Xue Han1, Ye Wang1, Peipei Zhang2, Manli Zhu3, Ling Li4, Xinmin Mao5,6, Xiaoting Sha1, Linlin Li1,5,7. 1. Department of Pharmacology, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China. 2. College of Pharmacy, Heze University, Heze, China. 3. Central Laboratory of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China. 4. Chemical Department, Pharmacy College, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China. 5. State Key Laboratory of Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment of High Incidence Diseases in Central Asia of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China. 6. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China. 7. Key Laboratory of Active Components of Xinjiang Natural Medicine and Drug Release Technology, Urumqi, China.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from Kazak individuals with normal glucose tolerance (KNGT) significantly reduces plasma glycolipid levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus db/db mice. However, the mechanism behind this effect has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To study the mechanism of improved glycolipid disorders in db/db mice by FMT from a KNGT donor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The normal diet group consisted of db/m mice orally administered 0.2 mL phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (db/m + PBS). For the db/db + PBS (Vehicle) and db/db + KNGT (FMT intervention group) groups, db/db mice received oral 0.2 mL PBS or faecal microorganisms from a KNGT donor, respectively. All mice were treated daily for 0, 6 or 10 weeks. Faecal DNA samples were sequenced and quantified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and RT-qPCR, respectively. Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) levels in the mouse faeces were determined by gas chromatography. G protein-coupled receptor 43 (GPR43) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) expression levels were determined. RESULTS: FMT intervention significantly increased the relative abundance of Bacteroides uniformis (0.038%, p < 0.05). Clostridium levels (LogSQ) were increased (p < 0.01), while Mucispirillum schaedleri levels (LogSQ) were decreased (p < 0.01). Acetate and butyrate levels in the faeces were significantly increased (acetate; butyrate: 22.68 ± 1.82 mmol/L; 4.13 ± 1.09 mmol/L, p < 0.05). GPR43 mRNA expression and GLP-1 protein expression increased in colon tissue (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Mechanistically, FMT-KNGT could improve glycolipid disorders by changing the bacterial composition responsible for producing SCFAs and activating the GPR43/GLP-1 pathway.
CONTEXT: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from Kazak individuals with normal glucose tolerance (KNGT) significantly reduces plasma glycolipid levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus db/db mice. However, the mechanism behind this effect has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To study the mechanism of improved glycolipid disorders in db/db mice by FMT from a KNGT donor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The normal diet group consisted of db/m mice orally administered 0.2 mL phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (db/m + PBS). For the db/db + PBS (Vehicle) and db/db + KNGT (FMT intervention group) groups, db/db mice received oral 0.2 mL PBS or faecal microorganisms from a KNGT donor, respectively. All mice were treated daily for 0, 6 or 10 weeks. Faecal DNA samples were sequenced and quantified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and RT-qPCR, respectively. Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) levels in the mouse faeces were determined by gas chromatography. G protein-coupled receptor 43 (GPR43) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) expression levels were determined. RESULTS: FMT intervention significantly increased the relative abundance of Bacteroides uniformis (0.038%, p < 0.05). Clostridium levels (LogSQ) were increased (p < 0.01), while Mucispirillum schaedleri levels (LogSQ) were decreased (p < 0.01). Acetate and butyrate levels in the faeces were significantly increased (acetate; butyrate: 22.68 ± 1.82 mmol/L; 4.13 ± 1.09 mmol/L, p < 0.05). GPR43 mRNA expression and GLP-1 protein expression increased in colon tissue (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Mechanistically, FMT-KNGT could improve glycolipid disorders by changing the bacterial composition responsible for producing SCFAs and activating the GPR43/GLP-1 pathway.
The increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its sequelae pose a serious challenge to global health. We previously conducted an epidemiological survey in the Xinjiang Uygur district and showed that the prevalence of T2DM amongst Kazak individuals was 1.56%, significantly lower than that of Uygurs (8.42%) (Tao et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2010). However, the reason for this low prevalence in Kazaks remains unclear. Identifying this reason could be of great significance for T2DM treatment. Recent studies have suggested that T2DM may be due to an imbalance in gut microbial composition and structure (Ma et al. 2018). For example, Prevotella copri and Bacteroides vulgatus contribute to insulin resistance, while Akkermansia municiphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii increase insulin sensitivity (Li et al. 2016).Our study showed significant gut differences between individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and T2DM (Wang et al. 2017). Disturbances in gut microbiota can lead to changes in the type and proportion of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) generated in the gut, which are closely related to obesity and T2DM (Qin et al. 2012). SCFAs, especially acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are the main products of intestinal microbial fermentation (Cummings et al. 1987). Interestingly, a previous study revealed that SCFAs improved glycolipid disorders in rodents (Koh et al. 2016). SCFAs act as signal transduction molecules that bind to and activate G protein-coupled receptors (GPRs), such as GPR43 and GPR41 (also called free fatty acid receptors 2 and 3, respectively [FFAR2 and FFAR3]) (Lu et al. 2016). A study focussing on SCFA target molecules in ffar2–/– and ffar3–/– mice showed that GPR43 and GPR41 were mainly activated by SCFAs, which promoted GLP-1 and peptide-yy (PYY) secretion from L cells and improved glucose tolerance (Samuel et al. 2008; Tolhurst et al. 2012).In a parallel study, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) material from an obese adult twin was performed on germ-free mice, resulting in mouse weight gains and increased obesity-associated metabolic phenotypes compared to FMT using faecal material from the thin twin (Ridaura et al. 2013). We previously treated db/db mice with FMT from Kazak individuals with normal glucose tolerance (FMT-KNGT). Our data showed that this FMT improved glucose and lipid metabolism in db/db mice, decreased Desulfovibrio and Clostridium coccoides levels, and increased Akkermansia municiphila levels (Zhang et al. 2020). To further explore this hypothesis from a mechanistic perspective, we investigated FMT-KNGT-mediated molecular mechanisms underlying these glucose and lipid metabolic improvements in db/db mice.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The use of human subjects and the db/db mouse model was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Urumqi, China; approval No: 20140212-113) (Supplementary 1 and 2). All participants provided written consent prior to the study (Supplementary 3).
