Literature DB >> 34411717

Permanent pacemaker implantation late after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Elena Elchinova1, Nikolas Nozica1, Joanna Bartkowiak1, Christoph Ryffel1, Benedikt Bernhard1, Mamdouh Elsmaan1, Babken Asatryan1, Mattia Branca2, Taishi Okuno1, Jonas Lanz1, Fabien Praz1, Stefan Stortecky1, Stephan Windecker1, Tobias Reichlin1, Thomas Pilgrim1, Laurent Roten3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impairment of atrioventricular (AV) conduction may occur late after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and progression to complete AV block is a matter of concern.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation late after TAVI.
METHODS: In a prospective TAVI registry, we retrospectively identified patients with PPM implantation after hospital discharge for TAVI and analyzed serial electrocardiograms for AV conduction impairment before PPM implantation.
RESULTS: Among 1059 patients discharged after TAVI without PPM between January 2012 and December 2017, 62 patients (5.9%) underwent PPM implantation at a median of 305 days after discharge for TAVI. Indications for PPM implantation late after TAVI were AV conduction impairment in 46 patients (74.2%); sick sinus syndrome in 10 (16.1%); cardiac resynchronization or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication in 2 (3.2%); and a pace and ablate strategy in 4 (6.5%). Clinical symptoms leading to PPM implantation late after TAVI included syncope in 19 patients (30.7%), presyncope in 7 (11.3%), and dyspnea in 8 (12.9%). First-degree AV block and new left bundle branch block (LBBB) after TAVI as well as valve-in-valve procedure during follow-up were independent predictors of PPM implantation late after TAVI due to AV conduction impairment.
CONCLUSION: PPM implantation late after TAVI is infrequent and is associated with clinical symptoms in half of patients. Impairment of AV conduction was the indication in three-quarters of patients. First-degree AV block and new LBBB after TAVI as well as valve-in-valve procedure during follow-up emerged as independent predictors.
Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrioventricular block; Left bundle branch block; Pacemaker; Right bundle branch block; Syncope; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34411717     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  2 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: does timing of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation impact mortality?

Authors:  Luai Madanat; Elizabeth Seeley; Kuldeep Shah; Ramy Mando; Ivan Hanson; Amr Abbas; Brian M Renard; David E Haines; Nishaki Mehta
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.759

2.  Assessment of New Onset Arrhythmias After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using an Implantable Cardiac Monitor.

Authors:  Nikolas Nozica; George C M Siontis; Elena Georgieva Elchinova; Eleni Goulouti; Masahiko Asami; Joanna Bartkowiak; Samuel Baldinger; Helge Servatius; Jens Seiler; Hildegard Tanner; Fabian Noti; Andreas Haeberlin; Mattia Branca; Jonas Lanz; Stefan Stortecky; Thomas Pilgrim; Stephan Windecker; Tobias Reichlin; Fabien Praz; Laurent Roten
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.