| Literature DB >> 34409768 |
Laura Oller1, Kimberley A Bennett1, J Chris McKnight2, Simon E W Moss2, Ryan Milne2, Ailsa J Hall2, Joel Rocha3.
Abstract
Excessive adiposity is associated with altered oxygen tension and comorbidities in humans. In contrast, marine mammals have high adiposity with no apparent detrimental effects. However, partial pressure of oxygen (Po2 ) in their subcutaneous adipose tissue (blubber) and its relationship with fatness have not been reported. We measured Po2 and temperature at different blubber depths in 12 healthy juvenile grey seals. Fatness was estimated from blubber thickness and morphometric parameters. Simultaneously, we monitored breathing pattern; heart rate and arterial blood saturation with a pulse oximeter; and relative changes in total hemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin, and oxyhemoglobin in blubber capillaries using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as proxies for local oxygenation changes. Blubber Po2 ranged from 14.5 to 71.4 mmHg (39.2 ± 14.1 mmHg), which is similar to values reported in other species. Blubber Po2 was strongly and negatively associated with fatness (LME: p < 0.0001, R2 marginal = 0.53, R2 conditional = 0.64, n = 10), but not with blubber depth. No other parameters explained variability in Po2 , suggesting arterial blood and local oxygen delivery did not vary within and between measurements. The fall in blubber Po2 with increased fatness in seals is consistent with other animal models of rapid fat deposition. However, the Po2 levels at which blubber becomes hypoxic and consequences of low blubber Po2 for its health and function, particularly in very fat individuals, remain unknown. How seals avoid detrimental effects of low oxygen tension in adipose tissue, despite their high and fluctuating adiposity, is a fruitful avenue to explore.Entities:
Keywords: NIRS; Po2; adiposity; blubber; marine mammals; oxygenation; temperature
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34409768 PMCID: PMC8374385 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
FIGURE 1Diagram of how the Po2 measurements were taken from one animal at different depths. Dark grey arrows illustrate direction of probe insertion and retraction. Grey bars show the area over which the probe measured Po2 at each depth
Summary of animal characteristics (n animals = 12). Animals were sampled once (n animals = 7) or twice (n animals = 4) after mass gain
| Date | Animal | Sex | Weight (kg) | Length (cm) | Girth (cm) | Blubber depth (mm) | Blubber fat percentage (LMD index) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/05/2018 | B | Female | 38.6 | 116 | 88 | 19 | 23.2 |
| 07/05/2018 | C | Female | 34.8 | 119 | 80 | 11 | 16.0 |
| 07/05/2018 | D | Male | 47 | 127 | 88 | 15 | 18.5 |
| 07/05/2018 | E | Male | 40.6 | 119 | 83 | 12 | 16.1 |
| 07/05/2018 | F | Male | 42.2 | 115 | 89 | 16 | 19.5 |
| 18/07/2018 | H | Male | 64.4 | 132 | 106 | 26 | 25.6 |
| 18/07/2018 | G | Male | 47.6 | 123 | 95 | 20 | 22.7 |
| 06/12/2018 | G | Male | 60 | 134 | 103 | 28 | 28.3 |
| 18/07/2018 | I | Female | 37.8 | 112 | 88 | 12 | 16.2 |
| 22/08/2018 | J | Male | 59.4 | 128 | 102 | 20 | 21.2 |
