Literature DB >> 34400506

Bindin is essential for fertilization in the sea urchin.

Gary M Wessel1, Yuuko Wada2, Mamiko Yajima3, Masato Kiyomoto2.   

Abstract

Species-specific sperm-egg interactions are essential for sexual reproduction. Broadcast spawning of marine organisms is under particularly stringent conditions, since eggs released into the water column can be exposed to multiple different sperm. Bindin isolated from the sperm acrosome results in insoluble particles that cause homospecific eggs to aggregate, whereas no aggregation occurs with heterospecific eggs. Therefore, Bindin is concluded to play a critical role in fertilization, yet its function has never been tested. Here we report that Cas9-mediated inactivation of the bindin gene in a sea urchin results in perfectly normal-looking embryos, larvae, adults, and gametes in both males and females. What differed between the genotypes was that the bindin -/- sperm never fertilized an egg, functionally validating Bindin as an essential gamete interaction protein at the level of sperm-egg cell surface binding.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; bindin; fertilization; sea urchin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34400506      PMCID: PMC8403831          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2109636118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


Sperm and eggs are two of the few cell types in an organism that fuse with each other and do so in a species-specific mechanism (1). The molecular basis for the selectivity in binding and fusion of eggs and sperm is key for fitness of an organism and is a centerpiece of speciation (2). Bindin was discovered in the sperm acrosome of the sea urchin, and intense study of this protein has resulted in many hypotheses as to its role in fertilization, and in speciation resulting from positively selected changes in its sequence (3–6). Despite the number of biochemical studies conducted, Bindin has never been directly tested for its function in fertilization. Recent progress in targeted genome manipulation through CRISPR-Cas9 and advances in sea urchin husbandry now make this goal possible.

Results

Hpbase (https://cell-innovation.nig.ac.jp/Hpul/) was used to identify the sequence and genomic locus of the bindin gene from Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus (Hp). Four gRNAs were designed to target the pro-protein region of the predicted bindin gene () with the logic that, were a mutation to disrupt the open reading frame of the cognate transcript, no parts of the mature Bindin protein would be made to complicate any interpretation of results. Each of the gRNAs along with the messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding Cas9 were injected into freshly fertilized eggs of Hp. Ensuing development was indistinguishable from uninjected, or irrelevant gRNA injections, and larvae and adults formed as normal. Our analysis focused on the sperm from eight males that were 25 mm in diameter or larger and sexually mature. Tube feet were collected from each adult, and the DNA was isolated and subjected to PCR sequencing for genotyping. Of the eight males tested, one (Bindin #2) had no mutations at any of the gRNA sites. The remaining animals had mutations in at least one of the gRNA sites, three of them in two of the gRNA sites (Bindins #1, #3, and #5), but, of those seven, mutations in two of the seven animals (Bindins #6 and #8) did not disrupt the open reading frame of the Bindin protein. Of the three adult females evaluated, each of them had a frame shift mutation in one of the gRNA sites, and the third adult (Bindin female #3) had two mutations. Overall, of the 11 adults tested, only one did not have a bindin mutation (Bindin #2), for a 91% efficiency of mutation, and, since no change occurred in the open reading frame of two animals, the knockout (KO) rate was 73%. The amount and morphology of bindin−/− eggs was normal, and they fertilized and developed normally. Sperm collected from each bindin−/− adult also appeared normal and were tested for Bindin protein expression. Sperm proteins from Bindin KO and wild-type (WT) animals were analyzed by immunoblotting with three different antibodies generated to the mature Bindin domain. Each of the affinity-purified antibodies had the same immunoreactivity, although AbPAV had the highest titer and was used for further studies. Immunoblots of WT sperm showed a band at ∼35 kDa in Hp and in Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Fig. 1). S. purpuratus also showed a larger band of ∼49 kDa that may reflect the pro-form of the protein. Protein from four different animals microinjected with bindin gRNAs/Cas9 was compared to WT animals. No Bindin protein was detectable in Bindin animals #1, #3, and #4, whereas normal amounts and size of Bindin were seen in Bindin animal #2, the only animal of these four that had no mutation.
Fig. 1.

