| Literature DB >> 34389676 |
R B Pratt1, A L Jacobsen2, M I Percolla2, M E De Guzman2, C A Traugh2, M F Tobin3.
Abstract
The xylem in plants is specialized to transport water, mechanically support the plant body, and store water and carbohydrates. Balancing these functions leads to trade-offs that are linked to xylem structure. We proposed a multivariate hypothesis regarding the main xylem functions and tested it using structural equation modeling. We sampled 29 native shrub species from field sites in semiarid Southern California. We quantified xylem water transport (embolism resistance and transport efficiency), mechanical strength, storage of water (capacitance) and starch, minimum hydrostatic pressures (P min), and proportions of fibers, vessels, and parenchyma, which were treated as a latent variable representing "cellular trade-offs." We found that xylem functions (transport, mechanical support, water storage, and starch storage) were independent, a result driven by P min P min was strongly and directly or indirectly associated with all xylem functions as a hub trait. More negative P min was associated with increased embolism resistance and tissue strength and reduced capacitance and starch storage. We found strong support for a trade-off between embolism resistance and transport efficiency. Tissue strength was not directly associated with embolism resistance or transport efficiency, and any associations were indirect involving P min With P min removed from the model, cellular trade-offs were central and related to all other traits. We conclude that xylem traits are broadly governed by functional trade-offs and that the P min experienced by plants in the field exerts a strong influence over these relationships. Angiosperm xylem contains different cell types that contribute to different functions and that underpin trade-offs.Entities:
Keywords: biomechanics; capacitance; carbohydrates; cavitation; drought
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34389676 PMCID: PMC8379947 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2104336118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Hypothesized relationships among the various xylem functions. The arrows represent pathways between two variables. Traits may have direct effects on another trait represented by an arrow directly connecting two traits, and traits may also exert indirect effects when they are connected through an intermediate trait. Latent variables are connected to their measured traits by gray arrows. Cellular trade-off is a latent variable represented by measured fiber, parenchyma, and vessel area in cross section. Tissue strength is represented by xylem density. Omitted are any double-headed arrows for variables with correlated errors ().
Fig. 2.Bivariate correlations among all the traits with associated r-values and significance (*** < 0.001; ** < 0.01, * < 0.05, . < 0.10) for raw trait values, and those for PICs are in the supplemental figures (). Cap. refers to capacitance or water storage, and Par. is short for parenchyma. P75 represents the water potential at 75% loss of hydraulic conductivity and estimates embolism resistance, and Ks is xylem specific conductivity and represents transport efficiency. Details about other traits are described in .
Fig. 3.Results from our analyzed SEM model for raw trait values (A) and PICs (B). The weights of the solid arrows correspond to P values where the thickest is <0.001, intermediate <0.01, and thinnest is <0.05. The dotted arrows correspond to P > 0.05. The values shown along paths are standardized coefficients and SEs in parentheses ( shows unstandardized coefficients). The variance explained (R2) is shown for each trait. Latent variables are connected to their measured traits by gray arrows. Values are not shown for xylem density because this trait is included within the “tissue strength” variable, and the values there apply to xylem density.
Model fit statistics comparing the fit of different models to our hypothesized model (full model, Fig. 2)
| K | AICc | AIC | BIC | CFI | TLI | LL | df |
| P | P | |
| Model raw traits | |||||||||||
| 1. All paths | 20 | 320.16 | 215.16 | 242.50 | 0.970 | 0.957 | −87.58 | 25 | 28.88 | 0.269 | 0.548 |
| 2. Cap.→ | 21 | 348.03 | 216.02 | 244.74 | 0.971 | 0.957 | −87.01 | 24 | 27.75 | 0.274 | 0.568 |
| 3. Full | 26 | 926.42 | 224.42 | 259.97 | 0.945 | 0.897 | −86.21 | 19 | 26.14 | 0.126 | 0.446 |
| Model PICS | |||||||||||
| 1. All paths | 20 | 237.60 | 117.60 | 144.24 | 0.961 | 0.944 | −38.80 | 25 | 29.93 | 0.227 | 0.506 |
| 2. Cap.→ | 21 | 272.44 | 118.44 | 146.42 | 0.962 | 0.944 | −38.22 | 24 | 28.76 | 0.229 | 0.525 |
| 3. Full | 26 | 1,527.9 | 123.86 | 158.49 | 0.959 | 0.922 | −35.93 | 19 | 24.19 | 0.189 | 0.511 |
This is adjusted for small sample size.
The comparative fit index (CFI) and Tucker–Lewis index indicate good model fits if values are ≥0.95.
These P values are from Bollen–Stine bootstrapping.
The six paths removed were between efficiency and cellular trade-off, minimum water potential, and strength and between embolism resistance and cellular trade-off and strength and between strength and cellular trade-off.
Fig. 4.The best-fitting SEM models for raw trait values (A) and PICs (B). The weights of the solid arrows correspond to P values where the thickest is <0.001, intermediate <0.01, and thinnest is <0.05. The dotted arrows correspond to P = 0.198 (A) and 0.220 (B). The values shown along paths are standardized coefficients and SEs in parentheses ( shows unstandardized coefficients). The variance explained (R2) is shown for each trait. Latent variables are connected to their measured traits by gray arrows. Values are not shown for xylem density because this trait is included within the “tissue strength” variable, and the values there apply to xylem density.