Literature DB >> 34394269

Pediatric self-medication use in Rwanda - a cross sectional study.

Joyeuse Ukwishaka1, Christian Umuhoza1,2, Peter Cartledge1,2,3, Natalie McCall1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-medication, a worldwide practice, has both benefits and risks. Many countries have regulated non-prescription medications available for use in self-medication. However, in countries such as Rwanda, where prescriptions are not required to purchase medications, prescription, non-prescription and traditional medications have been used for self-medication.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the reported self-medication use in Rwanda and to determine attitudes and reasons associated with parental decisions to self-medicate their children.
METHODS: A cross-sectional multi-center questionnaire based quantitative study of 154 parents/caregivers of children under ten years undertaken in private and public health facilities.
RESULTS: The use of self-medication was reported to be 77.9%. Among these parents/caregivers, 50.8% used modern self-medication only, 15.8% used traditional self-medication only and 33.3% used both types of self-medication. Paracetamol was the most commonly used drug in modern self-medication; the traditional drugs used were Rwandan local herbs. Parents/caregivers who used modern medicines had slightly more confidence in self-medication than self-medication users of traditional medicines (p=0.005). Parents/caregivers who used modern self-medication reported barriers to consultation as a reason to self-medicate more frequently than those who used traditional drugs. Having more than one child below 10 years of-age was the only socio-demographic factor associated with having used self-medication (AOR=4.74, CI: 1.94-11.58, p=0.001). Being above 30 years (AOR= 5.78, CI: 1.25-26.68, p=0.025) and living in Kigali (AOR=8.2, CI: 1.58-43.12, p=.0.012) were factors associated with preference of modern self- medication compared to traditional self-medication.
CONCLUSION: Self-medication is common in Rwanda. Parents/caregivers are involved in this practice regardless of their socio-demographic background.
© 2020 Ukwishaka J et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nonprescription Drugs; Rwanda; Self-medication; caregivers; children; medicines; parents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 34394269      PMCID: PMC8351863          DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v20i4.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


Introduction

Since the declaration of Alma-Ata in 1978, the principles of self-care, individual participation, responsibility and involvement in one's own health care have been recognized as important elements of primary healthcare1–3. Self-care includes self-medication which the WHO defines as “the selection and use of medicines by individuals to treat self-recognized illnesses or symptoms”4–7. In the pediatric population, self-medication implies administration of a drug to a child, by a caregiver, without prior medical consultation 8. WHO defines traditional medicine as “The sum of knowledge, skill, and practices based on the theories, beliefs, and experiences indigenous to different cultures, whether explicable or not, used in the maintenance of health as well as in the prevention, diagnosis, improvement or treatment of physical and mental illness” 9,10. Traditional medicines will often be chosen and provided by a traditional healer or therapist, but can also be produced or purchased by an individual and used as a form of self-medication. Responsible self-medication implies the use of approved, safe, and effective drugs, accompanied by information to direct users 11. There are several advantages of responsible self-medication, but the population must be aware of potentials risks and harms of self-medication12,13. Factors associated with the parental choice to self-medicate their children vary, but include: parents/caregivers perceiving their child's illness as being mild and not requiring health professional consultation, lack of time to attend consultations, high consultation fees, clinic waiting time, emergency treatment, use of old prescriptions available in the home, parent comfort in recognizing their children's disease based on the symptoms and having experience with the medication 14,15. Pediatric self-medication is a worldwide practice with a reported prevalence between 32–98% in Madagascar, India, Greece, and Australia 8,16–18. Tanzania, a fellow nation of the East African community has reported pediatric self-medication rates of 69% 19. There is also a difference in education and economic factors associated with the choice to self-medicate. Studies from Spain, Finland, Italy, and Madagascar12,19–21, found that families with high income and with secondary and higher education level practice more self-medication than families with low income and low education level. On the other hand, in studies done in Germany and India, family income and parental education were not significantly influencing self-medication practice 9,22. There is insufficient literature describing the use of self-medication in pediatric populations in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Rwanda, self-medication is being used by parents/caregivers for their children 20,21. The Rwandan Ministry of Health regulates essential medicines in accordane with WHO recommendations but there is no regulation of non-prescription or OTC drugs. In addition, there is a rise in antibiotic resistance in the country. Self-medication, if not done in a responsible and safe manner, could predispose the population to more harm than benefits. So there is a need to establish a baseline data on parental self-medication practices in Rwanda including the use of traditional and modern drugs. This could help health care providers and policymakers to plan education and establish policies aiming to achieve responsible use of medicines. Objectives The present study aimed at determining the proportion of parents/caregivers who reported self-medicating their children before consulting private and public health facilities in Rwanda and to determine attitudes and reasons associated with parental decisions to self-medicate their children.