(A) Anti-bindin antibody reveals gene KOs in sperm. Sperm proteins were isolated, separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, blotted to nitrocellulose, and challenged by antibody incubation. Anti-tubulin antibodies were used to estimate relative loading levels of sperm protein. HpBindin represent sperm isolated from different individuals of bindin gRNA/Cas9 mRNA microinjections, whereas Hp-WT and Sp-WT are from WT sperm of Hp (Hp-WT) and S. purpuratus (Sp-WT). (B–D) Immunolabeling of sperm in situ with anti-bindin antibodies. (B) S. purpuratus sperm. Note the Bindin spot at the tip of the sperm (arrow). (C) Hp-WT sperm. Note Bindin at the tip of the sperm (arrow), and also background labeling of the midpiece (asterisk). Surprisingly, any intact IgG (containing an Fc region) binds to the midpiece in Hp, but the Fab used as secondary antibodies does not. (D) Hp bindin KO sperm. Note that there is no Bindin label at the tip of the sperm (arrow), even though background labeling of the midpiece is present (asterisk). (Scale bar, 4 μm.)

(A) Anti-bindin antibody reveals gene KOs in sperm. Sperm proteins were isolated, separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, blotted to nitrocellulose, and challenged by antibody incubation. Anti-tubulin antibodies were used to estimate relative loading levels of sperm protein. HpBindin represent sperm isolated from different individuals of bindin gRNA/Cas9 mRNA microinjections, whereas Hp-WT and Sp-WT are from WT sperm of Hp (Hp-WT) and S. purpuratus (Sp-WT). (B–D) Immunolabeling of sperm in situ with anti-bindin antibodies. (B) S. purpuratus sperm. Note the Bindin spot at the tip of the sperm (arrow). (C) Hp-WT sperm. Note Bindin at the tip of the sperm (arrow), and also background labeling of the midpiece (asterisk). Surprisingly, any intact IgG (containing an Fc region) binds to the midpiece in Hp, but the Fab used as secondary antibodies does not. (D) Hp bindin KO sperm. Note that there is no Bindin label at the tip of the sperm (arrow), even though background labeling of the midpiece is present (asterisk). (Scale bar, 4 μm.) The anti-bindin antibody was also tested in situ, first on S. purpuratus sperm, the species for which Bindin was originally identified (Fig. 1). The antibody very selectively labeled the acrosomal vesicle at the tip of the sperm head. The antibody labeled the same structure in WT Hp also, but also resulted in signal in the midpiece (Fig. 1). This midpiece signal appeared to be due to the Fc region of the intact primary antibody, since each intact antibody we used (including tubulin and irrelevant antibodies) bound to the same structure but not the Fab secondary antibodies. However, the acrosomal tip of the bindin KO sperm was devoid of label (Fig. 1). We examined sperm by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and found that the bindin KO sperm underwent the acrosome reaction but did not bind to the egg, and their egg interaction seldom withstood the fixation and preparatory steps for SEM analysis (Fig. 2 ).
Fig. 2.

Scanning electron micrographs of (A and B) WT Hp sperm and eggs and (C and D) bindin−/− sperm on WT eggs. Note the binding to microvilli in B and lack thereof in D (arrow). (Scale bar in A and C, 20 μm; scale bar in B and D, 2 μm.) (E–H) Hp bindin−/− sperm do not bind to nor activate eggs. WT eggs challenged with WT sperm (E) or with bindin−/− sperm (G) after 30 min of incubation show a robust fertilization envelope (arrow in E) with WT sperm but not with bindin−/− sperm. After 2.5 h of incubation, the bindin−/− sperm still do not activate eggs (H), whereas sibling eggs challenged with WT sperm have developed to the eight-cell stage (F). Scale bar in G = 100 micrometers; scale bar in H = 50 micrometers.

