Literature DB >> 34401655

Risk Factors for Premature Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 77 Studies.

Sagar B Dugani1,2, Yousif M Hydoub3, Ana Patricia Ayala4, Roger Reka4, Tarek Nayfeh5, Jingyi Francess Ding5, Shannon N McCafferty6, Muayad Alzuabi5, Medhat Farwati5, M Hassan Murad5, Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali7, Samia Mora2,8,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the magnitude of the association between risk factors and premature myocardial infarction (MI) (men aged 18-55 years; women aged 18-65 years). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and other databases from inception through April 30, 2020, as well as bibliography of articles selected for data extraction. We selected observational studies reporting the magnitude of the association of at least 1 risk factor (demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, clinical risk factors, or biomarkers) with premature MI and a control group. Pooled risk estimates (random effects) from all studies unadjusted and adjusted for risk factors were reported as summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.
RESULTS: From 35,320 articles of 12.7 million participants, we extracted data on 19 risk factors from 77 studies across 58 countries. Men had a higher risk of premature MI (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.71 to 3.35) than did women. Family history of cardiac disease was associated with a higher risk of premature MI (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.29 to 3.27). Major modifiable risk factors associated with higher risk were current smoking (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 3.68 to 5.12 vs no/former), diabetes mellitus (OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.69 to 4.65), dyslipidemia (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.76 to 4.91), and hypertension (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.48 to 3.27). Higher body mass index carried higher risk (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.71 for ≥25 kg/m2 vs <25 kg/m2). Biomarkers associated with 2- to 3-fold higher risk were total cholesterol levels greater than 200 mg/dL, triglyceride levels higher than 150 mg/dL, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels less than 60 mg/dL (to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259).
CONCLUSION: Major risk factors for premature MI are mostly amenable to patient, population, and policy level interventions. Mild elevations in body mass index and triglyceride levels were associated with higher risk, which has implications for the growing worldwide epidemic of cardiometabolic diseases.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IHD, ischemic heart disease; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MI, myocardial infarction; OR, odds ratio; RoB, risk of bias

Year:  2021        PMID: 34401655      PMCID: PMC8358212          DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 2542-4548


Noncommunicable diseases, which include ischemic heart disease (IHD), are a major cause of premature mortality and claim 15 million lives annually. This has prompted organizations worldwide to adopt resolutions to tackle premature mortality, defined as mortality in adults aged 30 to 70 years.1, 2, 3 Premature IHD mortality is driven by premature myocardial infarction (MI). Despite this, there is no comprehensive synthesis of risk factors associated with premature MI, a limitation that impairs strategies to curb the burden of IHD and premature mortality. Premature MI generally refers to MI in men aged 18 to 55 years or women aged 18 to 65 years.4, 5, 6 In an early study of premature MI, American adults younger than 40 years with coronary thrombosis were observed to have a higher prevalence of tobacco use, sedentary habits, and possibly higher dietary intake of cholesterol-containing foods such as milk and eggs when compared with healthy adults. Since then, studies in different world regions have described risk factors associated with premature MI and generally observed a higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and smoking compared with adults without MI.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 INTERHEART was the largest global study to describe risk factors associated with premature MI. Although not exclusively focused on premature MI, age-stratified analysis in INTERHEART using age cutoff points defined above revealed that the population attributable risk of premature MI was more than 90% for a combination of 9 factors: smoking, low consumption of fruit and vegetables, inadequate exercise, low consumption of alcohol, psychosocial stress, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, abdominal obesity, and elevated ratio of blood levels of apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1. Despite the vast literature on premature MI, studies vary by selection criteria of participants, age cutoff point for premature MI, and operational definition of risk factors. Therefore, synthesis of the literature has typically focused on the association of individual risk factors with MI without stratification by age.21, 22, 23 To our knowledge, there is no synthesis of diverse risk factors associated with premature MI. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, clinical risk factors, and biomarkers associated with premature MI. Our findings highlight the contribution of risk factors to premature MI and could guide the development of interventions to reduce the burden of risk factors associated with premature MI and premature mortality.

