| Literature DB >> 34393697 |
Gengdong Chen1, Yan Li2, Shujun Liang2, Jinqiu Xiao2, Xinyu Duan2, Yuntao Zhou2, Yanqing Zeng2, Fanyiwen Sun2, Shiksha Shrestha2, Zheqing Zhang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous animal and in vitro studies indicated that anthocyanidins might contribute to the prevention of obesity, while epidemiological evidences were scarce and had not been conducted in children.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal obesity; anthocyanin; fat mass; handgrip strength; lean mass
Year: 2021 PMID: 34393697 PMCID: PMC8344405 DOI: 10.29219/fnr.v65.4428
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Nutr Res ISSN: 1654-661X Impact factor: 3.894
Characteristic of subjects included in the study
| Total ( | Girls ( | Boys ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 8.01 ± 0.93 | 8.06 ± 0.96 | 7.97 ± 0.91 | 0.285 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 15.8 ± 2.75 | 15.2 ± 2.10 | 16.2 ± 3.09 | |
| Height, m | 1.29 ± 7.99 | 1.28 ± 7.81 | 1.29 ± 8.14 | 0.704 |
| Weight, kg | 26.4 ± 7.04 | 25.3 ± 5.51 | 27.3 ± 7.92 | |
| Physical activity, Met×h/d | 39.9 ± 4.27 | 38.9 ± 3.87 | 40.6 ± 4.41 | |
| Dietary energy intake, kcal/d | 1,431 ± 434 | 1,336 ± 398 | 1,505 ± 449 | |
| Dietary protein intake, g/d | 61.8 ± 9.11 | 58.8 ± 8.83 | 64.1 ± 8.65 | |
| Dietary fat intake, g/d | 329 ± 69.7 | 316 ± 68.4 | 339 ± 69.1 | |
| Dietary carbohydrate intake, g/d | 193 ± 26.6 | 179 ± 22.3 | 204 ± 24.4 | |
| Dietary cholesterol intake, mg/d | 348 ± 140 | 333 ± 121 | 360 ± 151 | |
| Dietary calcium intake, mg/d | 491 ± 140 | 475 ± 131 | 503 ± 145 | |
| Dietary vitamin D intake, IU/d | 90.4 ± 47.9 | 85.5 ± 45.7 | 94.1 ± 49.3 | 0.059 |
| Dietary vegetable intake, g/d | 183 ± 94.3 | 188 ± 83.0 | 179 ± 102 | 0.339 |
| Dietary fruit intake, g/d | 149 ± 99.2 | 148 ± 97.8 | 150 ± 100 | 0.449 |
| Dietary anthocyanidin intake, mg/d | 6.88 ± 4.06 | 6.96 ± 4.05 | 6.81 ± 4.08 | 0.710 |
| Dietary delphinidin intake, mg/d | 0.58 ± 0.44 | 0.60 ± 0.44 | 0.56 ± 0.43 | 0.257 |
| Dietary cyanidin intake, mg/d | 5.36 ± 3.61 | 5.41 ± 3.55 | 5.32 ± 3.66 | 0.794 |
| Dietary peonidin intake, mg/d | 0.94 ± 0.72 | 0.95 ± 0.69 | 0.94 ± 0.75 | 0.905 |
| Delivery way, | 0.068 | |||
| Natural | 228 (50.4) | 109 (55.3) | 119 (46.7) | |
| Cesarean | 224 (49.6) | 88 (44.7) | 136 (53.3) | |
| Household income, Yuan×month-1, | 0.913 | |||
| ≤ 15,000 | 217 (48.0) | 94 (47.7) | 123 (48.2) | |
| > 15,000 | 235 (52.0) | 103 (52.3) | 132 (51.8) | |
| Maternal education, | 0.612 | |||
| ≤ 12 years | 173 (38.3) | 78 (39.6) | 95 (37.3) | |
| > 12 years | 279 (61.7) | 119 (60.4) | 160 (62.7) | |
| Paternal education | 0.746 | |||
| ≤ 12 years | 182 (40.3) | 81 (41.1) | 101 (39.6) | |
| > 12 years | 270 (59.7) | 116 (58.9) | 154 (60.4) | |
| Use of calcium supplements, | 0.192 | |||
| No | 269 (59.5) | 124 (62.9) | 145 (56.9) | |
| Yes | 183 (40.5) | 73 (37.1) | 110 (43.1) | |
| Use of multi-vitamin supplements, | 0.721 | |||
| No | 373 (82.5) | 164 (83.2) | 209 (82.0) | |
| Yes | 79 (17.5) | 33 (16.8) | 46 (18.0) | |
Continuous variables were presented as Mean ± standard deviation; Categorical variables were presented as frequency (percentage).
, adjusted for energy using residual methods.
Fig. 1Foods contribution of anthocyanidins in the study. Total anthocyanidins were derived by summarizing delphinidin, cyanidin, and peonidin. Pome fruits included apple, pear, peach, pineapple, and plum.
