Experiences of women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in Ghana: A qualitative analysis of their experiences.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to explore the experiences of women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies namely; Invitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection at the Finney Hospital and Fertility Centre, New Bortianor, Ghana.
METHOD: A qualitative research design was employed to analyse and describe the experiences of the women seeking Assisted Reproductive Technologies. A total of 32 women were invited to take part in the interview, 15 of them accepted the invitation. However, saturation was reached before all interviews had been complete.
RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the study: the women's experiences, challenges and the roles and contributions of significant others. The women were anxious, stressed-up, exhausted and financially burdened. Spouses and health professionals played significant roles by providing social, emotional and financial support for these women. Significant others such as spouses and close relatives were supportive and provided encouragement to the women.
CONCLUSION: The experiences of women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies are multi-dimensional. Thus, psychosocial interventions as part of ART services with health insurance cover may be client-centered and more appropriate for these group of women.

Introduction

Child bearing is an importance milestone in the life of most couples, especially in Africa, of which Ghana is no exception. The widely accepted belief is that the life of humans reaches completeness through the birth of a child. This is because the birth of a child is a fulfilment of an individual’s need for reproduction [1]. Thus, when couples live together and are engaged in regular unprotected sexual intercourse without achieving the goal of pregnancy, they are often diagnosed with infertility. This excludes transgender individuals, gays and lesbians couples. A voluntary decision to be childless is an uncommon practice in Ghanaian traditional setting because, the ultimate expectation of every marriage is to reproduce. Thus, infertility affects the stability of marriages in Ghana [2]. Primary infertility refers to couples who have never been able to conceive in their lifetime, while secondary infertility refers to couples who have either carried a pregnancy to a full term or have had a miscarriage in the past and are unable to conceive again. Infertility cuts across genders, cultures, races and socioeconomic classes. A review of previous studies from 1990 to 2006 reported prevalence rates in a 12-month range as 3.5% to 16.7% in developed nations and 6.9% to 9.3% in less developed countries [3]. In Ghana, it is estimated that the prevalence of infertility stands at 15% among Ghanaian women and 15.8% among men [4].

In recent times, orthodox medicine has helped to keep the hopes of infertile couples alive. This is significant because infertile couples have the opportunity to have children through the use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs). Likewise, same sex couples (lesbians and gays) can also achieve the joy of having children in marriage [5]. ARTs are medical interventions that are used to help childless couples to have their biological babies. In vitro fertilization (IVF), Gamete Intra Fallopian Transfer (GIFT), Pronuclear Stage Tubal Transfer (PROST), Tubal Embryo Transfer (TET), and Zygote Intra Fallopian Transfer (ZIFT) are some examples of such interventions [6]. IVF has contributed to population growth more than expected, reaching about 3.5% of the world population [7]. These figures are still projected to expand in the near future. It is not surprising that locally and internationally, the demand for ART services is growing exponentially. ART services may be skewed towards high-income level countries [7] whereas the sub-Saharan region is characterized by fewer IVF services [8]. Nonetheless, South Africa, Nigeria and Ghana in sub-Saharan Africa have experienced comparative regional success stories [8]. After the first successful IVF in 1995 in Ghana, several other clinics in the country commenced ARTs services to women with some degree of success.

Although ARTs have brought some measure of hope to infertile and childless couples, it has also brought untold economic, social, moral, legal and emotional burden onto women. Moral issues and legitimacy of children born with the help of ART involving a donor remains unresolved. Women would have to wait for several weeks without knowing whether the ART process was going to be successful or not. ARTs are rejected by many as intrinsically morally unacceptable because fertilization takes place outside the body. The process of fertilization outside body is believe, separates reproduction from sexual intercourse or does not associate reproduction with sexual intercourse. This is considered as morally unacceptable by some people. Some women expressed that going through the ART process make them feel as though they had lost their sense of control. This is because they had to wait not knowing what the outcome of the process was going to be. The desire for couples to have children after marriage is so intense that when pregnancy or childbirth continues to elude couples, it generates fear and anxiety with women disproportionately suffering the consequence the most.