Patients and Methods

The study protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42018076862) has been described. This study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines (Supplemental Table 1, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org).,

Eligibility Criteria

We selected studies that reported the magnitude of the association of at least 1 risk factor (demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, clinical risk factors, or biomarkers) with premature MI and age-matched non-MI referent groups. We included case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies and excluded conference abstracts, review articles, research theses, editorials, commentaries, opinions, viewpoints, and case reports. We excluded studies with fewer than 100 individuals with premature MI as well as studies without a non-MI referent group.

Risk Factors

We evaluated 19 potential risk factors from information provided on demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, clinical risk factors, and biomarkers. We obtained information on demographic characteristics (sex, race or ethnicity, and family history of any cardiac disease), lifestyle factors (tobacco and alcohol), and clinical risk factors (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, body mass index [BMI, calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared], and dyslipidemia). We obtained information on concentration/levels of biomarkers such as cholesterol (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol), triglycerides, apolipoprotein A and B, C-reactive protein, and related measures (eg, HDL cholesterol/total cholesterol ratio).

Outcome

Premature MI was defined as first or recurrent MI in men aged 18 to 55 years or women aged 18 to 65 years.

Search Methods

The search strategy combined electronic and manual searches (Supplemental Table 2, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org). The search strategy was developed by an academic librarian (A.P.A.) with input from 3 investigators (S.B.D., A.A.A., and S.M.). We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), AMED (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), EBSCO CINAHL Plus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through September 20, 2017 and updated our search in June 22, 2018 and April 30, 2020 to identify subsequent citations. Searches were limited to the English language. We conducted a manual search of the bibliography of articles selected for data extraction.

Study Selection

Articles identified from electronic literature databases were merged into a single database and imported into Covidence, an online software platform that streamlines the study using the Cochrane Review process. For primary screening, articles were screened by title and abstract independently by 2 investigators. For secondary screening, full-text articles were independently reviewed by 2 investigators. If full-text articles were unavailable online or through the library (Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota), we made 2 attempts to contact the authors by e-mail before excluding the study. The bibliography of selected studies was screened (by title and abstract, and full text if necessary) for inclusion by 1 investigator (S.B.D. or Y.M.H.).

Data Extraction and Management

Two investigators independently extracted data including study characteristics, risk factors, and measures of the association with premature MI using a piloted standardized data extraction form in Microsoft Excel. At the conclusion of data extraction, all articles and extracted data were reviewed by 1 investigator. If 2 or more articles reported results using the same data set or cohort, the study with the largest sample size for a given risk factor was selected. To quantify the association between a risk factor and premature MI, we extracted study level estimates (eg, odds ratio [OR] and 95% CI). We did not include studies that reported only concentrations/levels of biomarkers as we could not derive risk estimates. All studies reported 95% CIs except for 1 study, which reported 99% CI. If risk estimates were not reported, we extracted a 2×2 table from the study (frequency of risk factors with or without premature MI) and calculated the OR and 95% CI.

Risk of Bias Assessment

Two investigators independently assessed the risk of bias (RoB) using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control and cohort studies and adapted it for cross-sectional studies (Supplemental Method 1, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org). As information on risk factors may be obtained from different sources (eg, self-reported and medical records) and are associated with different risks of bias, we reported the RoB for each risk factor from individual studies (Supplemental Tables 3 and 4, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org). The RoB for risk factors was evaluated on the basis of the reported result (eg, frequency or risk estimate), method of ascertainment (eg, self-reported or verified from medical records), and whether the risk estimate was adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors (Supplemental Table 3). Accordingly, risk factors were categorized as having high, moderate, or low RoB. Therefore, the RoB assessment accounts for risk estimates that were unadjusted or adjusted for risk factors (Supplemental Table 3).

Resolution of Conflicts

Conflicts between investigators were resolved by discussion, and if necessary, through consultation with a third investigator.

Data Synthesis

Given variability in operational definitions across studies, risk factors were approximated to conventional definitions for inclusion in meta-analysis (Supplemental Table 4). We conducted a random effects meta-analysis to pool results across studies as we expected variation in study setting, adjusted covariates, and populations. The association between risk factors and premature MI is reported as summary OR (95% CI). Where applicable, we provided separate estimates for risk factors on the basis of RoB (low, moderate, and high). Pooled risk estimates include data with or without adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. We reported the I index test for heterogeneity. Analyses were conducted with STATA V.15 (StataCorp LLC). Statistical significance was defined as 2-tailed P<.05.

