Literature DB >> 34389685

Caenorhabditis elegans DSB-3 reveals conservation and divergence among protein complexes promoting meiotic double-strand breaks.

Albert W Hinman1,2, Hsin-Yi Yeh3, Baptiste Roelens1, Kei Yamaya1, Alexander Woglar1, Henri-Marc G Bourbon4, Peter Chi3,5, Anne M Villeneuve6,2.   

Abstract

Meiotic recombination plays dual roles in the evolution and stable inheritance of genomes: Recombination promotes genetic diversity by reassorting variants, and it establishes temporary connections between pairs of homologous chromosomes that ensure their future segregation. Meiotic recombination is initiated by generation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) by the conserved topoisomerase-like protein Spo11. Despite strong conservation of Spo11 across eukaryotic kingdoms, auxiliary complexes that interact with Spo11 complexes to promote DSB formation are poorly conserved. Here, we identify DSB-3 as a DSB-promoting protein in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Mutants lacking DSB-3 are proficient for homolog pairing and synapsis but fail to form crossovers. Lack of crossovers in dsb-3 mutants reflects a requirement for DSB-3 in meiotic DSB formation. DSB-3 concentrates in meiotic nuclei with timing similar to DSB-1 and DSB-2 (predicted homologs of yeast/mammalian Rec114/REC114), and DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 are interdependent for this localization. Bioinformatics analysis and interactions among the DSB proteins support the identity of DSB-3 as a homolog of MEI4 in conserved DSB-promoting complexes. This identification is reinforced by colocalization of pairwise combinations of DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 foci in structured illumination microscopy images of spread nuclei. However, unlike yeast Rec114, DSB-1 can interact directly with SPO-11, and in contrast to mouse REC114 and MEI4, DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 are not concentrated predominantly at meiotic chromosome axes. We speculate that variations in the meiotic program that have coevolved with distinct reproductive strategies in diverse organisms may contribute to and/or enable diversification of essential components of the meiotic machinery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. elegans; DNA double-strand breaks; Mei4; meiosis; meiotic recombination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34389685      PMCID: PMC8379965          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2109306118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  76 in total

1.  Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination.

Authors:  Mónica P Colaiácovo; Amy J MacQueen; Enrique Martinez-Perez; Kent McDonald; Adele Adamo; Adriana La Volpe; Anne M Villeneuve
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  HTP-1-dependent constraints coordinate homolog pairing and synapsis and promote chiasma formation during C. elegans meiosis.

Authors:  Enrique Martinez-Perez; Anne M Villeneuve
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Isolation of mutants defective in early steps of meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R E Malone; S Bullard; M Hermiston; R Rieger; M Cool; A Galbraith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Functional interactions of Rec24, the fission yeast ortholog of mouse Mei4, with the meiotic recombination-initiation complex.

Authors:  Sandrine Bonfils; Ana E Rozalén; Gerald R Smith; Sergio Moreno; Cristina Martín-Castellanos
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  COSA-1 reveals robust homeostasis and separable licensing and reinforcement steps governing meiotic crossovers.

Authors:  Rayka Yokoo; Karl A Zawadzki; Kentaro Nabeshima; Melanie Drake; Swathi Arur; Anne M Villeneuve
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Meiotic synapsis in the absence of recombination.

Authors:  K S McKim; B L Green-Marroquin; J J Sekelsky; G Chin; C Steinberg; R Khodosh; R S Hawley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Efficient marker-free recovery of custom genetic modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Joshua A Arribere; Ryan T Bell; Becky X H Fu; Karen L Artiles; Phil S Hartman; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  HTP-3 links DSB formation with homolog pairing and crossing over during C. elegans meiosis.

Authors:  William Goodyer; Susanne Kaitna; Florence Couteau; Jordan D Ward; Simon J Boulton; Monique Zetka
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  A role for Caenorhabditis elegans chromatin-associated protein HIM-17 in the proliferation vs. meiotic entry decision.

Authors:  Jessica B Bessler; Kirthi C Reddy; Michiko Hayashi; Jonathan Hodgkin; Anne M Villeneuve
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Comparative genomics supports a deep evolutionary origin for the large, four-module transcriptional mediator complex.

Authors:  Henri-Marc Bourbon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  TUNEL Labeling to Detect Double-stranded DNA Breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans Gonads.

Authors:  Peter A Kropp; Kyle Rhodehouse; Andy Golden
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2022-03-20

2.  Phosphoregulation of DSB-1 mediates control of meiotic double-strand break activity.

Authors:  Heyun Guo; Ericca L Stamper; Aya Sato-Carlton; Masa A Shimazoe; Xuan Li; Liangyu Zhang; Lewis Stevens; K C Jacky Tam; Abby F Dernburg; Peter M Carlton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 3.  DNA repair, recombination, and damage signaling.

Authors:  Anton Gartner; JoAnne Engebrecht
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.402

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.