Methods

Study Design: We conducted a cross-sectional study from July to September 2018. Reporting has been verified in accordance with the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist 22. Study Sites/settings: We conducted a multi-center study in three facilities: i) a provincial referral hospital, two hours from Kigali, the capital of Rwanda, ii) a vaccination clinic in an urban public health center in Kigali city and iii) a private pediatric clinic in Kigali, which serves a larger proportion of educated parents/caregivers with high socioeconomic level. This selection was done to increase the representativeness and generalizability of the results to the Rwandan Population. Study population: The study aimed to recruit parents/caregivers of both unwell and well children with different socioeconomic status. Unwell children were recruited at out and in-patient units of one private and one public health facility. Parents/caregivers of well children were approached at a vaccination clinic in a health center. Inclusion criteria: All Rwandan parents/caregivers of children aged one month to 10 years of life and who accepted to participate in the study were eligible to be included. Parents/caregivers who were not primary caregivers of the children were excluded as they would not be able to describe fully the self-treatment of the children. We excluded from the analysis the participants who consented but did not fully complete the questionnaire. Sampling: Non-probability convenience sampling was used to recruit study subjects on working days (Monday to Friday) during working hours (8am to 5pm). Procedures for enrollment: Eligible parents/caregivers were approached in the waiting area, prior to their consultation, and they were given a verbal explanation of the purpose and the methods of the study. All participants who signed the written consent form were then included. No data was kept on the number of participants who declined to participate. Administering the questionnaire: Questionnaires were given to parents/caregivers by the PI or a trained data collector (DC) who was available to answer questions regarding the questionnaire. For parents/caregivers who couldn't read or who preferred to be assisted, the DC read the questions and completed the questionnaires on behalf of the participant. The questionnaires were completed in the waiting area of the respective health facility. When the questionnaire was filled by the DC, this was indicated on the form. Variables: Dependent (outcome) variable were the percentage of parents/caregivers using self-medication, reasons of parental self-medication and common drugs used in self-medication. Independent variables were age, sex, province of origin, level of education, socioeconomic status, number of children under 10 years of age; health insurance, determinant/predictors of parental self-medication, relationship with the child, marital status. Potential confounders were site of interview and mode of completing questionnaire (verbal or written) Data collection tool (Questionnaire): A questionnaire was developed specifically for this study. To ensure content validity of our data collection tool, it was first built by the Principal Investigator (PI) (JU) using previously published studies14,15,23–25. The first draft was then reviewed by four local experts in research (three pediatricians (CU, NM & PC) and one statistician). There were four sections to the questionnaire, namely: demo- graphic characteristics of respondents; modern medicine questionnaire; traditional medicine questionnaire and finally the no self-medicating questionnaire. Parents/caregivers were asked whether they have ever used self-medication for their children and if so, what type they had used. Depending on their answers, they completed the appropriate questionnaire (i.e. Modern and/or Traditional medicines) or the questionnaire for parents/caregivers who have never used self-medication for their children. Therefore, not all subjects completed all sections of the questionnaires The questionnaires used 5-point Likert-scales to assess the parental attitudes and perceptions about self-medication. The responses given to the Likert-scale questions from each of the barriers (five questions) and confidence (six questions) domains were combined to create total “barriers to consultation” and total “confidence in self-medicating” scores. Translation and piloting of questionnaires: The questionnaire was initially prepared in English and translated into the national language (Kinyarwanda) by the PI. It was then back-translated in English for accuracy by an independent, non-medical translator. It was piloted on five subjects and amendments were then made based on this piloting, including changes in wording and the addition of further Likert-items. Sample size calculation: Sample-size was calculated for the prevalence of self-medicating, with a predicted baseline of 69% of parents/caregivers of children under-five years of age reported in Tanzania 19. Using the formula with Finite Population Correction 26 and a level of confidence aimed at 95% we calculated the sample size to be 152 study participants. Data management: EpiData Entry 3.1 Software was used for data entry and storage. The data was then exported into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.), for statistical analysis. Statistical analysis: For continuous numerical data, means and standard deviation were reported; for categorical data, frequency tables, percentages and graphs were reported. Comparison was made between responses on the modern-medicine and traditional-medicine questionnaires. Therefore, parents/caregivers, who self-medicated with both modalities, were included in both arms of the analysis For confidence and barrier questions, Likert-scale items were converted into means and compared using Mann-Whitney U test due to the non-normal distribution of the data. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Odds ratio were reported to identify associations. To account for multiple confounders logistic regression analysis was undertaken including variables with p-value <0.2.

