Literature DB >> 34381636

Evaluating Immediate and Short-Term Postoperative Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Ulnar Shortening for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome Using PROMIS.

David N Bernstein1, Richard D Lander1, Warren C Hammert1.   

Abstract

Background  The early recovery trajectory of patients undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is unknown. Questions/Purposes  Using PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE), Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression, we asked (1) do patients undergoing operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome present at their preoperative visit with notable impairment?; (2) At immediate follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity?; and (3) At short-term follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity? Materials and Methods  We identified patients from 01/2017 to 12/2019 at our institution undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome who completed all PROMIS domains at a preoperative visit and at least one postoperative time point (i.e., less than 4 weeks and/or greater than 12 weeks). Distribution- and anchor-based minimal clinically important difference estimates were used to evaluate clinically appreciable changes in symptoms over time. Results  A total of 38 patients met our inclusion criteria. The average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores from preoperative to immediate postoperative follow-up were -3.8, -4.3, 3.2, and 0.5, respectively. However, by short-term follow-up, the average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores were 3.7, 3.2, -4.7, and -3.9, respectively. Conclusions  Patients have worsening function at the immediate postoperative follow-up. By short-term postoperative follow-up, functional status and PI levels improve. Our findings can help hand surgeons provide evidence-based guidance on expected initial recovery following operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome. Level of Evidence  This is a level II, prognostic study. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROMIS; PROMs; patient-reported outcome measures; recovery pattern; ulnar impaction syndrome

Year:  2021        PMID: 34381636      PMCID: PMC8328548          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wrist Surg        ISSN: 2163-3916


  20 in total

1.  Ulnar shortening osteotomy in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome.

Authors:  Goo Hyun Baek; Moon Sang Chung; Young Ho Lee; Hyun Sik Gong; Sanglim Lee; Hyung Ho Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: Ulnar Shortening vs. Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure.

Authors:  Luc De Smet; Lore Vandenberghe; Ilse Degreef
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2014-05

3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes - Are They Living Up to Their Potential?

Authors:  Judith F Baumhauer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy fixed with a dynamic compression system.

Authors:  Zahab S Ahsan; Yohan Song; Jeffrey Yao
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 5.  Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in the upper extremity: the future of outcomes reporting?

Authors:  Eric C Makhni; Molly Meadows; Jason T Hamamoto; John D Higgins; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Outcomes of the Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Using a Dynamic Compression Plate on the Ulnar Surface of the Ulna.

Authors:  Ahmed Elgammal; Bernhard Rozée
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2017-12-14

7.  Large-scale clinical implementation of PROMIS computer adaptive testing with direct incorporation into the electronic medical record.

Authors:  M O Papuga; C Dasilva; A McIntyre; D Mitten; S Kates; J F Baumhauer
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2017-12-07

8.  The PROMIS physical function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness.

Authors:  Celeste L Overbeek; Sjoerd P F T Nota; Prakash Jayakumar; Michiel G Hageman; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.

Authors:  Amelia A Sorensen; Daniel Howard; Wen Hui Tan; Jeffrey Ketchersid; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test.

Authors:  James T Beckmann; Man Hung; Maren W Voss; Anthony B Crum; Jerry Bounsanga; Andrew R Tyser
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.