Literature DB >> 34394752

CRISPR-Cas9 and He Jiankui's Case: an Islamic Bioethics Review using Maqasid al-Shari'a and Qawaid Fighiyyah.

Nimah Alsomali1,2, Ghaiath Hussein3,4.   

Abstract

The discovery of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and the CRISPR-mediated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) immediately revealed numerous potential therapeutic applications. Although CRISPR-Cas9 will most likely be useful for addressing issues such as genetic diseases and related medical issues, use of this modality for germline modification generates complex ethical questions regarding the safety and efficacy, human genetic enhancement, and "designer" babies. In this article, the case of the He Jiankui affair is used as an example of the potential for unregulated use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology. In 2018, Dr He Jiankui reported that he had successfully edited human embryos. This work clearly violates all international principles of bioethics. As such, the purpose of this paper is to explore the ethical challenges inherent in the use of CRISPR-Cas9 for human germline editing from the perspectives of the goals of Islamic law (Maqasid al Shari'a) and the major jurisprudential maxims (Qawaid Fiqhiyyah). We argue that from an Islamic standpoint, the therapeutic application of CRISPR-Cas9 for germline editing may be permissible if the safety and efficacy concerns are resolved and if the principles of Maqasid al-Shari'a are fulfilled. © National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR-Cas9; Gene editing; Islamic bioethics; Maqasid al-Shari'a; Qawaid Fiqhiyyah

Year:  2021        PMID: 34394752      PMCID: PMC8298734          DOI: 10.1007/s41649-021-00167-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev        ISSN: 1793-9453


  30 in total

1.  Islam and the four principles of medical ethics.

Authors:  Yassar Mustafa
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  CRISPR-based adaptive and heritable immunity in prokaryotes.

Authors:  John van der Oost; Matthijs M Jore; Edze R Westra; Magnus Lundgren; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry.

Authors:  David Cyranoski; Heidi Ledford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease.

Authors:  Seung Woo Cho; Sojung Kim; Jong Min Kim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Chinese researcher who made CRISPR babies is sentenced to three years in prison.

Authors:  Owen Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-01-03

Review 6.  Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges.

Authors:  David Benjamin Turitz Cox; Randall Jeffrey Platt; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.

Authors:  Martin Jinek; Krzysztof Chylinski; Ines Fonfara; Michael Hauer; Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex.

Authors:  Silvana Konermann; Mark D Brigham; Alexandro E Trevino; Julia Joung; Omar O Abudayyeh; Clea Barcena; Patrick D Hsu; Naomi Habib; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Hiroshi Nishimasu; Osamu Nureki; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; Luhan Yang; Kevin M Esvelt; John Aach; Marc Guell; James E DiCarlo; Julie E Norville; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  CRISPR'd babies: human germline genome editing in the 'He Jiankui affair'.

Authors:  Henry T Greely
Journal:  J Law Biosci       Date:  2019-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.