| Literature DB >> 34397828 |
Qiujun Zhou1, Shenyu Wei1, Haijia Zhu1, Yue Hu2, Yong Liu3, Huifeng Yang1, Shicheng Zeng4, Shiqian Chai1, Jingyuan Li1, Maocan Tao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are still controversies between the curative effect of acupuncture combined with cupping therapy and western medicine for post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). Our meta-analysis fully incorporates the research of acupuncture combined with cupping therapy versus Western medicine for PHN, aiming to explore the difference in the efficacy of the 2 therapies, so as to provide guidance for clinical treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34397828 PMCID: PMC8341313 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Flow diagram for selection of studies.
Baseline characteristics.
| Number of cases | Gender (male/female) | Age | Duration of disease (m) | ||||||||
| Study | Research type | Experimental group | Control group | Experimental group | Control group | Experimental group | Control group | Experimental group | Control group | Types of acupuncture and moxibustion | Pain assessment scale |
| Xiong 2007[ | RCT | 48 | 40 | 20/28 | 16/24 | 50 ± 6 | 48 ± 6 | / | / | Fire needle | / |
| Jin 2009[ | RCT | 30 | 25 | 17/13 | 12/13 | 52 | 48.5 | / | / | Acupuncture | / |
| Ma 2010[ | RCT | 20 | 20 | 18/22 | 56.2 | 6.5 | Fire needle | / | |||
| Teng 2014[ | RCT | 48 | 48 | 53/43 | / | / | / | / | Fire needle | / | |
| Zheng 2014[ | RCT | 32 | 30 | 13/19 | 13/17 | 45.78 ± 15.28 | 46.30 ± 14.40 | 4.53 ± 1.74(d) | 4.60 ± 1.69(d) | Fire needle | / |
| Li 2014[ | RCT | 30 | 30 | 17/13 | 15/15 | 61.7 | 60.2 | 9.5 | 8.3 | Electroacupuncture | / |
| Zhang 2015[ | RCT | 36 | 36 | 22/14 | 19/17 | 62.06 ± 7.34 | 62.18 ± 7.16 | 3.51 ± 2.31 | 3.42 ± 2.55 | Fire needle | / |
| Wu 2017[ | RCT | 39 | 39 | 18/21 | 17/22 | 59.5 | 61.5 | 1-12 | 1-12 | Fire needle | / |
| Wang 2019[ | RCT | 39 | 39 | 20/19 | 22/17 | 58.3 ± 3.2 | 59.1 ± 2.8 | 4.2 ± 1.3 | 4.0 ± 1.4 | Fire needle | VAS |
| Tang 2019[ | RCT | 30 | 30 | 11/19 | 13/17 | 59.5 ± 10.3 | 61.67 ± 8.2 | / | / | Acupuncture | VAS |
| Han 2020[ | RCT | 55 | 55 | 28/27 | 29/26 | 47.22 ± 8.54 | 46.14 ± 8.62 | / | / | Fire needle | / |
| Zhang 2020[ | RCT | 32 | 32 | 12/20 | 14/18 | 53.72 ± 15.17 | 54.25 ± 11.19 | / | / | Fire needle | / |
| Li 2010[ | RCT | 36 | 31 | 15/11 | 12/19 | 43.67 ± 14.64 | 46.45 ± 15.27 | / | / | Electroacupuncture | / |
| Chen 2020[ | RCT | 30 | 30 | 16/14 | 17/13 | 53.67 ± 5.19 | 55.07 ± 4.85 | 5.79 ± 1.30 | 5.38 ± 1.28 | Electroacupuncture | VAS |
| Huang 2020[ | RCT | 45 | 45 | 24/21 | 22/23 | 65.8 ± 2.9 | 65.9 ± 2.7 | 7.8 ± 1.2 | 7.9 ± 1.5 | Electroacupuncture | VAS |
| Ming 2020[ | RCT | 30 | 30 | 13/17 | 11/19 | 54.52 ± 4.97 | 54.32 ± 5.47 | 3.26 ± 1.08 | 2.93 ± 1.15 | Acupuncture | / |
Methodological quality assessment of included studies.
| Study | Bias arising from the randomization process | Bias due to deviations from the intended interventions | Bias due to missing outcome data | Bias in the measurement of the outcome | Bias in the selection of the reported result | Overall bias |
| Xiong 2007[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Jin 2009[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Ma 2010[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Teng 2014[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Zheng 2014[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Li 2014[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Zhang 2015[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Wu 2017[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Wang 2019[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Tang 2019[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Han 2020[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Zhang 2020[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Li 2010[ | Moderate | High | High | High | Low | Moderate |
| Chen 2020[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Huang 2020[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Ming 2020[ | Moderate | High | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
Figure 2The comparison of total effective rate (A), remarkable effect rate (B), VAS score (C), and the prevention of PHN (D) of acupuncture and moxibustion combined with cupping therapy compared with conventional western medicine therapy. VAS = Visual Analogue Scale/Score.
Figure 3The comparison of total effective rate (A), remarkable effect rate (B), VAS score (C), and the prevention of PHN (D) of different types of acupuncture and moxibustion combined with cupping therapy compared with conventional western medicine therapy. PHN = post-herpetic neuralgia, VAS = visual analogue scale/score.