Scanning electron micrographs of (A and B) WT Hp sperm and eggs and (C and D) bindin−/− sperm on WT eggs. Note the binding to microvilli in B and lack thereof in D (arrow). (Scale bar in A and C, 20 μm; scale bar in B and D, 2 μm.) (E–H) Hp bindin−/− sperm do not bind to nor activate eggs. WT eggs challenged with WT sperm (E) or with bindin−/− sperm (G) after 30 min of incubation show a robust fertilization envelope (arrow in E) with WT sperm but not with bindin−/− sperm. After 2.5 h of incubation, the bindin−/− sperm still do not activate eggs (H), whereas sibling eggs challenged with WT sperm have developed to the eight-cell stage (F). Scale bar in G = 100 micrometers; scale bar in H = 50 micrometers. Bindin KO sperm never fertilized an egg (Fig. 2 and Movies S1–S4). The bindin KO sperm were seen to reach an egg, and even bounded on and off the egg, but no sperm−egg fusion was detected based on formation of the fertilization envelope, even if left for hours when the WT fertilized embryos had accomplished several cell divisions (compare Fig. 2 ).

Discussion

As essential as it is for sexual reproduction, the mechanisms of fertilization remain obscure. While many candidates have been offered as gene products essential for direct sperm−egg membrane interactions, few candidates in invertebrates have withstood the test of genetic KOs. One of particular interest is Spe-45 from the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans. Spe-45 is essential in C. elegans sperm for fertilization, and it has structural similarity to the mammalian sperm factor, Izumo, which binds to Juno on the mammalian egg cell surface (7, 8). Each of these proteins has a transmembrane domain, and an Ig-like extracellular domain essential for fertilization, a theme recently expanded with the finding of additional mammalian sperm proteins with Ig domains essential for fertilization, for example, Spaca6 (9). Bindin is distinct from these candidates, however, in that it does not have a transmembrane domain or an Ig-like domain. Instead, retention of Bindin on the sperm cell surface following the acrosome reaction appears to rely on its insolubility (3), and perhaps its phospholipid binding (10), enabling it to link sperm and egg membranes for a subsequent fusion step of unknown mechanism. What is the cognate egg surface molecule recognized by sperm Bindin? The search for an egg receptor for Bindin on sea urchin eggs resulted in the identification of two high molecular weight molecules, Ebr1 (Egg Bindin receptor 1) and a 350-kDa glycoprotein protein (11, 12). Ebr1 has multiple repeats of CUB domains (Complement C1s/C1r, Uegf, BMP1) contiguous with a TSP domain (Thrombospondin-1) as well as multiple hyalin (HYR) repeats, all of which are involved in extracellular and membrane-associated functions. Thus, even though Ebr1 does not have any predicted transmembrane domains that could directly instigate a fusion mechanism for sperm, Ebr1 is replete with protein interaction domains, and does appear to have species specificity, as might be expected for binding sperm. Embryos lacking Bindin activity are capable of normal embryogenesis, larval development, metamorphosis, and sperm production indistinguishable from WT adults. While mRNA expression of bindin is greatest in the testis, embryos and early larvae have detectable Bindin transcript levels. These mRNA, however, appear dispensable for a normal life cycle in Hp. The results here do lay the groundwork for more focused tests of Bindin function. High-efficiency Cas9/gRNA targeting and DNA cleavage seen here encourages a test of the B18 theoretical fusion site in Bindin (13) and replacement of Bindin segments with those of a heterospecific sperm sequence to determine the sites that control species specificity.

Materials and Methods

The gRNAs were designed and synthesized according to CRISPRscan (www.crisprscan.org), targeting the proprotein domain of the Hp bindin gene at HpBase (https://cell-innovation.nig.ac.jp/Hpul/ (14)). The gRNAs were mixed with 500 ng/μL of Cas9 mRNA and injected into freshly fertilized eggs (15). The resultant embryos, larvae, and juveniles were cultured at 15 °C and achieved sexual maturation in ∼1.5 y (15). Bindin-null animals were identified both by genomic DNA sequence and by antibodies made to bindin.
  13 in total

Review 1.  The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins.

