Jyotirmoy Deb1, Rajkumar Mondal1,2, Utpal Sarkar1, Hatef Sadeghi3. 1. Department of Physics, Assam University, Silchar 788011, India. 2. Department of Physics, Nabadwip Vidyasagar College, Nabadwip, West Bengal 741302, India. 3. Device Modelling Group, School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.
Abstract
In this paper, we have investigated the thermoelectric properties of BN-doped graphynes and compared them with respect to their pristine counterpart using first-principles calculations. The effect of temperature on the thermoelectric properties has also been explored. Pristine γ-graphyne is an intrinsic band gap semiconductor and the band gap significantly increases due to the incorporation of boron and nitrogen atoms into the system, which simultaneously results in high electrical conductivity, a large Seebeck coefficient, and low thermal conductivity. The Seebeck coefficient for all these systems is significantly higher than that of conventional thermoelectric materials, suggesting their potential in thermoelectric applications. Among all the considered systems, the "graphyne-like BN sheet" has the highest electrical conductance and lowest thermal conductance, ensuring its superiority in thermoelectric properties over the other studied systems. We find that a maximum full ZT of ∼6 at room temperature is accessible in the "graphyne-like BN sheet".
In this paper, we have investigated the thermoelectric properties of BN-doped graphynes and compared them with respect to their pristine counterpart using first-principles calculations. The effect of temperature on the thermoelectric properties has also been explored. Pristine γ-graphyne is an intrinsic band gap semiconductor and the band gap significantly increases due to the incorporation of boron and nitrogen atoms into the system, which simultaneously results in high electrical conductivity, a large Seebeck coefficient, and low thermal conductivity. The Seebeck coefficient for all these systems is significantly higher than that of conventional thermoelectric materials, suggesting their potential in thermoelectric applications. Among all the considered systems, the "graphyne-like BN sheet" has the highest electrical conductance and lowest thermal conductance, ensuring its superiority in thermoelectric properties over the other studied systems. We find that a maximum full ZT of ∼6 at room temperature is accessible in the "graphyne-like BN sheet".
The rapid advancement
of human civilization during recent days
demands a huge energy requirement, which is not able to be fulfilled
from the natural resources available and thus leads to the global
energy crisis. To overcome this crisis, various ways have been adopted,
among which thermoelectric energy conversion plays a very vital role
and is an essential requirement for fulfilling the demand for next-generation
nanoelectronic devices.[1] Thermoelectric
technology is one of the most effective methods for energy harvesting
since it provides a pavement that can convert waste heat into electricity
and vice versa. That is why thermoelectric materials
have gained significant attention among the research community during
the present days.[1,2] The performance of a thermoelectric
material is characterized by a dimensionless quantity, namely, the
figure of merit[3] ZT and is defined as , where G is the electrical
conductance, S is the Seebeck coefficient, T is the temperature, ke is
the electronic part of thermal conductance, and kph is the phonon contribution of thermal conductance.
To achieve a high ZT, a thermoelectric material should possess a large
Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductance (a high value of power
factor S2G) and simultaneously
a low thermal conductance. In general, it is difficult to fulfill
the above criteria as all these transport coefficients S, G, and k are coupled with each
other in traditional thermoelectric materials. However, recent studies
show that low-dimensional systems can possess a high ZT due to the
quantum confinement effect.[4,5] Thus, searching for
low-dimensional nanomaterials with high thermoelectric efficiency
is becoming a challenging task for the research community. Literature
survey reveals that a carbon-based material is a great choice for
designing and fabricating efficient thermoelectric materials.[6−13] Among these carbon-based materials, graphene[14] finds vast applications[15,16] but the presence
of zero band gap results in a very small Seebeck coefficient of graphene
along with high thermal conductivity, which significantly reduces
its thermoelectric performance.[17] To reduce
its thermal conductance, enormous efforts have been put in such as
defect engineering,[18,19] isotope engineering,[20] and a superlattice structure.[21] Another two-dimensional (2D) carbon allotrope, namely,
graphyne,[22] is formed by inserting acetylenic
linkages (sp hybridization) in between two carbon atoms of graphene.