Results

Study period: Recruitment took place from July to September 2018 with all sites being visited twice, gaining a total of 162 subjects who were enrolled (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Consort flow diagram (n=number of respondents, N=Number of participants)

Consort flow diagram (n=number of respondents, N=Number of participants) Participation flow and social-demographic characteristics: Eight participants were excluded from the analysis as they did not complete the questionnaires fully, leaving a total of 154 participants who were included in the final analysis with complete data. Fourteen participants (9%) self-completed the questionnaire with 140 (91%) needing assistance with verbal completion of the questionnaire. The mean age of respondents was 33 years (SD: 6.7). Mothers represented the majority (86.4%) of respondent and most respondents were married (94%) (Table 1).
Table 1

Participant demographics

ItemClassificationFrequencyPercentage
Site of interviewPrivate5133.1%
Public10366.9%

OriginKigali9259.7%
Outside Kigali6240.3%

RelationshipMother13386.4%
Other2113.6%

Marital status of parentMarried14594.2%
Single (+ Separated, Widowed)95.8%

Age of parent≤306039%
>309461%

Education levelAdvanced7750%
Minimal7750%

Economic statusHigh4529.2%
Low and Middle10970.8%

Health insurancePrivate6039%
Mutuelle de sante8957.8%
None53.2%

Number of children under 10yrs14831.2%
>110668.8%

Advanced education level = completed secondary school or university; Minimal education level = no education or completed primary school; High economic status = have both employment and own house; Middle economic class = have either employment or own house; Low economic class = have neither employment nor own house;

Participant demographics Advanced education level = completed secondary school or university; Minimal education level = no education or completed primary school; High economic status = have both employment and own house; Middle economic class = have either employment or own house; Low economic class = have neither employment nor own house; Self-medication indications and practices: Among 154 participants, 120 caregivers (78%) reported to have used self-medication for their children, Sixty-one of them (51%) used only modern drugs in self-medication, 19 (16%) used only traditional drugs while 40 (33%) used both types. Thirty-four caregivers had never used self-medication (22%) (Figure 1). Many parents/caregivers decided to self-medicate with modern medications without seeking advice from anyone. Whereas, for traditional self-medication, friends and relatives served as the main sources of advice (Table 2). All traditional self-medication users used local Rwandan herbs. Paracetamol was the most commonly used modern medicine. Traditional medicine was most commonly used when parents/caregivers suspected intestinal worms.
Table 2

Self-medication indications and practice

ItemClassificationModern medicines (N=101)Traditional medicine (N=59)
Source of advice before deciding to use self-medicationMyself54 (53.4%)14 (23.7%)
Health care provider32 (31.7%)0 (0%)
Friend/relative17 (16.8)36 (61.0%)
Internet/media5 (5.0%)5 (8.5%)
Traditional healer1 (1.0%)11 (18.6%)
Other2 (1.9%)-

Symptom for which self-medication is givenFever78 (77.2%)3 (5.1%)
Cough and runny nose44 (43.6%)16 (27.1%)
Intestinal worms15 (14.8%)20 (33.8%)
Pain6 (5.9%)1 (1.7%)
Difficult breathing5 (5.0%)2 (3.4%)
Diarrhea/vomiting5 (5.0%)13 (22.0%)
Skin conditions3 (3.0%)5 (8.5%)
Others15 (14.8%)17 (28.8%)

Source of medicationsPharmacy94 (93.1%)-
Leftover medicine15 (14.9%)-
Health care facility w/o prescription5 (5.0%)-
Shop/store1 (1.0%)-
Relative/friend0 (0%)5 (8.5%)
Traditional healer-22 (37.3%)
Self-collected herbs /plants-36 (94.7%)
Others-2 (5.2%)