Preparation of donor faecal fluid and plasma glycolipid analysis
The criteria for KNGT donor selection, preparation of donor faecal fluid, and plasma glycolipid analysis were previously described (Zhang et al. 2020). Briefly, fresh stool from a KNGT individual was collected, sealed quickly and transferred on ice to an aseptic biosafety cabinet. After the addition of sterile saline, the suspension was stirred, passed through stainless steel filters and centrifuged. The sediment was diluted with 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.2) containing sterile 10% medical-grade glycerine and stored at −80 °C. Preparations were thawed at 37 °C. The study consisted of three groups: db/m + PBS (n = 9 db/m mice), db/db + PBS (n = 9 db/db mice) and db/db + KNGT (n = 9 db/db mice). Faecal suspensions or PBS (0.2 mL) were administered by gavage to db/db mice every day for 0, 6 or 10 weeks. The normal control db/m mice received PBS. Three mice from each group were euthanized after 0, 6 or 10 weeks of FMT. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and postprandial glucose (PPG) were measured using the glucose oxidase method. Total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) levels were analyzed using the COD-PAP and GPOPAP assays. High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) plasma levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits.
Faecal stool collection and DNA extraction
Faecal samples were collected from all mice after 0, 6 and 10 weeks of FMT. The samples collected at six weeks were also used for 16S rRNA gene sequencing (n = 6 per group). The samples were stored at −80 °C until required. DNA was extracted from 200 mg of stool using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration and quality were determined using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
Amplification and sequencing of the V4 region of 16S rRNA gene
All qualified faecal DNA samples were used to construct libraries. The V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The libraries were sequenced in paired-end mode on a MiSeq System with sequencing strategy PE 250. The databases used for species annotation based on the 16S rRNA gene for bacterial and archaea community were Greengenes (default) V201305 (DeSantis et al. 2006) and RDP Release 9 201203 (Cole et al. 2014).
RT-qPCR of intestinal target bacteria
Faecal DNA was amplified using specific primers (Table 1) using a QuantStudio 6 Flex thermocycler (ABI, USA). PCR products were extracted from 1.5% agarose gels, purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Biosharp, China), and used as templates for RT-qPCR. RT-qPCR was conducted using the TB GreenTM Premix EX TaqTM II kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Reactions were performed in triplicate in a 20 μL reaction volume containing 0.8 µL of each primer, 10 µL Taq DNA polymerase, 6 µL nuclease-free water, 100 ng template DNA (2 μL) and 0.4 µL ROX, according to the TB GreenTM Premix EX TaqTM II kit instructions. Faecal DNA was amplified using specific target bacteria primers. The primers for the target genes and purified PCR products were designed and tested by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai). The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) was used to verify their accuracy (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (Supplementary 4).
Table 1.
RT-qPCR primers for intestinal target bacteria.
Target bacteria
Target gene
Amplicon length (bp)
Primer sequences (5′-3′)
Tm (°C)
(F, forward; R, reverse)
Clostridium (Da Silva et al. 2018)
16S rRNA
86
F: CATCCTGATGACGGTTTCTTAACC
58
R: GTTGCGGGACTTAACCCA
Bacteroides (Jiang et al. 2014)
16S rRNA
202
F: CTGAACCAGCCAAGTAGCG
58
R: CCGCAAACTTTCACAACTGACTTA
Sutterella (Williams et al. 2012)
16S rRNA
234
F: CGCGAAAAACCTTACCTAGCC
62
R: GACGTGTGAGGCCCTAGCC
Bacteroides uniformis (Tong et al. 2011)
16S rRNA
112
F: TCTTCCGCATGGTAGAACTATTA
60
R: ACCGTGTCTCAGTTCCAATGTG
Mucispirillum schaedleri
16S rRNA
178
F: CGAGCGTTGTTCGGAGTGACTG
65
R: CCAGCCAGATTGCCGCCTTC
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (Bartosch et al. 2004)
16S rRNA
177
F: GATGGCCTCGCGTCCGATTAG
60
R: CCGAAGACCTTCTTCCTCC
Ruminococcus gnavus (Cao et al. 2016)
16S rRNA
103
F: GGACTGCATCGTCCAGAAAG
58
R: AACGTCAGTCATCGTCCAGAAAG
RT-qPCR primers for intestinal target bacteria.
