Literature DB >> 34400272

Predicting Incident Heart Failure in Women With Machine Learning: The Women's Health Initiative Cohort.

Geoffrey H Tison1, Robert Avram2, Gregory Nah2, Liviu Klein2, Barbara V Howard3, Matthew A Allison4, Ramon Casanova5, Rachael H Blair6, Khadijah Breathett7, Randi E Foraker8, Jeffrey E Olgin2, Nisha I Parikh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of cardiac morbidity among women, whose risk factors differ from those in men. We used machine-learning approaches to develop risk- prediction models for incident HF in a cohort of postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI).
METHODS: We used 2 machine-learning methods-Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and Classification and Regression Trees (CART)-to perform variable selection on 1227 baseline WHI variables for the primary outcome of incident HF. These variables were then used to construct separate Cox proportional hazard models, and we compared these results, using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, against a comparator model built using variables from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) HF prediction model. We analyzed 43,709 women who had 2222 incident HF events; median follow-up was 14.3 years.
RESULTS: LASSO selected 10 predictors, and CART selected 11 predictors. The highest correlation between selected variables was 0.46. In addition to selecting well-established predictors such as age, myocardial infarction, and smoking, novel predictors included physical function, number of pregnancies, number of previous live births and age at menopause. In ROC analysis, the CART-derived model had the highest C-statistic of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.85), followed by LASSO 0.82 (95% CI, 0.81-0.84) and ARIC 0.73 (95% CI, 0.70-0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning approaches can be used to develop HF risk-prediction models that can have better discrimination compared with an established HF risk model and may provide a basis for investigating novel HF predictors.
Copyright © 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34400272      PMCID: PMC8642266          DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  30 in total

1.  Risk of cardiovascular disease among postmenopausal women with prior pregnancy loss: the women's health initiative.

Authors:  Donna R Parker; Bing Lu; Megan Sands-Lincoln; Candyce H Kroenke; Cathy C Lee; Mary O'Sullivan; Hannah L Park; Nisha Parikh; Robert S Schenken; Charles B Eaton
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Suveen Angraal; Bobak J Mortazavi; Aakriti Gupta; Rohan Khera; Tariq Ahmad; Nihar R Desai; Daniel L Jacoby; Frederick A Masoudi; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 12.035

3.  Reproductive Factors and Incidence of Heart Failure Hospitalization in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Philip S Hall; Gregory Nah; Barbara V Howard; Cora E Lewis; Matthew A Allison; Gloria E Sarto; Molly E Waring; Lisette T Jacobson; JoAnn E Manson; Liviu Klein; Nisha I Parikh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comparison between neural networks and multiple logistic regression to predict acute coronary syndrome in the emergency room.

Authors:  Michael Green; Jonas Björk; Jakob Forberg; Ulf Ekelund; Lars Edenbrandt; Mattias Ohlsson
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Improving risk prediction in heart failure using machine learning.

Authors:  Eric D Adler; Adriaan A Voors; Liviu Klein; Fima Macheret; Oscar O Braun; Marcus A Urey; Wenhong Zhu; Iziah Sama; Matevz Tadel; Claudio Campagnari; Barry Greenberg; Avi Yagil
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 15.534

6.  Cardiovascular Event Prediction by Machine Learning: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Xiaoying Yang; Colin O Wu; Kiang Liu; W Gregory Hundley; Robyn McClelland; Antoinette S Gomes; Aaron R Folsom; Steven Shea; Eliseo Guallar; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Pregnancy loss and risk of ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Alberto Maino; Bob Siegerink; Ale Algra; Ida Martinelli; Flora Peyvandi; Frits R Rosendaal
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 8.  Factors influencing the predictive power of models for predicting mortality and/or heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Wouter Ouwerkerk; Adriaan A Voors; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 12.035

9.  Prediction of incident heart failure in general practice: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Authors:  Sunil K Agarwal; Lloyd E Chambless; Christie M Ballantyne; Brad Astor; Alain G Bertoni; Patricia P Chang; Aaron R Folsom; Max He; Ron C Hoogeveen; Hanyu Ni; Pedro M Quibrera; Wayne D Rosamond; Stuart D Russell; Eyal Shahar; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Race-Specific Models to Predict 10-Year Risk of Heart Failure: A Multicohort Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew W Segar; Byron C Jaeger; Kershaw V Patel; Vijay Nambi; Chiadi E Ndumele; Adolfo Correa; Javed Butler; Alvin Chandra; Colby Ayers; Shreya Rao; Alana A Lewis; Laura M Raffield; Carlos J Rodriguez; Erin D Michos; Christie M Ballantyne; Michael E Hall; Robert J Mentz; James A de Lemos; Ambarish Pandey
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.