Literature DB >> 34392414

Bone-modifying agents for bone loss in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy; insights from a network meta-analysis.

Hirotaka Miyashita1,2, Sera Satoi3, Christina Cruz3, Se-Min Kim4,5, Vaibhav G Patel6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The data of head-to-head comparisons of the effect of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) in patients with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer without skeletal metastasis is limited. Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis to compare each BMA for the efficacy of bone mineral densities (BMDs) and the risk of fracture.
METHODS: We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the change of BMDs and the risk of vertebral fracture in the studies included using a random-effect model. The primary outcomes are the change of BMD of the lumbar spine (LS) and the total hip (TH) from the baseline at 1 year from the initiation of the BMA and the risk of vertebral fracture.
RESULTS: We identified and included 15 studies in this analysis. All BMAs except risedronate showed a significant increase of BMD of the LS compared with groups without BMA, among which zoledronate showed the most BMD gain. At TH, bisphosphonates (alendronate, pamidronate, and zoledronate) and denosumab showed significant elevation compared with the no-BMA group. Denosumab was associated with the most BMD gain at the TH. Only denosumab reduced the risk of vertebral fracture (relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.40 [0.20-0.81]). Although zoledronate showed the highest BMD gain at the LS, it did not reduce the risk of vertebral fracture in this analysis.
CONCLUSION: Most bisphosphonates and denosumab significantly increased BMD at the LS and the TH in patients receiving ADT for prostate cancer without skeletal metastasis. In particular, zoledronate and denosumab were the most potent BMAs in terms of BMD increment at the LS and the TH, respectively. However, denosumab, not zoledronate, was the only BMA that showed a significant risk reduction of vertebral fracture. We need further studies to examine the change of bone quality and the effect on the risk of non-vertebral and hip fractures.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bisphosphonate; Bone mineral density; Denosumab; Prostate cancer; Vertebral fracture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34392414     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06490-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  26 in total

Review 1.  FRAX Update.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; William D Leslie; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 2.  Safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or low bone mineral density: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenyu Zhou; Chen Chen; Jun Zhang; Xinran Ji; Lifeng Liu; Guichun Zhang; Xuecheng Cao; Pingshan Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-04-15

3.  Management of Osteoporosis in Survivors of Adult Cancers With Nonmetastatic Disease: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Charles L Shapiro; Catherine Van Poznak; Christina Lacchetti; Jeffrey Kirshner; Richard Eastell; Robert Gagel; Sean Smith; Beatrice J Edwards; Elizabeth Frank; Gary H Lyman; Matthew R Smith; Rahul Mhaskar; Tara Henderson; Joan Neuner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Bone loss after initiation of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Susan L Greenspan; Penelope Coates; Susan M Sereika; Joel B Nelson; Donald L Trump; Neil M Resnick
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory.

Authors:  Gerta Rücker
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.273

Review 6.  Drug holidays from bisphosphonates and denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: EMAS position statement.

Authors:  Panagiotis Anagnostis; Stavroula A Paschou; Gesthimani Mintziori; Iuliana Ceausu; Herman Depypere; Irene Lambrinoudaki; Alfred Mueck; Faustino R Pérez-López; Margaret Rees; Levent M Senturk; Tommaso Simoncini; John C Stevenson; Petra Stute; Florence A Trémollieres; Dimitrios G Goulis
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Philip Cornford; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Maria De Santis; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Thomas Wiegel; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Pamidronate to prevent bone loss during androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M R Smith; F J McGovern; A L Zietman; M A Fallon; D L Hayden; D A Schoenfeld; P W Kantoff; J S Finkelstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Randomized controlled trial of zoledronic acid to prevent bone loss in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; James Eastham; Donald M Gleason; Daniel Shasha; Simon Tchekmedyian; Norman Zinner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Review of major adverse effects of androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lockwood G Taylor; Steven E Canfield; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.