Patient and Public Involvement

There was no patient or public involvement in the study design, execution, or analysis.

Ethics Approval

This study analyzed data from published studies without individual level participant identifiers and was exempt from review by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (Rochester, MN).

Results

Of 35,320 unique articles, 1447 articles met criteria for full-text screening, of which 77 were selected for data extraction (Figure 1). The selected studies reported 19 risk factors in 12.7 million participants from 58 countries in all world regions; 96% of studies (n=74 of 77) were single country, with 24% (n=18 of 74) in the United States. Most studies (n=44 of 77) provided non–sex-stratified results, whereas others were limited only to men (n=16 of 77) or women (n=16 of 77).
Figure 1

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis flowchart of articles included for data extraction. The search strategy is provided in Supplemental Table 2 (available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). From 35,320 unique articles, we screened titles and abstracts and excluded 33,873 articles that did not include all 3 concepts (risk factor, premature, and myocardial infarction) (primary screening). The full-text of eligible articles (n=1447) was reviewed using criteria for primary screening to identify articles for data extraction (n=77). All stages were conducted independently by 2 investigators.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis flowchart of articles included for data extraction. The search strategy is provided in Supplemental Table 2 (available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). From 35,320 unique articles, we screened titles and abstracts and excluded 33,873 articles that did not include all 3 concepts (risk factor, premature, and myocardial infarction) (primary screening). The full-text of eligible articles (n=1447) was reviewed using criteria for primary screening to identify articles for data extraction (n=77). All stages were conducted independently by 2 investigators. Studies varied in participant selection criteria, operational definition of risk factors, and covariates adjusted in risk models (Supplemental Tables 4-6, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org). Of these, 29 studies reported risk estimates with adjustment for 1 or more cardiovascular risk factor (Supplemental Table 6). Most studies had a low risk of selection bias, a low risk of comparability bias, but a high risk of exposure bias (Figure 2). High and moderate RoBs for risk factors mostly resulted from studies that provided frequencies of self-reported risk factors rather than adjusted risk estimates of verified risk factors (Supplemental Table 4, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org).
Figure 2

Risk of bias of case-control studies selected for data extraction on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Criteria to determine low (orange), medium (brown), and high (blue) risk of bias using selection, comparability, and exposure/outcome factors are described in Supplemental Method 1 (available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was adapted for cohort studies (n=3). All studies had a low risk of bias on all criteria (described in Supplemental Method 1) except 1 study, which had a high risk of comparability bias. MI, myocardial infarction.

Risk of bias of case-control studies selected for data extraction on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Criteria to determine low (orange), medium (brown), and high (blue) risk of bias using selection, comparability, and exposure/outcome factors are described in Supplemental Method 1 (available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was adapted for cohort studies (n=3). All studies had a low risk of bias on all criteria (described in Supplemental Method 1) except 1 study, which had a high risk of comparability bias. MI, myocardial infarction.

Demographic Characteristics

Men had a higher risk of premature MI (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.71 to 3.35) than did women (Figure 3). Overall, white vs nonwhite individuals had a lower risk of premature MI (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.99). A similar trend was noted in the smaller number of studies reporting results for nonwhite vs white women (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.06) (Figure 3; Supplemental Tables 7 and 8 and Supplemental Figures 1 and 2, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org).
Figure 3

Pooled risk estimates for risk factors associated with the risk of premature MI. Pooled risk estimates include data with or without adjustment of cardiovascular risk factors. Given variability in the operational definition of risk factors across studies, risk factors were approximated to conventional definitions for inclusion in the meta-analysis (Supplemental Table 4, available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). Details on study characteristics, risk factors, risk estimates by sex, and risk estimates by risk of bias are given in Supplemental Tables 4 to 15 and Supplemental Figures 1 to 14 (available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). For family history of cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and LDL cholesterol level, pooled risk estimates are based on the presence vs absence of the risk factor. Diabetes mellitus includes type 1 and/or type 2 diabetes. BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MI, myocardial infarction. SI conversion factor: To convert mg/dL values to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259.

