| Literature DB >> 34384465 |
Song Gu1, Long Zhou2, Yinjun Huang1, Renguo Xie3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a modified internal fixation method for the treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fracture.Entities:
Keywords: Curative effect; Hand injury; Internal fixation; Kirschner wire; Metacarpal neck fracture
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34384465 PMCID: PMC8359124 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02627-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Demographic data of patients
| Case | Sex | Age | Dominant hand | Injuried hand | Trauma mechanism | Preoperative deformity | Postoperative deformity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| angulation (°) | length (mm) | angulation (°) | length (mm) | ||||||
| 1 | M | 62 | R | R | Sports injury | 41 | 52 | 15 | 60 |
| 2 | M | 56 | R | R | Traffic injury | 40 | 55 | 18 | 61 |
| 3 | M | 34 | L | L | Traffic injury | 42 | 52 | 17 | 59 |
| 4 | M | 38 | L | R | Sports injury | 45 | 49 | 20 | 57 |
| 5 | M | 27 | R | R | Sports injury | 38 | 51 | 15 | 62 |
| 6 | M | 32 | R | R | Sports injury | 35 | 55 | 17 | 62 |
| 7 | F | 32 | L | R | Sports injury | 40 | 52 | 18 | 61 |
| 8 | M | 17 | R | R | Sports injury | 39 | 49 | 18 | 58 |
| 9 | M | 33 | R | R | Traffic injury | 38 | 53 | 19 | 61 |
| 1o | M | 40 | R | R | Traffic injury | 35 | 50 | 18 | 59 |
| 11 | M | 45 | L | R | Sports injury | 39 | 51 | 16 | 62 |
| 12 | M | 39 | R | R | Sports injury | 48 | 49 | 20 | 58 |
Length: the length of the fifth metacarpal
Fig. 1The schematic diagram of surgical procedure. a The fracture reduction was achieved successfully. b Two Kirschner wires were used to fix the fracture. c The plate was inserted with three to four screws in the proximal part of the fracture and one screw in the distal part
Clinical and functional outcomes
| Case | Follow up time (months) | surgery duration (min) | Range of motion (°) | Grip strength (LB) | QDASH score | Return to work(weeks) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIS | TCS | TIS | TCS | |||||
| 1 | 14 | 45 | 85 | 90 | 80 | 85 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | 14 | 40 | 83 | 86 | 83 | 86 | 2 | 6 |
| 3 | 16 | 45 | 87 | 88 | 76 | 90 | 1 | 6 |
| 4 | 16 | 50 | 90 | 90 | 77 | 88 | 2 | 6 |
| 5 | 17 | 45 | 81 | 85 | 82 | 84 | 3 | 6 |
| 6 | 17 | 50 | 79 | 85 | 72 | 70 | 4 | 5 |
| 7 | 17 | 55 | 80 | 85 | 69 | 75 | 2 | 5 |
| 8 | 18 | 45 | 86 | 85 | 75 | 75 | 2 | 7 |
| 9 | 18 | 35 | 90 | 88 | 81 | 83 | 1 | 6 |
| 1o | 18 | 40 | 82 | 85 | 70 | 72 | 1 | 7 |
| 11 | 18 | 40 | 83 | 85 | 67 | 70 | 2 | 6 |
| 12 | 18 | 45 | 85 | 86 | 65 | 65 | 1 | 7 |
Range of motion: the range of motion of the fifth metacarpophalangeal joint; TIS the injuried side, TCS the contralateral side
Fig. 2The treatment process of patient No.12. a The preoperative lateral X-ray with the angulation of 48°. b The preoperative anteroposterior X-ray with a length of the fifth metacarpal of 49 mm. c The postoperative lateral X-ray with the angulation of 20°. d The postoperative anteroposterior X-ray with a length of the fifth metacarpal of 58 mm. e The appearance of the extension position of the fifth metacarpophalangeal joint at the last follow-up. f The appearance of the flexion position of the fifth metacarpophalangeal joint at the last follow-up
Statistical analysis results of clinical and functional outcomes
| n | Follow up time (months) | surgery duration (min) | Preoperative deformity | Postoperative deformity | Range of motion (°) | Grip strength (LB) | QDASH score | Return To Work (weeks) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| angulation (°) | length (mm) | angulation (°) | length (mm) | TIS | TCS | TIS | TCS | |||||
| 12 | 16.8 ± 1.5 | 44.8 ± 5.4 | 40.0 ± 3.7 | 51.5 ± 2.1 | 17.6 ± 1.7 | 60.0 ± 1.8 | 84.3 ± 3.6 | 86.5 ± 2.0 | 74.8 ± 6.1 | 78.6 ± 8.3 | 2.0 ± 1.0 | 6.0 ± 0.7 |
Length: the length of the fifth metacarpal; Range of motion: the range of motion of the fifth metacarpophalangeal joint; TIS the injuried side, TCS the contralateral side