Faecal SCFA detection by gas chromatography (GC)
Faecal acetate, propionate and butyrate levels were measured by GC, as previously described (Wu et al. 2015). Approximately 100 mg of each dry stool sample was weighed, suspended in 0.4 mL methanol (Thermo, USA) and homogenized for about 2 min. The pH was adjusted to 1 to 2 by adding 5 M HCl. The samples were incubated at room temperature for 10 min with occasional shaking. The suspension was transferred to a polypropylene tube and centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000 rpm. Centrifugation was repeated until the supernatant was clear. The supernatants were spiked with the internal standard, 2-ethylbutyric acid (Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH, Germany), at a final concentration of 0.2 mM. The samples (1 μL) were then injected into a SHIMADZU GC2010 plus system (Japan) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). A high-resolution GC column (IntertCap pure-wax, 30 m × 0.25 mm internal diameter, SHIMADZU) coated with a 0.25 μm film thickness was used. Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas. The initial oven temperature was maintained at 100 °C for 0.5 min. The temperature was raised at 3 °C/min to 130 °C and held at this temperature for 15 min. The temperatures of the FID and injection port were 230 °C. The flow rates for hydrogen, air and nitrogen as carrier gases were 30, 300, and 40 mL/min, respectively. The run time for each analysis was 25 min. Acetate, propionate and butyrate levels in the samples were calculated using an internal standard curve method.
RNA extraction and GPR43 and GLP-1 RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from mouse colon tissue using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). cDNA was reverse transcribed using the PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was performed using the ABI QuantStudio 6 Flex (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Target primers were designed by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai) and tested for efficiency using the Primer-BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) (Table 2). Co-amplification with β-actin and invariant internal controls was performed for all samples. Assays were performed in triplicate, and data were normalized to internal standard mRNA levels using the 2−ΔΔCT method.
Table 2.
RT-qPCR primers for gene expression.
Primer name
Primer sequences (5′-3′)
Resource
(F, forward; R, reverse)
GPR43
F: ATCCTCCTGCTTAATCTGACCC
NM_146187
R: CGCACACGATCTTTGGTAGGT
GLP-1
F: CAAACCAAGATCACTGACAAGAAAT
Primer bank
R: GGGTTACACAATGCTAGAGGGA
β-actin
F: CAACTTGATGTATGAAGGCTTTGGT
Primer bank
R: ACTTTTATTGGTCTCAAGTCAGTGTACAG
RT-qPCR primers for gene expression.
Western blot analysis
Total protein was extracted from mouse colon tissue using RIPA lysis buffer containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, Thermo, USA). Protein concentrations were determined using the PierceTM bicinchoninic acid (BCA) Protein Assay kit (Thermo, USA). Protein lysates were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Roche, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk for 2 h at room temperature and washed three times with washing buffer (1 × Tris-buffered saline plus Tween 20 [TBST]). Membranes were incubated with anti-GLP-1 primary antibody (1:1000; Affinity, China) at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with secondary anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated IgG antibody (Bioss, China) at room temperature for 1 h. Protein bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (ECL, Biosharp, China). Protein signal intensities were quantified using Image J software. Data were normalized to β-actin. Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 software. Differences between the three groups (db/m + PBS, db/db + PBS and db/db + KNGT) were evaluated using one-way ANOVA analysis for normally distributed variables and the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-normally distributed variables (e.g., the 16S rRNA gene sequencing). All values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). p Values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
FMT-KNGT improved blood glucose levels in db/db mice
Comprehensive data from this study are shown in Figure 1 and Table 3. FBG and PPG levels were significantly increased in the mice in the db/db + PBS group over time (Figure 1(A,B); p < 0.01 for both). At 6 and 10 weeks post-FMT, the increases in the FBG and PPG levels were significantly inhibited in the db/db + KNGT group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively).
Figure 1.
The effects of faecal microbial transplantation from a Kazak individual with normal glucose tolerance on FBG (A) and PPG (B) levels in T2DM db/db mice. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. ## p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
Table 3.
Effect of FMT-KNGT on blood glucose levels in mice ( ± s, mmol/L).
Blood glucose
Group
Time (Week)
0w
6w
10w
FBG
db/m + PBS
5.04 ± 0.28
6.28 ± 0.37
6.48 ± 0.42
db/db + PBS
16.81 ± 2.23##
20.66 ± 1.74##
24.19 ± 1.30##
db/db + KNGT
16.78 ± 1.05
17.62 ± 0.87**
20.11 ± 1.59**
PPG
db/m + PBS
5.36 ± 0.23
6.72 ± 0.53
7.19 ± 0.40
db/db + PBS
19.88 ± 1.04##
23.48 ± 1.77##
26.16 ± 1.58##
db/db + KNGT
19.97 ± 0.65
20.38 ± 2.23**
20.49 ± 2.71*
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice. 0w: n = 6; 6w: n = 6; 10w: n = 3.
The effects of faecal microbial transplantation from a Kazak individual with normal glucose tolerance on FBG (A) and PPG (B) levels in T2DM db/db mice. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. ## p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice.Effect of FMT-KNGT on blood glucose levels in mice ( ± s, mmol/L).Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice. 0w: n = 6; 6w: n = 6; 10w: n = 3.
