| Literature DB >> 34394871 |
Kiana Hassanpour1,2, Ramin Nourinia1, Ebrahim Gerami1, Ghavam Mahmoudi1, Hamed Esfandiari3.
Abstract
Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) or encephalotrigeminal angiomatosis is a non-inherited congenital disorder characterized by neurologic, skin, and ocular abnormalities. A somatic activating mutation (R183Q) in the GNAQ gene during early embryogenesis has been recently recognized as the etiology of vascular abnormalities in SWS. Approximately, half of the patients with SWS manifest ocular involvement including glaucoma as the most common ocular abnormality followed by choroidal hemangioma (CH). The underlying pathophysiology of glaucoma in SWS has not been completely understood yet. Early onset glaucoma comprising 60% of SWS glaucoma have lower success rates after medical and surgical treatments compared with primary congenital glaucoma. Primary angle surgery is associated with modest success in the early onset SWS glaucoma while the success rate significantly decreases in late onset glaucoma. Filtration surgery is associated with a higher risk of intraoperative and postoperative choroidal effusion and suprachoroidal hemorrhage. CH is reported in 40-50% of SWS patients. The goal of treatment in patients with CH is to induce involution of the hemangioma, with reduction of subretinal and intraretinal fluid and minimal damage to the neurosensory retina. The decision for treating diffuse CHs highly depends on the patient's visual acuity, the need for glaucoma surgery, the presence of subretinal fluid (SRF), its chronicity, and the potential for visual recovery.Entities:
Keywords: Glaucoma; Ocular Manifestations; Sturge-weber Syndrome; Choroidal Hemangioma
Year: 2021 PMID: 34394871 PMCID: PMC8358762 DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmic Vis Res ISSN: 2008-322X
Summary of ocular findings in Sturge-Weber syndrome[
|
| |
|
| |
| General | |
| Proptosis | |
| Lids | |
| Ptosis | |
| Port-wine birthmarks of eyelid | |
|
| |
| Sclera | |
| Nevoid marks or vascular dilation of the episclera | |
| Large, anomalous vessels in the episclera | |
| Dilation and tortuosity of episcleral vessels | |
| Episcleral hemangiomas | |
| Conjunctiva | |
| Conjunctival telangiectasia | |
| Conjunctival hemangiomas | |
| Dilation and tortuosity of conjunctival vessels | |
| Large, anomalous vessels in the conjunctiva | |
|
| |
| Anterior Segment | |
| Increased corneal diameter | |
| Iris discoloration | |
| Telangiectasia of the iris with heterochromia | |
| Dilation and tortuosity of the iris vessels | |
| Sluggish pupils | |
| Anisocoria or other disturbances in pupil reactions | |
| Deep anterior chamber angle | |
| Glaucoma | |
| Ectopia lentis | |
| Choroid | |
| Choroidal hemangioma | |
| Angioid streaks | |
| Retina | |
| Dilation and tortuosity of retinal vessels | |
| Retinal arteriovenous aneurysm | |
| Varicosity of retinal veins | |
| Glioma | |
| Retinal detachment | |
| Central retinal vein occlusion | |
| Optic Nerve | |
| Arteriovenous angioma | |
| Papilledema | |
| Optic atrophy | |
| Optic nerve cupping | |
| Optic nerve drusen | |
|
| |
| Strabismus | |
| Nystagmus | |
| Loss of vision | |
| Cortical blindness | |
| Abnormal visual field due to the lesions in visual pathway | |
| Anisometropia | |
Summary of important studies investigating different surgeries in the treatment of glaucoma associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wagner et al[ | Trabeculotomy combined with cyclotherapy | 6 | 5 | Three weeks to nine years | All achieved controlled IOP Two patients needed additional surgery | Average 4.5 years From three to eight years |
| Iwach et al[ | Goniotomy[ | 20 eyes Early onset 16 eyes late onset | 30 patients | Not separately reported | Median stable time for goniotomy and medical therapy 101 months. For trabeculotomy 21 months For trabeculectomy 23 months | Mean 10 years Range: 2–21 years |
