Literature DB >> 34393191

Comparing Performance of Different Predictive Models in Estimating Disease Progression in Alzheimer Disease.

Ali Ezzati1,2, Andrea R Zammit1, Richard B Lipton1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Automatic classification techniques provide tools to analyze complex data and predict disease progression.
METHODS: A total of 305 cognitively normal; 475 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI); and 162 patients with dementia were included in this study. We compared the performance of 3 different methods in predicting progression from aMCI to dementia: (1) index-based model; (2) logistic regression (LR); and (3) ensemble linear discriminant (ELD) machine learning models. LR and ELD models were trained using data from cognitively normal and dementia subgroups, and subsequently were applied to aMCI subgroup to predict their disease progression.
RESULTS: Performance of ELD models were better than LR models in prediction of conversion from aMCI to Alzheimer dementia at all time frames. ELD models performed better when a larger number of features were used for prediction.
CONCLUSION: Machine learning models have substantial potential to improve the predictive ability for cognitive outcomes.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34393191      PMCID: PMC8847534          DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.357


  10 in total

1.  Subtypes Based on Neuropsychological Performance Predict Incident Dementia: Findings from the Rush Memory and Aging Project.

Authors:  Andrea R Zammit; Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Mindy J Katz; Charles B Hall; Ali Ezzati; David A Bennett; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  Machine Learning Predictive Models Can Improve Efficacy of Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Ali Ezzati; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.

Authors:  Evangelia Christodoulou; Jie Ma; Gary S Collins; Ewout W Steyerberg; Jan Y Verbakel; Ben Van Calster
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  A 'Framingham-like' Algorithm for Predicting 4-Year Risk of Progression to Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment or Alzheimer's Disease Using Multidomain Information.

Authors:  Kyle Steenland; Liping Zhao; Samantha E John; Felicia C Goldstein; Allan Levey; Alonso Alvaro
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

6.  Optimizing Machine Learning Methods to Improve Predictive Models of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Ali Ezzati; Andrea R Zammit; Danielle J Harvey; Christian Habeck; Charles B Hall; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

7.  Big Data and Machine Learning in Health Care.

Authors:  Andrew L Beam; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Enchi Liu; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Mark E Schmidt; Leslie Shaw; Li Shen; Judith A Siuciak; Holly Soares; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 21.566

9.  Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Logistic regression.

Authors:  Priya Ranganathan; C S Pramesh; Rakesh Aggarwal
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

10.  Guidelines for Developing and Reporting Machine Learning Predictive Models in Biomedical Research: A Multidisciplinary View.

Authors:  Wei Luo; Dinh Phung; Truyen Tran; Sunil Gupta; Santu Rana; Chandan Karmakar; Alistair Shilton; John Yearwood; Nevenka Dimitrova; Tu Bao Ho; Svetha Venkatesh; Michael Berk
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.