Associations of dietary anthocyanidins with abdominal obesity
| Abdominal obesity | Per SD increase of dietary anthocyanidin and its main compounds | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthocyanidin | Delphinidin | Cyanidin | Peonidin | |||||||||
| Total ( | ||||||||||||
| Model 1 | 0.74 | (0.56, 0.97) | 0.81 | (0.64, 1.07) | 0.136 | 0.71 | (0.53, 0.94) | 0.016 | 1.05 | (0.84, 1.32) | 0.664 | |
| Model 2 | 0.59 | (0.37, 0.94) | 0.80 | (0.50, 1.25) | 0.323 | 0.56 | (0.35, 0.90) | 0.018 | 1.04 | (0.74, 1.47) | 0.802 | |
| Girls ( | ||||||||||||
| Model 1 | 0.80 | (0.53, 1.22) | 0.295 | 0.94 | (0.64, 1.39) | 0.757 | 0.78 | (0.51, 1.19) | 0.249 | 0.91 | (0.68, 1.45) | 0.961 |
| Model 2 | 0.91 | (0.45, 1.84) | 0.790 | 1.27 | (0.56, 2.88) | 0.563 | 0.77 | (0.37, 1.60) | 0.489 | 1.60 | (0.83, 3.08) | 0.159 |
| Boys ( | ||||||||||||
| Model 1 | 0.70 | (0.49, 1.00) | 0.052 | 0.72 | (0.48, 1.06) | 0.096 | 0.66 | (0.45, 0.96) | 1.09 | (0.82, 1.45) | 0.550 | |
| Model 2 | 0.36 | (0.17, 0.77) | 0.49 | (0.22, 1.13) | 0.095 | 0.33 | (0.14, 0.75) | 0.83 | (0.49, 1.40) | 0.474 | ||
Logistic regression analysis, with Model 1 as univariate analysis without adjustment; and Model 2 adjusted for covariates including: age, sex, height, weight, delivery way, household income, parental education, physical activity, use of calcium and multi-vitamin supplements, dietary intake of energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, cholesterol, calcium, and vitamin D.
Associations of dietary anthocyanidins with body composition after adjusted for potential covariates
| Anthocyanidin | Delphinidin | Cyanidin | Peonidin | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole body | ||||||||||||
| Fat mass (FM), kg | −0.134 | 0.055 | −0.114 | 0.053 | −0.114 | 0.054 | −0.079 | 0.051 | 0.124 | |||
| Lean mass (LM), kg | 0.223 | 0.053 | 0.168 | 0.052 | 0.209 | 0.052 | 0.059 | 0.050 | 0.237 | |||
| Fat mass percentage (FMP), % | −0.628 | 0.195 | −0.619 | 0.191 | −0.540 | 0.194 | −0.327 | 0.184 | 0.076 | |||
| Trunk | ||||||||||||
| FM, kg | −0.064 | 0.027 | −0.033 | 0.026 | 0.213 | −0.058 | 0.027 | −0.030 | 0.025 | 0.241 | ||
| LM, kg | 0.099 | 0.027 | 0.057 | 0.027 | 0.093 | 0.027 | 0.034 | 0.025 | 0.180 | |||
| FMP, % | −0.708 | 0.206 | −0.485 | 0.191 | −0.633 | 0.205 | −0.366 | 0.194 | 0.060 | |||
| Limbs | ||||||||||||
| FM, kg | −0.070 | 0.033 | −0.079 | 0.032 | −0.055 | 0.033 | 0.093 | −0.049 | 0.031 | 0.117 | ||
| LM, kg | 0.121 | 0.031 | 0.120 | 0.030 | 0.110 | 0.030 | 0.029 | 0.029 | 0.317 | |||
| FMP, % | −0.749 | 0.269 | −0.968 | 0.261 | −0.620 | 0.268 | −0.387 | 0.253 | 0.127 | |||
| Android area | ||||||||||||
| FM, kg | −0.009 | 0.005 | 0.055 | −0.004 | 0.005 | −0.008 | 0.005 | −0.005 | 0.005 | 0.242 | ||
| LM, kg | 0.013 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.014 | 0.006 | −0.004 | 0.006 | 0.506 | |||
| FMP, % | −0.761 | 0.218 | −0.511 | 0.214 | −0.701 | 0.217 | −0.302 | 0.206 | 0.142 | |||
| Gynoid area | ||||||||||||
| FM, kg | −0.024 | 0.011 | −0.033 | 0.011 | −0.015 | 0.011 | 0.166 | −0.031 | 0.010 | |||
| LM, kg | 0.034 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.235 | 0.038 | 0.012 | −0.007 | 0.011 | 0.543 | ||
| FMP, % | −0.755 | 0.242 | −0.846 | 0.235 | −0.625 | 0.241 | −0.463 | 0.227 | ||||
Linear regression analysis, adjusted for covariates including: age, sex, height, weight, delivery way, household income, parental education, physical activity, use of calcium and multi-vitamin supplements, dietary intake of energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, cholesterol, calcium, vitamin D.