| Olsen et al[ | Goniotomy Trabeculotomy | 12 4 | 14 | Mean 10 | IOP | 5.4 years Range: 1.4–15 years |
| Wu et al[ | Trabeculotomy ab externo | 34 | 32 | Median (IQR) = 3 months (1.25, 6.75) | Cumulative proportion of overall success: 94.1%, 90.5%, 86.6%, 86.6%, and 86.6% at three months, six months, one year, two years, and three years, respectively | Median (IQR) = 15.5 months (9.50, 25.50) |
| Irkec et al[ | Trabeculotomy and guarded filtration surgery | 6 | 5 | Between 23 days and 9 years | Lowered IOP in five eyes; two eyes needed additional medical therapy | 6.3 Range: 2–11 years |
| Sood et al[ | Combined trabeculotomy and trabeculectomy | 22 | 20 | Mean 18.64 | 41.7% (10/24) of eyes qualified and modified qualified success No complete success | Mean SD 134.73 |
| Board and Shields[ | Combined trabeculotomy and trabeculectomy | 5 | 5 | Two months to fifteen years | Despite postoperative IOP control, it increased in three patients who had longer follow-ups No additional surgeries were needed | Median 11 months 6–36 months |
| Agarwal et al[ | Combined trabeculotomy and trabeculectomy | 18 | 16 | Mean 17.8 months Range: Birth–7 years | ( | 42 months Range: 1–8 years |
| Mandal et al[ | Combined trabeculotomy and trabeculectomy | 10 | 9 | 1.5 | All eyes maintained a postoperative IOP | 27.6 |
| Ali et al[ | Trabeculectomy | 7 | 6 | Mean 22.42 years Range: 7–38 years | Two eyes w/o meds Four eyes with meds One eye needed repeat trabeculectomy | Nine months to Nine years |
| Mohamed et al[ | Trabeculectomy with MMC With Ologen | 10 10 | 8 8 | 3–5 years | Complete and qualified success in 80% and 20% in MMC, 70% and 20% in Ologen | 12 months |
| Hamush et al[ | Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation | 10 | 9 | 10 days–25.5 years Only three | Cumulative probability of success of 79%, 59%, and 30% at 24, 42, and 60 months, respectively | Mean 910.5 days (SD 6 574.1 days) |
| Kaushik et al[ | Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation | 24 | 18 | 7.91 | Cumulative probability of success rate was 75% | 2.12 |
| Budenz et al[ | Baerveldt glaucoma implantation | 10 | 9 | Six weeks and thirteen years | All eyes had adequate IOP control ( | 35 months Range: 10–50 |
| Amini et al[ | Molteno drainage device | 9 | 7 | 9.6 +/– 3.7 years Range: 5–17 years | The cumulative probability of success was 97.2% at 12 months, 78.02% at 24 months, and 43.34% at the final follow-up | 32 +/– 4.7 months Range: 20–36 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Audren et al[ | Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy | 9 | 9 | Eleven days to twenty-four years | Success rates (including no need for anti-glaucoma medications) were 56%, 28%, and 0% at 6, 13, and 26 months post surgery | 26.3 months Range: 6–48 months |
Summary of important studies investigating different treatment strategies in diffuse choroidal hemangioma associated with SWS. Only studies with more than three cases were included
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Randon et al[ | External beam radiotherapy (20 Gy in 10 fractions) | 26 eyes of 25 patients | Five years (4–41) years | Reduced tumor thickness (4.5 mm, 2.7 mm at the last visit) Resolved retinal detachment in all except two |
| Schilling et al[ | External beam radiotherapy (20 Gy) | 15 eyes of 12 patients with diffuse CH | 18.3 years | Exudative RD resolution Shrinkage of the tumor was seen in five eyes |
| Arepalli et al[ | Plaque brachytherapy (Iodine-125 plaque) | 5 eyes | 13 years Median 11 Range: 11–27 years | Complete regression of SRF in all cases |
| Zografos et al[ | Proton beam radiotherapy | 6 eyes with diffuse CH | Not reported | Resolution of exudative RD tumor regression |