Pooled risk estimates for risk factors associated with the risk of premature MI. Pooled risk estimates include data with or without adjustment of cardiovascular risk factors. Given variability in the operational definition of risk factors across studies, risk factors were approximated to conventional definitions for inclusion in the meta-analysis (Supplemental Table 4, available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). Details on study characteristics, risk factors, risk estimates by sex, and risk estimates by risk of bias are given in Supplemental Tables 4 to 15 and Supplemental Figures 1 to 14 (available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). For family history of cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and LDL cholesterol level, pooled risk estimates are based on the presence vs absence of the risk factor. Diabetes mellitus includes type 1 and/or type 2 diabetes. BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MI, myocardial infarction. SI conversion factor: To convert mg/dL values to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259. Individuals reporting a positive family history of any cardiac disease had a nearly 3-fold higher risk of premature MI (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.29 to 3.27) compared with individuals reporting no cardiac family history (Figure 3; Supplemental Figure 3, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org).

Lifestyle Risk Factors

Individuals who were current smokers vs no/former smokers had a more than 4-fold higher risk of premature MI (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 3.68 to 5.12) (Figure 3; Supplemental Table 9 and Supplemental Figures 4 and 5, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org). The risk of premature MI in individuals with current alcohol use vs no/former alcohol use varied by RoB: there was a higher risk in high RoB studies and no association in moderate RoB studies. In men, current alcohol use vs no/former alcohol use as well as no alcohol vs 0.1 to 30.0 g of alcohol per day were associated with a higher risk of premature MI (Figure 3; Supplemental Tables 9 and 10 and Supplemental Figure 6, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org).

Clinical Risk Factors

Individuals with diabetes mellitus had a 4- to 5-fold higher risk of premature MI in men (OR, 5.04; 95% CI, 2.56 to 9.91) and women (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 2.74 to 5.83) than did individuals without diabetes mellitus. Individuals with hypertension and dyslipidemia had a nearly 3-fold higher risk of premature MI than did individuals without these risk factors (Figure 3; Supplemental Table 11 and Supplemental Figures 7, 8, and 9, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org). The association of BMI 30 kg/m2 or higher vs less than 30 kg/m2 with premature MI was reported in 16 studies (non–sex-stratified, n=9; men, n=4; women, n=3) and varied by RoB and sex. One high RoB study found no association with premature MI (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.23), whereas 15 moderate or low RoB studies found higher risk. This positive association was preserved in sex-stratified analysis of men (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.47 to 2.56), with a nonsignificant association in women (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.73). Notably, the association of BMI 25 kg/m2 or higher vs less than 25 kg/m2 with premature MI was similar to that of BMI 30 kg/m2 or higher vs less than 30 kg/m2 with premature MI (Figure 3; Supplemental Table 11 and Supplemental Figures 9-11, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org). Two studies evaluated the association of waist-to-hip ratio with the risk of premature MI. In men, waist-to-hip ratio greater than 0.90, compared with 0.90 or less, was associated with a 10-fold higher risk of premature MI (adjusted OR, 9.57; 95% CI, 5.52 to 16.6); in another study, waist-to-hip ratio (top 2 tertiles vs lowest tertile) in non–sex-stratified analysis was associated with a higher risk of premature MI (OR, 1.79; 99% CI, 1.52 to 2.09), albeit to a lesser magnitude.

