| Literature DB >> 34409278 |
Julie Lucifora1,2, Florentin Pastor1, Émilie Charles1, Caroline Pons1,2, Héloïse Auclair2, Floriane Fusil1, Michel Rivoire3, François-Loïc Cosset1, David Durantel1, Anna Salvetti1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: HBV persists in the nucleus of infected hepatocytes as a covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) episome that constitutes the template for viral RNA and protein synthesis. Both HBx and HBc (core) viral proteins associate with cccDNA but, while HBx is required for viral transcription, the role of HBc is still unclear. The aim of this study was to determine if HBc derived from incoming nucleocapsid can associate with cccDNA before the onset of viral transcription and protein production.Entities:
Keywords: CAM; ChIP; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; FA, formaldehyde; H3K27Ac, histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation; HBVΔX, HBx-deficient HBV; HBc; HBc, HBV core protein; Hepatitis B Virus; HuHep, liver-humanized mice; PHHs, primary human hepatocytes; cccDNA; cccDNA, covalently closed circular DNA; dHepaRG, differentiated HepaRG cells; rcDNA, relaxed circular DNA
Year: 2021 PMID: 34409278 PMCID: PMC8363821 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JHEP Rep ISSN: 2589-5559
Fig. 1Cross-linking of samples prevents good nuclear purification and efficient anti-HBc IP.
(A) Cells or liver samples from HuHep mice were cross-linked or not with FA before nuclear fractionation and analyses by WB. (B, C) Liver samples from (B) HBV-infected or (C) HBV/HDV co-infected HuHep mice were either cross-linked with 1
% FA or left untreated (0
% FA) before nuclei isolation and IP with indicated antibodies. IP efficiencies were analyzed by WB. (D) A liver sample from a HuHep mouse was divided into 4 pieces before cross-linking with the indicated amount of FA. Cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were prepared with different concentration of SDS for nuclear lysis and analyzed by WB. (E) PHHs or dHepaRG cells were infected by HBV (500 vge/cell). Ten days later, nuclear extracts were prepared in native conditions, sonicated or not and HBV DNA was analyzed by Southern Blot. (F) dHepaRG cells or PHHs were infected with HBV wild-type for 10 days. HuHep mice were infected with HBV for 7 weeks. Half of each sample was either cross-linked with 1% FA or left untreated before nuclei isolation and IP with the indicated antibodies from Thermofisher followed by DNA extraction. The % of HBc-associated cccDNA, relative to the amount in the input, was assessed by qPCR. Results are the mean ± SD of 2 experiments for dHepaRG cells and HuHep mice and 1 experiment for PHHs. cccDNA, covalently closed circular DNA; dHepaRG, differentiated HepaRG cells; dslDNA, double-stranded linear DNA; FA, formaldehyde; FT, flow through; IP, immunoprecipitation; HBc, HBV core protein; HuHep, liver-humanized mice; PHHs, primary human hepatocytes; rcDNA, relaxed circular DNA; vge, viral genome equivalents.
Fig. 2HBc derived from incoming HBV capsids associates with cccDNA in a stable manner.
(A, B, C) dHepaRG cells were infected with HBV WT or HBVΔX (1,000 vge/cell). Starting at day 7 pi, cells were either treated twice a week with RG7834 (0.1 uM) or left untreated. At the indicated time, (A) supernatants were collected and levels of HBeAg assessed by ELISA. (B) At day 28, RNAs were extracted and the levels of HBV RNAs assessed by RT-qPCR analyses. Native ChIP assays were performed at the indicated time and % of HBc associated to cccDNA assessed by qPCR analysis. Results are the mean ± SD of 2 to 5 independent experiments each performed with 2 biological replicates (2 experiments for 42 dpi, 3 experiments for cells treated with RG7834, 5 for the other conditions). cccDNA, covalently closed circular DNA; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; dHepaRG, differentiated HepaRG cells; HBc, HBV core protein; HBVΔX, HBx-deficient HBV; RT-qPCR, reverse-transcription PCR; vge, viral genome equivalents; WT, wild-type.