| Literature DB >> 34401655 |
Sagar B Dugani1,2, Yousif M Hydoub3, Ana Patricia Ayala4, Roger Reka4, Tarek Nayfeh5, Jingyi Francess Ding5, Shannon N McCafferty6, Muayad Alzuabi5, Medhat Farwati5, M Hassan Murad5, Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali7, Samia Mora2,8,9.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the magnitude of the association between risk factors and premature myocardial infarction (MI) (men aged 18-55 years; women aged 18-65 years). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and other databases from inception through April 30, 2020, as well as bibliography of articles selected for data extraction. We selected observational studies reporting the magnitude of the association of at least 1 risk factor (demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, clinical risk factors, or biomarkers) with premature MI and a control group. Pooled risk estimates (random effects) from all studies unadjusted and adjusted for risk factors were reported as summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.Entities:
Keywords: BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IHD, ischemic heart disease; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MI, myocardial infarction; OR, odds ratio; RoB, risk of bias
Year: 2021 PMID: 34401655 PMCID: PMC8358212 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.03.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ISSN: 2542-4548
Figure 1Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis flowchart of articles included for data extraction. The search strategy is provided in Supplemental Table 2 (available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). From 35,320 unique articles, we screened titles and abstracts and excluded 33,873 articles that did not include all 3 concepts (risk factor, premature, and myocardial infarction) (primary screening). The full-text of eligible articles (n=1447) was reviewed using criteria for primary screening to identify articles for data extraction (n=77). All stages were conducted independently by 2 investigators.
Figure 2Risk of bias of case-control studies selected for data extraction on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Criteria to determine low (orange), medium (brown), and high (blue) risk of bias using selection, comparability, and exposure/outcome factors are described in Supplemental Method 1 (available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was adapted for cohort studies (n=3). All studies had a low risk of bias on all criteria (described in Supplemental Method 1) except 1 study, which had a high risk of comparability bias. MI, myocardial infarction.
Figure 3Pooled risk estimates for risk factors associated with the risk of premature MI. Pooled risk estimates include data with or without adjustment of cardiovascular risk factors. Given variability in the operational definition of risk factors across studies, risk factors were approximated to conventional definitions for inclusion in the meta-analysis (Supplemental Table 4, available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). Details on study characteristics, risk factors, risk estimates by sex, and risk estimates by risk of bias are given in Supplemental Tables 4 to 15 and Supplemental Figures 1 to 14 (available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). For family history of cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and LDL cholesterol level, pooled risk estimates are based on the presence vs absence of the risk factor. Diabetes mellitus includes type 1 and/or type 2 diabetes. BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MI, myocardial infarction. SI conversion factor: To convert mg/dL values to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259.