| Literature DB >> 34386661 |
Lama Nazzal1, Leland Soiefer2, Michelle Chang3, Farah Tamizuddin4, Daria Schatoff5, Lucas Cofer1, Maria E Aguero-Rosenfeld6, Albert Matalon1, Bjorn Meijers7, Robert Holzman1, Jerome Lowenstein1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Declining renal function results in the accumulation of solutes normally excreted by healthy kidneys. Data suggest that some of the protein-bound solutes mediate accelerated cardiovascular disease. Many of the poorly dialyzable protein-bound uremic retention solutes are products of gut bacterial metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic; indoxyl sulfate; microbiome; p-cresyl sulfate; uremic toxins
Year: 2021 PMID: 34386661 PMCID: PMC8343810 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.05.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int Rep ISSN: 2468-0249
Demographics and other participant data
| Gender (male/female) | 9/1 |
| Mean age (years ± SD) | 56.6 ± 10.1 |
| Ethnicity (White/Black/Asian/Hispanic/>1 or other) | 1/2/2/4/1 |
| Dialysis shift (MWF/TTS) | 5/5 |
| Time on HD (mean years ± SD) | 7.4 ± 7.7 |
| Length of HD session (mean hours ± SD) | 3.6 ± 0.4 |
| Heparin with HD (yes/no/unknown) | 6/3/1 |
| Cause of ESRD (DM, HTN, DM, and HTN, unknown) | 4,4, 1, 1 |
| Urine production (yes/no) | 6/4 |
| Diagnosis of HTN (yes/no) | 9/1 |
| DM type II (yes/no) | 4/6 |
| Coronary artery disease (yes/no) | 2/8 |
| Diet (nonrestricted/low sodium and/or low potassium) | 6/4 |
| In the past month, have you experienced a change in bowel habits? (yes/no) | 2/8 |
DM, diabetes mellitus; HD, hemodialysis; HTN, hypertension; MWF, Monday, Wednesday, Friday; TTS, Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday.
MWF: Monday, Wednesday, Friday. TTS: Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday,
DM: Diabetes Mellitus, HTN: Hypertension
Figure 1Changes in concentration of solutes from 10 subjects (126 samples) over the 12-week treatment periods. Changes in μmols/ml are shown on the right axis and changes in units of standard deviation on the left axis. Differences in the response to placebo and to oral weekly vancomycin were compared by likelihood ratio tests of mixed models. Red lines depict individual responses. Black lines and shaded areas depict fitted mixed models and 95% confidence limits. (a) Solutes for which the response to vancomycin significantly differed from that to placebo. (b) Solutes for which the response to vancomycin did not differ from that to placebo. The magnitude of individual subjects’ decline in solute concentration during vancomycin administration was statistically significantly correlated with their initial plasma concentration
Summary of statistical analysis of changes in solute concentrations
| Solute | Vancomycin effect | Change in level ,Week 0–4 (μM/ml) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Vancomycin | ||||
| Change | Change | ||||
| Phenyl acetyl Glutamine | <0.001 | 16.41 | 0.683 | –88.57 | 0.002 |
| Kynurenine | 0.016 | 0.15 | 0.668 | –0.67 | 0.008 |
| p-cresyl sulphate | <0.001 | 0.64 | 0.98 | –73.51 | 0.010 |
| p-cresyl glucuronide | <0.001 | 1.83 | 0.792 | –12.88 | 0.011 |
| Hippuric acid | <0.001 | 72.73 | 0.406 | –147.23 | 0.019 |
| Indoxyl sulphate | <0.001 | 9.71 | 0.558 | –25.31 | 0.033 |
| TMAO | <0.001 | 12.38 | 0.498 | –27.27 | 0.037 |
| Indole-3-acetic acid | 0.093 | 1.06 | 0.699 | 4.00 | 0.041 |
| CMPF | 0.803 | 1.72 | 0.651 | 4.34 | 0.113 |
| Phenyl sulphate | 0.066 | 2.88 | 0.869 | 18.29 | 0.136 |
| Phenylalanine | 0.064 | 10.07 | 0.387 | –9.29 | 0.259 |
| Tyrosine | 0.339 | 8.01 | 0.363 | –4.73 | 0.447 |
| Kynurenic acid | 0.204 | 0.22 | 0.302 | –0.08 | 0.593 |
| Phenyl glucuronide | 0.452 | 0.19 | 0.852 | 0.36 | 0.627 |
| Tryptophan | 0.865 | 2.89 | 0.410 | 1.12 | 0.651 |
CMPF: 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionate; TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide.
Rows are sorted by P values for change in vancomycin level (μM/ml) between 0 and 4 weeks. Solutes showing a significant decline in concentration with vancomycin are highlighted in green. The changes are estimated model means from the mixed polynomial models depicted in Figure 1.
Likelihood ratio test of mixed models (subjects as random variable) with fixed cubic polynomial terms compared with a similar model incorporating additive and interactive treatment effect terms. Shaded area shows solutes for which this comparison was statistically significant.
Tukey honest significant difference post hoc comparisons based on mixed model.
Figure 2Microbiome diversity in treatment and placebo groups from 10 subjects (48 samples). (a) Alpha diversity. Total operational taxonomic units and Shannon indices versus weeks from starting vancomycin. The blue lines are mixed model estimates of the means for the placebo and the Vancomycin periods. Count data were rarefied to a depth of 800. (b) Beta diversity. Constrained correspondence analysis (CCA) of microbiome samples from subjects receiving weekly placebo or vancomycin over the course of the study. Count data were rarified to a depth of 800.
Figure 3Taxa that increased or decreased in abundance while receiving vancomycin in 7 subjects (36 samples).
Figure 4Correlation between contemporaneous operational taxonomic units count and solute levels in 10 subjects (57 stool and 57 serum samples). Significant correlations are shown in blue, nonsignificant correlations in red.
Figure 5Recovery of microbiome and solutes after discontinuation of Vancomycin. (a) Alpha diversity in 3 subjects (12 samples). Change in operational taxonomic units (OTU) numbers and Shannon index after discontinuation of Vancomycin. (b) Beta diversity in 3 subjects (12 samples). Constrained correspondence analysis (CCA) of stool microbiomes. The model included effects for Treatment, Subject, and Subject by Treatment Interactions. (c) Solutes recovery data in each of the 5 individuals (41 samples). Data shown for weeks 12, the last week of vancomycin administration and for weeks 16, 20, and 24 thereafter.