| Literature DB >> 34380511 |
Yu Du1, Zhuang Miao2, Kedi Wang1, Yan Lv3, Lijuan Qiu4, Lusheng Guo5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: miR-92b is a carcinogenic miRNA that has great potential as a biomarker for disease prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment in the clinic. It is of great significance to analyse the relationship between miR-92b and the clinicopathological characteristics of cancer patients. This paper aimed to investigate the expression levels and clinical values of miR-92b-3p in breast cancer (BC).Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Diagnosis; Pathological features; Prognosis; miR-92b-3p
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34380511 PMCID: PMC8359031 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02347-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Primer sequences
| Primers | Positive primers | Reverse primers |
|---|---|---|
| miR-92b-3p | ACACTCCAGCTGGGTATTGCACTCGTCCCGGC | TCTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGT |
| U6 | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
Comparison of demographic information ()/n [%]
| Study group ( | Control group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 50.64 ± 4.58 | 50.49 ± 5.21 | 0.23 | 0.82 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.53 ± 2.24 | 22.49 ± 2.26 | 0.13 | 0.90 |
| Smoking or not | 0.16 | 0.69 | ||
| Yes | 21 (18.75) | 18 (16.67) | - | - |
| No | 91 (81.25) | 90 (83.33) | - | - |
| Drinking or not | 0.10 | 0.75 | ||
| Yes | 29 (25.89) | 30 (27.78) | - | - |
| No | 83 (74.11) | 78 (72.22) | - | - |
| Place of residence | 0.10 | 0.75 | ||
| City | 63 (56.25) | 63 (58.33) | - | - |
| Countryside | 49 (43.75) | 45 (41.67) | - | - |
| TNM staging | - | - | ||
| I-II | 55 (49.11) | 0 (0.00) | - | - |
| III | 57 (50.89) | 0 (0.00) | - | - |
Fig. 1Comparison of miR-92b-3p expression. The expression of miR-92b-3p in the study group was remarkably higher than that in the control group. Asterisk indicates P < 0.05 for the comparison between two groups
Value of miR-92b-3p alone for predicting the prognosis of BC
| Specificity | Sensitivity | Optimal cut-off value | Youden index | AUC | 95% confidence interval | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| miR-92b-3p | 73.08% | 75.34% | < 1.65 | 0.06 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.88 |
Diagnostic value of single miR-92b-3p for BC
| Specificity | Sensitivity | Optimal cut-off value | Youden index | AUC | 95% confidence interval | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| miR-92b-3p | 79.46% | 88.39% | > 0.32 | 0.02 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 0.92 |
Fig. 2ROC curve of single miR-92b-3p. The AUC of single miR-92b-3p was 0.88
Correlation of miR-92b-3p expression with clinicopathological features ()
| Number of cases | miR-92b-3p | t | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.48 | 0.63 | ||
| < 50 | 52 | 1.56 ± 0.35 | ||
| ≥ 50 | 60 | 1.59 ± 0.31 | ||
| Tumour size (cm) | 6.21 | 0.00 | ||
| < 2 | 43 | 1.37 ± 0.32 | ||
| ≥ 2 | 69 | 1.72 ± 0.27 | ||
| Degree of differentiation | 5.88 | 0.00 | ||
| Moderately + highly differentiated | 44 | 1.38 ± 0.34 | ||
| Lowly differentiated | 68 | 1.74 ± 0.30 | ||
| TNM staging | 6.47 | 0.00 | ||
| I-II | 55 | 1.41 ± 0.42 | ||
| III | 57 | 1.86 ± 0.31 | ||
| Menopause | 0.89 | 0.37 | ||
| Yes | 41 | 1.55 ± 0.38 | ||
| No | 71 | 1.62 ± 0.41 | ||
| Lymphatic metastasis | 4.63 | 0.00 | ||
| No | 40 | 1.40 ± 0.37 | ||
| Yes | 72 | 1.75 ± 0.39 |
Fig. 3Correlation of miR-92b-3p expression with TNM staging and degree of differentiation of BC. A miR-92b-3p expression was positively correlated with the TNM staging of BC. B miR-92b-3p expression was negatively correlated with the degree of differentiation of BC. In B, 1 indicates a low differentiation, 2 indicates a moderate differentiation, and 3 indicates a high differentiation
Fig. 4Correlation of miR-92b-3p with CA125. A CA125 expression in the study group was remarkably higher than that in the control group. B miR-92b-3p and CA125 expression was positively correlated in BC patients. Asterisk indicates P < 0.05 for the comparison between two groups
Fig. 5Correlation of survival status with miR-92b-3p expression. A The OSR of the 99 interviewed BC patients was 73.74%. B The OSR in the low expression group was remarkably higher than that in the high expression group. C miR-92b-3p expression in the death group was remarkably higher than that in the survival group. D The AUC of miR-92b-3p alone in the death and survival groups was 0.76. Asterisk indicates P < 0.05 when there is a comparison between two groups