| 06/12/2018 | J | Male | 68.2 | 132 | 106 | 27 | 25.8 |
| 18/07/2018 | K | Male | 39 | 123 | 89 | 10 | 14.6 |
| 19/07/2018 | L | Female | 36 | 113 | 85 | 12 | 16.9 |
| 06/12/2018 | L | Female | 60.6 | 122 | 102 | 25 | 24.6 |
| 21/06/2018 | M | Male | 48 | 126 | 94 | 11 | 14.6 |
| 06/12/2018 | M | Male | 80 | 131 | 113 | 26 | 23.4 |
FIGURE 2Example traces over time. (a) Oxygen supply: Breath holding events of over 30 s are shaded in light blue. SpO2 (left axis, top line in blue), heart rate (right axis, bottom line in grey). (b) Blubber blood supply: Breath holding events of over 30 s are shaded in light blue. Total blood volume is represented in black (left axis, top line) and hemoglobin oxygenation difference in grey (right axis, bottom line). Arrow indicates a sudden movement of the animal, probably due to a deep inhalation (c) Blubber Po2: Arrow indicates the end of the stabilization period. Dashed lines represent the movement of the probe to the next depth and boxes the duration over which the data were averaged for analysis. (d) Blubber temperature (left axis, top line in blue). Dashed lines represent the movement of the probe to the next depth
Output of augmented Dickey–Fuller test for systemic blood saturation (n animals = 12), total hemoglobin (n animals = 11), and hemoglobin oxygenation (n animals = 11). Animal H and animals resampled after mass gain were not included in blubber hemoglobin analysis (NA)
| SpO2 | Total hemoglobin | Hemoglobin oxygenation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Animal | Dickey–Fuller test | Dickey–Fuller test | Dickey–Fuller test | |||
| 07/05/2018 | B | −6.7985 | ≤0.01 | −5.5700 | ≤0.01 | −5.4380 | ≤0.01 |
| 07/05/2018 | C | −3.4256 | 0.05 | −10.092 | ≤0.01 | −6.1414 | ≤0.01 |
| 07/05/2018 | D | −4.5414 | 0.01 | −17.107 | ≤0.01 | −8.1425 | ≤0.01 |
| 07/05/2018 | E | −2.2864 | 0.46 | −7.6322 | ≤0.01 | −10.1500 | 0.01 |
| 07/05/2018 | F | −4.0999 | ≤0.01 | −3.3455 | 0.0627 | −7.3087 | ≤0.01 |
| 18/07/2018 | G | −4.3708 | ≤ | −4.6603 | ≤0.01 | −2.9951 | 0.1544 |
| 06/12/2018 | G | −6.5936 | ≤ | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 18/07/2018 | I | −2.9499 |
| −3.3604 | 0.0600 | −3.5650 | 0.0358 |
| 18/07/2018 | H | −6.0899 | ≤0.01 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 22/08/2018 | J | −3.4324 |
| −11.5860 | ≤0.01 | −2.9182 | 0.1863 |
| 06/12/2018 | J | −4.9117 | ≤ | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 18/07/2018 | K | −2.1866 |
| −4.9860 | ≤0.01 | −5.3221 | ≤0.01 |
| 19/07/2018 | L | −2.4067 |
| −2.5541 | 0.3434 | −5.4451 | ≤0.01 |
| 06/12/2018 | L | −9.2874 | ≤0.01 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 21/06/2018 | M | −9.1633 | ≤0.01 | −4.2387 | ≤0.01 | −5.9610 | ≤0.01 |
| 06/12/2018 | M | −11.758 | ≤0.01 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Oxygen probe measurements of each animal at each depth percentage. Averages of Po2 and temperature (± SD) are shown in the final two columns
| Date | Animal | Sex | Depth percentage | Po2 (mmHg) | Tb (ºC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7/5/2018 | B | F | 37 | 57.3 ± 0.4 | 32.7 ± 0.2 |
| 7/5/2018 | B | F | 74 | 49.6 ± 0.9 | 34.8 ± 0.1 |
| 7/5/2018 | C | F | 45 | 50.2 ± 0.5 | 32.0 ± 0.6 |