The effects of FMT-KNGT on blood lipid levels in db/db mice
FMT-KNGT improved dysfunctional lipid metabolism in db/db mice. As shown in Figure 2 and Table 4, the overall trend of the TC, TG and LDL-C levels in the db/db + KNGT group during the post-FMT period demonstrated a slow decline. After six weeks of intervention, the TC, TG and LDL-C levels were significantly reduced compared to the db/db + PBS group (p < 0.01). In contrast, the HDL-C levels increased significantly (p < 0.05) 6 and 10 weeks post-FMT compared to the db/db + PBS group (Figure 2(D)).
Figure 2.
The effects of faecal microbial transplantation from a Kazak individual with normal glucose tolerance on total cholesterol (TC) (A), triglycerides (TG) (B), LDL-C (C) and HDL-C (D) plasma levels in T2DM db/db mice. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
Table 4.
Effect of FMT-KNGT on blood lipid levels in mice ( ± s, TC, TG: mmol/L; HDL-C, LDL-C: mg/dL).
Blood lipid
Group
Time (week)
0w
6w
10w
TC
db/m + PBS
1.61 ± 0.27
1.89 ± 0.15
1.78 ± 0.16
db/db + PBS
3.45 ± 0.61##
4.21 ± 0.38##
3.53 ± 0.16##
db/db + KNGT
3.44 ± 0.43
3.15 ± 0.48**
3.16 ± 0.07*
TG
db/m + PBS
0.87 ± 0.13
0.88 ± 0.24
1.02 ± 0.02
db/db + PBS
1.62 ± 0.24##
1.67 ± 0.09##
1.89 ± 0.07##
db/db + KNGT
1.67 ± 0.16
1.40 ± 0.14**
1.29 ± 0.04**
LDL-C
db/m + PBS
3.11 ± 0.08
3.20 ± 0.05
3.08 ± 0.02
db/db + PBS
4.43 ± 0.14##
4.21 ± 0.02##
4.34 ± 0.08##
db/db + KNGT
4.27 ± 0.10
3.57 ± 0.08**
3.56 ± 0.07**
HDL-C
db/m + PBS
63.02 ± 2.28
70.30 ± 2.21
72.52 ± 1.37
db/db + PBS
53.97 ± 2.18##
55.30 ± 0.89##
56.68 ± 0.69##
db/db + KNGT
55.32 ± 1.99
58.28 ± 1.19*
59.24 ± 0.84*
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice. 0w: n = 6; 6w: n = 6; 10w: n = 3.
The effects of faecal microbial transplantation from a Kazak individual with normal glucose tolerance on total cholesterol (TC) (A), triglycerides (TG) (B), LDL-C (C) and HDL-C (D) plasma levels in T2DM db/db mice. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice.Effect of FMT-KNGT on blood lipid levels in mice ( ± s, TC, TG: mmol/L; HDL-C, LDL-C: mg/dL).Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice. 0w: n = 6; 6w: n = 6; 10w: n = 3.
Intestinal microbiome composition
We performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the faeces from the KNGT donor (Figure 3(A), Table 5) and each mouse group after six weeks of FMT (Figure 3(B,C)). The results of the sequencing at the genera and species levels are shown in Tables 6 and 7, respectively. In the KNGT donor stool samples, the relative abundance of the genus Prevotella microbes was the highest (78.04%), followed by Ruminococcus (3.81%), Dialister (3.77%), Oscillospira (1.63%), Bacteroides (1.53%), and Escherichia (1.39%). These bacteria accounted for >90% at the genus level. The remaining bacteria were unclassified or other genera.
Figure 3.
Relative abundance of gut microbiota species at the genus (A) level in faecal samples from the KNGT donor. Relative abundance differences of species at the genus (B) and species (C) levels from each mouse group after FMT-KNGT. Data are presented as percentages. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. For B and C, mouse faeces were tested at week 6. ‘Others’ refer to bacteria not indicated in the figure.
Table 5.
The relative abundance of bacteria in faecal samples from the KNGT donor at the genus level (%).
Bacteria
Relative abundance
Bacteroides
1.53
Blautia
0.19
Butyricimonas
0.28
Clostridium
0.13
Collinsella
0.01
Coprococcus
0.64
Dialister
3.77
Dorea
0.11
Enterobacter
0.11
Escherichia
1.39
Eubacterium
0.05
Faecalibacterium
1.44
Gemmiger
0.41
Oscillospira
1.63
Parabacteroides
0.33
Prevotella
78.04
Roseburia
0.61
Ruminococcus
3.81
Sutterella
0.67
Trabulsiella
0.05
Unclassified
3.78
Others
1.04
Table 6.
The relative abundance of the dominant bacteria in faecal samples from mice at the genus level (%, n = 6).
Bacteria
db/m + PBS
db/db + PBS
db/db + KNGT
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Bacteroides
2.32
2.2
4.16
2.00
4.14
2.32
Butyricicoccus
0.26
0.08
0.45
0.19
0.27
0.3
Clostridium
0.25
0.28
0.10
0.14
0.12
0.14
Coprococcus
2.10
2.65
0.45
0.36
0.73
0.67
Dorea
0.46
0.97
0.14
0.1
0.42
0.71
Escherichia
0.03
0.02
6.45
9.68
1.85
0.48
Mucispirillum
0.02
0.03
0.83
0.89
0.16
0.25
Odoribacter
0.21
0.25
1.66
2.3
1.00
0.96
Sutterella
3.78
1.39
0.17
0.18
0.18
0.1
Unclassified
66.13
61.73
66.97
Others
24.45
23.85
24.14
Results were obtained using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Mouse faeces were tested at week 6. ‘Others’ refer to bacteria not indicated in the table.
