| Literature DB >> 34386013 |
Maria C Ramello1,2, Nicolás G Núñez3, Jimena Tosello Boari1,2,3, Sabrina N Bossio1,2, Fernando P Canale1,2, Carolina Abrate1,2, Nicolas Ponce1,2, Andrés Del Castillo4, Marta Ledesma4, Sophie Viel3, Wilfrid Richer3, Christine Sedlik3, Carolina Tiraboschi5, Marcos Muñoz6, Daniel Compagno5, Adriana Gruppi1,2, Eva V Acosta Rodríguez1,2, Eliane Piaggio3, Carolina L Montes1,2.
Abstract
Senescent T cells have been described during aging, chronic infections, and cancer; however, a comprehensive study of the phenotype, function, and transcriptional program of this T cell population in breast cancer (BC) patients is missing. Compared to healthy donors (HDs), BC patients exhibit an accumulation of KLRG-1+CD57+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood. These T cells infiltrate tumors and tumor-draining lymph nodes. KLRG-1+CD57+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from BC patients and HDs exhibit features of senescence, and despite their inhibitory receptor expression, they produce more effector cytokines and exhibit higher expression of Perforin, Granzyme B, and CD107a than non-senescent subsets. When compared to blood counterparts, tumor-infiltrating senescent CD4+ T cells show similar surface phenotype but reduced cytokine production. Transcriptional profiling of senescent CD4+ T cells from the peripheral blood of BC patients reveals enrichment in genes associated with NK or CD8+-mediated cytotoxicity, TCR-mediated stimulation, and cell exhaustion compared to non-senescent T cells. Comparison of the transcriptional profile of senescent CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood of BC patients with those of HDs highlighted marked similarities but also relevant differences. Senescent CD4+ T cells from BC patients show enrichment in T-cell signaling, processes involved in DNA replication, p53 pathways, oncogene-induced senescence, among others compared to their counterparts in HDs. High gene expression of CD4, KLRG-1, and B3GAT1 (CD57), which correlates with increased overall survival for BC patients, underscores the usefulness of the evaluation of the frequency of senescent CD4+ T cells as a biomarker in the follow-up of patients.Entities:
Keywords: CD57; KLRG-1; breast cancer; cytotoxic CD4+T cells; polyfunctional T cells; senescent T cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34386013 PMCID: PMC8353459 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.713132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1KLRG-1+CD57+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are present in peripheral blood, tumor, and invaded and non-invaded lymph nodes from untreated breast cancer patients. (A) Representative dot plots from one healthy donor (HD) and one breast cancer patient (BC), show the frequency of peripheral blood (PB) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells based on the surface expression of KLRG-1 and CD57 molecules. (B) Bar graphs show frequency of KLRG-1+CD57+ CD4+ T cells and KLRG-1+CD57+ CD8+ T cells from PB of HDs (dots) and BC patients (triangles). Each dot/triangle represents a subject analyzed. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used to compare double positive CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in HD vs. BC patients (p is indicated in each graph). (C) Proportion of CD4+ and CD8+ subsets within tumor-infiltrating CD3+ population. (D) Bar graphs show mean frequency (± SEM) of KLRG-1+CD57+ (DP), KLRG-1+CD57− (SP), KLRG-1−CD57− (DN) within conventional CD4+ (left panel) or CD8+ (right panel) T cells in tumor (black), invaded lymph nodes I-LN (gray) and non-invaded LN, NI-LN (white). One-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-test was applied. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ns, not significant.
Figure 2KLRG-1+CD57+ CD4+ cells from peripheral blood exhibit features of senescence. (A) Pie charts exhibit proportion of CD27+CD28+ (white), CD27+CD28- (light gray), CD27−CD28+ (dark gray) and CD27−CD28− (black) within CD4+ T cell subpopulations defined by the expression of KLRG-1 and CD57, for all HDs and BC patients analyzed. (B) Bar graph shows frequency of CD27−CD28− cells within KLRG-1+CD57+ CD4+ T cells from HDs (dots) and BC patients (triangles). (C) Representative histograms show the expression/activity of SA-βgal in KLRG-1−CD57− (DN), KLRG-1+CD57− (SP) and KLRG-1+CD57+ (DP) CD4+ T cells from BC patients. (D) Mean frequency (± SEM) of SA-βgal+ CD4+ T cells within DN, SP and DP subsets. (E) Mean frequency (± SEM) of H2AX+ cells in DN, SP and DP CD4+ T cell subsets. (F) Bar graph shows frequency of H2AX+ cells within KLRG-1+CD57+ CD4+ T cells from HDs (dots) and BC patients (triangles). (G) Bar graph shows frequency of proliferating (Ki-67+) CD4+ T cells after stimulation and within CD57− and CD57+ populations from BC patients. (H) Mean frequency (± SEM) of IL-2+ cells after PMA/Ionomycin stimulation in DN, SP, and DP CD4+ T cells. In all cases, each dot/triangle/square represents a subject analyzed. For two group comparisons (HD vs BC) unpaired Student’s t-tests were used in all cases (p is indicated in each graph). For more three groups comparisons (DN, SP, and DP) matched one-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison tests were used (ns, not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.005; ****p < 0.001).