Considering the fact that in many traditional Ghanaian settings, the natural means of having children is more preferable to society, raising pertinent questions such as:

What are the experiences and challenges women go through accessing ART services?

What is the role of significant others in the life of the women seeking ART services?

These are the nagging questions this research is seeking to address by exploring the experiences of women undergoing ART at the Finney Hospital and Fertility Centre, New Bortianor in Ghana. below presents the statement of significance.

Materials and methods

Design

A qualitative research design with content analysis was employed to describe the experiences of the women seeking Assisted Reproductive Technologies at the Finney Hospital and Fertility Centre in Ghana. Qualitative research design was used because it is the most appropriate to explore and understand the experiences of the women seeking Assisted Reproductive Technology services.

Study population and sampling strategy

The population for the study were mainly women Assisted Reproductive Technologies services and women who were referred from other health facilities or who visited the Finney Hospital and Fertility Centre seeking Assisted Reproductive Technologies services. Purposive sampling technique was used [9]. Purposeful sampling is widely used in qualitative research for the identification and selection of information-rich cases related to the phenomenon of interest. In the study, the phenomenon of interest was experiences of women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies thus women with the appropriate characteristics were identified and invited. Data collection spanned from November 2019 to January 2020. During this period, the research team was at the facility, identified and approached potential participants individually. Those women who met the inclusion criteria were invited and provided with Participants Information and Consent Form (PICF). The women were informed that participation was voluntarily. Those who were willing to take part in the study joined after written consents were obtained. Participants were then taken individually to a room at the facility and interviewed. Generation of a large and representative sample is not the primary focus of qualitative research [10]; rather, the purpose is to explore meanings and experiences to add another layer to the existing scientific evidence. A total of 32 women were invited to take part in the interview, 15 of them accepted the invitation. However, ssaturation was reached before all interviews had been complete [10], i.e. no new themes emerged from the last few interviews.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Women were included in this study if they were undergoing fertility treatment at the Finney Hospital and Fertility Centre using any of the assisted reproductive technologies, were in their first cycle or a repeated cycle and were willing to take part in the study. Women were excluded it they did not experience any of assisted reproductive technologies.

Data collection tool and process

An interview guide was developed based on the study objective and after a review of the relevant literature. The interview guide was in two sections: the first section was concerned with the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants while the second section was to elicit information on the experiences of the women undergoing ARTs, their challenges in accessing treatments and the role of significant others in the ART process. All the participants could speak and understand English therefore all the interviews were conducted in English by the Principal Investigator (PI) who has a strong background in qualitative research. The PI is nurse with Postgraduate qualifications in Public Health. She completed research methodology coursework while undergoing her postgraduate program. The knowledge acquired from this training has been applied to this study. After consenting to participate in the study, interviews were scheduled based on dates and times suitable to the participants. The interviews were audio-recorded and field-notes were also taken. Each interview lasted between 45 minutes and one hour. Probing questions was used to ensure in-depth information of the subject matter.

The position of the researcher

It’s known that a researcher’s background and position may influence data collection and interpretation [11] and indicating how researcher’s beliefs and values came into play during the research process is a common strategy to negotiate certain knowledge claims [12]. Therefore, this study endeavoured to capture the views and expressions of the study participants in all their original complexity and depth, without distorting the meaning. All the stages of the research process; data collection, interpretation and reporting of results were shaped by her personal and social characteristics and the researcher’s understanding of the research objectives. However, the researcher focused using an emic approach in the analysis and presented diverse perspectives and maximized the use of direct quotations from the participants.

Data analysis

The data were manually analysed using content analysis to identify patterns across the data sets [13, 14]. Content analysis was considered for this study because of its flexibility; it is applicable to a data-driven or theory-driven analysis. The analysis started with immersion into the data, involving verbatim transcriptions of all the audio recordings by the Principal Investigator and verified independently by the research team members. The team read the interview scripts multiple times in order to accurately capture the accounts of participants’ experiences. The transcripts and the field-notes taken during the interviews were reflected upon and coded. Key themes were identified from the different transcripts and displayed in matrices to enable systematic examination of similarities and patterns among various responses [14].

