| Literature DB >> 34405575 |
Pierre-Emmanuel Tardo-Dino1,2,3,4, Cindy Taverny1, Julien Siracusa1,4, Stéphanie Bourdon1,4, Stéphane Baugé1,4, Nathalie Koulmann1,2,3,4, Alexandra Malgoyre1,4.
Abstract
Aerobic training leads to well-known systemic metabolic and muscular alterations. Heat acclimation may also increase mitochondrial muscle mass. We studied the effects of heat acclimation combined with endurance training on metabolic adaptations of skeletal muscle. Thirty-two rats were divided into four groups: control (C), trained (T), heat-acclimated (H), and trained with heat acclimation (H+T) for 6 weeks. Soleus muscle metabolism was studied, notably by the in situ measurement of mitochondrial respiration with pyruvate (Pyr) or palmitoyl-coenzyme A (PCoA), under phosphorylating conditions ( V˙max ) or not ( V˙0 ). Aerobic performance increased, and retroperitoneal fat mass decreased with training, independently of heat exposure (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Citrate synthase and hydroxyl-acyl-dehydrogenase activity increased with endurance training (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), without any effect of heat acclimation. Training induced an increase of the V˙0 and V˙max for PCoA (p < .001 and p < .01, respectively), without interference with heat acclimation. The training-induced increase of V˙0 (p < 0.01) for pyruvate oxidation was limited when combined with heat acclimation (-23%, p < 0.01). Training and heat acclimation independently increased the V˙max for pyruvate (+60% p < 0.001 and +50% p = 0.01, respectively), without an additive effect of the combination. Heat acclimation doubled the training effect on muscle glycogen storage (p < 0.001). Heat acclimation did not improve mitochondrial adaptations induced by endurance training in the soleus muscle, possibly limiting the alteration of carbohydrate oxidation while not facilitating fatty-acid utilization. Furthermore, the increase in glycogen storage observed after HA combined with endurance training, without the improvement of pyruvate oxidation, appears to be a hypoxic metabolic phenotype.Entities:
Keywords: endurance training; heat acclimation; mitochondrial respiration; skeletal muscle metabolism cross-tolerance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34405575 PMCID: PMC8371354 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
PHOTO 1Temperature‐controlled device to perform acclimation conditioning
FIGURE 1Design of experiment conditioning and steps
FIGURE 2Training protocol
Reference and conditions of the utilization of primary antibodies
| Antibodies reference | % acrylamide in gel | Dilution antibody | HRP‐conjugated secondary antibody | ECL substrate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti‐Pyruvate Dehydrogenase E1‐alpha subunit (phospho S293) antibody [EPR12200] |
ab177461 Abcam | 10% | 1/1000 |
Anti‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Anti‐Pyruvate Dehydrogenase E1‐alpha subunit antibody [EPR11098] |
ab168379 Abcam | 10% | 1/1000 |
Anti‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Total OXPHOS Human WB Antibody Cocktail |
ab110411 Abcam | 15% | 1/400 |
anti‐mouse antibodies ab205719 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Anti‐Adenine Nucleotide Translocase 1/ANT 1 antibody |
ab110322 Abcam | 10% | 1/1000 |
Anti‐mouse antibodies ab205719 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Anti‐CPT1A antibody |
ab128568 Abcam | 10% | 1/500 |
Anti‐mouse antibodies ab205719 Abcam |
Clarity Max WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Anti‐CPT2 Antibody |
ABS85 Abcam | 10% | 1/1000 |
Anti‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Anti‐Uncoupling Protein 3 Antibody |
AB3046 Abcam | 10% | 1/1000 |
Anti‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| HSP70 Antibody |
4872S Ozyme | 10% | 1/1000 |
Anti‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Phospho‐GSK‐3alpha/beta (Ser21/9) Antibody | 9331S Ozyme | 10% | 1/500 |
