| Literature DB >> 34409184 |
Bassem Ahmed Sabry1, Amr Farouk2, Ahmed Noah Badr1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Usually, it takes about a year since the harvested fresh star anise fruit (SAF) reaches the market for consumer usage, all this time with different handling processes and different storage circumstances greatly affect its quality as well as its chemical composition and biological activity. AIM: This study investigated the chemical constituents for volatiles and water extracts of commercialized SAF, as well as, their bioactivities.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-mycotoxigenic; Antimicrobial; Commercial star anise; Cytotoxicity; Essential oil; Water extract
Year: 2021 PMID: 34409184 PMCID: PMC8361074 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
The phenolic compounds content of SAF water extract.
| Compound | Rt (min) | Conc. (μg/g extract) |
|---|---|---|
| Gallic | 3.97 | 27.3 ± 1.33 |
| Protocatechuic | 7.35 | 344.5 ± 4.58 |
| 11.29 | 32.9 ± 1.12 | |
| Gentisic | 12.29 | 10.8 ± 1.05 |
| Cateachin | 14.64 | 22.2 ± 1.34 |
| Chlorogenic | 15.95 | 9.3 ± 0.88 |
| Caffeic | 16.22 | 13.15 ± 1.02 |
| Syringic | 18.15 | 40.08 ± 1.41 |
| Vanillic | 21 | 12.78 ± 1.27 |
| Salycilic | 24.88 | 79.77 ± 2.15 |
| Ferulic | 26.47 | 56.45 ± 2.37 |
| Sinapic | 30.156 | 4.85 ± 0.66 |
| 34.4 | 48.00 ± 1.05 | |
| Rutin | 33.98 | 75.18 ± 1.73 |
| Apigenin-7-glucoside | 37.93 | 299.39 ± 5.27 |
| Rosmarinic | 38.8 | 415.89 ± 4.97 |
| Cinnamic | 39.3 | 43.22 ± 1.56 |
| Quercetin | 45.3 | 130.50 ± 2.05 |
| Coumarin | 55.22 | 275.67 ± 2.77 |
| Kaempferol | 58.4 | 70.99 ± 1.33 |
| Chrysin | 58.44 | 68.76 ± 1.58 |
The data expressed as mean ± SEM.
Concentrations were calculated in micrograms per gram of lyophilized extract.
Volatile constituents identified from the star anise fruits hydro distilled (HD).
| No. | Identified Compound | KI | % Area | Identification method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 928 | 0.43 | MS & KI | |
| 2 | 932 | MS, KI, & ST | ||
| 3 | Camphene | 971 | 0.44 | MS & KI |
| 4 | 978 | 0.28 | MS & KI | |
| 5 | 991 | 0.27 | MS & KI | |
| 6 | Linalool | 1095 | MS, KI, & ST | |
| 7 | Estragole | 1194 | MS, KI, & ST | |
| 8 | 1250 | MS, KI, & ST | ||
| 9 | Linalool acetate | 1254 | MS, KI, & ST | |
| 10 | 1281 | MS, KI, & ST | ||
| 11 | Safrole | 1292 | 0.21 | MS, KI, & ST |
| 12 | 1373 | 0.37 | MS & KI | |
| 13 | 1414 | MS, KI, & ST | ||
| 14 | 1433 | MS, KI, & ST | ||
| 15 | Aromadendrene | 1436 | MS, KI, & ST | |
| 16 | 1465 | 0.33 | MS & KI | |
| 17 | 1502 | MS, KI, & ST | ||
| 18 | 1510 | 0.70 | MS & KI | |
| 19 | Elemol | 1544 | 0.49 | MS & KI |
| 20 | Germacrene B | 1553 | 0.91 | MS & KI |
| 21 | 1560 | MS, KI, & ST | ||
| 22 | Spathulenol | 1572 | 0.27 | MS & KI |
| 23 | Caryophyllene oxide | 1577 | 0.23 | MS & KI |
| 24 | 1649 | 0.55 | MS & KI | |
| 25 | Foeniculin | 1672 | MS, KI, & ST | |
| 26 | Farnesol | 1692 | 0.50 | MS & KI |
| - - | - - - - | - - - - - |
Confirmed by comparison with Kovat's index on a DB5 column (Adams 2007).
Values represent averages ±standard deviations for triplicate experiments.
Confirmed by comparison with the mass spectrum of the authentic compound.
Identification by comparison with data obtained from the NIST mass spectra library.
Figure 1Antimicrobial activity of the SAF (water and volatile extracts) against pathogenic bacteria and toxigenic fungi.
Figure 2The inhibition impacts the SAF extracts on fungal growth (agar diffusion and liquid media).
The impact of the SAF extracts on mycotoxin production of fungi growth in liquid media∗.
| Control∗∗ | 100 μL VE/mL media∗∗∗ | Inhibition Ratio | 100 μL WE/mL∗∗∗∗ | Inhibition Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 349.2 ± 1.3a | 125.7 ± 2.34b | 64 % | 85.24 ± 2.09c | 75.58 % | |
| 119.4 ± 1.34a | 92.0 ± 2.05b | 22.95 % | 39.8 ± 1.36c | 66.6 % | |
| 119.6 ± 1.67a | 85 ± 2.88b | 28.93 % | 33.14 ± 1.04c | 72.41 % | |
| 119.4 ± 3.41a | 87.4 ± 4.11b | 26.8 % | 26.4 ± 2.54c | 77.89 % | |
| ZEN | 452.6 ± 8.96a | 186.2 ± 4.31b | 61.08 % | 74.7 ± 6.05c | 83.49 % |
The results expressed as means ± SEM.
Results with a different superscription letter are significantly different (P = 0.05).
The control measured as toxin secreted by fungi in control growth media.
VE: volatile oil extract; WE: water extract.
∗ mycotoxin production was estimated for Aflatoxins (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2) and zeralenone.
∗∗ Control express the toxin amount secreted in fungal media without the treatment.
∗∗∗ Toxin amount determined in fyngal media contains 100μL volatile extract of star anise /mL of growth media.
∗∗∗∗ Toxin amount determined in fyngal media contains 100μL water extract of star anise /mL of growth media.
Figure 3Evaluation of cell viability percentage of the liver cancer cell line (Hep G2) post-treatment A- SAF volatile compounds, B- SAF water extract compared with reference drug C– CIS using MTT assay.
Figure 4Evaluation of cell viability percentage of healthy human hepatic cells (THLE2) post-treatment A- SAF volatile compounds, B- SAF water extract compared with reference drug C– CIS using MTT assay.