| Literature DB >> 34407153 |
Shiguang Shen1, Chaoyang Zhu1, Chenjing Fan1, Chengcheng Wu1, Xinran Huang1, Lin Zhou2.
Abstract
The development of China's manufacturing industry has received global attention. However, research on the distribution pattern, changes, and driving forces of the manufacturing industry has been limited by the accessibility of data. This study proposes a method for classifying based on natural language processing. A case study was conducted employing this method, hotspot detection and driving force analysis, wherein the driving forces industrial development during the "13th Five-Year plan" period in Jiangsu province were determined. The main conclusions of the empirical case study are as follows. 1) Through the acquisition of Amap's point-of-interest (POI, a special point location that commonly used in modern automotive navigation systems.) data, an industry type classification algorithm based on the natural language processing of POI names is proposed, with Jiangsu Province serving as an example. The empirical test shows that the accuracy was 95%, and the kappa coefficient was 0.872. 2) The seven types of manufacturing industries including the pulp and paper (PP) industry, metallurgical chemical (MC) industry, pharmaceutical manufacturing (PM) industry, machinery and electronics (ME) industry, wood furniture (WF) industry, textile clothing (TC) industry, and agricultural and food product processing (AF) industry are drawn through a 1 km× 1km projection grid. The evolution map of the spatial pattern and the density field hotspots are also drawn. 3) After analyzing the driving forces of the changes in the number of manufacturing industries mentioned above, we found that manufacturing base, distance from town, population, GDP per capita, distance from the railway station were the significant driving factors of changes in the manufacturing industries mentioned above. The results of this research can help guide the development of manufacturing industries, maximize the advantages of regional factors and conditions, and provide insight into how the spatial layout of the manufacturing industry could be optimized.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34407153 PMCID: PMC8372942 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Distribution of manufacturing POIs in Jiangsu province in 2020.
(A) The position of Jiangsu province in China. (B) Number of manufacturing POIs in cities of Jiangsu province. (C) Distribution of manufacturing POIs in Jiangsu province. The maps were generated by ArcGIS 10.5 and were for illustrative purposes only.
Fig 2Distribution pattern of various manufacturing industries in Jiangsu province in 2015.
Number of different industries in a 1 km×1 km projection grid in 2015. Hotspots in 2015 were calculated based on manufacturing POIs distribution. The maps were generated by ArcGIS 10.5 and were for illustrative purposes only.
Fig 3Distribution pattern of various manufacturing industries in Jiangsu province in 2020.
Number of different industries in a 1 km×1 km projection grid in 2020. Hotspots in 2020 were calculated based on manufacturing POIs distribution. The maps were generated by ArcGIS 10.5 and were for illustrative purposes only.
Data sources and descriptive statistics of various industry driving forces.
| Type | Code | Variable Name | Calculation Method | Min | Max | Average | Std. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Calculation by grid increment | -47 | 124 | 0.03 | 0.847 | |||
| -727 | 125 | 0.37 | 4.734 | |||||
| -173 | 19 | -0.87 | 4.063 | |||||
| -26 | 27 | -0.04 | 0.547 | |||||
| -38 | 328 | 0.55 | 2.798 | |||||
| -443 | 36 | -0.64 | 3.203 | |||||
| -44 | 30 | 0.07 | 0.577 | |||||
|
|
| X1a | 2015 TC | The number of industries falling in each grid fishing net in 2015 | 0 | 609 | 0.47 | 3.603 |
| X1b | 2015 ME | 0 | 162 | 0.87 | 4.118 | |||
| X1c | 2015 WF | 0 | 22 | 0.06 | 0.422 | |||
| X1d | 2015 AF | 0 | 28 | 0.04 | 0.294 | |||
| X1e | 2015 MC | 0 | 328 | 0.60 | 2.850 | |||
| X1f | 2015 PM | 0 | 42 | 0.03 | 0.277 | |||
| X1g | 2015 PP | 0 | 30 | 0.09 | 0.546 | |||
|
|
| X2 | Distance from town | After performing Euclidean distance analysis on the town boundary in GIS, a table is used to display the minimum value of the regional statistics, and the logarithm of the minimum distance from the town boundary is taken | 0 | 10.367 | 6.836 | 3.133 |
| X3 | Population | Population of Jiangsu province | 0 | 253510 | 834.388 | 2.2 | ||
| X4 | GDP per capita | Divide the total GDP(2015) by the population each grid | 0 | 91719 | 77.774 | 519.101 | ||
|
| X5 | Distance from railway station | After performing Euclidean distance analysis on the station location in GIS, the minimum value of the regional statistics is displayed in a table, and the minimum value of the obtained distance from the high-speed rail station is taken as the logarithm | 0 | 12.036 | 10.466 | 0.791 | |
| X6 | Distance from industrial park | After performing Euclidean distance analysis on the station location in GIS, the minimum value of the regional statistics is displayed in a table, and the minimum value of the obtained distance from the industrial park is taken as the logarithm | 0 | 12.194 | 10.450 | 0.662 | ||
|
| X7 | Longitude gravity | Longitude of site location | 116.371 | 121.901 | 119.440 | 1.026 | |
Regression analysis of industry driving forces.
| Independent variable | Model of TC Industry | Model of ME Industry | Model of WF Industry | Model of AF Industry | Model of MC Industry | Model of PM Industry | Model of PP Industry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.348**** | 0.617**** | -0.161**** | 0.446**** | 0.997**** | -0.025**** | 0.891**** |
|
| -0.018**** | 0.033**** | 0.042**** | 0.067**** | 0.004**** | 0.083**** | 0.006**** |
|
| -0.053**** | -0.028**** | -0.169**** | -0.038**** | -0.022**** | -0.104**** | -0.07**** |
|
| -0.003 | 0.001 | 0.012**** | 0.009** | 0.001 | 0.012**** | 0.002 |
|
| 0.031**** | -0.02**** | 0.152**** | 0.036**** | 0.004**** | 0.111**** | 0.028**** |
|
| -0.002 | -0.009** | 0.017**** | 0.007* | 0 | -0.014**** | 0.008**** |
|
| -0.03**** | -0.054**** | -0.099**** | 0 | 0.001* | -0.077**** | -0.002 |
|
| 0.119 | 0.372 | 0.123 | 0.193 | 0.985 | 0.052 | 0.764 |
Independent variables as defined in Table 1. ****, ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05 levels, respectively.