By varying the number and position of acetylenic linkages, several
substructures of graphyne can be obtained such as α-, β-,
γ-, 6,6,12-graphyne, and graphdiyne.[23,24] Among these, α-, β-, and 6,6,12-graphyne show characteristics
of a Dirac material while γ-graphyne and graphdiyne are intrinsic
semiconductors in nature.[24] The presence
of versatile characteristics in γ-graphyne makes it a suitable
candidate for electronic,[25,26] optoelectronic,[27−29] gas sensing,[30,31] energy storage,[32] and spintronic devices.[33] The
presence of a band gap also leads to a significant enhancement of
its Seebeck coefficient[13] and the presence
of acetylenic linkages reduces the thermal conductivity significantly.[13] All these surveys prompt that γ-graphyne
is a promising candidate for a future thermoelectric material, as
already reported by several researchers theoretically.[10,11,13] Recent advances in experimental
synthesis of γ-graphyne[34] open a
new door for fabrication of thermoelectric devices based on graphyne.
As the band gap is responsible for the large Seebeck coefficient,
the thermoelectric performance of graphyne can be tuned by engineering
its band gap. One of the effective methods for tuning the band gap
is doping with suitable atoms. Interestingly, it has been observed
that the band gap of γ-graphyne can be increased by co-doping
with B and N atoms at different positions.[28,29,35,36]Motivated
by the above findings, here for the first time, we investigate
the thermoelectric properties of BN-doped γ-graphynes and compare
its performance with its pristine counterpart. Interestingly, it has
been observed that doping with the B or N atom increases the band
gap, thus leading to a large Seebeck coefficient and high thermoelectric
performance of BN-doped γ-graphynes compared to pristine γ-graphyne.
Incorporating B and N atoms in other systems such as holey graphene,
graphene oxide, and so forth significantly enhances the thermoelectric
performance,[37,38] which is another reason for choosing
B and N atoms as dopants in our present study. For any thermoelectric
device, p-type and n-type materials need to be arranged in a tandem
device to increase its thermal voltage output. This is achieved in
our study by co-doping with B and N atoms.[39]
Computational Methodology
To obtain the optimized geometry
and ground-state Hamiltonian of
all these materials, we have used SIESTA 3.2 computational package[40] using density functional theory (DFT). The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof
method[41] is used to account for the exchange
and correlation functional of generalized gradient approximation.
Troullier–Martins-type norm-conserving pseudopotentials[42] are used to account for the core electrons and
linear combinations of atomic orbitals to construct the valence states.
A double-ζ-plus polarized numerical atomic orbitals type basis
set along with a real-space grid having a mesh cut-off energy of 600
Ry is considered for the calculation. The Brillouin zone is sampled
using a 1 × 12 × 12 Monkhorst–Pack grid k-point, and a maximum force tolerance of 0.01 eV/Å is used in
the calculation. A vacuum of 15 Å is kept along X-direction to avoid the interaction between two periodic images.
Transport
Calculation
The mean-field Hamiltonians obtained
from the converged DFT calculations are combined with the quantum
transport code GOLLUM.[43,44] The transmission coefficient, T(E), for electrons passing from the source
to the drain with energy E is calculated through
the relationwhere ΓL,R(E) = i[ΣL,R(E) – ΣL,R†(E)] describes the broadening due
to the coupling between
the central scattering region (SR) and left (L) and right (R) electrodes.
ΣL,R(E) are the retarded self-energies
associated with this coupling. GR = (ES – H – ΣL – ΣR)−1 is the retarded
Green’s function where H is the Hamiltonian
and S is the overlap matrix.Thermoelectric
properties such as the electrical conductance (G),
Seebeck coefficient (S), and electronic part of thermal
conductance (ke) of the device as a function
of temperature are calculated using the following relations[43,45]where f(E) is the Fermi–Dirac probability
distribution function, T is the temperature, EF is
the Fermi energy, G0 = 2e2/h is the quantum conductance, e is the charge of the electron, and h is
Planck’s constant.After obtaining the transmission as
a function of energy [T(E)], we
have calculated the integral L(EF, T) using eq . This equation depends
on temperature and Fermi energy. To
calculate the electrical conductance G(EF, T), we use the Landauer formula as
given in eq where the
term L0 is obtained from eq . We then calculate G versus the Fermi energy for fixed temperatures as shown in Figure . The other thermoelectric
parameters such as the Seebeck coefficient (S) and
electronic part of thermal conductance (ke) also depend on the integral L(EF, T) and can
be calculated using the relations 3 and 4.