Table 7.
The relative abundance of the dominant bacteria in faecal samples from mice at the species level (%, n = 6).
Bacteria
db/m + PBS
db/db + PBS
db/db + KNGT
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Bacteroides uniformis
0.007
0.004
0.001#
0.001
0.038*
0.04
Bacteroides acidifaciens
0.265
0.32
0.885
0.80
0.660
0.43
Bacteroides caccae
0.153
0.11
1.591
1.24
2.067
1.91
Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum
0.256
0.08
0.453
0.19
0.269
0.3
Helicobacter hepaticus
0.017
0.01
0.391
0.29
0.298
0.27
Mucispirillum schaedleri
0.021
0.03
0.830
1.89
0.161
0.25
Ruminococcus flavefaciens
0.306
0.32
0.000
0.00
0.000
0
Ruminococcus gnavus
2.435
3.71
1.044
0.38
1.151
1.27
Unclassified
93.939
87.695
93.064
Others
2.602
7.110
2.293
Results were obtained using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Mouse faeces were tested at week 6. ‘Others’ refer to bacteria not indicated in the table. #p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice. *p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
Relative abundance of gut microbiota species at the genus (A) level in faecal samples from the KNGT donor. Relative abundance differences of species at the genus (B) and species (C) levels from each mouse group after FMT-KNGT. Data are presented as percentages. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. For B and C, mouse faeces were tested at week 6. ‘Others’ refer to bacteria not indicated in the figure.The relative abundance of bacteria in faecal samples from the KNGT donor at the genus level (%).The relative abundance of the dominant bacteria in faecal samples from mice at the genus level (%, n = 6).Results were obtained using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Mouse faeces were tested at week 6. ‘Others’ refer to bacteria not indicated in the table.The relative abundance of the dominant bacteria in faecal samples from mice at the species level (%, n = 6).Results were obtained using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Mouse faeces were tested at week 6. ‘Others’ refer to bacteria not indicated in the table. #p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice. *p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.In the mouse stool samples, the relative abundances of Odoribacter, Mucispirillum, Escherichia, Bacteroides, Butyricicoccus, Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum, Mucispirillum schaedleri, Helicobacter hepaticus, and Bacteroides acidifaciens were higher in the db/db + PBS mice than in the db/m + PBS mice. These bacteria levels were downregulated in the db/db + KNGT mice after six weeks of FMT. In contrast, the relative abundances of Sutterella, Dorea, Coprococcus, Clostridium, Bacteroides uniformis, and Ruminococcus gnavus were lower in the db/db + PBS mice. Interestingly, the levels of these bacteria were upregulated in the db/db + KNGT mice after six weeks of FMT (Figure 3(B,C), and Tables 6 and 7).
Verification of target bacteria based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing
Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing data (Figure 3(B,C)), we verified the target bacteria by RT-qPCR (Figure 4, Table 8). The RT-qPCR analysis showed that the Mucispirillum schaedleri levels in the faeces of db/db + PBS mice were significantly higher compared to the levels in the db/m + PBS mice (p < 0.01) (Figure 4(A)), while the Clostridium levels in the faeces of db/db + PBS mice were significantly lower than in the db/m + PBS mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 4(B)). Sutterella, Bacteroides uniformis, Ruminococcus gnavus, Bacteroides, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were reduced over time but not significantly (Figure 4(C–G)). When compared to the db/db + PBS mice, Mucispirillum schaedleri levels were significantly lower in db/db + KNGT mice over the FMT period (p < 0.01) (Figure 4(A)). In contrast, Clostridium levels were significantly higher over this time period (p < 0.01) (Figure 4(B)). There was also an upward trend in the Bacteroides, Sutterella, Bacteroides uniformis, Ruminococcus gnavus, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels, but these changes did not reach statistical significance (Figure 4(C–G)).
Figure 4.
Quantification of gut bacteria in each group over time. SQ represents the starting template quantity of Mucispirillum schaedleri (A), Clostridium (B), Sutterella (C), Bacteroides uniformis (D), Ruminococcus gnavus (E), Bacteroides (F) and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (G). On the horizontal axis, 0w, 6w, and 10w represent 0, 6 and 10 weeks after FMT-KNGT intervention. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice. **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
Table 8.
Effect of FMT- KNGT on the levels of target bacteria in the faeces of mice by RT-qPCR ( ± s, LogSQ).