Figure 3Senescent CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood exhibit an effector-memory/EMRA phenotype, express high levels of inhibitory receptors, and are highly polyfunctional. (A) Bar graphs show proportion of naive (white), CM (light gray), EM (dark gray), and EMRA (black) cells within DN and DP CD4+ T cell subpopulations, for all BC patients (top) and HDs (bottom) analyzed. (B) Line graphs show frequency of iR-expressing CD4+ T cells within EM/EMRA populations and within DN and DP subsets as indicated in graphs. Each line represents a subject analyzed. (C) Bar graphs show iR-expressing CD4+ T cells within KLRG-1+CD57+ EM/EMRA population from BC patients and HDs. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare iR expression between DN and DP subsets in each sample (HD or BC). (D) Line graphs show frequency of BC patients’ CD4+ T cells co-expressing TNF and IFN or Granzyme B and CD107a (after PMA/Ionomycin stimulation) or expressing Perforin (ex vivo), within EM/EMRA populations and within DN and DP subsets as indicated in graphs. Each line represents a subject analyzed. Paired t-tests were used to compare functionality between DN and DP subsets (p are indicated in each graph). (E) Bar graphs show proportion of KLRG-1+CD57+CD4+ T cells expressing the indicated cytokines or cytotoxic-associated molecules in HDs and BC patients. Unpaired t-test was applied to compare HD vs BC (ns, not significant).
Figure 4Tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells express inhibitory receptors and are highly polyfunctional cells. (A, B) Frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ (A) and CD8+ (B) T cells expressing PD-1 or TIGIT within EM/EMRA populations and within DN and DP subsets as indicated in graphs. Each line represents a sample analyzed. (C, D) Frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ (C) and CD8+ (D) T cells co-expressing TNF and IFN or expressing CD107a within EM/EMRA populations and within DN and DP subsets as indicated in graphs. Each line represents a sample analyzed. Paired t-tests were used to compare DN and DP subsets (p are indicated in each graph). (E, F) Frequency of cytokine- or CD107a-expressing senescent CD4+ (E) and CD8+ (F) T cells within EM/EMRA populations in peripheral blood (PB, circles) vs tumor (squares). Each line represents a paired PB–tumor from the same patient. Paired t-tests were used to compare both tissues (PB vs. T: *p < 0.05).
Figure 5CD4+ senescent T cells from breast cancer patients exhibit a distinctive transcriptional profile. Affymetrix microarray analysis performed in sorted KLRG-1+CD57+ and KLRG-1−CD57− CD4+ T cells from BC patients (DPBC and DNBC, respectively) and KLRG-1+CD57+ CD4+ T cells from HDs (DPHD). (A) Volcano plot shows differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between DPBC and DNBC samples (p-value <0.05 corrected with Benjamini–Hochberg, indicated as red dots). Genes of interest are shown in black with their gene symbols. (B) Heat map shows the normalized gene expression of cytotoxic signature. (C) Graph shows the p-value of selected pathways significantly enriched in DEGs of panel A (DPBC vs DNBC) using EnrichR. (D) GSEA enrichment plots shows selected gene sets (GSE: 22886 and GSE: 45739) enriched in DPBC vs DNBC. Normalized enrichment score (NES) and p-value (FCRq) are indicated. (E) Volcano plot shows DEGs between DPBC and DPHD samples (p-value < 0.05 corrected with Benjamini–Hochberg, indicated as red dots). Selected genes are highlighted in black. (F) GSEA plot shows the enrichment of the gene set Reactome oncogene-induced senescence in the transcriptome of DPBC vs DPHD. Significant p-value (FCRq) is indicated.
Figure 6Overall survival for breast cancer patients. Expression data from two TCGA breast invasive carcinoma cohorts were analyzed using cBio Cancer Genomics Portal (http://cbioportal.org). The overall survival (OS) of patients was calculated in accordance with the level of mRNA expression (low or high) of CD4, KLRG1, and B3GAT1 (CD57) (mRNA expression z-scores relative to all samples (logRNAseqs V2 RSEM). (A) TCGA-PanCancer Cohort. (B) TCGA-Cell 2015 cohort. NA, not analyzed when less than 50% of the patients died. Statistical analysis by log rank Test p and q. The number of patients in each selected population is indicated in parenthesis in each KM plot.