Biomarkers

Thirteen studies reported the association of measured lipids with premature MI (Figure 3; Supplemental Tables 12-15 and Supplemental Figures 12-14, available online at http://www.mcpiqojournal.org). Individuals with total cholesterol levels greater than 200 mg/dL (to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259) had a higher risk of premature MI (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 2.28 to 4.59) than did individuals with total cholesterol levels 200 mg/dL or lower. Similarly, individuals with elevated LDL cholesterol levels (cutoff point not defined) had a higher risk of premature MI (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.62 to 3.06) as did individuals with triglyceride levels greater than 150 mg/dL vs 150 mg/dL or less (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.37 to 3.54) and individuals with HDL cholesterol levels less than 60 mg/dL vs 60 mg/dL or higher (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.14 to 4.11). Biomarker measurements reported per 0.1 increment in HDL/cholesterol ratio and per SD increment in LDL cholesterol level, HDL cholesterol level, and non-HDL cholesterol level had associations similar to those based on biomarker cutoff points., Based on 1 study (INTERHEART) for each biomarker, apolipoprotein A1 (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.74) and apolipoprotein B (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.50 to 1.69) levels indicated the magnitude of risk similar to their associated cholesterol, HDL, and LDL levels. When combined, the apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio indicated a higher risk of premature MI (OR, 4.35; 99% CI, 3.49 to 5.42). Based on 1 study for each biomarker, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels (top quartile vs lowest quartile, for all) were associated with a higher risk of premature MI whereas HDL cholesterol level was associated with a lower risk.

