E David Osinski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Glenohumeral rotational range of motion in collegiate overhead-throwing athletes during an athletic season.

Authors:  Priscilla M Dwelly; Brady L Tripp; Patricia A Tripp; Lindsey E Eberman; Steven Gorin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Glenohumeral Range of Motion Deficits in Youth, Collegiate, and Professional Baseball Players.

Authors:  C Luke Wilcox; Hillary A Plummer; Roger V Ostrander Iii
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-12-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.