Ethical considerations

A number of activities were employed to establish the credibility of the study. Experts in reproductive health and qualitative research contributed to this study. The data analysis endeavoured to capture and retain the women’s expressions in their original depth without any distortion. The analysis and interpretation of the data were reviewed by all study team members. Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Health and Allied Sciences Research Ethics Committee (UHAS-REC. A.1 [47] 19–20). The purpose of the study and procedures were explained to the women with the aid of participants information and informed consent guide. Confidentiality was ensured and data collected were sealed and stored under key and lock. All the research team members verified the transcript and field-notes used to corroborate the women’s accounts. Some of the women were followed-up on for further clarifications and confirmation of their accounts.

Results

Participants characteristics

Fifteen women provided accounts of their individual experiences of ART process. All the women were above 34 years, thirteen were married, eleven were leaving with their spouses and only two had ever conceived. One woman had a child about 19 years ago. Ten were self-employed, five had a Master’s Degree, while the remaining ten were educated below a Bachelor’s Degree level. presents a summary of the participants characteristics.

Themes

Three themes emerged from the data analysis and these are presented in Table 3.

Table 3

Themes.

THEMES	HEADINGS
Theme 1	Experiences of women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology
Theme 2	Challenges women face as they seek Assisted Reproductive Technology
Theme 3	Role of significant others in the ART procedure.

Theme 1. Experiences of women undergoing ART

The findings from the study revealed several reasons behind women seeking ART. Some of the reasons expressed by these women were: to escape social stigma of childlessness, the desire to satisfy their spouses and for some of these women, to avoid the displeasure of their in-laws. However, for majority of the women, the strong desire to become pregnant was what motivated them to seek for ART. Most of them have been married for years and had made several attempts to conceive naturally and they were not successful. All the participants were concerned about their current ages because they are getting older without children and therefore they needed help. One of the participants stated that:

“I am concern about my age. My husband and I, we both felt we were growing old and we needed children. We read somewhere that it is better to give birth early and we decided to have a child early but things became difficult…” (Participant 4)

Another participant also expressed that:

“After 5 years of marriage, I felt age was catching up with me so I needed some medical help if I wanted to conceive so I decided to come here to look for help for pregnancy” (Participant 10)

A majority of the women interviewed experienced anxiety and emotional distress. They expressed that they were anxious going through the treatment process because of the uncertainty about the treatment outcome:

“I have tried for 6 times and at the first attempt I thought I will just succeed…… I thought of this option as a solution to my problem so that people will not mock at me again but it didn’t work the first time………” (Participant 15).

“I came to the hospital because of a child so I was happy at the beginning but later I got very anxious because I got to realized that it’s a 50% chance and therefore I had to pray hard. Not knowing the outcome of the treatment makes me very anxious” (Participant 3).

The women also indicated that the ART process was painful, exhausting, time consuming and tortuous and at a point they were considering giving up. Majority of them complained about the number of laboratory investigations, scans and medications involved:

“I was a bit disturbed about the scans because the frequency of doing scan was too much. I think there should be a way to reduce the scans. Because I feel very uncomfortable with the scans and I was not enjoying it. The egg retrieval part is also very painful. I threw up a lot after the procedure” (Participant 14)

Only few of the women indicated that going through the ART process has contributed positively to their sexual life. According to these women their sexual lives weren’t good and pleasant, however, the ART process has improved their sexual life significantly. Of the 11 women who were living with their spouses, only two shared that the ART process has positively impacted their marriage lives. According to them the ART also gave their spouses some hope of having babies of their own and this they believe rejuvenated their marriages:

‘‘It has brought happiness to my life. Because it’s been long since I gave birth and it feels as if I have never given birth before, because I have no children with my current husband. But now my husband and I are very happy.” (Participant 1).

