Literature DB >> 34405474

Assessing acute myeloid leukemia susceptibility in rearrangement-driven patients by DNA breakage at topoisomerase II and CCCTC-binding factor/cohesin binding sites.

Naomi D Atkin1, Heather M Raimer1, Zhenjia Wang2, Chongzhi Zang1,2,3, Yuh-Hwa Wang1.   

Abstract

An initiating DNA double strand break (DSB) event precedes the formation of cancer-driven chromosomal abnormalities, such as gene rearrangements. Therefore, measuring DNA breaks at rearrangement-participating regions can provide a unique tool to identify and characterize susceptible individuals. Here, we developed a highly sensitive and low-input DNA break mapping method, the first of its kind for patient samples. We then measured genome-wide DNA breakage in normal cells of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with KMT2A (previously MLL) rearrangements, compared to that of nonfusion AML individuals, as a means to evaluate individual susceptibility to gene rearrangements. DNA breakage at the KMT2A gene region was significantly greater in fusion-driven remission individuals, as compared to nonfusion individuals. Moreover, we identified select topoisomerase II (TOP2)-sensitive and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)/cohesin-binding sites with preferential DNA breakage in fusion-driven patients. Importantly, measuring DSBs at these sites, in addition to the KMT2A gene region, provided greater predictive power when assessing individual break susceptibility. We also demonstrated that low-dose etoposide exposure further elevated DNA breakage at these regions in fusion-driven AML patients, but not in nonfusion patients, indicating that these sites are preferentially sensitive to TOP2 activity in fusion-driven AML patients. These results support that mapping of DSBs in patients enables discovery of novel break-prone regions and monitoring of individuals susceptible to chromosomal abnormalities, and thus cancer. This will build the foundation for early detection of cancer-susceptible individuals, as well as those preferentially susceptible to therapy-related malignancies caused by treatment with TOP2 poisons.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTCF; DNA fragility; acute myeloid leukemia; cohesin; topoisomerase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34405474      PMCID: PMC8511143          DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  70 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program.

Authors:  Matthew J Hayat; Nadia Howlader; Marsha E Reichman; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-01

2.  Genome Organization Drives Chromosome Fragility.

Authors:  Andres Canela; Yaakov Maman; Seolkyoung Jung; Nancy Wong; Elsa Callen; Amanda Day; Kyong-Rim Kieffer-Kwon; Aleksandra Pekowska; Hongliang Zhang; Suhas S P Rao; Su-Chen Huang; Peter J Mckinnon; Peter D Aplan; Yves Pommier; Erez Lieberman Aiden; Rafael Casellas; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Assessment of DNA damage in blood lymphocytes of bakery workers by comet assay.

Authors:  Mojtaba Kianmehr; Jafar Hajavi; Javad Gazeri
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 4.  Markers of DNA repair and susceptibility to cancer in humans: an epidemiologic review.

Authors:  M Berwick; P Vineis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Distribution of 11q23 breakpoints within the MLL breakpoint cluster region in de novo acute leukemia and in treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia: correlation with scaffold attachment regions and topoisomerase II consensus binding sites.

Authors:  P L Broeker; H G Super; M J Thirman; H Pomykala; Y Yonebayashi; S Tanabe; N Zeleznik-Le; J D Rowley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Topoisomerase II beta interacts with cohesin and CTCF at topological domain borders.

Authors:  Liis Uusküla-Reimand; Huayun Hou; Payman Samavarchi-Tehrani; Matteo Vietri Rudan; Minggao Liang; Alejandra Medina-Rivera; Hisham Mohammed; Dominic Schmidt; Petra Schwalie; Edwin J Young; Jüri Reimand; Suzana Hadjur; Anne-Claude Gingras; Michael D Wilson
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Strategies for the evaluation of DNA damage and repair mechanisms in cancer.

Authors:  Gabriela Figueroa-González; Carlos Pérez-Plasencia
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing with improved accuracy and cost.

Authors:  Masako Suzuki; Will Liao; Frank Wos; Andrew D Johnston; Justin DeGrazia; Jennifer Ishii; Toby Bloom; Michael C Zody; Soren Germer; John M Greally
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  The insulator binding protein CTCF positions 20 nucleosomes around its binding sites across the human genome.

Authors:  Yutao Fu; Manisha Sinha; Craig L Peterson; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Topoisomerase II contributes to DNA secondary structure-mediated double-stranded breaks.

Authors:  Karol Szlachta; Arkadi Manukyan; Heather M Raimer; Sandeep Singh; Anita Salamon; Wenying Guo; Kirill S Lobachev; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 19.160

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  3D chromatin architecture and transcription regulation in cancer.

Authors:  Siwei Deng; Yuliang Feng; Siim Pauklin
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 23.168

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.