Type of Health care facility consulted in case of self-medication failurePrivate47 (46.5%)9 (15.3%)
Public38 (37.6%)23 (39.0%)
Traditional healer5 (5.0%)5 (8.5%)
None24 (23.7%)26 (44.1%)

Drugs used in self-medication with modern medications (n=101)Paracetamol73 (72.3%)-
Cough Syrup40 (39.6%)-
Ibuprofen29 (28.7%)-
Antibiotics18 (17.8%)-
Drugs for intestinal worms17 (16.8%)-
Skin preparation4 (4%)-
Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS)3 (3%)-
Others15 (14.8%)-

Respondents could choose more than two options.

Self-medication indications and practice Respondents could choose more than two options. Reasons for using self-medication: There was a statistically significant difference in reasons for choosing modern and traditional self-medication among our participants, with participants choosing modern medications having slightly more confidence in self-medication than self-medication providers of traditional medicines (p=0.005) and parents/caregivers who used modern self-medication reporting barriers to consultation more frequently as reason to self-medicate than parents/caregivers who used traditional self-prescription (p=0.028) (Table 3).
Table 3

Reasons of using self-medication – Means of Likert questions

Modern Medicine (n=101)Traditional medicine (n=59)p-value
DisagreeNeutralAgreeMean (±SD)DisagreeNeutralAgreeMean (±SD)
Confidence in self-prescribing
The symptoms of my child are minor and do not require a health facility consultation29 (28.8%)0 (0%)72 (71.2%)3.56 (±1.08)23 (40%)1 (1.7%)35 (59.3%)3.31 (±1.14)p=0.164
I can recognize my child's disease based on his/her symptoms35 (34.7%)0 (0%)66 (65.3%)3.39 (±1.07)27 (45.8%)0 (0%)32(54.2%)3.22 (±1.21)p=0.477
I have used drug previously24 (23.8%)1 (1%)76 (75.2%)3.64 (±1.04)24 (40.8%)0 (0%)35 (59.3%)3.31 (±1.22)p=0.111
I want to give emergency treatment to my child13 (12.9%)1 (1%)87 (86.1%)3.83 (±0.81)31 (52.6%)0 (0%)28 (47.4%)3.00 (±1.17)p<0.001
Non-prescription medicines work well27 (26.7%)6 (6%)68 (67.3%)3.37 (±1.02)20 (34%)3 (5%)36 (61%)3.27 (±1.04)p=0.558
Non-prescription medicines are not dangerous28 (27.8%)4 (4%)69 (68.3%)3.38 (±1.01)22 (37.3%)3 (5%)34 (57.7%)3.24 (±1.10)p=0.441
Total confidence score---21.2 (±3.25)---19.3 (±4.38)p=0.005
Barriers to consultation
I don't have health insurance89 (88.1%)0 (0%)12 (11.9%)2.06 (±1.00)51 (86.4%)0 (0%)8 (13.6%)2.14 (±0.99)p=0.484
Consultations fees are high88 (87.1%)2 (2%)11 (10.9%)2.06 (±0.83)53 (89.8%)1 (1.7%)5 (8.5%)2.08 (±0.81)p=0.725
I spent lot of time waiting when I consult a health facility60 (59.4%)2 (2%)39 (38.6%)2.84 (±1.18)44 (74.6%)1 (1.7%)14 (23.7%)2.53 (±1.04)p=0.106
The health facility is far from my home81 (80.2%)0 (0%)20 (19.8%)2.34 (±0.89)54 (91.5%)0 (0%)5 (8.5%)2.14 (±0.60)p=0.250
I don't have time to go to a health facility71 (70.3%)1 (1%)29 (28.7%)2.53 (±1.11)53 (89.8%)0 (0%)6 (10.2%)2.03 (±0.76)p=0.004
Total barriers score---11.8 (±3.18)---10.9 (±2.69)p=0.028

Likert scale: 1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=neutral;4=agree; 5=strongly agree. P-value: Mann-Whitney U-test Comparison of means