Discussion

In this meta-analysis of 77 studies of 12.7 million participants, modifiable risk factors associated with a higher risk of premature MI included diabetes mellitus and smoking (3- to 4-fold higher risk), dyslipidemia (2- to 3-fold higher risk), and obesity (1.5-fold higher risk). Individuals with higher levels of total cholesterol and lower levels of HDL cholesterol had a 2- to 3-fold higher risk of premature MI. Notably, mild elevations in BMI (≥25 kg/m2 vs <25 kg/m2) and triglyceride levels (>150 mg/dL vs lower) were associated with a higher risk of premature MI. Major nonmodifiable risk factors associated with a 2- to 3-fold higher risk of premature MI were male sex and a positive family history of cardiac disease. White vs nonwhite individuals had a lower risk of premature MI. The higher risk of premature MI associated with elevation in BMI and cholesterol levels is concerning because their global prevalence is increasing, with substantial implications for the burden of premature MI., Our study evaluated the association of 19 risk factors with premature MI, identified articles from various electronic databases from database inception to April 2020, and had 2 investigators independently screen articles, extract data, and assess RoB. This allowed us to apply a uniform rigorous methodology and summarize risk estimates for several risk factors. Our study differs from studies that evaluated single risk factors, applied time restrictions to the search, had independent evaluations at select stages in the review process, or were narrative descriptions. One study compared the prognosis of smokers vs nonsmokers in adults 45 years and younger with MI. This study included articles from 2001 to 2017 and included only adults with MI; based on 4 studies, there were no differences between smokers and nonsmokers with in-hospital cardiac events and major adverse cardiovascular events. Recent narrative reviews have highlighted the cardiovascular risk factor burden in young adults.38, 39, 40 These reviews focused on primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention and management in women, on risk factors for diverse cardiovascular conditions (eg, IHD and atrial fibrillation), and on differences between young and older adults with IHD.38, 39, 40 Consequently, the search strategy and study selection criteria differed from our study. Recently, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study based in the United States reported that from 1995 to 2014, the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus has increased in adults aged 35 to 54 years hospitalized with MI. Taken together, these studies support our results on risk factors associated with a higher risk of premature MI. Risk factors identified in our meta-analysis are a useful starting point for discussions between providers and patients but will require formal evaluation and integration into risk prediction scores. Current cardiovascular risk scores such as pooled cohort equations (adults aged 40-79 years), Reynolds risk score (adults aged 45-80 years), Framingham risk score (adults aged 30-74 years), QResearch risk score (adults aged 25-84 years), Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (adults aged 45-80 years), and Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults risk score (adults aged 18-30 years) use different risk factors and cardiovascular end points, yield different estimates of cardiovascular risk, and are not validated in adults below the age cutoff points of their cohorts.42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 This is relevant as coronary atherosclerosis begins to develop in late adolescence or early adulthood, below the age cutoff point of cohorts used for current risk scores., In addition, current risk scores emphasize conventional MI events (ie, MI in men older than 55 years and in women older than 65 years), but predominant risk factors in premature and conventional MI may be different. Recently, there were a few reports that compared risk factors associated with premature and conventional MI. Studies such as Framingham Heart Study and INTERHEART found the age-related association of biomarkers (eg, total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B) and cardiovascular risk., Genetic studies have found that familial hypercholesterolemia mutations and polygenic scores are associated with a higher risk of premature MI, suggesting that the pathophysiology of premature and conventional MI may differ., Further studies are required to identify these differences and guide the development of targeted therapies, in particular for young adults. Compared with conventional MI, premature MI was associated with a higher prevalence of smoking, obesity, and family history of cardiac disease but a lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension., Consistent with these findings, a recent study found that the 25-year risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (cardiovascular and cerebrovascular) events could be predicted on the basis of simple lifestyle factors (eg, diet and physical activity). These results support observations from the present study and stress the need for risk prediction scores specific to premature MI. Most risk prediction scores were developed and validated in adults older than 40 years. In adults aged 25 to 40 years, further research is required to identify risk factors that predict the risk of premature MI. The present study identified demographic characteristics, lifestyle risk factors, clinical risk factors, and biomarkers associated with odds of premature MI. Whether these or other factors (eg, lipoproteins, inflammatory biomarkers, or metabolic biomarkers) can predict the risk of premature MI should be the topic of future studies. Recent studies found that young women compared with older women or similarly aged men have a higher prevalence of myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, a clinical entity of MI with less than 50% coronary occlusion. The risk factors for myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease are not well understood and may explain part of the burden of MI in younger people. Although the risk factors identified in the present study may not explain causative factors in atherosclerosis, future studies will be required to identify whether other risk factors (eg, novel biomarkers) reveal pathways involved in accelerated atherosclerosis. At the global level, the higher burden of premature MI has affected several countries including Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States, in which the rates of incidence and mortality for premature MI appear to be increasing.55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 From 2019 to 2035, the cost of managing premature cardiovascular disease in the United States is projected to increase from US$270 billion to US$370 billion, and much more globally. Recently, the Disease Control Priorities 3 working group provided policymakers with broad recommendations on cost-effective cardiovascular interventions. Although not specific to premature MI, these recommendations as well as findings from our meta-analysis may guide local and regional interventions for premature MI. Targeting key risk factors highlighted in this and other studies could reduce the number of premature cardiovascular deaths in men (from >5 million to 3.5 million) and women (from 2.8 million to 2 million) by the year 2025. Our study has potential limitations. We included only English language articles, which may alter the precision of our estimates but not necessarily cause systematic bias. During primary screening, we excluded abstracts that did not mention risk factors or age groups of interest; therefore, studies may have been excluded inadvertently if this information was not reported in the abstract. To mitigate this, we used a broad search strategy as evidenced by the large number of articles obtained for primary screening and had 2 authors independently screen articles. Furthermore, few studies included in the meta-analysis used unconventional operational definitions for risk factors or cutoff points for biomarkers, which we approximated to conventional definitions and cutoff points. Also, studies differed by design (eg, cross-sectional and cohort) and whether the risk estimates were adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and by the number of risk factors adjusted, which could potentially alter the magnitude of the association between risk factors and premature MI. To mitigate potential bias, we incorporated information on whether risk estimates were adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors into the RoB assessment (Supplemental Tables 3 and 6). These were determined a priori, and we provided pooled and subtotal estimates on the basis of RoB. Further, we did not include studies that report only concentrations/levels of biomarkers as they could not be used to derive risk estimates. Despite this, our study has several strengths as it comprehensively analyzed the association of several risk factors with premature MI, applied rigorous methodology, and identified several risk factors amenable to interventions. To our knowledge, this study is the most comprehensive evaluation of risk factors associated with premature MI and identifies risk factors amenable to individual and population level interventions. In this study, most data were from high-income countries. Future studies should focus on improving risk prediction in young adults, particularly in regions such as Latin America, Middle East and North Africa, and sub-Saharan Africa, in which the burden of premature MI is high and there is a paucity of studies of risk factors. Future studies should also consider combining individual level data from studies of biomarkers to estimate differences in premature MI and controls. Studies should also focus on long-term outcomes of individuals with premature MI. In this regard, the Young-MI cohort based on 2 hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts, has characterized risk factors and short- and long-term outcomes in adults younger than 55 years with MI.,,65, 66, 67, 68 Similar studies in other regions/countries may guide clinical practice and monitoring of individuals with premature MI. Ultimately, success will require coordination between governmental and nongovernmental stakeholders to place “people first” on any agenda that strives to reduce premature cardiovascular mortality by the year 2030, as prioritized in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis identified major modifiable risk factors for premature MI, including diabetes mellitus, smoking, dyslipidemia, and obesity. We also found that higher levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides and lower levels of HDL cholesterol were associated with a higher risk of premature MI. The significance of these risk factors to the burden of premature MI is concerning because the global prevalence of most of these risk factors is increasing, with significant implications for the burden of premature MI. However, most of these risk factors are modifiable and amenable to interventions. We did not identify articles related to socioeconomic status and the risk of premature MI, and further studies are required to determine whether socioeconomic status is associated with the risk of premature MI. Further research is required to develop interventions at the person, population, and policy levels to reduce the burden of these risk factors and of premature MI.
  59 in total

