Gizem Kumru Sahin1,2, Sahin Eyupoglu3, Rezzan Eren Sadioglu3, Gule Cinar4, Kenan Ates3, Sehsuvar Erturk3, Gokhan Nergizoglu3, Sule Sengul3, Sim Kutlay3, Kenan Keven3. 1. Department of Nephrology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. gizemkumru@gmail.com. 2. Department of Nephrology, Ministry of Health Van Education Research Hospital, Van, Turkey. gizemkumru@gmail.com. 3. Department of Nephrology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 4. Department of Infectious Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cytomegalovirus infection is an important complication in immunocompromised patients. As few studies have shown that cyclophosphamide treatment is a risk factor for cytomegalovirus infection in patients with glomerulonephritis, we aimed to describe the frequency and risk factors of cytomegalovirus infection in glomerulonephritis patients treated with cyclophosphamide. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 43 cytomegalovirus seropositive patients with glomerulonephritis treated with cyclophosphamide. We screened all patients for viral DNA monthly during treatment. Patients were compared for age, sex, glomerular pathology, renal function and clinical status regarding development of cytomegalovirus infection before and after the treatment. RESULTS: Cytomegalovirus infection was detected in 10 (23.3%) patients, most commonly within the first 2 months of cyclophosphamide treatment. All patients recovered without any cytomegalovirus-related complications. Patients with cytomegalovirus infection had higher serum creatinine (4.2 ± 3.2 vs. 1.9 ± 1.8 mg/dl, p = 0.006) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (29 ± 11 vs. 65 ± 8 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.016) at diagnosis compared with cytomegalovirus infection non-occurred patients. In addition, number of patients presented with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis were higher in cytomegalovirus infection group (80.0% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.007). Moreover, cytomegalovirus infection was associated with prolonged hospital stay (54 ± 7 vs. 29 ± 6 days, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Cytomegalovirus infection is a common complication in glomerulonephritis patients treated with cyclophosphamide in this prospective study. Routine monitoring and prophylaxis should be considered for these high-risk patients.
PURPOSE: Cytomegalovirus infection is an important complication in immunocompromised patients. As few studies have shown that cyclophosphamide treatment is a risk factor for cytomegalovirus infection in patients with glomerulonephritis, we aimed to describe the frequency and risk factors of cytomegalovirus infection in glomerulonephritis patients treated with cyclophosphamide. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 43 cytomegalovirus seropositive patients with glomerulonephritis treated with cyclophosphamide. We screened all patients for viral DNA monthly during treatment. Patients were compared for age, sex, glomerular pathology, renal function and clinical status regarding development of cytomegalovirus infection before and after the treatment. RESULTS: Cytomegalovirus infection was detected in 10 (23.3%) patients, most commonly within the first 2 months of cyclophosphamide treatment. All patients recovered without any cytomegalovirus-related complications. Patients with cytomegalovirus infection had higher serum creatinine (4.2 ± 3.2 vs. 1.9 ± 1.8 mg/dl, p = 0.006) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (29 ± 11 vs. 65 ± 8 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.016) at diagnosis compared with cytomegalovirus infection non-occurred patients. In addition, number of patients presented with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis were higher in cytomegalovirus infection group (80.0% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.007). Moreover, cytomegalovirus infection was associated with prolonged hospital stay (54 ± 7 vs. 29 ± 6 days, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Cytomegalovirus infection is a common complication in glomerulonephritis patients treated with cyclophosphamide in this prospective study. Routine monitoring and prophylaxis should be considered for these high-risk patients.
Authors: Per Ljungman; Michael Boeckh; Hans H Hirsch; Filip Josephson; Jens Lundgren; Garrett Nichols; Andreas Pikis; Raymund R Razonable; Veronica Miller; Paul D Griffiths Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 9.079