Reasons of using self-medication – Means of Likert questions Likert scale: 1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=neutral;4=agree; 5=strongly agree. P-value: Mann-Whitney U-test Comparison of means Non-self-prescribers: Parents/caregivers who choose not to self-medicate reported most frequently that they don't use self-medication because “non-prescription drugs are dangerous”. Access to pharmacy, traditional healer, traditional medication shop or cost, were not found to be reasons to not use self-medication (Table 4).
Table 4

Reason for not using self-medication (n=34)

ReasonsDisagreeNeutralAgreeMean (±SD)
Nonprescription drugs are dangerous6 (17.7%)1 (2.9%)27 (79.4%)3.82 (±0.96)
Nonprescription drugs do not work9 (26.5%)3 (8.8%)22 (64.7%)3.53 (±1.05)
My child/children did not get sick30 (88.2%)0 (0%)4 (11.8%)2.18 (±0.93)
I have limited access to pharmacy33 (97.1%)0 (0%)1 (2.9%)1.94 (±0.48)
I can't afford medication in pharmacy32 (94.1%)0 (0%)2 (5.9%)1.88 (±0.68)
I have limited access to traditional medication shop/store32 (94.1%)1 (2.9%)1 (2.9%)1.82 (±0.62)
I have limited access to traditional healer33 (97.1%)0 (0%)1 (2.9%)1.76 (±0.51)

Likert scale: 1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3= neutral;4=agree; 5=strongly agree

Reason for not using self-medication (n=34) Likert scale: 1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3= neutral;4=agree; 5=strongly agree Social demographic association with use of non-prescription drug: The association between different demographic characteristics and the use of self-medication was analyzed. In bivariate analysis the factors that were statistically significantly associated with use of non-prescription drugs included being from Kigali and having more than one child less than 10 years of age. In the multivariate analysis of factors that were significant in the bivariate analysis (with cut-off p<0.2), the only factor associated with increased use of self-prescribed drugs was having more than 1 child under the age of 10 years (Table 5).
Table 5

Social demographic association with use of nonprescription drug

Use of medication w/o prescription

Yes (n=120)No (n=34)OR (CI)P-valueAdjusted OR (CI)P-value
Number of children <10yrsN (%)N (%)

>1 child92 (86.8%)14 (13.2%)4.6 (2.10–10.48)p<0.0014.74 (1.94–11.58)p=0.001
One child28 (58.3%)20 (41.7%)

OriginKigali78 (84.8%)14 (15.2%)2.65 (1.21–5.78)p=0.0132.23 (0.91–5.46)p=0.078
Outside Kigali42 (67.7%)20 (32.2%)

Site of interviewPrivate44 (86.3%)7 (13.7%)2.23 (0.89–5.55)p=0.0801.09 (0.32–3.67)p=0.886
Public76 (73.8%)27 (26.2%)

Economic statusHigh39 (86.6%)6 (13.3%)2.24 (0.86–5.87)p=0.0941.79 (0.53–6)p=0.342
Low/Moderate81 (74.3)28 (25.7)

Age of parent>3077 (81.9%)17 (18.1%)1.79 (0.83–3.86)p=0.1360.82 (0.32–2.09)p=0.679
<3043 (71.7%)17 (28.3%)

Education levelAdvanced61 (79.2%)16 (20.8%)1.16 (0.54–2.49)p=0.699NANA
Minimal59 (76.6%)18 (23.4%)

RelationshipMother104 (78.2%)29 (21.8%)1.12 (0.37–3.31)p=0.837NANA
Other16 (76.2%)5 (23.8%)

Marital statusMarried113 (77.9%)32 (22.1%)1.00 (0.20–5.09)p=0.991NANA
Single7 (77.8%)2 (22.2%)

Health insurancePrivate47 (78.3%)13 (21.7%)1.04 (0.47–2.27)p=0.922NANA
Mutuelle de santé/None73 (77.7%)21 (22.3%)

OR=Odds ratio; AOR=Adjusted Odds Ratio; Multivariate analysis (AOR) undertaken on factors with p-value <0.20

Social demographic association with use of nonprescription drug OR=Odds ratio; AOR=Adjusted Odds Ratio; Multivariate analysis (AOR) undertaken on factors with p-value <0.20 Association of socio-demographic factors with the use of modern versus. Traditional medication: The association between socio-demographic factors and the use of modern only vs. traditional only drugs was analyzed. In bivariate analysis the factors associated with use of exclusive modern rather than exclusive traditional drugs in self-medication were: caregivers in private clinic, caregivers from Kigali, advanced education, high social economic class, having private health insurance, and being older than 30 years. e included all factors with a p-value<0.2 in a multivariate analysis and after adjusting for confounders only age above 30 and living in Kigali remained associated with the preference of exclusive modern self-medication compared to exclusive traditional self-medication (Table 6).
Table 6

