| Literature DB >> 34410437 |
Anna Biernasiuk1, Anna Berecka-Rycerz2, Anna Gumieniczek2, Maria Malm3, Krzysztof Z Łączkowski4, Jolanta Szymańska5, Anna Malm6.
Abstract
Recently, the occurrence of candidiasis has increased dramatically, especially in immunocompromised patients. Additionally, their treatment is often ineffective due to the resistance of yeasts to antimycotics. Therefore, there is a need to search for new antifungals. A series of nine newly synthesized thiazole derivatives containing the cyclopropane system, showing promising activity against Candida spp., has been further investigated. We decided to verify their antifungal activity towards clinical Candida albicans isolated from the oral cavity of patients with hematological malignancies and investigate the mode of action on fungal cell, the effect of combination with the selected antimycotics, toxicity to erythrocytes, and lipophilicity. These studies were performed by the broth microdilution method, test with sorbitol and ergosterol, checkerboard technique, erythrocyte lysis assay, and reversed phase thin-layer chromatography, respectively. All derivatives showed very strong activity (similar and even higher than nystatin) against all C. albicans isolates with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 0.008-7.81 µg/mL Their mechanism of action may be related to action within the fungal cell wall structure and/or within the cell membrane. The interactions between the derivatives and the selected antimycotics (nystatin, chlorhexidine, and thymol) showed additive effect only in the case of combination some of them and thymol. The erythrocyte lysis assay confirmed the low cytotoxicity of these compounds as compared to nystatin. The high lipophilicity of the derivatives was related with their high antifungal activity. The present studies confirm that the studied thiazole derivatives containing the cyclopropane system appear to be a very promising group of compounds in treatment of infections caused by C. albicans. However, this requires further studies in vivo. KEY POINTS: • The newly thiazoles showed high antifungal activity and some of them - additive effect in combination with thymol. • Their mode of action may be related with the influence on the structure of the fungal cell wall and/or the cell membrane. • The low cytotoxicity against erythrocytes and high lipophilicity of these derivatives are their additional good properties.Entities:
Keywords: Antifungal activity; Candida albicans; Interactions; Lipophilicity; Mode of actions; Thiazole
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34410437 PMCID: PMC8374424 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11477-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0175-7598 Impact factor: 4.813
Fig. 1The newly synthesized thiazole derivatives with high activity against Candida spp
The activity data (µg/mL) of the newly synthesized thiazole derivatives against 30 clinical isolates of C. albicans from hospitalized patients with hematological malignancies. The standard antibiotic —nystatin (NY) was used as positive control
| Compounds | Range of MIC | Range of MFC | MIC50 | MIC90 | MFC50 | MFC90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 0.48–3.91 | 0.98–7.81 | 0.98 | 1.95 | 1.95 | 7.81 |
| T2 | 0.008–0.48 | 0.015–1.95 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.98 |
| T3 | 0.015–0.98 | 0.06–1.95 | 0.12 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 1.95 |
| T4 | 0.015–0.48 | 0.06–1.95 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 1.95 |
| T5 | 0.015–1.95 | 0.03–7.81 | 0.48 | 0.98 | 1.95 | 3.91 |
| T6 | 0.24–1.95 | 0.24–1.95 | 0.48 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.95 |
| T7 | 0.48–7.81 | 1.95–15.62 | 1.95 | 3.91 | 7.81 | 15.62 |
| T8 | 0.24–3.91 | 0.48–31.25 | 0.98 | 1.95 | 3.91 | 7.81 |
| T9 | 0.48–3.91 | 0.48–3.91 | 0.98 | 1.95 | 1.95 | 3.91 |
| NY | 0.015–0.48 | 0.06–0.98 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.48 |
The fungicidal/fungistatic effect of the newly synthesized thiazole derivatives against 30 clinical isolates of C. albicans from hospitalized patients with hematological malignancies. The standard antibiotic — nystatin (NY) was used as positive control
