| Literature DB >> 34384678 |
Chunyang Meng1, Lei Peng1, Jinze Li1, Jinming Li2, Yunxiang Li3, Junbao Yang4, Ji Wu1.
Abstract
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of Thulium laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP) and Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases within a period from the date of database establishment to October 2020. RevMan 5.4. was used for calculation and statistical analyses. 8 studies of 2125 patients were included. ThuLEP provided less hemoglobin decrease (MD: -0.37, 95%CI -0.61 to -0.14, P = 0.002) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD: -0.41, 95%CI -0.72 to -0.10, P = 0.01). During the postoperative follow-ups, statistically significant differences only were found in IPSS (MD: -0.96; 95%CI -1.27 to -0.65; P < 0.00001) at the 3rd month. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that ThuLEP, compared with HoLEP, has better security, faster improvement of symptoms. However, our conclusions still require a larger sample size, multi-center, and longer follow-up randomized controlled trials to verify.Entities:
Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Enucleation; HoLEP; Laser; ThuLEP
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34384678 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.07.045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Surg ISSN: 1015-9584 Impact factor: 2.767