Figure 4
Variation of electrical conductance with Fermi
energy for (a) pristine
γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with BN at the linear chain;
(c) γ-graphyne with BN at the hexagonal ring; and (d) γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet at different temperatures.
It is worth mentioning that we calculate
the thermoelectric properties
of structures under the assumption that the charge state of the structures
and their electronic structure are not changed by changes of Fermi
energy (EF) or temperature (T), which is valid for small changes in EF and T.
Results and Discussion
In this work, we have studied the thermoelectric properties of
2D BN-doped γ-graphynes and compared them with pristine γ-graphyne.
For BN-doped systems, we have considered three configurations as “γ-graphyne
with BN at the hexagonal ring”, “γ-graphyne with
BN at the chain” and “γ-graphyne-like BN sheet”.
The device comprising the SR sandwiched between two electrodes is
presented in Figure and the corresponding coordinates of the structures are provided
in Table S1 of the Supporting Information. State-of-the-art theoretical calculations by several research groups
already confirmed the stability of the above-mentioned systems.[28,35,36,46,47] Thus, we considered pristine γ-graphyne
and its BN-derivatives for making the device.
Figure 1
Representative device
model showing two electrodes and the SR (a)
for pristine γ-graphyne nanojunction; (b) for γ-graphyne
nanojunction with BN at the linear chain; (c) for the γ-graphyne
nanojunction with BN at the hexagonal ring (d) for γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet nanojunction. LE and RE represent the left electrode and
right electrode, respectively.
Representative device
model showing two electrodes and the SR (a)
for pristine γ-graphyne nanojunction; (b) for γ-graphyne
nanojunction with BN at the linear chain; (c) for the γ-graphyne
nanojunction with BN at the hexagonal ring (d) for γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet nanojunction. LE and RE represent the left electrode and
right electrode, respectively.We then calculate the thermoelectric properties such as Seebeck
coefficients, the electronic contribution to the thermal conductance,
and the electronic part of figure of merit for pristine and BN-doped
γ-graphyne and discuss their variation with temperatures. All
of these parameters are obtained from the energy dependence of the
electron transmission coefficient.Figure shows the
electron transmission spectra [T(E)] at zero bias voltage as a function of E within
the energy range [−3.0, +3.0] eV. There is an energy band gap
in all transmissions that follows “pristine γ-graphyne”
< “γ-graphyne with BN at the chain” < “γ-graphyne
with BN at the hexagonal ring” < “γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet”.[35] The transmission spectra
equal to the number of open channels and show stepwise behavior.
Figure 2
Variation
of zero-bias transmission spectra with energy for (a)
pristine γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with BN at linear
chain; (c) γ-graphyne with BN at hexagonal ring; and (d) γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet. T(E) describes the transmission
probability of electrons with energy E traversing
from one side of the device to the other side. This is combined with eq to calculate temperature-dependent
quantities such as the conductance and the Seebeck coefficient (see
the Computational Methodology section).
