Literature DB >> 34389905

The Role of External Loop Recorders in Arrhythmia-Related Symptoms in Children: A Single Center Experience.

Tugberk Akca1, Fahrettin Uysal2, Ozlem Mehtap Bostan2, Abdusselam Genc2, Hasan Turkmen2.   

Abstract

In this study, we report our experience with the use of external loop recorders (ELRs), in terms of diagnostic efficiency according to symptoms and symptom-rhythm correlation in pediatric patients. We evaluated ELRs applied to 178 patients between April 2017 and November 2020 at our center. The mean age of 172 patients included in the study was 13.6 ± 3.8 years, and 69.8% were female. ELR indications were palpitations in 98 (56.9%) cases, chest pain and palpitations in 43 (25%) cases, presyncope/syncope in 28 (16.2%) cases, and pacemaker/ implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) problems in 3 (0.2%) cases. ELR recording times were 14.2 ± 9.7 days on average, ranging from 2 to 67 days. While the symptom-rhythm correlation was 29.1% in total, when the indications were evaluated one by one, this correlation was found to be 30.2% in palpitations, 34.7% in chest pain and palpitations, and 10.7% in presyncope/syncope. The total diagnostic efficiency was 68.1%. In the follow-up of ELR cases, a total of 139 (80.8%) patients received clinical follow-up without medication, 15 (8.8%) patients received medical treatment, and 18 (10.4%) patients underwent EPS. The cardiac ELR system is useful in detecting underlying arrhythmias. Demonstrating sinus tachycardia at the time of the symptom may be seen as negative finding, but while experiencing symptoms, it is diagnostically valuable and may help avoid further investigation with costly and invasive diagnostic procedures. For diagnostic efficiency and cost effectiveness, the optimal recording time is 2 weeks, but it should be extended to 4 weeks in cases such as of presyncope/syncope that cannot be explained with a 2-week ELR use.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arrhythmia;; Children;; External loop recorders;; Palpitation;; Syncope

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34389905     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02705-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  4 in total

1.  Holter monitoring in the management of cardiac arrhythmias in children.

Authors:  A H Rees; R Solinger; F Elbl
Journal:  Compr Ther       Date:  1985-03

2.  Analysis of 2017 Holter records in pediatric patients.

Authors:  C Ayabakan; S Ozer; A Celiker; S Ozme
Journal:  Turk J Pediatr       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.552

3.  OLAM: A wearable, non-contact sensor for continuous heart-rate and activity monitoring.

Authors:  Ryan K Albright; Benjamin J Goska; Tory M Hagen; Mike Y Chi; G Cauwenberghs; Patrick Y Chiang
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

4.  The value of Holter monitoring in the assessment of Pediatric patients.

Authors:  Ranya A Hegazy; Wael N Lotfy
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2007-10-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.