Bacteria
Group
Time (Week)
0w
6w
10w
Mucispirillum schaedleri
db/m + PBS
2.28 ± 0.20
2.59 ± 0.22
3.01 ± 0.10
db/db + PBS
3.17 ± 0.48#
3.60 ± 0.54##
4.11 ± 0.43##
db/db + KNGT
2.98 ± 0.33#
2.88 ± 0.39**
3.12 ± 0.30**
Clostridium
db/m + PBS
1.34 ± 0.12
1.22 ± 0.11
1.16 ± 0.07
db/db + PBS
1.12 ± 0.08#
1.02 ± 0.07#
0.92 ± 0.07#
db/db + KNGT
1.19 ± 0.14#
1.43 ± 0.17**
1.21 ± 0.05**
Sutterella
db/m + PBS
2.54 ± 0.30
2.24 ± 0.22
2.02 ± 0.05
db/db + PBS
2.00 ± 0.25#
1.64 ± 0.15#
1.66 ± 0.22#
db/db + KNGT
2.15 ± 0.31#
2.05 ± 0.59
1.82 ± 0.15
Bacteroides uniformis
db/m + PBS
2.27 ± 0.34
2.31 ± 0.22
1.84 ± 0.09
db/db + PBS
2.07 ± 0.18
2.16 ± 0.14
1.65 ± 0.23
db/db + KNGT
2.07 ± 0.17
2.29 ± 0.17
1.79 ± 0.09
Ruminococcus gnavus
db/m + PBS
2.83 ± 0.63
2.57 ± 0.75
2.20 ± 0.61
db/db + PBS
2.12 ± 0.46#
1.62 ± 0.28#
1.23 ± 0.20
db/db + KNGT
2.25 ± 0.60
2.20 ± 0.61
1.72 ± 0.43
Bacteroides
db/m + PBS
5.54 ± 0.86
5.02 ± 0.23
4.47 ± 0.23
db/db + PBS
4.23 ± 0.31#
4.68 ± 0.10#
3.86 ± 0.25
db/db + KNGT
4.37 ± 0.36#
4.78 ± 0.29
4.34 ± 0.51
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
db/m + PBS
2.80 ± 0.38
2.94 ± 0.36
2.91 ± 0.04
db/db + PBS
2.39 ± 0.51
2.19 ± 0.53#
2.08 ± 0.23#
db/db + KNGT
2.37 ± 0.43
2.50 ± 0.44
2.62 ± 0.43
SQ represents the starting template quantity. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice. 0w: n = 6, 6w: n = 6, 10w: n = 3.
Quantification of gut bacteria in each group over time. SQ represents the starting template quantity of Mucispirillum schaedleri (A), Clostridium (B), Sutterella (C), Bacteroides uniformis (D), Ruminococcus gnavus (E), Bacteroides (F) and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (G). On the horizontal axis, 0w, 6w, and 10w represent 0, 6 and 10 weeks after FMT-KNGT intervention. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice. **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice.Effect of FMT- KNGT on the levels of target bacteria in the faeces of mice by RT-qPCR ( ± s, LogSQ).SQ represents the starting template quantity. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 compared to db/m + PBS mice; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice. 0w: n = 6, 6w: n = 6, 10w: n = 3.
Changes in faecal SCFA levels upon FMT intervention
Acetate, propionate and butyrate levels in faecal samples were quantified by GC (Figure 5(A,B)). Over time, faecal acetic acid levels were significantly increased in db/db + KNGT mice when compared to db/db + PBS mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 5(C), Table 9). Butyric acid levels were significantly increased after ten weeks of FMT in db/db + KNGT mice compared to db/db + PBS mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 5(C), Table 9). However, we observed no differences in the propionate levels across the three groups at any of the time points (Figure 5(C), Table 9).
Figure 5.
Gas chromatography comparisons between SCFA standards (A) and faecal samples (B) a = acetic acid, b = propionic acid, c = butyric acid, d = 2-ethyl butyric acid. SCFA data at 0, 6 and 10 weeks for faecal samples from mice after FMT-KNGT treatment (C). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
Table 9.
Concentrations of acetic acid, propionic acid and butyrate acid in faecal samples of mice ( ± s, mmol/L).
SCFAs
Group
Time (Week)
0w
6w
10w
Acetic acid
db/m + PBS
5.39 ± 0.98
6.05 ± 1.03
12.32 ± 2.60
db/db + PBS
6.86 ± 1.77
4.52 ± 0.59
11.97 ± 3.06
db/db + KNGT
6.60 ± 1.98
6.60 ± 1.32*
22.68 ± 1.82**
Propionic acid
db/m + PBS
0.85 ± 0.22
0.87 ± 0.19
2.09 ± 0.47
db/db + PBS
0.67 ± 0.15
0.75 ± 0.18
1.87 ± 0.47
db/db + KNGT
0.64 ± 0.21
0.66 ± 0.07
1.93 ± 0.60
Butyric acid
db/m + PBS
0.95 ± 0.25
0.97 ± 0.27
2.13 ± 0.27
db/db + PBS
1.07 ± 0.48
1.17 ± 0.41
1.87 ± 0.15
db/db + KNGT
1.09 ± 0.20
1.17 ± 0.30
4.13 ± 1.09*
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice. 0w: n = 6, 6w: n = 6, 10w: n = 3.
Gas chromatography comparisons between SCFA standards (A) and faecal samples (B) a = acetic acid, b = propionic acid, c = butyric acid, d = 2-ethyl butyric acid. SCFA data at 0, 6 and 10 weeks for faecal samples from mice after FMT-KNGT treatment (C). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice.Concentrations of acetic acid, propionic acid and butyrate acid in faecal samples of mice ( ± s, mmol/L).Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 compared to db/db + PBS mice. 0w: n = 6, 6w: n = 6, 10w: n = 3.
