Tiffany A Radcliff1,2, Karen Chu1, Claudia Der-Martirosian1, Aram Dobalian1,3. 1. Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center (VEMEC), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, California, USA. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA. 3. Division of Health Systems Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare primary care appointment disruptions around Hurricanes Ike (2008) and Harvey (2017) and identify patterns that indicate differing continuity of primary care or care systems across events. METHODS: Primary care appointment records covering 5 wk before and after each storm were identified for Veterans Health Affairs (VA) facilities in the greater Houston and surrounding areas and a comparison group of VA facilities located elsewhere. Appointment disposition percentages were compared within and across storm events to assess care disruptions. RESULTS: For Hurricane Harvey, 14% of primary care appointments were completed during the week of landfall (vs 33% for Hurricane Ike and 69% in comparison clinics), and 49% were completed the following week (vs 58% for Hurricane Ike and 71% for comparison clinics). By the second week after Hurricane Ike and third week after Harvey, the scheduled appointment completion percentage returned to prestorm levels of approximately 60%. CONCLUSIONS: There were greater and more persistent care disruptions for Hurricane Harvey relative to Hurricane Ike. As catastrophic emergencies including major natural disasters and infectious disease pandemics become a more recognized threat to primary and preventive care delivery, health-care systems should consider implementing strategies to monitor and ensure primary care appointment continuity.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare primary care appointment disruptions around Hurricanes Ike (2008) and Harvey (2017) and identify patterns that indicate differing continuity of primary care or care systems across events. METHODS: Primary care appointment records covering 5 wk before and after each storm were identified for Veterans Health Affairs (VA) facilities in the greater Houston and surrounding areas and a comparison group of VA facilities located elsewhere. Appointment disposition percentages were compared within and across storm events to assess care disruptions. RESULTS: For Hurricane Harvey, 14% of primary care appointments were completed during the week of landfall (vs 33% for Hurricane Ike and 69% in comparison clinics), and 49% were completed the following week (vs 58% for Hurricane Ike and 71% for comparison clinics). By the second week after Hurricane Ike and third week after Harvey, the scheduled appointment completion percentage returned to prestorm levels of approximately 60%. CONCLUSIONS: There were greater and more persistent care disruptions for Hurricane Harvey relative to Hurricane Ike. As catastrophic emergencies including major natural disasters and infectious disease pandemics become a more recognized threat to primary and preventive care delivery, health-care systems should consider implementing strategies to monitor and ensure primary care appointment continuity.
Authors: Symielle A Gaston; Sandro Galea; Gregory H Cohen; Richard K Kwok; Ariane L Rung; Edward S Peters; Chandra L Jackson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ibraheem Karaye; Kahler W Stone; Gaston A Casillas; Galen Newman; Jennifer A Horney Journal: Environ Manage Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 3.266
Authors: Eric Weinstein; Luca Ragazzoni; Frederick Burkle; Mea Allen; David Hogan; Francesco Della Corte Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 1.385