OBJECTIVE: When clients' lives are not reflected in therapy, they struggle to apply the skills learned in treatment to everyday situations. In this pilot study, we determined if using clients' real-world interactions in therapy could effectively target metacognitive capacity-yielding improved symptoms and social functioning-by tailoring treatment to focus on issues faced by clients in daily life. METHOD: Using a randomized controlled trial design, schizophrenia subjects with metacognitive deficits completed 24 sessions of: (a) Standard Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT); or (b) Tailored MERIT. Real-world interactions were captured via the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), a smartphone application that passively records audio in daily life. All subjects wore the EAR; however, real-world interactions were only used to personalize sessions in Tailored MERIT. RESULTS: Feasibility and acceptability were shown; those in Tailored MERIT wore the EAR 84% of their waking hours and reported minimal burden. When compared to Standard MERIT, Tailored MERIT participants showed large pre-post reductions in negative metacognitive beliefs and disorganized symptoms. Small, but nonsignificant, improvements in social functioning were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to an evidence-based benchmark, we observed that real-world interactions can be used to tailor metacognitive therapy and improve outcomes in schizophrenia. Tailored MERIT has the potential to impact practice by personalizing treatment to account for individual variations in environment and lifestyle-aligning with the Precision Medicine Initiative-in a way that is not possible with current therapy. This is particularly salient in schizophrenia, where limited insight and cognitive deficits often make subjective reporting unreliable. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: When clients' lives are not reflected in therapy, they struggle to apply the skills learned in treatment to everyday situations. In this pilot study, we determined if using clients' real-world interactions in therapy could effectively target metacognitive capacity-yielding improved symptoms and social functioning-by tailoring treatment to focus on issues faced by clients in daily life. METHOD: Using a randomized controlled trial design, schizophrenia subjects with metacognitive deficits completed 24 sessions of: (a) Standard Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT); or (b) Tailored MERIT. Real-world interactions were captured via the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), a smartphone application that passively records audio in daily life. All subjects wore the EAR; however, real-world interactions were only used to personalize sessions in Tailored MERIT. RESULTS: Feasibility and acceptability were shown; those in Tailored MERIT wore the EAR 84% of their waking hours and reported minimal burden. When compared to Standard MERIT, Tailored MERIT participants showed large pre-post reductions in negative metacognitive beliefs and disorganized symptoms. Small, but nonsignificant, improvements in social functioning were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to an evidence-based benchmark, we observed that real-world interactions can be used to tailor metacognitive therapy and improve outcomes in schizophrenia. Tailored MERIT has the potential to impact practice by personalizing treatment to account for individual variations in environment and lifestyle-aligning with the Precision Medicine Initiative-in a way that is not possible with current therapy. This is particularly salient in schizophrenia, where limited insight and cognitive deficits often make subjective reporting unreliable. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Kyle S Minor; Kathryn L Hardin; Danielle M Beaudette; Lesley C Waters; Anna L White; Virgilio Gonzenbach; Megan L Robbins Journal: J Clin Psychol Date: 2020-07-02
Authors: Megan L Robbins; Elizabeth S Focella; Shelley Kasle; Ana María López; Karen L Weihs; Matthias R Mehl Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Kyle S Minor; Matthew P Marggraf; Beshaun J Davis; Lauren Luther; Jenifer L Vohs; Kelly D Buck; Paul H Lysaker Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Paul H Lysaker; Kyle S Minor; John T Lysaker; Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon; Kelsey Bonfils; Jesse Hochheiser; Jenifer L Vohs Journal: Schizophr Res Cogn Date: 2019-04-24
Authors: Paul H Lysaker; Emily Gagen; Reid Klion; Aieyat Zalzala; Jenifer Vohs; Laura A Faith; Bethany Leonhardt; Jay Hamm; Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon Journal: Psychol Res Behav Manag Date: 2020-04-02