Anti‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| GSK‐3beta (27C10) Rabbit mAb | 9315S Ozyme | 10% | 1/500 |
Anti‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Parkin (PrK8) Mouse mAb |
4211S Cell signaling | 10% | 1/500 |
Anti‐mouse antibodies ab205719 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| DRP1 (D8H5) Rabbit mAb |
5391S Cell signaling | 10% | 1/500 |
ANTI‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Mitofusin‐2 (D2D10) Rabbit mAb |
9482S Cell signaling | 10% | 1/500 |
Anti‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
| Anti‐PINK1 antibody |
Ab23707 Abcam | 10% | 1/500 |
Anti‐rabbit antibodies ab6721 Abcam |
Clarity WB ECL Bio‐Rad |
FIGURE 3Typical western blotting analysis illustrated for each measured protein. The muscle cells lysate was obtained from each animal of the four groups (Control, heat acclimated, trained, and heat + trained) in the presence of protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The proteins were resolved by SDS‐PAGE (7.5%–12%) and electroblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were probed with primary antibody (Table 1) and then peroxidase‐tagged with secondary antibody (anti‐mouse or anti‐rabbit, 1/10,000). Membranes were soaked in ECL solution and scanned using a ChemiDoc XRS+ (Bio‐Rad). A molecular‐weight ladder (Precision Plus All Blue Prestained Protein Standards from Bio‐Rad Laboratories, no. 1610373) and an internal control (mix of all control group animals) were also loaded onto each gel. The bands corresponding to the molecular weight of the proteins of interest were quantified using Quantity One (version Windows, Bio‐Rad) and normalized to the internal control (software ImageLab). Dash line brands the delimitation between the two pictures of the same gel performed at two different development times (1 and 60 s) to get a good definition of each lane and subsequent quantification for the five OXPHOS complexes. PDH; pyruvate dehydrogenase. P‐PDH: phosphorylated PDH (E1 subunit). GSK, glycogen synthase kinase; P‐GSK, phosphorylated GSK; CPT, carnitine palmitoyltransferase/UCP‐3, uncoupling protein 3; ANT‐1, adenine nucleotide translocase 1; HSP‐70, heat shock protein 70; MF, mitofusin, PRK, parkin; DRP, dynamin‐related protein; PINK, PTEN‐induced putative kinase
Body and tissue weight in male rats after 6‐week conditioning
| Weight (g) | C (8) | H (8) | T (7) | H+T (8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body | 277.88 ± 11.20 | 286.25 ± 12.27 | 269.14 ± 8.89 | 270.50 ± 11.79 | |
| Final body | 395.25 ± 6.86 | 386.75 ± 10.52 | 361.71 ± 6.90 | 364.25 ± 6.81 | Training effect ( |
| Soleus | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | |
| Adipose tissue | 8.19 ± 0.68 | 7.86 ± 0.85 | 4.22 ± 0.34 | 4.97 ± 0.52 | Training effect ( |
Data are expressed as the means ± SEM per group (n). Analyses of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the effect of two factors (training, heat acclimation) for each weight. A training effect was observed without interaction with heat acclimation.
Abbreviations: C, control; H, heat acclimated; T, endurance trained; H+T, heat acclimated and trained.
Resting blood parameters in male rats after 6‐week conditioning
| C | H | T | H+T | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (g/L) | 2.12 ± 0.07 (7) | 2.14 ± 0.16 (8) | 1.58 ± 0.07 (7) | 1.77 ± 0.14 (8) | Training effect ( |
| Glycerol (µmol/L) | 65.92 ± 4.48 (7) | 104.97 ± 20.35 (8) | 60.03 ± 5.49 (7) | 62.45 ± 10.48 (8) | |
| NEFA (mmol/L) | 0.14 ± 0.02 (7) | 0.21 ± 0.06 (7) | 0.12 ± 0.02 (6) | 0.09 ± 0.01 (6) | |
Data are expressed as the means ± SEM per group (n). ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of two factors (training, heat acclimation) for each concentration. A training effect was observed without interaction with heat acclimation.
Abbreviations: C, control; H, heat acclimated; T, endurance trained; H+T, heat acclimated and trained.