As the women shared their experiences the study further explored and identified challenges in seeking ART services. This may help the ART service providers to consider appropriate strategies to remove these challenges.

Theme 2. Challenges women faces as they seek ART

All the women irrespective of their occupation or educational background complained of financial challenges. According to these women, the ART was expensive and they were able to afford the treatment because they sacrificed other needs in order to saved money towards the treatment; others obtain loans from the banks and others also said they were supported by their spouses:

“I have been saving for about 7 years…….…a lot of sacrifices, we sold our car in July just before we started the IVF. We had to sell it. I could have built a house with my money. I got the opportunities to travel to the US and while in the US I never went shopping because I had to save the money for the ART…………” (Participant 2)

‘‘I had to safe for about 6 months. I Had to go for a loan to be approved. So, I used my shop as collateral to get the loan”,

Some of the participants indicated that they were even still paying for debts incurred as a result of the ART:

“I took a loan from the bank and I am now paying it back about six months now and for a couple of more months to come.” (Participant 6)

Due to the financial burden, one participant stated that her husband tried to convince her to give up so they could save the money being spent on ART for other things:

“My husband thought of us stopping because of the money but for me I was interested in getting a child so I never got exhausted. Because money is nothing but children are important” (Participant 1)

In addition to the financial burden experienced, all the women described going through the ART procedures as tortuous, stressful, time consuming and very exhausting. The women expressed the following:

” It has been quite tedious travelling to and from the hospital, the injections, the disappointments at the negative tests. Hmmmmm! She exclaimed. It has not been easy. Severally, I had thought about giving up and adopting or just living my life” (Participant 10)

“The injections are on daily basis and we were coming from home for the injection, and it was very stressful. Sometimes we come late and all that, so I felt like giving up” (participant 4).

There were challenges confronting the women going through the ART period and financial burden was largely experienced by all the women interviewed. Some of the women funded for the therapy by themselves whereas others were supported by their spouses. While some of the women were being supported by their spouses, the study observed that one woman’s husband wanted her to stopped the therapy and save the money. It was therefore important to explore the role of significant others during ART.

Theme 3. Significant others and their Role in the ART procedure

The study also sought to identify the women’s significant others and their roles during the ART procedures. When the participants were asked about family and friends who were involve in the ART process they were going through, it was observed that these women preferred to keep their treatments a secret between them and their spouses largely to avoid the displeasure of people. Majority of support the women received during the ART process came from their spouses, including financial support. One participant indicated that:

“In addition to the huge amount of money that my husband is spending for this treatment, I also got emotional support from my him. My husband has been very supportive” (Respondent 9).

A few of the women involved other family members such as siblings and mothers during the ART process. According to them, it is because of the support they were receiving from these individuals. Among those who informed their mothers, one stated:

“My mom has been very encouraging; she does not understand the process but whenever I talk to her, she asks if it has worked yet. She encouraged me to keep on praying and I should not stop” (Participant 12)

Although some of the participants were supported by their family members, some of the women were of the opinion that their family members showed open disapproval of the ART and tended to discourage them from undergoing the procedures. For these group of women, they would prefer to involve their church pastors instead. One woman for instance, said she involved her church pastors so that they would support her with prayers:

“My two pastors were aware of my situation but nobody else knew because they would never support me through such thing so I kept all this to myself. Furthermore, some people will end up discouraging you but the pastors always pray for me.” (Participant 2).

Majority of the women also mentioned that they received support and encouraging words from health workers at the facility. The doctors and nurses provided encouragement and showed positive attitude toward them. These kind gestures helped majority of them from giving up. One woman expressed the following:

“The nurses have been very helpful too. The doctors try to explain the process as much as possible. It has been good so far.” (Participant 8)

“My nurse, especially, was very encouraging and supportive throughout. The doctors too made me feel comfortable and relaxed at all times. Even at odd hours” (participant 7)