Variation
of zero-bias transmission spectra with energy for (a)
pristine γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with BN at linear
chain; (c) γ-graphyne with BN at hexagonal ring; and (d) γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet. T(E) describes the transmission
probability of electrons with energy E traversing
from one side of the device to the other side. This is combined with eq to calculate temperature-dependent
quantities such as the conductance and the Seebeck coefficient (see
the Computational Methodology section).Figure depicts
the variation of the Seebeck coefficient (S) for
the pristine and BN-doped γ-graphyne systems with Fermi energy
at different temperatures (200, 300, and 500 K). The temperature gradient
in a material initiates the flow of current between hot and cold electrodes
and as a result, an electric field is developed across the two ends
and hence a voltage, known as the Seebeck voltage. As observed in Figure a, the highest value
of S is 1.01 × 10–3 V/K at
200 K (Table ), corresponding
to EF = ±0.03 eV, which is much higher
than that of a conventional thermoelectric material.[48] The S value decreases with an increase
in temperature. The magnitude of S for pristine γ-graphyne
at room temperature is 0.64 × 10–3 V/K (Table ) and is in good agreement
with the previously reported result[11] and
the magnitude of S at room temperature is also much
higher than that of the conventional thermoelectric material such
as Bi2Te3.[48] Now
for γ-graphyne with BN at the chain position, the highest value
of S is 3.07 × 10–3 V/K (Table ) at 200 K and the
maximum values of S are found at the Fermi energy
of −0.32 and +0.05 eV, respectively (Figure c). When BN is at the ring position of γ-graphyne,
the highest value of S is 3.09 × 10–3 V/K at T = 300 K (Table ) and the maximum value of S is recorded corresponding to the Fermi energy of −0.64 and
+0.02 eV, respectively (Figure b). Finally, for the “γ-graphyne-like BN sheet”,
the maximum value of S is found at the Fermi energy
+0.18 and +1.17 eV (Figure d) and the highest value of S is 3.13 ×
10–3 V/K (Table ). Interestingly, for the “γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet” as the temperature increases, the asymmetric energy
distribution of electrons around the Fermi level also increases, which
leads to an increase in the magnitude of S with the
temperature rise. The Seebeck coefficient of pristine γ-graphyne
possess two peak values around the Fermi level irrespective of temperature
and both of them have nearly the same value, indicating the isotropic
nature of S. Although the magnitude of the two peaks
is the same for BN-doped systems, for “γ-graphyne with
BN at the chain” (at 300 and 500 K) and “γ-graphyne
with BN at the ring” (at 500 K), both the peaks move toward
the negative energy side, whereas the peaks shift toward the positive
energy side for the “γ-graphyne-like BN sheet”
(at 500 K) with respect to pristine γ-graphyne. This asymmetric
energy distribution of electrons around the Fermi level for BN-doped
systems leads to a greater value of the Seebeck coefficient. A system
with a wide band gap generally has a large S value
as S is related to Egvia the relation .[49] The wide
band gap of pristine γ-graphyne, which is already reported by
various groups,[25,35] contributes to the significant S value in this system. For pristine γ-graphyne, the
calculated S value is higher than graphene[50] due to its semiconducting nature.[13] When BN has doped, the magnitude of S increases significantly compared to that of pristine γ-graphyne.
The magnitudes of S at 300 and 500 K for all these
systems increase in the following manner “pristine γ-graphyne”
< “γ-graphyne with BN at the chain” < “γ-graphyne
with BN at the ring” < “γ-graphyne-like BN
sheet”. This result is supported by the band gap characteristic
of these systems. The Seebeck coefficient for all systems studied
is significantly higher than for some other reported materials such
as the boron arsenide sheet,[51] graphdiyne,[52] phosphorene,[53] MoSe2,[54] WSe2,[54] monolayer bismuth,[55] 1L-ZnPSe3,[56] selenene, and
tellurene.[57] The experimental and theoretical
studies already confirmed that a material to be used in thermoelectricity
should have thermoelectric conversion performances of around 230 μV/K[58] and as all our studied material exhibits, a
much higher Seebeck coefficient compared to the usual value, clearly
suggesting the possibility of using these materials in thermoelectric
applications. We found that the Seebeck coefficient is generally high
in the structures studied. This is due to sharp features in the transmission
functions. It is because the Seebeck coefficient is proportional to
the slope of the transmission coefficient[59]T(E) as S ∝
−∂LT(E)/∂E at EF. This means that a flat transmission gives
a zero Seebeck coefficient, while zones with large slopes give a high S. Furthermore, the sign of S changes for
zones with positive and negative slopes. For example, the sign of S for pristine γ-graphyne is positive (negative) for
energies around −0.2 eV (0.2 eV).
