| Literature DB >> 34379782 |
Ju Lynn Ong1,2, S Azrin Jamaluddin1,2, Jesisca Tandi2, Nicholas I Y N Chee1,2, Ruth L F Leong1,2, Reto Huber3,4, June C Lo1,2, Michael W L Chee1,2.
Abstract
STUDYEntities:
Keywords: adolescence; cognitive function; cortical thickness; slow wave activity
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34379782 PMCID: PMC8754498 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsab206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sleep ISSN: 0161-8105 Impact factor: 5.849
Characteristics of study sample (N = 109)
| Mean |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 16.77 | 1.07 |
| Sex (% male) | 45.00 | — |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.62 | 2.65 |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale score | 7.72 | 3.38 |
| Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index | ||
| Bedtime on weekdays (hh:mm) | 23:37 | 01:02 |
| Bedtime on weekends (hh:mm) | 00:06 | 01:03 |
| Waketime on weekdays (hh:mm) | 06:12 | 00:38 |
| Waketime on weekends (hh:mm) | 09:09 | 01:29 |
| TIB on weekdays, h | 6.59 | 1.06 |
| TIB on weekends, h | 9.03 | 1.16 |
| Global PSQI score | 4.87 | 2.16 |
| Morningness-Eveningness score | 49.83 | 7.47 |
| Beck-Depression Inventory score | 9.58 | 6.08 |
| Beck-Anxiety Inventory score | 9.92 | 7.00 |
| Cognitive Tasks | ||
| Raven’s Progressive Matrices score (# correct) | 9.17 | 1.90 |
| 10-min Psychomotor Vigilance Task median reaction time (ms)* | 268 | 28 |
| 2-min Symbol Digit Modalities Task score (# correct)* | 82.90 | 8.63 |
| 4-min Mental Arithmetic Task score (# correct)* | 63.49 | 16.85 |
| 3-Back Working Memory Task score (A')* | 0.94 | 0.05 |
*Mean of three test batteries (morning, afternoon, evening) conducted the day following the polysomnographic recording.
TIB, time in bed.
Figure 1.Scatter plots relating (A) speed of processing (SOP) T-scores and (B) nonverbal intelligence (APM) with age for males (blue) and females (red), respectively. Overall linear regression lines are shown as black solid lines. r-values denote partial correlations, controlled for sex.
Figure 2.Scatter plots relating cortical thickness measures in the (A) left and (B) right hemispheres, and (C) all-night SWA with age for males (blue) and females (red), respectively. Overall linear regression lines are shown as black solid lines. r-values denote partial correlations, controlled for sex.
Brain regions of interest showing significant partial correlations between cortical thickness measures and age/SWA, controlled for sex
| Hemisphere/lobe | Region |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RH Temporal | Middle temporal | −0.49 | <0.001 | 0.30 | 0.002 |
| LH Temporal | Middle temporal | −0.46 | <0.001 | 0.22 | 0.02 |
| LH Temporal | Superior temporal | −0.45 | <0.001 | 0.30 | 0.002 |
| RH Parietal | Supramarginal | −0.45 | <0.001 | 0.21 | 0.03 |
| LH Parietal | Supramarginal | −0.44 | <0.001 | 0.25 | 0.009 |
| LH Temporal | Inferior temporal | −0.41 | <0.001 | 0.26 | 0.007 |
| LH Temporal | Banks of the superior temporal sulcus | −0.39 | <0.001 | 0.32 | 0.001 |
| RH Temporal | Superior temporal | −0.36 | <0.001 | 0.19 | 0.04 |
| LH Parietal | Inferior parietal | −0.34 | <0.001 | 0.27 | 0.005 |
| RH Parietal | Inferior parietal | −0.31 | 0.001 | 0.11 | n.s. |
| LH Parietal | Postcentral | −0.28 | 0.004 | 0.14 | n.s. |
| RH Temporal | Inferior temporal | −0.24 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.03 |
| RH Parietal | Superior parietal | −0.22 | 0.02 | 0.04 | n.s. |
| RH Temporal | Banks of the superior temporal sulcus | −0.21 | 0.03 | 0.19 | n.s. |
| LH Occipital | Cuneus | −0.21 | 0.03 | 0.15 | n.s. |
| LH Parietal | Precuneus | −0.21 | 0.03 | 0.11 | n.s. |
| LH Temporal | Transverse temporal | −0.21 | 0.03 | 0.11 | n.s. |
| RH Occipital | Precuneus | −0.21 | 0.03 | 0.06 | n.s. |
Regions are sorted in descending order, beginning with the strongest negative associations between cortical thickness and age.
Figure 3.Whole-brain vertex-wise analysis of the left and right hemisphere in Freesurfer identifying brain regions whose thickness was associated with (A) age, (B) slow wave activity, (C) speed of processing, and (D) nonverbal intelligence. Statistical maps show regions with positive (red) and negative (blue) correlations between cortical thickness measures and these variables, controlled for sex. The color bars indicate logarithmic scale of p values (−log10). To visually demonstrate widespread changes, significant thresholds were set at p < 0.01, uncorrected. Panels (E) and (F) indicate intersecting brain regions from the conjunction of these three thresholded maps (age, SWA, and speed of processing/nonverbal intelligence). Regions identified in these conjunction analyses were then extracted for further serial mediation analyses.
Figure 4.The serial mediating effect of cortical thickness measures in middle/superior temporal brain regions as well as sleep slow wave activity in the relationship between age and cognitive domains of speed of processing (A, B) and nonverbal intelligence (C, D) (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). All effects are unstandardized; an represents effects of age on cortical thickness measures and SWA as mediators; bn represents the effect of these mediators on cognition; c' and c represent direct and total effects of age on cognition; d is effect of cortical thickness in the right and left middle/superior temporal regions on SWA. All models were controlled for sex (male = 0). Results indicated full mediation of the age-related improvement effect on cognition, as direct effects were no longer significant after inclusion of SWA and cortical thickness measures as mediators.