1.  Age and clinical outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Emad Ahmed; Khalid F Alhabib; Ayman El-Menyar; Nidal Asaad; Kadhim Sulaiman; Ahmad Hersi; Wael Almahmeed; Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali; Haitham Amin; Ahmed Al-Motarreb; Shukri Al Saif; Rajvir Singh; Jawad Al-Lawati; Jassim Al Suwaidi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res       Date:  2013-06-21

2.  Do younger women fare worse? Sex differences in acute myocardial infarction hospitalization and early mortality rates over ten years.

Authors:  Mona Izadnegahdar; Joel Singer; May K Lee; Min Gao; Christopher R Thompson; Jacek Kopec; Karin H Humphries
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Premature Myocardial Infarction in the Middle East and North Africa: Rationale for the Gulf PREVENT Study.

Authors:  Sagar B Dugani; Waheed Murad; Karisamae Damilig; Jean Atos; Eshraga Mohamed; Edward Callachan; Zareen Farukhi; Arshia Shaikh; Abubaker Elfatih; Salwa Yusef; Yousif M Hydoub; M Vinayaga Moorthy; Bassem Mora; Ahlam Alawadhi; Robin Issac; Abdulkarim Saleh; Arif Al-Mulla; Samia Mora; Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Screening of family members of patients with premature coronary heart disease; results from the EUROASPIRE II family survey.

Authors:  J De Sutter; D De Bacquer; K Kotseva; S Sans; K Pyörälä; D Wood; G De Backer
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Psoriasis and major adverse cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Ehrin J Armstrong; Caitlin T Harskamp; April W Armstrong
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years.