Discussions

The study found that women undergoing ART have personal experiences resulting from their expectations and the procedures involved in the treatment process. Although a majority of the women felt very happy at the first instance of knowing that they have another chance of getting pregnant to have a child, they later became very anxious. This is because after the commencement of the ART procedures these women were confronted with uncertain outcome of the ART. Their anxieties heightened as some experienced fear, treatment failures and burdened financially. This finding is consistent with a previous study in Iran by [15] that reported fear of the unknown among women who were not confident about their treatment outcome and this was a great source of distress. Despite the aforementioned challenges associated with ART, infertile women go for the procedure in their quest to have children, the problem is heightened by the fact that they have to save for long periods, take bank loans, or gain support from relatives in order to cover for treatment cost. Even more worrying is that there is no certainty about the success of the procedure. An indication that the ART procedure can sometimes fail. The women in the study indicated that the ART procedure was tortuous, stressful, time consuming and exhausting. This finding is consistent with other studies in Iran and China that reported that women, including their families, go through physical and emotional pain, uncertainty, low self-esteem, stress, distress and frustration when undergoing ART [15-17]. The findings in this current study suggest that women seeking ART services in Ghana experience anxiety, stress, frustration and are burdened with the challenge of funding the treatment. Thus, the need for a psychosocial intervention as part of ART services and insurance cover for the ART may be appropriate. These women clearly need support however, it is also not whether there are adequate support systems for women accessing ART services. It is therefore necessary that further studies investigating ways to lessen the burden for women undergoing ART are conducted so that appropriate interventions may be developed for these women.

Whether these women had failed attempts or not, the desires to overcome the related challenges and carry pregnancy to term and deliver their children successfully were the ultimate goal. They strove to get pregnancy and once that is achieved, they were satisfied, fulfilled and all the struggle and pains are forgotten. According to the women, they were very happy getting pregnant and the feeling of having a child despite the difficulties was very great for them and their spouses. Similar finding was reported by Dornelles, MacCallum [18], who revealed that women in Brazil who initially experienced failed attempts of ART and later achieved success with ARTs regarded their pregnancies as a reward or as a compensation for the difficulties they had experienced. Such was the sentiments echoed by the nineteen expectant first-time mothers from Brazil who conceived through Assisted Reproductive Technology treatment [18].

The study findings revealed two main challenges facing these women and this included the time-consuming aspect of the procedure and the financial burden associated with it. Funding ART for majority of the women required several years of saving and making sacrifices such as using income intended for such wealth as cars and buildings for the ART procedure. These findings are consistent with the findings of Ranjbar, Behboodi-Moghadam [15] which revealed that with respect to the financial difficulties encountered, some participants highlighted that raising funds for the treatment came at great cost to them. Some had to take bank loans for the ART as insurance services did not cover their treatment cost. For some, it meant reorganizing their priorities in life; sacrificing purchasing a house or a car for having children [15]. It is not clear the impact of these challenges on the treatment outcome. Nonetheless, these challenges can be lessened if ART is considered and included in health insurance schemes for these women who are already troubled, stressed and uncertain about the treatment outcome.

Other individuals play critical roles in the success of the ART procedure apart from the women undergoing the procedure. In this study, it was revealed that the spouses of the women played significant roles by providing financial and emotional support to the women during the process. This finding correlates with a study by Pedro and Mwaba [19] who found that, ARTs have experienced a surge in its usage as a means of having children and the reason for the increased patronage, according to the author, was that the infertile couples had decided not to be discouraged by the negative attitudes of their relatives and society towards ART.

Health professionals were also supportive during the ART process. The study revealed that the women undergoing ART were encouraged by positive attitudes shown by doctors and nurses. The doctors and nurses were empathetic and showed positive attitudes toward these women throughout the ART process.

Conclusions

There is a solid evidence that women seeking ART services in Ghana experience anxiety, stress, frustration and are burdened with the challenge of funding the treatment. These women had to endure these challenges to escape the stigma of childlessness. It is not clear how these challenges impact upon the treatment outcome and no medical intervention can change the desires women feel towards child-bearing. However, the burden of these women can be lessened if their challenges are viewed in a broader context. The social, emotional and financial support from significant others such as spouses, relatives and healthcare workers were felt and appreciated by the women. These kinds of support may not be adequate, reliable and consistent. A psychosocial intervention as part of ART services may be more appropriate and client-centered for women undergoing ART procedure.