Maximal aerobic speed and resting indirect calorimetry measurements in male rats after 6‐week conditioning
| C (8) | H (8) | T (7) | H+T (8) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAS (m/min) | 25.26 ± 1.59 | 28.30 ± 1.08 | 49.10 ± 1.35 | 47.16 ± 2.23 | Training effect ( |
| RQ | 0.85 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.01 | 0.86 ± 0.01 | 0.85 ± 0.01 | |
| VO2 (ml/min/kg^0.75) | 13.88 ± 0.46 | 14.24 ± 0.26 | 14.81 ± 0.22 | 14.53 ± 0.33 | |
| VCO2 (ml/min/kg^0.75) | 11.84 ± 0.47 | 12.39 ± 0.28 | 12.75 ± 0.15 | 12.35 ± 0.31 |
Data are expressed as the means ± SEM per group (n). ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of two factors (training, heat acclimation) for each variable. A training effect was observed without interaction with heat acclimation.
Abbreviations: MAS, maximal aerobic speed; RQ, respiratory quotient; VO2, dioxygen consumption; VCO2, carbon dioxide production; C, control; H, heat acclimated; T, endurance trained; H+T, heat acclimated and trained.
Maximal activities of citrate synthase (CS), 3‐hydroxyl acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase (3‐HAD), hexokinase (HK) and lactico‐deshydrogenase (LDH) of soleus muscle after 6‐week conditioning of male rats
| C | H | T | H+T | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzyme activity UI/g fresh tissue | |||||
| CS | 22.20 ± 1.28 (7) | 26.82 ± 1.67 (8) | 37.64 ± 1.85 (6) | 37.61 ± 2.68 (8) | Training effect |
| HAD | 24.40 ± 0.58 (8) | 24.50 ± 1.23 (7) | 27.10 ± 1.38 (7) | 28.32 ± 1.38 (8) | Training effect |
| HK | 0.89 ± 0.19 (7) | 0.84 ± 0.14 (8) | 1.03 ± 0.07 (6) | 0.87 ± 0.17 (7) | |
| LDH | 135.50 ± 16.97 (8) | 144.16 ± 6.64 (8) | 111.44 ± 11.71 (7) | 129.30 ± 5.80 (8) | Training effect |
Data are expressed as the means ± SEM. UI per g of fresh tissue. Control (C), heat acclimated (H), trained (T) and heat acclimated and trained (H+T). Two‐factor ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of heat and training on protein content. There was no interaction between heat‐acclimation and training effects.
Expression of proteins involved in carbohydrates and fatty acids mitochondrial metabolism, proteins of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (I, II, III, IV, and V complexes), putative cytoprotective proteins and proteins involved in mitochondrial remodeling in soleus after 6‐week conditioning of male rats
| C | H | T | H+T | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipids and CHO oxidation steps | |||||
| PDH | 0.82 ± 0.15 (8) | 0.64 ± 0.14 (8) | 1.08 ± 0.24 (7) | 1.01 ± 0.16 (8) | Training effect ( |
| P‐PDH | 1.01 ± 0.15 (8) | 1.07 ± 0.15 (8) | 1.25 ± 0.19 (7) | 1.22 ± 0.18 (8) | |
| GSK | 1.12 ± 0.18 (8) | 1.20 ± 0.20 (8) | 1.20 ± 0.15 (7) | 0.89 ± 0.22 (8) | |
| P‐GSK | 0.25 ± 0.10 (6) | 0.22 ± 0.04 (7) | 0.36 ± 0.11 (7) | 0.22 ± 0.04 (8) | |
| CPT‐1 | 0.77 ± 0.16 (8) | 0.67 ± 0.19 (8) | 0.90 ± 0.07 (7) | 0.96 ± 0.26 (8) | |
| CPT‐2 | 0.89 ± 0.08 (8) | 0.75 ± 0.05 (7) | 0.47 ± 0.10 (7) | 0.74 ± 0.06 (7) | Heat acclimation effect ( |
| Mitochondrial respiratory chain | |||||
| CI | 0.91 ± 0.21 (8) | 1.10 ± 0.16 (7) | 1.27 ± 0.18 (6) | 1.20 ± 0.08 (8) | |
| CII | 0.84 ± 0.21 (8) | 0.99 ± 0.15(7) | 1.30 ± 0.20(6) | 1.13 ± 0.11 (8) | |
| CIII | 1.16 ± 0.09 (7) | 1.12 ± 0.12 (7) | 1.27 ± 0.06 (7) | 1.10 ± 0.05 (8) | |