Social demographic association with type of self-medication used(modern vs. traditional)

Modern only (n=61)Traditional only (n=19)OR (95%CI)p-valueAdjusted OR(CI)p-value
N (%)N (%)
Site of interviewPrivate33 (97.1%)1 (2.9%)21.21 (2.66–169)p<0.0010.61 (0.02–18.16)p=0.778
Public28 (60.9%)18 (39.1%)

Education levelAdvanced43 (95.5%)2 (4.4%)20.3 (4.24–97.12)p<0.0012.38 (0.24–22.92)p=0.453
Minimal18 (51.4%)17 (48.6%)

Economic statusHigh30 (96.7%)1 (3.2%)17.41 (2.18–138.77)p=0.0014.75 (0.32–70.28)p=0.257
Low /Moderate32 (63.2)18 (36.7)

Health insurancePrivate38 (95%)2 (5%)14.04 (2.96–66.42)p<0.0012.78 (0.20–37.44)p=0.440
Mutuelle de santé/none23 (57.5%)17 (42.5%)

Age of parent>3049 (89.1%)6 (10.9%)8.84 (2.78–28.08)p<0.0015.78 (1.25–26.68)p=0.025
≤3012 (48%)13 (52%)

OriginKigali46 (90.2%)5 (9.8%)8.5 (2.65–27.82)p<0.0018.2 (1.58–43.12)p=0.012
Outside Kigali15 (51.7%)14 (48.2%)

Number of children <10yrs>one49 (79%)13 (21%)1.88 (0.59–5.98)p=0.281NANA
One12 (66.6%)6 (33.3%)

RelationshipOther11 (84.6%)2 (15.4%)1.87 (0.37–9.29)p=0.442NANA
Mother50 (74.6%)17 (25.4%)

Marital statusMarried59 (76.6%)18 (23.4%)1.63(0.14–19.14)p=0.693NANA
Single2 (66.7%)1 (33.3%)

OR=Odds ratio; AOR=Adjusted Odds Ratio; Multivariate analysis (AOR) undertaken on factors with p-value <0.20

Social demographic association with type of self-medication used(modern vs. traditional) OR=Odds ratio; AOR=Adjusted Odds Ratio; Multivariate analysis (AOR) undertaken on factors with p-value <0.20

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the reported self-medication use in children in private and public health facilities in Rwanda and to determine attitudes and reasons associated with parental decisions to self-medicate their children. Our study showed that 78% of participants have used self-medication for their children. Both modern and traditional drugs were used. This is similar to 77% reported in Pakistan 7 and higher than the prevalence of 32% and 58.82% reported in Madagascar and India 8,11,16. However, higher prevalence of 95.1% and 98.1% were reported in Greece and Australia 17,18. This shows that self-medication in children is a universal practice with some differences between countries. In our study 51% of parents/caregivers who used self-medication used only modern medicines, 16% used only traditional self-medicines and 33% used both. Our findings show that we had a lower rate of parents/caregivers who used only modern medicines compared to previous studies conducted in Sudan and Saudi Arabia where 84% and 86.7% of parents/caregivers reported using modern medicines over traditional ones 23,24; this difference can be explained by the fact that in our study we separately analyzed participants who used both types of self- medication, and did not attempt to specify whether they preferred modern or traditional drugs. Self-medication has many potential benefits, for example medications such as paracetamol can be effectively used. However, self-medication can result in ineffective medications being used, wasting parental resources and potentially delaying a child receiving appropriate care. Cough syrups were the second most widely used self-medication. This is of concern, particularly in young children as cough suppressants in this age group are known to be ineffective and to have potentially harmful effects27. Drugs for intestinal worms were the third most commonly used in self-medication. Clinical experience of the authors demonstrates that parents/caregivers may be attributing many other symptoms such as decreased appetite, poor weight gain as being caused by intestinal worms and therefore use of drugs for suspected intestinal worms without prior consultation may be inappropriate. Most alarming in our results was the finding that nearly 20% of parents/caregivers were self-medicating their children with antibiotics. As the world aims to combat antibiotic resistance, this form of self-medication should be addressed. There is a difference between education and economic factors associated with the choice to self-medicate. Studies from Spain, Finland, Italy, and Madagascar15,16,28,29, found that families with high income and with secondary and higher education level practice more self-medication than families with low income and low education level. On the other hand in a study done in India, family income and parental education were not significantly influencing self-medication practice, in Germany, mother with lower education level used fewer OTC and no significant difference was seen with regard to income status 11,30. In our study, financial, insurance or geographical access barriers were not reasons to choose self-medication. This finding is not surprising as 58% of our participants had Mutuelle de santé insurance, and access to healthcare in Rwanda is overall good with 79% of the population subscribing to an affordable community health insurance (Mutuelle de Santé) which covers 90% of consultation fees in public health facilities 31. Furthermore, our study showed that having more than one child less than 10 years of age was associated with the practice of self-medication. No other factor was shown to be associated with parental use of self-medication. Caregiver's age above 30 years of age were found to be associated with the use of modern self-medication compared to traditional ones. In contrast to our findings, being female and younger were associated with the practice of self-medication in Italy and Spain 15,28. We observed that coming from Kigali city was associated with the preference of modern drugs over traditional ones, which can be explained by the fact that most of our study participants were from Kigali where there is a wider availability of pharmacies dispensing modern medicines than in areas outside Kigali.