There is no doubt that ARTs have brought some measure of hope to infertile and childless couples and also the opportunity to escape social stigma of childlessness. As the number of ART clinics in Ghana continue to grow the issues concerning ART largely remain unexplored, as such ART has not been given much policy attention in Ghana. The position of the government and churches regarding ART for instance are needed. Considering that very few studies have been conducted in Ghana regarding ARTs, the finding of this current study may contribute to the consideration of ART to be included in the health insurance schemes so that these women can benefit from health insurance cover.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

24 May 2021

PONE-D-21-02324

Experiences of Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology in Ghana: A Qualitative Analysis of their Experiences

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Justice,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by six weeks. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Shah Md Atiqul Haq

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Author(s),

I would like to ask you to revise the paper by following the reviewers' comments and suggestions.

The paper has many limitations in the introduction section, organization of data and topic.

The discussion part should be strong by comparing your results with other relevant studies.

Best wishes,

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. When reporting the results of qualitative research, we suggest consulting the COREQ guidelines: http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/349. In this case, please consider including more information on the number of interviewers, their training and characteristics; and please provide the interview guide used.

Furthermore, in your Methods section, please provide additional information about the participant recruitment method and the demographic details of your participants. Please ensure you have provided sufficient details to replicate the analyses such as: 1)  a description of any inclusion/exclusion criteria that were applied to participant recruitment and 2) a description of how participants were recruited.

3. Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document. We do appreciate that you have a title page document uploaded as a separate file, however, as per our author guidelines (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-title-page) we do require this to be part of the manuscript file itself and not uploaded separately.

Could you therefore please include the title page into the beginning of your manuscript file itself, listing all authors and affiliations.

4. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1- They should follow the correct steps to conduct a qualitative analysis. It should include reliable references upon which researchers have relied in applying the qualitative analysis.

2- they should Draft and organize the data. This could be transcribing the interview, organizing field notes from observations or ensuring all documents used in the analysis are available.

3- they should Categorize data into themes and code data elements and creating categories.

4-they should Present the collected data.

5- There are many misspellings, using capital letters in the wrong places.

6-The paper should be rearranged so that it matches the basic elements needed for the research

7-The objectives of the research and its importance should be shown more clearly. The importance of the research has not been shown well

Reviewer #2: I recommend to accept this paper. But author should address some of the issue.

1. A brief discussion (in discussio part) on, what additional knowledge this study contributing to us. (As author mentioned in Table 1)

2. Three Themes of the study should be linked properly. As I see, there is no linkage between the Themes.

3. One additional section can be added to make this study far better. i.e. If author could mention some of the existing policies taken by government, and authors view point on policy recommendation.

Reviewer #3: Thank you for the opportunity given me to give my opinion on the manuscript entitled “Experiences of Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology in Ghana: A Qualitative Analysis of their Experiences”

The manuscript is well written and well presented. It deals with an important issues. The high value placed on procreation especially in SSA showed the pain that accompanies infertility in the region.

The manuscript has several strengthen.

Below are my comments to the authors.

Introduction

Page 4:

Please add the source to the statement: “infertility is one of the reasons why some marriages end in divorce”

Please specify the date of the prevalence rates (3.5% to 16.7% in developed nations and 6.9% to 9.3% in less developed countries) of infertility specify in the introduction.

Page 5, paragraph 2: please add the source for the statements

Methodology

The abstract states that fifteen participants were invited and interviewed while in the methodology (page 7) mentions “A total of 32 women were invited to take part in the interview. However, 19 of them accepted the invitation and were successfully interviewed”. Kindly adjust

Kindly relabel, the session “Rigor and Ethical Considerations” to “Ethical considerations”

Were all interviews conducted and in English? Kindly specify and add detail if needed.

