| Literature DB >> 34383269 |
Michèle Boileau-Falardeau1,2, Shermeen Farooqi1, Christine O'Rourke1, Leslie Payne3,4.
Abstract
Performance measurement (PM) aims to ensure transparency and effectiveness in public spending. More specifically, it provides a foundation that allows funders to determine whether an intervention has achieved its stated objective, thus improving understanding of what interventions should be funded in the future. Ideally, performance measurement should help us understand "what works, for whom, and in what context." Unfortunately, more often than not, performance reports are limited to a collection of indicators that make it difficult to answer this question. Based on our work with the Public Health Agency of Canada Innovation Strategy (PHAC-IS), we offer several recommendations to address this issue and support the performance measurement process, especially for complex interventions. We discuss the importance of contextualizing results to better understand impact and associating these results to a well-defined intervention. We also suggest using a validated tool to improve data collection and analysis and critically appraise the methods used to collect impact information. The integration of these key considerations will save time in data analysis and ensure funded recipients are not overburdened by the data collection process. Although this commentary is presented within the context of a complex multi-year population health funding program, we believe our approach can be applied to any performance management process and ultimately improve decisions such as whether an intervention should be continued, scaled up, or adapted to different contexts.Entities:
Keywords: Performance measurement; Strategic grantmaking
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34383269 PMCID: PMC8360244 DOI: 10.17269/s41997-021-00514-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Public Health ISSN: 0008-4263