Figure 3
Variation of the Seebeck
coefficient with Fermi energy for (a)
pristine γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with BN at the linear
chain; (c) γ-graphyne with BN at the hexagonal ring; and (d)
γ-graphyne-like BN sheet at different temperatures.
Table 1
Calculated Seebeck Coefficient for
Pristine and BN-Doped γ-Graphynes at Different Temperatures
system
T (K)
EF (eV)
S (V/K)
pristine γ-graphyne
200
–0.03
1.01 × 10–3
0.03
–1.01 × 10–3
300
–0.05
0.64 × 10–3
0.05
–0.64 × 10–3
500
–0.07
0.36 × 10–3
0.07
–0.36 × 10–3
γ-graphyne with BN at
the chain
200
–0.32
3.07 × 10–3
0.05
–3.07 × 10–3
300
–0.20
2.50 × 10–3
–0.08
–2.50 × 10–3
500
–0.23
1.46 × 10–3
–0.05
–1.46 × 10–3
γ-graphyne with BN at
the ring
200
–0.95
3.07 × 10–3
0.33
–3.07 × 10–3
300
–0.64
3.09 × 10–3
0.02
–3.09 × 10–3
500
–0.41
2.33 × 10–3
–0.20
–2.34 × 10–3
γ-graphyne-like BN sheet
200
–0.77
3.07 × 10–3
2.12
–3.07 × 10–3
300
–0.45
3.10 × 10–3
1.80
–3.10 × 10–3
500
0.18
3.13 × 10–3
1.17
–3.13 × 10–3
Variation of the Seebeck
coefficient with Fermi energy for (a)
pristine γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with BN at the linear
chain; (c) γ-graphyne with BN at the hexagonal ring; and (d)
γ-graphyne-like BN sheet at different temperatures.For a material
to be applicable in thermoelectric applications,
in addition to a high value of the Seebeck coefficient, a large magnitude
of electrical conductance (G) is also needed. The
electrical conductance (Figure ) is highest for the “γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet” and the magnitude is lowest for the “γ-graphyne
with BN at the ring”. The magnitude of G increases
with temperature in the gap (e.g., E = [−0.2 to +0.2]); however, it decreases on resonances (e.g., E = [−0.8 to +0.4]) for all
these systems. However, for the “γ-graphyne-like BN sheet”,
the decrement in G is more prominent compared to
the rest of the systems.Variation of electrical conductance with Fermi
energy for (a) pristine
γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with BN at the linear chain;
(c) γ-graphyne with BN at the hexagonal ring; and (d) γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet at different temperatures.The electronic part of thermal conductance is small for all these
materials (Figure ). The highest ke is observed for pristine
γ-graphyne while ke is lowest for
the “γ-graphyne-like BN sheet”. The magnitude
of ke increases with an increase in T. The thermal conductance shows a similar trend with the
electrical conductance in agreement with the Wiedemann–Franz
law.
Figure 5
Variation of the electronic part of thermal conductance with Fermi
energy for (a) pristine γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with
BN at the linear chain; (c) γ-graphyne with BN at the hexagonal
ring; and (d) γ-graphyne-like BN sheet at different temperatures.
Variation of the electronic part of thermal conductance with Fermi
energy for (a) pristine γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with
BN at the linear chain; (c) γ-graphyne with BN at the hexagonal
ring; and (d) γ-graphyne-like BN sheet at different temperatures.After obtaining all the transport coefficients,
we have finally
calculated the electronic thermoelectric figure of merit of pristine
and BN-doped γ-graphyne systems using the relation . Here, we have considered
only the electronic
part of the figure of merit. Figure S1 shows
the variation of ZTe as a function of the Fermi energy
for different temperatures. For all these systems, two obvious peaks
around the Fermi level have been observed. ZTe for “pristine
γ-graphyne” and “γ-graphyne with BN at the
chain” decreases with an increase in temperature, while for
“γ-graphyne with BN at the ring” it increases
first (200 to 300 K) and then decreases (300 to 500 K) (Table S2). In the case of the “γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet”, ZTe increases with an increase in temperature
and it also has the highest ZTe among the considered systems.