| MFC/MIC ratio | Number (percentage) of | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | T9 | NY | |
| 1 | 6 (20) | - | - | 1 (3.33) | - | 7 (23.33) | - | 1 (3.33) | 3 (10) | 10 (33.33) |
| 2 | 18 (60) | 5 (16.66) | 11 (36.66) | 2 (6.67) | 4 (13.33) | 20 (66.67) | 15 (50) | 14 (46.67) | 17 (56.67) | 18 (60) |
| 4 | 6 (20) | 20 (66.67) | 17 (56.67) | 16 (53.33) | 19 (63.33) | 3 (10) | 14 (46.67) | 9 (30) | 10 (33.33) | 2 (6.67) |
| 8 | - | 2 (6.67) | 2 (6.67) | 8 (26.67) | 6 (20) | - | 1 (3.33) | 4 (13.33) | - | - |
| 16 | - | 3 (10) | - | 3 (10) | 1 (3.33) | - | - | 2 (6.67) | - | - |
Fig. 3Hemolytic effect (% of hemolysis) of the newly synthesized thiazole derivatives
Fig. 2The increase in the MIC values (× MIC) of the newly synthesized thiazole derivatives in the presence of a sorbitol (0.8 M) and b ergosterol (400 µg/mL) against C. albicans ATCC 10231 and C. albicans ATCC 2091. The standard antibiotic — nystatin (NY) was used as control
The log P and R values of the reference substances (S1–S5)
| Substance | log | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 0.62 | 1.68 | − 0.03 | 0.9204 | 53.63 |
| S2 | 1.86 | 1.38 | − 0.03 | 0.9242 | 51.34 |
| S3 | 2.47 | 1.69 | − 0.03 | 0.9917 | 53.48 |
| S4 | 3.80 | 3.46 | − 0.05 | 0.8684 | 73.97 |
| S5 | 6.04 | 4.14 | − 0.05 | 0.9695 | 79.58 |
| S1 | 0.62 | 1.64 | − 0.03 | 0.9452 | 60.29 |
| S2 | 1.86 | 1.75 | − 0.03 | 0.9720 | 58.40 |
| S3 | 2.47 | 1.78 | − 0.03 | 0.9380 | 58.77 |
| S4 | 3.80 | 3.61 | − 0.05 | 0.9956 | 74.96 |
| S5 | 6.04 | 4.78 | − 0.06 | 0.9704 | 82.68 |
| S1 | 0.62 | 1.24 | − 0.01 | 0.9747 | 65.83 |
| S2 | 1.86 | 1.73 | − 0.03 | 0.9902 | 55.78 |
| S3 | 2.47 | 1.96 | − 0.04 | 0.9733 | 53.50 |
| S4 | 3.80 | 2.64 | − 0.03 | 0.9899 | 77.28 |
| S5 | 6.04 | 4.26 | − 0.05 | 0.9409 | 95.22 |
| S1 | 0.62 | 2.58 | − 0.03 | 0.9880 | 82.69 |
| S2 | 1.86 | 2.18 | − 0.03 | 0.9749 | 65.83 |
| S3 | 2.47 | 2.35 | − 0.03 | 0.9703 | 68.69 |
| S4 | 3.80 | 3.61 | − 0.04 | 0.9917 | 87.71 |
| S5 | 6.04 | 5.30 | − 0.05 | 0.9964 | 103.80 |
The R values of the of the newly synthesized thiazole derivatives
| Compound | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 3.99 | − 0.06 | 0.9290 | 69.58 |
| T2 | 3.54 | − 0.05 | 0.8517 | 73.71 |
| T3 | 3.46 | − 0.05 | 0.8453 | 73.39 |
| T4 | 3.18 | − 0.04 | 0.8154 | 72.23 |
| T5 | 2.83 | − 0.04 | 0.7888 | 67.98 |
| T6 | 3.77 | − 0.05 | 0.8579 | 73.39 |
| T7 | 2.93 | − 0.04 | 0.8098 | 67.29 |
| T8 | 3.55 | − 0.05 | 0.8255 | 73.88 |
| T9 | 3.14 | − 0.05 | 0.7955 | 69.56 |
| T1 | 3.12 | − 0.04 | 0.9669 | 71.91 |
| T2 | 3.62 | − 0.05 | 0.9738 | 75.46 |
| T3 | 3.51 | − 0.05 | 0.9831 | 74.66 |
| T4 | 2.93 | − 0.04 | 0.9305 | 73.30 |
| T5 | 2.43 | − 0.03 | 0.9147 | 71.08 |
| T6 | 3.67 | − 0.05 | 0.9906 | 74.88 |
| T7 | 2.46 | − 0.03 | 0.9618 | 72.29 |
| T8 | 3.69 | − 0.05 | 0.9650 | 75.08 |
| T9 | 3.79 | − 0.05 | 0.9901 | 72.33 |
| T1 | 2.62 | − 0.03 | 0.9919 | 75.60 |
| T2 | 3.04 | − 0.04 | 0.9983 | 80.64 |
| T3 | 2.79 | − 0.03 | 0.9945 | 80.59 |
| T4 | 2.60 | − 0.03 | 0.9875 | 80.07 |
| T5 | 2.48 | − 0.03 | 0.9913 | 75.37 |
| T6 | 2.78 | − 0.04 | 0.9869 | 79.53 |
| T7 | 2.51 | − 0.03 | 0.9863 | 72.34 |
| T8 | 2.81 | − 0.04 | 0.9804 | 79.35 |
| T9 | 2.67 | − 0.04 | 0.9950 | 74.94 |
| T1 | 4.03 | − 0.05 | 0.9911 | 85.38 |
| T2 | 4.54 | − 0.05 | 0.9459 | 90.87 |
| T3 | 4.89 | − 0.05 | 0.9883 | 88.71 |
| T4 | 4.19 | − 0.05 | 0.9939 | 89.21 |
| T5 | 4.12 | − 0.05 | 0.9933 | 86.75 |
| T6 | 4.94 | − 0.06 | 0.9842 | 88.17 |
| T7 | 3.77 | − 0.05 | 0.9953 | 82.03 |
| T8 | 4.83 | − 0.05 | 0.9689 | 88.88 |
| T9 | 4.21 | − 0.05 | 0.9920 | 85.22 |
Log PEXP values of the newly synthesized thiazole derivatives calculated using the standardization method
| Compounds | log | log | log | log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 5.27 | 3.53 | 3.40 | 4.15 |
| T2 | 4.58 | 4.22 | 4.13 | 4.91 |
| T3 | 4.47 | 4.06 | 3.70 | 5.42 |
| T4 | 4.03 | 3.26 | 3.36 | 4.40 |
| T5 | 3.50 | 2.57 | 3.16 | 4.30 |
| T6 | 4.93 | 4.29 | 3.69 | 5.49 |
| T7 | 3.66 | 2.61 | 3.20 | 3.79 |
| T8 | 4.59 | 4.32 | 3.74 | 5.33 |
| T9 | 3.98 | 4.45 | 3.49 | 4.43 |