Sithara Vivek1, Mercedes R Carnethon2, Anna Prizment3, April P Carson4, Michael P Bancks5, David R Jacobs6, Bharat Thyagarajan7. 1. University of Minnesota, School of Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, United States. 2. Northwestern University, Chicago, Department of Preventive Medicine, United States. 3. University of Minnesota, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, United States. 4. University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, United States. 5. Wake Forest, School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, United States. 6. University of Minnesota, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, United States. 7. University of Minnesota, School of Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, United States. Electronic address: thya0003@umn.edu.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate whether the extent of return to fasting state 2-hours after a glucose challenge among normoglycemic individuals is associated with lower risk of incident prediabetes/ type 2 diabetes in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) cohort study. METHODS: We evaluated this association among 1879 normoglycemic adults who were categorized into three groups: 'Low post load' (2hPG < FPG); 'Medium post load' (2hPG ≥ FPG and < 75th percentile of the difference); and 'High post load' (2hPG > FPG and ≥ 75th percentile of the difference). We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the association of the difference in 2hPG and FPG with incident diabetes/prediabetes after adjustment for demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: During 20 years of follow-up, 8% developed type 2 diabetes and 35% developed prediabetes. Compared to those with 'Low post load', the risk of type 2 diabetes was higher for participants with 'High post load' [HR: 1.56, 95% CI (1.03, 2.37)] and similar for participants with 'Medium post load' [HR: 0.99, 95% CI (0.64, 1.52)]. However, HRs for incident prediabetes among participants with 'High post load' [HR = 1.2, 95 %CI = (0.98, 1.46)] was not significantly different compared to participants with 'Low post load'. CONCLUSION: Among normoglycemic individuals, a difference between 2hPG and FPG concentration > 0.9 mmol/L can be used to stratify individuals at higher risk for developing type 2 diabetes.
AIM: To evaluate whether the extent of return to fasting state 2-hours after a glucose challenge among normoglycemic individuals is associated with lower risk of incident prediabetes/ type 2 diabetes in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) cohort study. METHODS: We evaluated this association among 1879 normoglycemic adults who were categorized into three groups: 'Low post load' (2hPG < FPG); 'Medium post load' (2hPG ≥ FPG and < 75th percentile of the difference); and 'High post load' (2hPG > FPG and ≥ 75th percentile of the difference). We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the association of the difference in 2hPG and FPG with incident diabetes/prediabetes after adjustment for demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: During 20 years of follow-up, 8% developed type 2 diabetes and 35% developed prediabetes. Compared to those with 'Low post load', the risk of type 2 diabetes was higher for participants with 'High post load' [HR: 1.56, 95% CI (1.03, 2.37)] and similar for participants with 'Medium post load' [HR: 0.99, 95% CI (0.64, 1.52)]. However, HRs for incident prediabetes among participants with 'High post load' [HR = 1.2, 95 %CI = (0.98, 1.46)] was not significantly different compared to participants with 'Low post load'. CONCLUSION: Among normoglycemic individuals, a difference between 2hPG and FPG concentration > 0.9 mmol/L can be used to stratify individuals at higher risk for developing type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Muhammad A Abdul-Ghani; Valeriya Lyssenko; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Ralph A DeFronzo; Leif Groop Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: A R Folsom; D R Jacobs; L E Wagenknecht; S P Winkhart; C Yunis; J E Hilner; P J Savage; D E Smith; J M Flack Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1996-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Eric J Epstein; Jamie L Osman; Hillel W Cohen; Swapnil N Rajpathak; Oksana Lewis; Jill P Crandall Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 19.112