Literature DB >> 34393231

[Evaluating continence recovery time after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy].

H Hao1, Y Liu1, Y K Chen1, L M Si1, M Zhang1, Y Fan1, Z Y Zhang1, Q Tang1, L Zhang1, S L Wu1, Y Song1, J Lin1, Z Zhao1, C Shen1, W Yu1, W K Han1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate urinary continence recovery time and risk factors of urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP).
METHODS: From January 2019 to January 2021, a consecutive series of patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1-T3, cN0, cM0) were prospectively collected. RARP with total anatomical reconstruction was performed in all the cases by an experienced surgeon. Lymph node dissection was performed if the patient was in high-risk group according to the D'Amico risk classification. The primary endpoint was urinary continence recovery time after catheter removal. Postoperative and pathological variables were analyzed. Continence was rigo-rously analyzed 48 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after catheter removal. Continence was evaluated by recording diaper pads used per day, and all the patients were instructed to perform the 24-hour pad weight test until full recovery of urinary continence. The patient was defined as continent if no more than one safety pad were needed per day, or no more than 20-gram urine leakage on the 24-hour pad weight test. Time from catheter removal to full recovery of urinary continence was recorded, and risk factors influencing continence recovery time evaluated.
RESULTS: In total, 166 patients were analyzed. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 66.2 years, and the median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 8.51 μg/L. A total of 59 patients (35.5%) had bilateral lymphatic dissection, and 28 (16.9%) underwent neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation surgery. Postoperative pathology results showed that stage pT1 in 1 case (0.6%), stage pT2 in 77 cases (46.4%), stage pT3 in 86 cases (51.8%), and positive margins in 28 patients (16.9%). Among patients who underwent lymph node dissection, lymph node metastasis was found in 7 cases (11.9%). Median continence recovery time was one week. The number of the continent patients at the end of 48 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks were 65 (39.2%), 32 (19.3%), 34 (20.5%), 24 (14.5%), and 9 (5.4%). Two patients remained incontinent 24 weeks after catheter removal. The continence rates after catheter removal at the end of 48 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks were 39.2%, 58.4%, 78.9%, 93.4%, and 98.8%, respectively. Univariate COX analysis revealed that diabetes appeared to influence continence recovery time (OR=1.589, 95%CI: 1.025-2.462, P=0.038). At the end of 48 hours, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after catheter removal, the mean OABSS score of the continent group was significantly lower than that of the incontinent group.
CONCLUSION: RARP showed promising results in the recovery of urinary continence. Diabetes was a risk factor influencing continence recovery time. Bladder overactive symptoms play an important role in the recovery of continence after RARP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostatectomy; Robotic surgical procedures; Urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34393231      PMCID: PMC8365051     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  18 in total

1.  Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  G Novara; V Ficarra; C D'elia; S Secco; A Cioffi; S Cavalleri; W Artibani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery.

Authors:  Sergey Shikanov; Vikas Desai; Aria Razmaria; Gregory P Zagaja; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Rafael F Coelho; Kenneth J Palmer; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Riccardo Bertolo; Matteo Manfredi; Stefano De Luca; Enrico Checcucci; Ivano Morra; Roberto Passera; Cristian Fiori
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Critical review of 'pentafecta' outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high-volume centres.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Haidar M Abdul-Muhsin; Oscar Schatloff; Rafael F Coelho; Rair Valero; Young H Ko; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kenneth J Palmer; Sanket Chauhan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  A prospective study of quantification of urinary incontinence and quality of life in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  M Jønler; F A Madsen; P R Rhodes; M Sall; E M Messing; R C Bruskewitz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Does Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Have an Impact on Postoperative Early, Mid-Term and Late-Term Urinary Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?

Authors:  Serdar Cakmak; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Kemal Ener; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Serkan Altinova; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Ivano Morra; Marco Lucci Chiarissi; Matteo Manfredi; Fabrizio Mele; Susanna Grande; Francesca Ragni; Massimiliano Poggio; Cristian Fiori
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Brian A Link; Rebecca Nelson; David Y Josephson; Jeffrey S Yoshida; Laura E Crocitto; Mark H Kawachi; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Reduction of date microbial load with ozone.

Authors:  Davood Farajzadeh; Ali Qorbanpoor; Hasan Rafati; Mohsen Saberi Isfeedvajani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.