Expression of GPR43 and GLP-1 mRNA during FMT treatment
GPR43 and GLP-1 mRNA levels were lower in the colons from db/db + PBS mice than db/m + PBS mice. FMT-KNGT for six weeks significantly increased GPR43 expression levels in the colons of db/db + KNGT mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 6(A), Table 10). However, no statistical differences were observed after ten weeks of FMT. FMT-KNGT increased GLP-1 expression levels over time in the colons of the db/db + KNGT mice (Figure 6(B), Table 10).
Figure 6.
GPR43 mRNA (A) and GLP-1 (B) levels in colon tissues from each mouse group after FMT-KNGT at 0, 6 and 10 weeks. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. #p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice. *p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
Table 10.
GPR43 and GLP-1 mRNA expression in colonic tissue of mice ( ± s, n = 3).
mRNA
Group
Time (week)
0w
6w
10w
GPR43
db/m + PBS
1.08 ± 0.23
1.05 ± 0.07
1.37 ± 0.23
db/db + PBS
0.50 ± 0.15#
0.44 ± 0.17#
1.07 ± 0.70
db/db + KNGT
0.60 ± 0.10#
0.82 ± 0.16*
1.16 ± 0.21
GLP-1
db/m + PBS
1.04 ± 0.30
1.00 ± 0.37
1.19 ± 0.58
db/db + PBS
0.87 ± 0.25
0.80 ± 0.47
0.75 ± 0.24
db/db + KNGT
0.83 ± 0.43
0.92 ± 0.44
1.01 ± 0.63
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. #p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
GPR43 mRNA (A) and GLP-1 (B) levels in colon tissues from each mouse group after FMT-KNGT at 0, 6 and 10 weeks. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. #p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice. *p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.GPR43 and GLP-1 mRNA expression in colonic tissue of mice ( ± s, n = 3).Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. #p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice; *p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
GLP-1 protein expression during FMT treatment
GLP-1 protein expression was significantly lower in the colon of the db/db + PBS group over time when compared to the db/m + PBS group (p < 0.05). FMT-KNGT over a 10-week period significantly increased GLP-1 expression in the colon of db/db + KNGT mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 7(A), Table 11).
Figure 7.
GLP-1 protein expression in the colon tissue of each mouse group after FMT-KNGT at 0, 6 and 10 weeks. The grey values were analyzed by ImageJ. Data are presented as the mean ± SD values. *p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice. #p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
Table 11.
Protein expression of GLP-1 in colonic tissue of mice ( ± s, n = 3).
Protein expression
Group
Time (Week)
0w
6w
10w
GLP-1
db/m + PBS
1.08 ± 0.08
1.03 ± 0.07
0.82 ± 0.14
db/db + PBS
0.89 ± 0.40
0.59 ± 0.27#
0.40 ± 0.09#
db/db + KNGT
0.96 ± 0.22
0.73 ± 0.22
0.62 ± 0.20*
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice; #p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
GLP-1 protein expression in the colon tissue of each mouse group after FMT-KNGT at 0, 6 and 10 weeks. The grey values were analyzed by ImageJ. Data are presented as the mean ± SD values. *p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice. #p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.Protein expression of GLP-1 in colonic tissue of mice ( ± s, n = 3).Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05 compared to db/m + PBS mice; #p < 0.05 compared to db/db + PBS mice.
Correlation analysis
Pearson correlation analysis for the seven target bacteria and glycolipid metabolism parameters after 6 weeks of FMT-KNGT showed that Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium prausnitziiand, and Ruminococcus gnavus levels were negatively correlated with FBG, PPG, TC and TG levels. Sutterella levels were also negatively correlated with PPG, FBG, and TC levels. In contrast, Mucispirillum schaedleri levels were positively correlated with FBG, PPG, TC, and TG levels (Figure 8(A)).
Figure 8.
Correlations between faecal target bacteria and plasma glycolipid levels in three groups mice treated with FMT-KNGT for 6 weeks (A) and 10 weeks (B). R value is between 0.6∼-0.6; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Correlations between faecal target bacteria and plasma glycolipid levels in three groups mice treated with FMT-KNGT for 6 weeks (A) and 10 weeks (B). R value is between 0.6∼-0.6; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.Pearson correlation analysis after ten weeks of FMT-KNGT showed that the expression levels of Bacteroides and Ruminococcus gnavus were still negatively correlated with FBG, PPG, TC, and TG levels, and Sutterella levels were negatively correlated with PPG, FBG, and TG levels. Clostridium levels were negatively correlated with TG, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels were negatively correlated with PPG and TG levels. Moreover, Mucispirillum schaedleri levels were positively correlated with FBG, PPG, TC, and TG levels (Figure 8(B)).
