Literature DB >> 34403794

Percutaneous Cement Discoplasty for Degenerative Low Back Pain with Vacuum Phenomenon: A Multicentric Study with a Minimum of 2 Years of Follow-Up.

Gaston Camino-Willhuber1, Gilles Norotte2, Nicolas Bronsard3, Gonzalo Kido4, Matias Pereira-Duarte4, Martin Estefan4, Mariana Bendersky5, Sergio Terrasa6, Julio Bassani4, Matias Petracchi4, Marcelo Gruenberg4, Carlos Sola4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To report clinical results after percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) in a multicentric case series with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.
METHODS: Between December 2014 and January 2019, 180 patients with low back pain and advanced degeneration were treated with percutaneous discoplasty in 2 centers. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients 65 years or older, with mechanical low back pain with or without spinal stenosis, who did not respond to conservative management. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1: patients without previous spine surgeries who underwent PCD, group 2: patients with previous spine surgeries who underwent PCD, and group 3: patients with/without previous surgery who underwent PCD plus decompression surgery. Clinical and radiological analyses were performed as well as complication and readmission rates.
RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (74% female; mean age, 75.8 ± 5.7 years; mean body mass index, 29.9 ± 5.2) were included in our study. Overall preoperative visual analog score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were 7.8 ± 0.9 and 68.1 ± 9.6, respectively. At 2 years of follow-up, mean VAS improvement was 3.56 (95% confidence interval: 3.92-3.20; P < 0.0001) and mean ODI improvement was 17.18 (95% confidence interval: 19.52-14.85; P < 0.0001), showing a significant and sustained improvement in both scores. In addition, 84% of patients reached both VAS and ODI minimum important clinical difference at the final follow-up. Finally, 5.7% of patients suffered major complications 30 days postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: PCD showed significant improvement of VAS and ODI scores at 2 years of follow-up with relatively low rate of complications.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; Minimally invasive surgery; Percutaneous cement discoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34403794     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

Review 1.  Critical Review of the State-of-the-Art on Lumbar Percutaneous Cement Discoplasty.

Authors:  Chloé Techens; Peter Endre Eltes; Aron Lazary; Luca Cristofolini
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-10

Review 2.  Precision medicine strategies for spinal degenerative diseases: Injectable biomaterials with in situ repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhao; Hongyun Ma; Hao Han; Liuyang Zhang; Jing Tian; Bo Lei; Yingang Zhang
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous cement discoplasty by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hongwei Jia; Bin Xu; Xiangbei Qi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Long-term outcome of targeted therapy for low back pain in elderly degenerative lumbar scoliosis" by Yamada K, et al. (Eur Spine J. 2021;30(7):2020-2032).

Authors:  Gaston Camino-Willhuber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  An ex-vivo model for the biomechanical assessment of cement discoplasty.

Authors:  Salim Ghandour; Konstantinos Pazarlis; Susanne Lewin; Per Isaksson; Peter Försth; Cecilia Persson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.