Limitations

Our analysis to identify associated factors did not include the group of parents/caregivers who used both types of self-medication. The internal validity could have been compromised by the high rate of verbal completion of the questionnaire, with participants being potentially prone to acquiescence bias. Recall bias may have also limited caregiver responses. All regional provinces of Rwanda were not represented.

Conclusion

Self-medication, a worldwide practice, is also common in Rwanda. Parents/caregivers are involved in this practice for their children regardless of their socio-demographic background. Consideration should be given to regulating drugs used in self-medication as well as the education of the population with the goal of minimizing the risks of self- medication and maximizing benefits.
  12 in total

1.  Information sources used by parents buying non-prescription medicines in pharmacies for preschool children.

Authors:  Nicola J Gray; Helen F Boardman; B Sue Symonds
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-08-11

2.  Primary Health Care in London: onwards from Alma Ata.

Authors:  Cyprian Okoro
Journal:  London J Prim Care (Abingdon)       Date:  2008

3.  Parental administration of over-the-counter medication to Spanish children: A population-based national study.

Authors:  Mar Martín-Pérez; Ana López De Andrés; Miguel Ángel Barcenilla González; Rodrigo Jiménez-García; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo; Domingo Palacios-Ceña; Pilar Carrasco-Garrido
Journal:  J Spec Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 1.260

4.  Parental attitudes toward medicine use in children in Finland.

Authors:  Katri Hämeen-Anttila; Pirjo Halonen; Sanna Siponen; Miina Holappa; Riitta Ahonen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-08-21

5.  Use of over-the-counter medicines for young children in Australia.

Authors:  Misel Trajanovska; Elizabeth Manias; Noel Cranswick; Linda Johnston
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 1.954

6.  Estimating the burden of minor ailment consultations in general practices and emergency departments through retrospective review of routine data in North East Scotland.

Authors:  Shona Fielding; Terry Porteous; James Ferguson; Vivienne Maskrey; Annie Blyth; Vibhu Paudyal; Garry Barton; Richard Holland; Christine M Bond; Margaret C Watson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among children from a German birth cohort (GINIplus): patterns, costs, and trends of use.

Authors:  Salvatore Italia; Helmut Brand; Joachim Heinrich; Dietrich Berdel; Andrea von Berg; Silke Britta Wolfenstetter
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.659

8.  Out-of-Hospital Administration of Medication without Prescription and Associated Factors among Preschool Children.

Authors:  Fotini Andritsou; Vassiliki Benetou; Koralia A Michail; Nikolaos Pantazis; Ioanna D Pavlopoulou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Caregiver delay in seeking healthcare during the acute phase of pediatric illness, Kigali, Rwanda.

Authors:  Christian Umuhoza; Angelique Charlie Karambizi; Lisine Tuyisenge; Peter Cartledge
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.