Authors:  Willie J Swanson; Victor D Vacquier
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Speciation and the evolution of gamete recognition genes: pattern and process.

Authors:  S R Palumbi
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  The quest for the sea urchin egg receptor for sperm.

Authors:  Victor D Vacquier
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Isolation of bindin: the protein responsible for adhesion of sperm to sea urchin eggs.

Authors:  V D Vacquier; G W Moy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sea urchin egg receptor for sperm: sequence similarity of binding domain and hsp70.

Authors:  K R Foltz; J S Partin; W J Lennarz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  HpBase: A genome database of a sea urchin, Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus.

Authors:  Sonoko Kinjo; Masato Kiyomoto; Takashi Yamamoto; Kazuho Ikeo; Shunsuke Yaguchi
Journal:  Dev Growth Differ       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.053

7.  The Immunoglobulin-like Gene spe-45 Acts during Fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans like the Mouse Izumo1 Gene.

Authors:  Hitoshi Nishimura; Tatsuya Tajima; Heather Skye Comstra; Elizabeth J Gleason; Steven W L'Hernault
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Genetic manipulation of the pigment pathway in a sea urchin reveals distinct lineage commitment prior to metamorphosis in the bilateral to radial body plan transition.

Authors:  Gary M Wessel; Masato Kiyomoto; Tun-Li Shen; Mamiko Yajima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Interaction of the sperm adhesive protein, bindin, with phospholipid vesicles. II. Bindin induces the fusion of mixed-phase vesicles that contain phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylserine in vitro.

Authors:  C G Glabe
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Sperm proteins SOF1, TMEM95, and SPACA6 are required for sperm-oocyte fusion in mice.

Authors:  Taichi Noda; Yonggang Lu; Yoshitaka Fujihara; Seiya Oura; Takayuki Koyano; Sumire Kobayashi; Martin M Matzuk; Masahito Ikawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  A protein bridging the gap between sea urchin generations.

Authors:  Victor D Vacquier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Regulation of the Actin Cytoskeleton-Linked Ca2+ Signaling by Intracellular pH in Fertilized Eggs of Sea Urchin.

Authors:  Nunzia Limatola; Jong Tai Chun; Luigia Santella
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 7.666

3.  Sperm lacking Bindin are infertile but are otherwise indistinguishable from wildtype sperm.

Authors:  Gary M Wessel; Yuuko Wada; Mamiko Yajima; Masato Kiyomoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Cell-Cell Mating Interactions: Overview and Potential of Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Peter N Lipke; Jason M Rauceo; Albertus Viljoen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Recurrent Co-Option and Recombination of Cytokine and Three Finger Proteins in Multiple Reproductive Tissues Throughout Salamander Evolution.

Authors:  Damien B Wilburn; Christy L Kunkel; Richard C Feldhoff; Pamela W Feldhoff; Brian C Searle
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-23

6.  Generation of a homozygous mutant drug transporter (ABCB1) knockout line in the sea urchin Lytechinus pictus.

Authors:  Himanshu Vyas; Catherine S Schrankel; Jose A Espinoza; Kasey L Mitchell; Katherine T Nesbit; Elliot Jackson; Nathan Chang; Yoon Lee; Jacob Warner; Adam Reitzel; Deirdre C Lyons; Amro Hamdoun
Journal:  Development       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.862

7.  Editorial: Fertilization in the spotlight: Dynamics and mechanisms of sperm-egg interaction.

Authors:  Enrica Bianchi; Maria Jimenez-Movilla; Amber R Krauchunas
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-09-08

8.  Species-Specific Gamete Interaction during Sea Urchin Fertilization: Roles of the Egg Jelly and Vitelline Layer.

Authors:  Nunzia Limatola; Jong Tai Chun; Luigia Santella
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 7.666

9.  Effects of Dithiothreitol on Fertilization and Early Development in Sea Urchin.

Authors:  Nunzia Limatola; Jong Tai Chun; Sawsen Cherraben; Jean-Louis Schmitt; Jean-Marie Lehn; Luigia Santella
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.