Authors:  Ashkan Afshin; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Marissa B Reitsma; Patrick Sur; Kara Estep; Alex Lee; Laurie Marczak; Ali H Mokdad; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Mohsen Naghavi; Joseph S Salama; Theo Vos; Kalkidan H Abate; Cristiana Abbafati; Muktar B Ahmed; Ziyad Al-Aly; Ala’a Alkerwi; Rajaa Al-Raddadi; Azmeraw T Amare; Alemayehu Amberbir; Adeladza K Amegah; Erfan Amini; Stephen M Amrock; Ranjit M Anjana; Johan Ärnlöv; Hamid Asayesh; Amitava Banerjee; Aleksandra Barac; Estifanos Baye; Derrick A Bennett; Addisu S Beyene; Sibhatu Biadgilign; Stan Biryukov; Espen Bjertness; Dube J Boneya; Ismael Campos-Nonato; Juan J Carrero; Pedro Cecilio; Kelly Cercy; Liliana G Ciobanu; Leslie Cornaby; Solomon A Damtew; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Samath D Dharmaratne; Bruce B Duncan; Babak Eshrati; Alireza Esteghamati; Valery L Feigin; João C Fernandes; Thomas Fürst; Tsegaye T Gebrehiwot; Audra Gold; Philimon N Gona; Atsushi Goto; Tesfa D Habtewold; Kokeb T Hadush; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Simon I Hay; Masako Horino; Farhad Islami; Ritul Kamal; Amir Kasaeian; Srinivasa V Katikireddi; Andre P Kengne; Chandrasekharan N Kesavachandran; Yousef S Khader; Young-Ho Khang; Jagdish Khubchandani; Daniel Kim; Yun J Kim; Yohannes Kinfu; Soewarta Kosen; Tiffany Ku; Barthelemy Kuate Defo; G Anil Kumar; Heidi J Larson; Mall Leinsalu; Xiaofeng Liang; Stephen S Lim; Patrick Liu; Alan D Lopez; Rafael Lozano; Azeem Majeed; Reza Malekzadeh; Deborah C Malta; Mohsen Mazidi; Colm McAlinden; Stephen T McGarvey; Desalegn T Mengistu; George A Mensah; Gert B M Mensink; Haftay B Mezgebe; Erkin M Mirrakhimov; Ulrich O Mueller; Jean J Noubiap; Carla M Obermeyer; Felix A Ogbo; Mayowa O Owolabi; George C Patton; Farshad Pourmalek; Mostafa Qorbani; Anwar Rafay; Rajesh K Rai; Chhabi L Ranabhat; Nikolas Reinig; Saeid Safiri; Joshua A Salomon; Juan R Sanabria; Itamar S Santos; Benn Sartorius; Monika Sawhney; Josef Schmidhuber; Aletta E Schutte; Maria I Schmidt; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Moretza Shamsizadeh; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Min-Jeong Shin; Rahman Shiri; Ivy Shiue; Hirbo S Roba; Diego A S Silva; Jonathan I Silverberg; Jasvinder A Singh; Saverio Stranges; Soumya Swaminathan; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Fentaw Tadese; Bemnet A Tedla; Balewgizie S Tegegne; Abdullah S Terkawi; J S Thakur; Marcello Tonelli; Roman Topor-Madry; Stefanos Tyrovolas; Kingsley N Ukwaja; Olalekan A Uthman; Masoud Vaezghasemi; Tommi Vasankari; Vasiliy V Vlassov; Stein E Vollset; Elisabete Weiderpass; Andrea Werdecker; Joshua Wesana; Ronny Westerman; Yuichiro Yano; Naohiro Yonemoto; Gerald Yonga; Zoubida Zaidi; Zerihun M Zenebe; Ben Zipkin; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

8.  Coronary Heart Disease Mortality Declines in the United States From 1979 Through 2011: Evidence for Stagnation in Young Adults, Especially Women.

Authors:  Kobina A Wilmot; Martin O'Flaherty; Simon Capewell; Earl S Ford; Viola Vaccarino
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Diabetes Is Associated With Worse Long-term Outcomes in Young Adults After Myocardial Infarction: The Partners YOUNG-MI Registry.

Authors:  Sanjay Divakaran; Avinainder Singh; David Biery; Junjie Yang; Ersilia M DeFilippis; Bradley L Collins; Mattheus Ramsis; Arman Qamar; Jon Hainer; Josh Klein; Christopher P Cannon; Donna M Polk; Jorge Plutzky; Khurram Nasir; James L Januzzi; Marcelo F Di Carli; Deepak L Bhatt; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 17.152

Review 10.  Gout and Risk of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Shuang-Chun Liu; Lei Xia; Jin Zhang; Xue-Hong Lu; Da-Kang Hu; Hai-Tao Zhang; Hai-Jun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Importance of Sex Differences in Research on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Miho Iida
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.394

2.  Hallmarks of aging-based dual-purpose disease and age-associated targets predicted using PandaOmics AI-powered discovery engine.

Authors:  Frank W Pun; Geoffrey Ho Duen Leung; Hoi Wing Leung; Bonnie Hei Man Liu; Xi Long; Ivan V Ozerov; Ju Wang; Feng Ren; Alexander Aliper; Evgeny Izumchenko; Alexey Moskalev; João Pedro de Magalhães; Alex Zhavoronkov
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  Assessment of Disparities in Diabetes Mortality in Adults in US Rural vs Nonrural Counties, 1999-2018.

Authors:  Sagar B Dugani; Christina M Wood-Wentz; Michelle M Mielke; Kent R Bailey; Adrian Vella
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

4.  Clusters of the Risk Markers and the Pattern of Premature Coronary Heart Disease: An Application of the Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  Leila Jahangiry; Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi; Mahdi Najafi; Parvin Sarbakhsh
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.