Literature DB >> 34394656

National clinical programmes in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative study of acute hospitals.

Geraldine Shaw1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The national clinical programmes (NCPs) were established in 2010 to achieve three objectives, namely: improve quality, access and cost effectiveness. Limited research exists on their implementation in the Republic of Ireland (ROI). This qualitative study identified key stakeholders' perceptions on (a) implementation thus far, and (b) conditions perceived necessary for implementation in acute hospitals. AIMS: The overall aim of this research was to undertake an in-depth study to explore from the perspectives of key stakeholders, their perceptions on implementation of the national clinical programmes, thus far, in relation to three overarching objectives (to improve quality, access, cost effectiveness) and what are the conditions necessary for their implementation in the Republic of Ireland's acute hospitals.
METHODS: Twenty participants were interviewed using face-to-face audio-recorded semi-structured interviews. Transcribed data were coded and analysed, and a number of themes emerged from the dataset relating to the study aims.
RESULTS: Implementation was perceived as being inconsistent. Outcomes were identified as: best practice guidelines, models of care, protocols, pathways; education & training; new services; improved discharges; improved patient outcomes; reduced length of stay; timely access; reduced waiting lists; cost effectiveness and other intangible outcomes. Sixteen conditions, under four themes, were perceived necessary for implementation, namely: Governance - structure, audit & monitoring, senior management support, accountability, and clear objectives and expectations; Communication - visible face-to-face engagement, internal awareness, and external awareness; Leadership - programme level, national level, hospital level, and professional level; Resources - budget, staff, information technology, training, skills, and competency.
CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the existing limited body of knowledge on implementation of the NCPs in the acute hospitals in the ROI while contributing to the wider international literature in this area. The study provides hitherto unreported knowledge on the conditions that are perceived necessary for implementation. Novel in the ROI context is the perceived necessity to condense the number of NCPs, placing greater emphasis on (a) the need to structurally integrate the NCPs across the continuum of care, and (b) the importance of communication through visible face-to-face engagement. This study concludes that significant progress has been made by the NCPs towards meeting the objectives, albeit to varying degrees. There is a strong perception that the NCPs should remain, and that addressing the conditions perceived necessary for implementation in the areas of governance, communications, leadership and resources by both top-down senior health officials and bottom-up front-line hospital staff would significantly enhance the ability of the NCPs to meet objectives and implementation. It provides the ROI health services with valuable information to inform future reform, strategic planning and NCP implementation.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute hospitals; clinical networks; communication; governance; health policy; implementation; leadership; national clinical programmes; resources

Year:  2020        PMID: 34394656      PMCID: PMC7932382          DOI: 10.1177/1744987119893014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Nurs        ISSN: 1744-9871


  20 in total

1.  National Acute Medicine Programme--improving the care of all medical patients in Ireland.

Authors:  Orlaith O'Reilly; Fiona Cianci; Avelene Casey; Eilish Croke; Celine Conroy; Anne-Marie Keown; Gemma Leane; Barbara Kearns; Shane O'Neill; Garry Courtney
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.960

2.  The Greater Metropolitan Clinical Taskforce: an Australian model for clinician governance.

Authors:  Graeme J Stewart; John M Dwyer; Kerry J Goulston
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Managed clinical networks: scope, evidence and feasibility.

Authors:  F Lega; M Sartirana
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Early warning scores: a sign of deterioration in patients and systems.

Authors:  Adrian Fox; Naomi Elliott
Journal:  Nurs Manag (Harrow)       Date:  2015-04

5.  Do managed clinical networks improve quality of diabetes care? Evidence from a retrospective mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  A Greene; C Pagliari; S Cunningham; P Donnan; J Evans; A Emslie-Smith; A Morris; B Guthrie
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-12

6.  Day of surgery admission for the elective surgical in-patient: successful implementation of the Elective Surgery Programme.

Authors:  E S Concannon; A M Hogan; L Flood; W Khan; R Waldron; K Barry
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  A managed clinical network for cardiac services: set-up, operation and impact on patient care.

Authors:  Karen E Stc Hamilton; Frank M Sullivan; Peter T Donnan; Rex Taylor; Divine Ikenwilo; Anthony Scott; Chris Baker; Sally Wyke
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 5.120

8.  Net benefits: assessing the effectiveness of clinical networks in Australia through qualitative methods.

Authors:  Frances C Cunningham; Geetha Ranmuthugala; Johanna I Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  What are the reasons for clinical network success? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth McInnes; Mary Haines; Amanda Dominello; Deanna Kalucy; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Sandy Middleton; Emily Klineberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  The effectiveness of clinical networks in improving quality of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Authors:  Bernadette Bea Brown; Cyra Patel; Elizabeth McInnes; Nicholas Mays; Jane Young; Mary Haines
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.