Literature DB >> 34407276

Two In Cis Variants-Two Worlds Apart.

Ying-Chun Lo1,2, Rupa Narayan3, Valentina Nardi1, Jochen K Lennerz1.   

Abstract

Precision oncology emphasizes genotyping as one of the mainstays of oncological decision-making. The core information element exchanged between the laboratory and the oncologist is the precise mutation. Specifically, it is the written representation typically in the form of a variant description at the DNA or protein level. These annotations can be confusing, and many commercial laboratories have abandoned DNA-level annotations. Here we present a complex double-point mutation to illustrate a situation where a formally "correct" reporting nomenclature can obscure clinically relevant and potentially clinically actionable information. KEY POINTS: The Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) currently recommends that "two variants separated by one or more nucleotides should be described individually and not as a combined 'delins' (deletion-inserion)." There remains confusion about the appropriate nomenclature to report variants and the significance of these variants among clinicians. It is the clinically integrated molecular-genetic interpretation that will help clinicians make informed decisions to improve patient care.
© 2021 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker • IDH • Variant annotation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34407276      PMCID: PMC8649014          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  5 in total

1.  HGVS Nomenclature in Practice: An Example from the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme.

Authors:  Zandra C Deans; Jennifer A Fairley; Johan T den Dunnen; Caroline Clark
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  VarGrouper: A Bioinformatic Tool for Local Haplotyping of Deletion-Insertion Variants from Next-Generation Sequencing Data after Variant Calling.

Authors:  Ryan J Schmidt; Allison Macleay; Long Phi Le
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  HGVS Recommendations for the Description of Sequence Variants: 2016 Update.

Authors:  Johan T den Dunnen; Raymond Dalgleish; Donna R Maglott; Reece K Hart; Marc S Greenblatt; Jean McGowan-Jordan; Anne-Francoise Roux; Timothy Smith; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Peter E M Taschner
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 4.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists.

Authors:  Marilyn M Li; Michael Datto; Eric J Duncavage; Shashikant Kulkarni; Neal I Lindeman; Somak Roy; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones; Daynna J Wolff; Anas Younes; Marina N Nikiforova
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Enasidenib in mutant IDH2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Eytan M Stein; Courtney D DiNardo; Daniel A Pollyea; Amir T Fathi; Gail J Roboz; Jessica K Altman; Richard M Stone; Daniel J DeAngelo; Ross L Levine; Ian W Flinn; Hagop M Kantarjian; Robert Collins; Manish R Patel; Arthur E Frankel; Anthony Stein; Mikkael A Sekeres; Ronan T Swords; Bruno C Medeiros; Christophe Willekens; Paresh Vyas; Alessandra Tosolini; Qiang Xu; Robert D Knight; Katharine E Yen; Sam Agresta; Stephane de Botton; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 25.476

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.