Literature DB >> 34406564

Cerebrospinal fluid diversion for leptomeningeal metastasis: palliative, procedural and oncologic outcomes.

Evan D Bander1,2, Melissa Yuan1, Anne S Reiner3, Andrew L A Garton1,2, Katherine S Panageas3, Cameron W Brennan1, Viviane Tabar1, Nelson S Moss1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) occurs in 3-5% of patients with solid metastatic tumors and often portends a severe prognosis including symptomatic hydrocephalus and intracranial hypertension. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting can provide symptomatic relief in this patient subset; however, few studies have examined the role of shunting in the palliation, prognosis and overall oncologic care of these patients.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate risk factors associated with prognosis after CSF diversion and assess surgical, symptomatic and oncologic outcomes in this population.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with solid-malignancy LM treated with a shunt at a NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019.
RESULTS: One hundred and ninety patients with metastatic LM underwent CSF diversion. Overall survival was 4.14 months from LM diagnosis (95% CI: 3.29-4.70) and 2.43 months (95% CI: 2.01-3.09) from shunting. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) at time of shunting and brain metastases (BrM) number at LM diagnosis demonstrated significant associations with survival (HR = 0.66; 95% CI [0.51-0.86], p = 0.002; HR = 1.40; 95% CI [1.01-1.93] per 10 BrM, p = 0.04, respectively). Eighty-three percent of patients experienced symptomatic relief, and 79% were discharged home or to rehabilitation facilities post-shunting. Post-shunt, 56% of patients received additional systemic therapy or started or completed WBRT. Complications included infection (5%), symptomatic subdural hygroma/hematoma (6.3%), and shunt externalization/removal/repair (8%). Abdominal seeding was not identified.
CONCLUSIONS: CSF diversion for LM with hydrocephalus and intracranial hypertension secondary to metastasis can achieve symptomatic relief, hospital discharge, and return to further oncologic therapy, with a complication profile unique to this pathophysiology. However, decision-making in this population must incorporate end-of-life goals of care given limited prognosis.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebrospinal fluid; Intracranial hypertension; Leptomeningeal metastasis; Metastasis; Shunt

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34406564      PMCID: PMC8504535          DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03827-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.506


  31 in total

1.  Ventriculoperitoneal shunt for hydrocephalus caused by central nervous system metastasis.

Authors:  Seung Hoon Lee; Doo Sik Kong; Ho Joon Seol; Do-Hyun Nam; Jung-Il Lee
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Leptomeningeal metastasis.

Authors:  Lisa M DeAngelis; Dina Boutros
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 3.  Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria Alice Franzoi; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: a comparison of two prospective series treated with and without intra-cerebrospinal fluid chemotherapy.

Authors:  F Bokstein; A Lossos; T Siegal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Leptomeningeal metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Haiying Cheng; Roman Perez-Soler
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal sustained-release cytarabine (DepoCyt) to intrathecal methotrexate in patients with neoplastic meningitis from solid tumors.

Authors:  M J Glantz; K A Jaeckle; M C Chamberlain; S Phuphanich; L Recht; L J Swinnen; B Maria; S LaFollette; G B Schumann; B F Cole; S B Howell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Improved Risk-Adjusted Survival for Melanoma Brain Metastases in the Era of Checkpoint Blockade Immunotherapies: Results from a National Cohort.

Authors:  J Bryan Iorgulescu; Maya Harary; Cheryl K Zogg; Keith L Ligon; David A Reardon; F Stephen Hodi; Ayal A Aizer; Timothy R Smith
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 11.151

Review 8.  Management of hydrocephalus in patients with leptomeningeal metastases: an ethical approach to decision-making.

Authors:  Nayan Lamba; Tim Fick; Rhishi Nandoe Tewarie; Marike L Broekman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Palliative cerebrospinal fluid shunting for leptomeningeal metastasis-related hydrocephalus in patients with lung adenocarcinoma: A single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Koichi Mitsuya; Yoko Nakasu; Nakamasa Hayashi; Shoichi Deguchi; Toshiaki Takahashi; Haruyasu Murakami; Tateaki Naito; Hirotsugu Kenmotsu; Akira Ono; Kazushige Wakuda; Hideyuki Harada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ventriculoperitoneal shunting versus endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of patients with hydrocephalus related to metastasis.

Authors:  David D Gonda; Teddy E Kim; Peter C Warnke; Ekkehard M Kasper; Bob S Carter; Clark C Chen
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-08-27
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Leptomeningeal Metastases: New Opportunities in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Jessica A Wilcox; Min Jun Li; Adrienne A Boire
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 7.620

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.