Literature DB >> 34383269

Revisiting the Innovation Strategy performance measurement process: insights from practice.

Michèle Boileau-Falardeau1,2, Shermeen Farooqi1, Christine O'Rourke1, Leslie Payne3,4.   

Abstract

Performance measurement (PM) aims to ensure transparency and effectiveness in public spending. More specifically, it provides a foundation that allows funders to determine whether an intervention has achieved its stated objective, thus improving understanding of what interventions should be funded in the future. Ideally, performance measurement should help us understand "what works, for whom, and in what context." Unfortunately, more often than not, performance reports are limited to a collection of indicators that make it difficult to answer this question. Based on our work with the Public Health Agency of Canada Innovation Strategy (PHAC-IS), we offer several recommendations to address this issue and support the performance measurement process, especially for complex interventions. We discuss the importance of contextualizing results to better understand impact and associating these results to a well-defined intervention. We also suggest using a validated tool to improve data collection and analysis and critically appraise the methods used to collect impact information. The integration of these key considerations will save time in data analysis and ensure funded recipients are not overburdened by the data collection process. Although this commentary is presented within the context of a complex multi-year population health funding program, we believe our approach can be applied to any performance management process and ultimately improve decisions such as whether an intervention should be continued, scaled up, or adapted to different contexts.
© 2021. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Performance measurement; Strategic grantmaking

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34383269      PMCID: PMC8360244          DOI: 10.17269/s41997-021-00514-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  9 in total

1.  Understanding the basic principles of programme evaluation.

Authors:  B C K Choi
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Using a qualitative approach to develop an evaluation data set for community-based health promotion programs addressing racial and ethnic health disparities.

Authors:  Mark C Edberg; Kristen Corey; Marcia Cohen
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2011-06-15

Review 3.  Current challenges in population health intervention research.

Authors:  Linda Cambon; François Alla
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.

Authors:  Tammy C Hoffmann; Paul P Glasziou; Isabelle Boutron; Ruairidh Milne; Rafael Perera; David Moher; Douglas G Altman; Virginia Barbour; Helen Macdonald; Marie Johnston; Sarah E Lamb; Mary Dixon-Woods; Peter McCulloch; Jeremy C Wyatt; An-Wen Chan; Susan Michie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-03-07

5.  Assessing health program performance in low- and middle-income countries: building a feasible, credible, and comprehensive framework.

Authors:  Onil Bhattacharyya; Kathryn Mossman; John Ginther; Leigh Hayden; Raman Sohal; Jieun Cha; Ameya Bopardikar; John A MacDonald; Himanshu Parikh; Ilan Shahin; Anita McGahan; Will Mitchell
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.185

6.  Addressing complexity in population health intervention research: the context/intervention interface.

Authors:  Laetitia Minary; François Alla; Linda Cambon; Joelle Kivits; Louise Potvin
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Dean Fixsen; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Is reporting on interventions a weak link in understanding how and why they work? A preliminary exploration using community heart health exemplars.

Authors:  Barbara L Riley; JoAnne MacDonald; Omaima Mansi; Anita Kothari; Donna Kurtz; Linda I vonTettenborn; Nancy C Edwards
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Reporting of context and implementation in studies of global health interventions: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jill Luoto; Paul G Shekelle; Margaret A Maglione; Breanne Johnsen; Tanja Perry
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 7.327

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.