| Literature DB >> 34379769 |
Anton Schönstein1, Dinh Thao Trinh Ngo2, Yannick Stephan3, Ali Siè4, Guy Harling5, Till Bärnighausen2, Hans-Werner Wahl6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Previous research on subjective age (SA), that is, how young or old a person feels relative to their chronological age, has shown that older adults tend to feel younger than they are (by about 15%-20%), but the extent of this effect depends, in part, on their health. However, as most of the studies have been conducted in Western countries, it is unclear how well these results generalize to culturally different samples. Objectives, therefore, were to examine SA in middle-aged and older adults from a very low-income setting in rural Burkina Faso, to examine associations between SA and health/quality of life-related measures, and to compare findings with Western studies.Entities:
Keywords: Cross-cultural differences; Health; Stereotypes; Views on aging
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34379769 PMCID: PMC8599075 DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbab151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci ISSN: 1079-5014 Impact factor: 4.077
Descriptive Data of the Study Sample (N = 3,028)
| Variables |
| Mean ( | Median | Interquartile range (Q1, Q3) | Range (Min, Max) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Age | 54.31 (11.0) | 52 | 45, 62 | 40, 103 | |
| Sex male | 1504 (50%) | ||||
| Sex female | 1524 (50%) | ||||
| Household size | 8.17 (5.4) | 7 | 5, 10 | 1, 55 | |
| School years | 1.01 (2.9) | 0 | 0, 0 | 0, 38 | |
|
| |||||
| Grip strength (kg) | 37.95 (11.3) | 37 | 30, 45 | 6, 79 | |
| BMI | 22.06 (4.2) | 21.41 | 19.26, 24.13 | 12.15, 45.83 | |
| Walking speed | 0.97 (0.3) | 1.00 | 0.80, 1.00 | 0.13, 2.00 | |
| Fried frailty score | 0.86 (1.0) | 1 | 0, 1 | 0, 5 | |
| WHODAS (norm.) | 14.90 (17.4) | 8.33 | 2.08, 22.92 | 0, 95.38 | |
|
| |||||
| PHQ-9 score (depression) | 4.38 (3.6) | 4 | 2, 7 | 0, 23 | |
| CSI-D (cognition) | 8.41 (1.1) | 9 | 8, 9 | 2, 9 | |
|
| |||||
| WHOQOL (norm.) | 56.01 (14.3) | 59.38 | 46.88, 65.62 | 9.38, 96.88 | |
|
| |||||
| Felt age | 52.81 (13.0) | 50 | 43, 60 | 19, 100 | |
| Subjective age (diff.) | −1.50 (6.9) | 0 | −5, 1 | −38, 28 | |
| Subjective age (prop.) | −0.03 (0.1) | 0.00 | −0.09, 0.02 | −0.56, 0.46 |
Notes: Household size = total number of adults and children in the household; BMI = body mass index; WHODAS = WHO Disability Assessment Schedule with normalized scores (percentiles); PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire (nine-item version); CSI-D = Community Screening Instrument for Dementia; WHOQOL = WHO Quality of Life scale with normalized scores (percentiles); felt age = how old do you feel (years)?; Subjective age. (diff.) = Felt age − Chronological age; Subjective age (prop.) = (Felt age − Chronological age)/(Chronological age).
Figure 1.Felt age across the span of chronological age in (A) the Nouna Study (N = 3,028) and (B) in a Western reference by Rubin and Berntsen (N = 1,470; Rubin & Berntsen, 2006, p. 779). Dashed line functions as a reference that indicates Felt Age (in years; y-axis) equal to Chronological Age (in years; x-axis). In both (A) and (B) dots are means and whiskers show the standard deviation. Before the calculation of these descriptive summary measures, participants were grouped by chronological age (in bins of 5 years). Panel B is adapted from Rubin and Berntsen, 2006. Copyright [2006] by Springer Nature. Adapted with permission from Springer Nature Customer Center Service GmbH.
Figure 2.Proportion of participants feeling younger in the two African studies versus in a selection of comparable Western studies. Data are reported in Macia et al. (2012) for Senegal, Dakar; Rubin and Berntsen (2006) for the Danish sample; Stephan et al. (2018) for the USA: Midlife in the United States and Health and Retirement Study; and Demakakos et al. (2007) for the UK: English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. In all studies, the minimum recruitment age was 40–50 years, with an effort for a representative sample.
Hierarchical Regression with Subjective Age (proportional score) as Outcome (N = 3,028)
| Model 1: Demographics | Model 2: Functional mobility | Model 3: Affective and cognitive health | Model 4: Quality of Life | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | β | 95% CI: β | β | 95% CI: β | β | 95% CI: β | β | 95% CI: β |
| Age | 0.03 | 0.00, 0.07 | 0.00 | −0.04, 0.04 | −0.06** | −0.10, −0.02 | −0.07** | −0.12, −0.03 |
| Sex | 0.08*** | 0.04, 0.11 | 0.04* | 0.00, 0.08 | 0.02 | −0.02, 0.05 | 0.01 | −0.03, 0.05 |
| Household size | −0.03 | −0.07, 0.00 | −0.02 | −0.06, 0.01 | −0.02 | −0.05, 0.02 | −0.01 | −0.05, 0.03 |
| Education | −0.02 | −0.05, 0.02 | −0.01 | −0.05, 0.03 | 0.00 | −0.04, 0.04 | 0.00 | −0.03, 0.04 |
| Walk speed | −0.12*** | −0.16, −0.08 | −0.10*** | −0.14, −0.06 | −0.09*** | −0.13, −0.05 | ||
| Walk speed × Age | 0.01 | −0.02, 0.05 | 0.02 | −0.02, 0.05 | 0.02 | −0.02, 0.05 | ||
| PHQ-9 | 0.17*** | 0.13, 0.21 | 0.14*** | 0.10, 0.19 | ||||
| PHQ-9 × Age | 0.00 | −0.03, 0.03 | 0.01 | −0.03, 0.05 | ||||
| CSI-D | −0.10*** | −0.15, −0.06 | −0.09*** | −0.14, −0.05 | ||||
| CSI-D × Age | 0.01 | −0.02, 0.04 | 0.01 | −0.03, 0.04 | ||||
| WHOQOL | −0.08*** | −0.12, −0.04 | ||||||
| WHOQOL × Age | 0.02 | −0.03, 0.06 | ||||||
|
| 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.06 | ||||
| Δ | 0.01*** | 0.03*** | 0.01*** |
Notes: PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire (nine-item version); CSI-D = Community Screening Instrument for Dementia; Household size = total number of adults and children in the household; WHOQOL = WHO Quality of Life scale with normalized scores (percentiles). β values are standardized regression coefficients. “Predictor × Age” denotes age interaction effects.
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.
Figure 3.Estimates of the associations (with 95% CIs) between a range of specific diseases and Subjective Age as proportional score (N = 3,028). Estimates are controlled for demographics (age, sex, household size, education). For each estimate associated with a condition, the reference is participants without that condition. The number of cases for each disease in the data set is denoted by n. Only diseases with n ≥ 30 cases were included. Information on Hypertension and Diabetes was based on either objective physical examinations or self-report. Information on other diseases was based on self-report to a question of the format: Has your health care worker ever informed you that you have, e.g., heart disease?