Discussion and conclusions
More and more evidence suggests that intestinal microbiota is a causative factor in T2DM (Tong et al. 2018). Therefore, the intestinal microbiota is a promising target for disease control. We determined the species composition of KNGT donor faecal samples and mouse faecal samples after FMT-KNGT by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Twenty genera were identified. Prevotella accounted for 78.04% of the bacteria at the genus level (Table 5). It was previously reported (Kovatcheva-Datchary et al. 2015) that the oral administration of Prevotella or Prevotella copri bacteria from normal faeces to C57 BL/6 mice for seven days improved glucose metabolism levels. However, we did not observe such a phenomenon in our study. After six weeks of FMT-KNGT in db/db mice, the relative abundance of Prevotella in the three groups was not statistically different.Interestingly, nine genera of Odoribacter, Mucispirillum, Escherichia, Bacteroides, Butyricicoccus, Sutterella, Dorea, Coprococcus, and Clostridium and six strains of Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum, Mucispirillum schaedleri, Helicobacter hepaticus, Bacteroides acidifaciens, Bacteroides uniformis, and Ruminococcus gnavus were changed among the three groups (Tables 6 and 7). Rawls et al. (2006) showed that after transplanting mouse and zebrafish microbiota into germ-free zebrafish and mice, the hosts supported a complex foreign microbial consortium by shaping its composition. Similarly, our results demonstrated that after foreign microbiota were transplanted into db/db mice, the community composition in the mice changed. The changes were not towards the composition of the donor community; however, under the actions of the recipient host, some bacteria with low relative abundance changed (e.g., Bacteroides uniformis). Seven bacteria were evaluated by RT-qPCR. We found that Bacteroides, Sutterella, Clostridium, Bacteroides uniformis, and Ruminococcus gnavus levels decreased after FMT-KNGT over time, while the Mucispirillum schaedleri content increased with time. Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Ruminococcus gnavus are acetic acid-producing bacteria, and Bacteroides uniformis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii are butyric acid-producing (Koh et al. 2016). Mucispirillum schaedleri can induce intestinal inflammation in doubly-deficient Nod2/Cybb mice (Caruso et al. 2019). Moreover, Clostridium is depleted in individuals with pre-diabetes, and these levels are negatively correlated with fasting levels of glucose and triacylglycerol, insulin resistance estimates, inflammation and adiposity (Allin et al. 2018). Butyric acid is a metabolite of Bacteroides uniformis that improves the metabolic and immune dysfunction caused by gut microbiota imbalance in obese mice (Gauffin Cano et al. 2012). Furthermore, intestinal SCFAs are associated with T2DM, and glycolipid levels can be regulated by SCFAs (Li et al. 2017).Therefore, we observed that after six weeks of FMT-KNGT treatment, acetic acid levels increased significantly in the db/db + KNGT group, whereas butyric acid levels significantly increased after ten weeks of treatment, suggesting that bacterial metabolites could significantly change in response to changes in the microbiota in relation to the intervention time. A previous study showed that SCFAs were GPR43 agonists to stimulate GLP-1 and PYY secretion from L cells, which could improve dysfunctional glucose and lipid metabolism and insulin resistance (Koh et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2020). We found GPR43 mRNA expression and GLP-1 protein expression levels in the colons of db/db mice increased after six weeks of FMT-KNGT treatment and were related to the SCFA data. These results suggested that promoting GLP-1 secretion might be dependent on the upregulation of GPR43 by SCFAs. Thus, our data demonstrated that FMT from Kazaks could promote GLP-1 secretion induced by the SCFAs by regulating gut microbiota in db/db mice. However, one limitation of our study was the use of only FMT-KNGT. The effects of human faecal transplantation from Uygur and Han nationalities with normal glucose tolerance on T2DM should be included. This deficiency will be addressed in future studies to investigate the FMT-KNGT mechanisms for improving dysfunctional glucose and lipid metabolism.One of the possible mechanisms for the ability of FMT-KNGT to improve dysfunctional glucose and lipid metabolism is that by increasing the diversity of the gut microbiota and affecting the different microbial species in the intestines of mice, the level of bacteria producing SCFAs could increase, resulting in an increased SCFA content in the faeces of mice. This increase might activate the GPR43/GLP-1 pathway and increase GLP-1 expression in the colon, thus, regulating dysfunctional glucose and lipid metabolism.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Buck S Samuel; Abdullah Shaito; Toshiyuki Motoike; Federico E Rey; Fredrik Backhed; Jill K Manchester; Robert E Hammer; S Clay Williams; Jan Crowley; Masashi Yanagisawa; Jeffrey I Gordon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Vanessa K Ridaura; Jeremiah J Faith; Federico E Rey; Jiye Cheng; Alexis E Duncan; Andrew L Kau; Nicholas W Griffin; Vincent Lombard; Bernard Henrissat; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Olga Ilkayeva; Clay F Semenkovich; Katsuhiko Funai; David K Hayashi; Barbara J Lyle; Margaret C Martini; Luke K Ursell; Jose C Clemente; William Van Treuren; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Christopher B Newgard; Andrew C Heath; Jeffrey I Gordon Journal: Science Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Gwen Tolhurst; Helen Heffron; Yu Shan Lam; Helen E Parker; Abdella M Habib; Eleftheria Diakogiannaki; Jennifer Cameron; Johannes Grosse; Frank Reimann; Fiona M Gribble Journal: Diabetes Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Hannah E Da Silva; Anastasia Teterina; Elena M Comelli; Amel Taibi; Bianca M Arendt; Sandra E Fischer; Wendy Lou; Johane P Allard Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: James R Cole; Qiong Wang; Jordan A Fish; Benli Chai; Donna M McGarrell; Yanni Sun; C Titus Brown; Andrea Porras-Alfaro; Cheryl R Kuske; James M Tiedje Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 16.971