The phonon thermal conductivity of pristine γ-graphyne is predicted
to be about 75 W/mK at room temperature.[11] From this, we estimate the phonon contribution to thermal conductance
in our pristine γ-graphyne junction as kph = 30 pW/K. Using this value, the full ZT = ZTe/(1 + kph/ke) is obtained for the pristine γ-graphyne junction as shown
in Figure a. Phonon
band structure of these systems calculated using first-principles
methods including all phonon modes are shown in Figure S2 of the Supporting Information. This indicates that they
a have similar dispersion relation. The Debye frequency of “pristine
γ-graphyne” is amongst the highest. It is expected that
it should have higher thermal conductance (kph) than the “γ-graphyne-like BN sheet”
and “γ-graphyne with BN at the chain”. Its thermal
conductance (kph) also should be close
to the kph of “γ-graphyne
with BN at the hexagonal ring”, especially the small difference
in Debye frequency happens to be in high frequencies with a small
contribution to room temperature kph. Figure shows the estimated
full ZT. Clearly, ZT is high in these materials. This is an indication
that these systems hold great potential for thermoelectricity. Among
all the considered systems, the “γ-graphyne-like BN sheet”
possesses the highest maximum ZT and a maximum ZT of ∼6 is
observed at room temperature. This is the minimum ZT expected as the
Debye frequency of the “γ-graphyne-like BN sheet”
is lower than that of “pristine γ-graphyne”, and kph for the “γ-graphyne-like BN
sheet” is expected to be lower than that used to estimate the
full ZT and therefore full ZT is expected to be higher than these
values. The other factors which attribute to the highest ZT in the
“γ-graphyne-like BN sheet” are the largest Seebeck
coefficient (S), largest electrical conductance (G), and lowest electrical thermal conductance (ke) of the “γ-graphyne-like BN sheet”
compared to other systems.
Figure 6
Variation of the figure of merit with Fermi
energy for (a) pristine
γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with BN at the linear chain;
(c) γ-graphyne with BN at the hexagonal ring; and (d) γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet at different temperatures.
Variation of the figure of merit with Fermi
energy for (a) pristine
γ-graphyne; (b) γ-graphyne with BN at the linear chain;
(c) γ-graphyne with BN at the hexagonal ring; and (d) γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet at different temperatures.A previous study[60] by our group shows
that a double vacancy in γ-graphyne results in a wide band gap
semiconductor with a band gap of 1.82 eV for majority spin while the
band gap for minority spin is 1.34 eV. This wide band gap indicates
that double vacancy in γ-graphyne will lead to a large Seebeck
coefficient. Literature survey also reveals that the introduction
of the defective environment in the γ-graphyne nanoribbon system
significantly enhances the thermoelectric performance of the material.[61−63] Therefore, we expect further enhancement with defects in our structures
too.
Conclusions
In conclusion, within the framework of DFT in
association with
the quantum transport technique, the thermoelectric properties of
BN-doped γ-graphynes with varying temperatures have been investigated
and compared with respect to their pristine analogue. The Seebeck
coefficient of all these doped systems is significantly higher than
those of conventional thermoelectric materials, ensuring their potentiality
for thermoelectric applications. The large Seebeck coefficient originates
from the modulation of the band gap achieved by the incorporation
of BN atoms. This leads to high full ZT of ∼6 for the γ-graphyne-like
BN sheet at room temperature. Our present study shows that these materials
have huge potential for thermoelectricity. We hope that our report
of a large value of ZT will motivate the experimentalists to characterize
BN-doped graphyne systems.
Authors: K S Novoselov; A K Geim; S V Morozov; D Jiang; Y Zhang; S V Dubonos; I V Grigorieva; A A Firsov Journal: Science Date: 2004-10-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: S V Morozov; K S Novoselov; M I Katsnelson; F Schedin; D C Elias; J A Jaszczak; A K Geim Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Raphael M Tromer; A Freitas; Isaac M Felix; Bohayra Mortazavi; L D Machado; S Azevedo; Luiz Felipe C Pereira Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 3.676