Literature DB >> 34405256

The effect of 6-day subcutaneous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide infusion on time in glycaemic range in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Sebastian M N Heimbürger1,2,3, Bjørn Hoe1,4, Chris N Nielsen1, Natasha C Bergmann1, Bolette Hartmann3,5, Jens J Holst3,5, Tina Vilsbøll1,2,4, Thomas F Dejgaard1,2, Mikkel B Christensen1,4,6,7, Filip K Knop8,9,10,11.   

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 diabetes is characterised by reduced glucagon response to hypoglycaemia, increasing the risk of insulin treatment-associated hypoglycaemia known to hamper glycaemic control. We previously reported a glucagonotropic effect of exogenous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Here we investigate the effect of a 6-day s.c. GIP infusion on time in glycaemic range as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
METHODS: In a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study, time in glycaemic range (assessed by double-blinded CGM) was evaluated in 20 men with type 1 diabetes (18-75 years, stable insulin treatment ≥3 months, diabetes duration 2-15 years, fasting plasma C-peptide below 200 pmol/l, BMI 20-27 kg/m2, HbA1c <69 mmol/mol [8.5%]) during two × 6 days of continuous s.c. GIP (6 pmol kg-1 min-1) and placebo (saline [154 mmol/l NaCl]) infusion, respectively, with an interposed 7-day washout period. The primary outcome was glycaemic time below range, time in range and time above range.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in time below range (<3.9 mmol/l, p = 0.53) or above range (>10 mmol/l, p = 0.32) during night-time or daytime, in mean glucose, or in hypoglycaemic events as assessed by CGM. GIP altered neither self-reported hypoglycaemia nor safety measures. Compared with placebo, GIP significantly increased time in tight range (3.9-7.8 mmol/l) during daytime (06:00-23:59 hours) by [mean ± SEM] 11.2 ± 5.1% [95% CI 0.41, 21.9] (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS/
INTERPRETATION: Six-day s.c. GIP infusion in men with type 1 diabetes did not procure convincing effect on overall time in range, but increased time in tight glycaemic range during daytime by ~2 h per day. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03734718. FUNDING: The study was funded by grants from The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust and Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adipose tissue; Continuous glucose monitoring; GIP; Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; Glycaemic control; Glycaemic time in range; Hypoglycaemia; Hypoglycaemic events; Insulin resistance; Insulin sensitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34405256     DOI: 10.1007/s00125-021-05547-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  13 in total

1.  Normal reference range for mean tissue glucose and glycemic variability derived from continuous glucose monitoring for subjects without diabetes in different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Nathan R Hill; Nick S Oliver; Pratik Choudhary; Jonathan C Levy; Peter Hindmarsh; David R Matthews
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Degradation of endogenous and exogenous gastric inhibitory polypeptide in healthy and in type 2 diabetic subjects as revealed using a new assay for the intact peptide.

Authors:  C F Deacon; M A Nauck; J Meier; K Hücking; J J Holst
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Incretin hormone and insulin responses to oral versus intravenous lipid administration in humans.

Authors:  Ola Lindgren; Richard D Carr; Carolyn F Deacon; Jens J Holst; Giovanni Pacini; Andrea Mari; Bo Ahrén
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide augments glucagon responses to hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Mikkel Christensen; Salvatore Calanna; Alexander H Sparre-Ulrich; Peter L Kristensen; Mette M Rosenkilde; Jens Faber; Francesco Purrello; Gerrit van Hall; Jens J Holst; Tina Vilsbøll; Filip K Knop
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Proglucagon products in plasma of noninsulin-dependent diabetics and nondiabetic controls in the fasting state and after oral glucose and intravenous arginine.

Authors:  C Orskov; J Jeppesen; S Madsbad; J J Holst
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  How hypoglycaemia can affect the life of a person with diabetes.

Authors:  Brian M Frier
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.876

8.  Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide: a bifunctional glucose-dependent regulator of glucagon and insulin secretion in humans.

Authors:  Mikkel Christensen; Louise Vedtofte; Jens J Holst; Tina Vilsbøll; Filip K Knop
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 9.  Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range.

Authors:  Tadej Battelino; Thomas Danne; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie A Amiel; Roy Beck; Torben Biester; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce A Buckingham; William T Cefalu; Kelly L Close; Claudio Cobelli; Eyal Dassau; J Hans DeVries; Kim C Donaghue; Klemen Dovc; Francis J Doyle; Satish Garg; George Grunberger; Simon Heller; Lutz Heinemann; Irl B Hirsch; Roman Hovorka; Weiping Jia; Olga Kordonouri; Boris Kovatchev; Aaron Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Brian Levine; Alexander Mayorov; Chantal Mathieu; Helen R Murphy; Revital Nimri; Kirsten Nørgaard; Christopher G Parkin; Eric Renard; David Rodbard; Banshi Saboo; Desmond Schatz; Keaton Stoner; Tatsuiko Urakami; Stuart A Weinzimer; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Thomas Danne; Revital Nimri; Tadej Battelino; Richard M Bergenstal; Kelly L Close; J Hans DeVries; Satish Garg; Lutz Heinemann; Irl Hirsch; Stephanie A Amiel; Roy Beck; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce Buckingham; Claudio Cobelli; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle; Simon Heller; Roman Hovorka; Weiping Jia; Tim Jones; Olga Kordonouri; Boris Kovatchev; Aaron Kowalski; Lori Laffel; David Maahs; Helen R Murphy; Kirsten Nørgaard; Christopher G Parkin; Eric Renard; Banshi Saboo; Mauro Scharf; William V Tamborlane; Stuart A Weinzimer; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.