| 7/5/2018 | C | F | 64 | 48.4 ± 0.5 | 32.8 ± 0.6 |
| 7/5/2018 | D | M | 47 | 37.2 ± 0.1 | 33.8 ± 0.1 |
| 7/5/2018 | D | M | 73 | 59.1 ± 0.4 | 33.8 ± 0.1 |
| 7/5/2018 | E | M | 33 | 20.8 ± 0.1 | 26.5 ± 0.1 |
| 7/5/2018 | E | M | 67 | 17.7 ± 0.9 | 26.0 ±0.3 |
| 7/5/2018 | F | M | 44 | 38.2 ± 0.6 | 32.7 ± 0.2 |
| 7/5/2018 | F | M | 75 | 36.8 ± 2.4 | 35.6 ± 0.1 |
| 18/7/2018 | G | M | 35 | 34.4 ± 0.1 | 34.6 ± 0.3 |
| 18/7/2018 | G | M | 55 | 40.5 ± 0.2 | 33.6 ±0.6 |
| 18/7/2018 | G | M | 80 | 38.9 ± 0.3 | 35.5 ± 0.0 |
| 6/12/2018 | G | M | 21 | 22.9 ± 0.1 | 30.0 ± 0.2 |
| 6/12/2018 | G | M | 43 | 14.5 ± 1.7 | 35.4 ± 0.0 |
| 18/7/2018 | I | F | 33 | 71.4 ± 0.6 | 34.5 ± 0.2 |
| 18/7/2018 | I | F | 67 | 69.3 ± 1.2 | 34.9 ± 0.1 |
| 22/8/2018 | J | M | 35 | 51.2 ± 0.1 | 31.2 ± 1.9 |
| 22/8/2018 | J | M | 55 | 42.2 ± 1.0 | 35.3 ± 0.1 |
| 22/8/2018 | J | M | 75 | 41.0 ± 0.8 | 35.2 ± 0.5 |
| 6/12/2018 | J | M | 26 | 23.2 ± 1.0 | 32.7 ± 0.6 |
| 6/12/2018 | J | M | 56 | 19.3 ± 3.1 | 32.7 ± 0.7 |
| 6/12/2018 | J | M | 85 | 23.0 ± 0.6 | 28.7 ± 0.3 |
| 18/7/2018 | K | M | 60 | 53.0 ± 0.3 | 34.3 ± 2.0 |
| 19/7/2018 | L | F | 33 | 31.9 ± 0.2 | 33.9 ± 1.0 |
| 19/7/2018 | L | F | 67 | 28.6 ± 0.2 | 34.8 ± 0.7 |
| 6/12/2018 | L | F | 36 | 31.4 ± 0.4 | 33.7 ± 1.2 |
| 6/12/2018 | L | F | 60 | 27.7 ± 6.8 | 35.2 ± 0.4 |
| 6/12/2018 | L | F | 84 | 27.7 ± 0.8 | 35.4 ± 0.2 |
| 21/6/2018 | M | M | 64 | 49.6 ± 0.5 | 35.4 ± 0.1 |
| 6/12/2018 | M | M | 38 | 36.8 ± 2.6 | 35.1 ± 0.1 |
| 6/12/2018 | M | M | 62 | 27.8 ± 5.8 | 35.7 ± 0.1 |
| 6/12/2018 | M | M | 85 | 32.1 ± 3.7 | 35.5 ± 0.1 |
LME models for drivers of blubber temperature (n animals = 10, n observations = 32)
| Model | df | AICc | Delta | Weight |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMD | Depth percentage | Tday | LMD* Tday | |||||||
| 1 | 3 | 129.1 | 0.00 | 0.283 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2 | 6 | 129.2 | 0.03 | 0.278 | 0.0233 | – | 0.0301 | 0.0206 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| 3 | 4 | 129.9 | 0.76 | 0.193 | – | – | 0.1902 | – | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| 4 | 4 | 130.6 | 1.45 | 0.137 | – | 0.2935 | – | – | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| 5 | 4 | 131.0 | 1.89 | 0.110 | 0.4003 | – | – | – | 0.03 | 0.03 |
LME models for drivers of blubber Po2 (n animals = 10, n observations = 31)
| Model | df | AICc | Delta | Weight |
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMD | Depth percentage | Sex | SpO2 | Tb | |||||||
| 1 | 4 | 11.4 | 0.00 | 0.515 | <0.0001 | – | – | – | ‐ | 0.51 | 0.63 |
| 2 | 5 | 12.6 | 1.23 | 0.278 | 0.0001 | – | – | – | 0.2117 | 0.51 | 0.67 |
| 3 | 5 | 13.2 | 1.82 | 0.207 | <0.0001 | – | 0.3852 | – | – | 0.55 | 0.74 |
FIGURE 3Relationship between absolute Po2 values and (a) fatness (LMD), where repeated measurements correspond to different depths for each individual. Smooth line (blue) from best model output for fatness with standard error (grey shadow). Resampling measurements after mass gain are represented with solid symbols; and (b) Comparasion between Po2 values before and after mass gain for those animals that were resampled after blubber tissue expansion (n animals = 4)