| CIV | 0.28 ± 0.04 (8) | 0.11 ± 0.03 (8) | 0.16 ± 0.04 (7) | 0.85 ± 0.32 (8) | Heat and training effect ( |
| CV | 1.70 ± 0.53 (6) | 2.19 ± 0.44 (8) | 2.14 ± 0.41 (7) | 1.44 ± 0.25 (8) | |
| Putative cytoprotection | |||||
| UCP‐3 | 1.01 ± 0.13 (8) | 0.96 ± 0.16 (8) | 1.07 ± 0.12 (7) | 1.04 ± 0.18 (7) | |
| ANT‐1 | 0.50 ± 0.07 (8) | 0.65 ± 0.18 (8) | 0.66 ± 0.14 (7) | 0.56 ± 0.06 (8) | |
| HSP‐70 | 1.00 ± 0.10 (8) | 0.93 ± 0.03 (6) | 1.25 ± 0.15 (7) | 1.14 ± 0.17 (7) | |
| Mitochondrial remodeling | |||||
| MF | 0.63 ± 0.15 (7) | 0.38 ± 0.04 (6) | 0.77 ± 0.18 (7) | 0.86 ± 0.26 (8) | |
| PRK | 1.55 ± 0.20 (8) | 1.33 ± 0.25 (8) | 0.85 ± 0.10 (7) | 0.84 ± 0.22 (8) | Training effect ( |
| DRP | 0.73 ± 0.14 (8) | 0.60 ± 0.14 (8) | 0.43 ± 0.12 (7) | 0.34 ± 0.11 (8) | Training effect ( |
| PINK | 0.66 ± 0.12 (7) | 0.68 ± 0.16 (7) | 0.47 ± 0.10 (7) | 0.47 ± 0.12 (8) | |
Data are expressed as the means ± SEM in fold standard. Control (C) heat acclimated (H) trained (T), and heat acclimated and trained (H+T). Two‐factor ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of heat and training on protein content. There was no interaction between heat‐acclimation and training effects.
Abbreviations: PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; P‐PDH, phosphorylated PDH (E1 subunit); GSK, glycogen synthase kinase; P‐GSK, phosphorylated GSK; CPT, carnitine palmitoyltransferase; UCP‐3, uncoupling protein 3; ANT‐1, adenine nucleotide translocase 1; HSP‐70, heat shock protein 70; MF, mitofusin; PRK, parkin; DRP, dynamin‐related protein; PINK, PTEN‐induced putative kinase.
FIGURE 4The effect of heat acclimation and endurance training on in situ mitochondrial respiration in permeabilized soleus muscle fibers of male rats. Respiration rates were measured in the absence () or presence of ADP (), for palmitoyl‐coenzyme A + carnitine and pyruvate substrates. Non‐phosphorylating () and phosphorylating () rates and the respiratory control ratio (RCR), corresponding to the ratio in the control group (open circles), heat‐acclimated group (closed circles), trained group (open triangles), and heat‐acclimated and trained group (closed triangles) for pyruvate (A,B,C) and PCoA (D,E,F) are presented. Each point shows the value of one animal. The lines represent the means for all animals ± SEM. An analysis by two‐factor ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of heat and training on the respiration parameters of both substrates. Post‐hoc analysis was performed using the Newman‐Keuls test. **p < .01, ***p < .001: difference from the heat exposure‐matched group. $ p < .05, $$ p < .01: difference from the training‐matched group. # difference from the control group
FIGURE 5The effect of heat acclimation and endurance training on glycogen content in soleus muscle of male rats. C: control group (open circles), H: heat‐acclimated group (closed circles), T: trained group (open triangles), H+T: heat‐acclimated and trained group (closed triangles). Data are expressed in µmol of glycosyl units g−1 wet weight. Each point shows the value of one animal. The lines represent the means for all animals ± SEM. An analysis by two‐factor ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of heat and training on the respiration parameters of both substrates