It will be good to strengthen the introduction with statistics and information about the coverage and use of ART in SSA and in Ghana, in particular. The authors include the prevalence rates of infertile which is totally fine. It will also be good if the authors include in the introduction the synthesis of the key findings of studies included in the discussion. It will provide the readers with more insight and the state of the art before the discussion.

For data analysis, I would suggest using, if possible, qualitative software data analysis. It will strengthened the robustness of the study.

The reader wants to know more about the study interviewers: were they health personnel or non-health practitioner researchers recruited outside health facility? Since the interviews took place at the health facility participants may only reported the positive experiences with health providers during the process. Kindly clarify this in the methodology and discuss, if possible, the extent to which it may affect participants’ declarations toward health practitioners providing ART services. I think this is important since it has been reported that the nature of the healthcare system play an important role ART access.

Results:

Page 14: last verbatim, second phrase, kindly remove “my” (a surplus word).

Discussion

I think the discussion session may be improved by adding more studies from sub-Saharan Africa and removing studies outside Africa if possible. Only five studies were referred to for the discussion, among which only on from SSA (South Africa). I will suggest making the discussion more clearer by including the setting (name of the countries or areas) of the studies involve in the discussion.

All of the findings presented in the current studies were in agreement with past studies according to the discussion. I will suggest the author recall clearly what is new in their study (maybe the current study is among the first in Ghanaian setting, etc….).

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Suzan Abdel -Rahman

Reviewer #2: Yes: Tushar Dakua

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

16 Jul 2021

Reviewer Two

Reviewer’s Remarks Author’s Response Reference Page

A brief discussion (in discussion part) on, what additional knowledge this study contributing to us. (As author mentioned in Table 1)

The suggestion has been considered Page 19

Three Themes of the study should be linked properly. As I see, there is no linkage between the Themes.

Statements linking the study themes have been included in the main document Pages 16 and 17

One additional section can be added to make this study far better. i.e. If author could mention some of the existing policies taken by government, and authors view point on policy recommendation

An additional section has been included in the main document Page 22

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

Click here for additional data file.

28 Jul 2021

Experiences of Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology in Ghana: A Qualitative Analysis of their Experiences

PONE-D-21-02324R1

Dear Dr. JONATHAN,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Shah Md Atiqul Haq

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Dear authors,

Congratulations!!!

The paper is accepted now.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: This manuscript should be accepted for publication. This is a very interesting topic dealing with the population of Ghana.

Reviewer #3: Comments were addressed. Thanks

Comments were addressed. Thanks

Comments were addressed. Thanks

Comments were addressed. Thanks

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: Yes: Tushar Dakua

Reviewer #3: No

2 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-02324R1

EXPERIENCES OF WOMEN UNDERGOING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN GHANA: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THEIR EXPRIENCES

Dear Dr. JONATHAN:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Shah Md Atiqul Haq

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Table 1

Statement of significance.

Problem or Issue	Although ARTs have brought some measure of hope to childless couples, it has also brought untold challenges.
What is already known	Modern orthodox medicine has helped to keep the hopes of infertile couples alive by having children through the use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs). By extension, same sex couples (lesbians and gays) can also achieve the joy of having children in marriage. ART has contributed to population growth more than expected, reaching about 3.5% of the world’s population but very little is known about the experiences of women who seek this intervention in the Ghanaian setting.
What this paper adds	Evidence that women seeking ART services in Ghana experience anxiety, stress, frustration and are burdened with the challenge of funding the treatment. Thus, the need for a psychosocial intervention as part of ART services and insurance cover for ART may be appropriate.

Table 2

Participant characteristics.

Participants	Age (Years)	Occupation	Education	Marital status	Living with spouse	Conceived before
Participant 1	42	Trader	SHS graduate	Married	Yes	Yes, has one child.
Participant 2	36	Seamstress	Voc. Training	Divorced	No	No
Participant 3	44	Hairdresser	JHS graduate	Married	Yes	No.
Participant 4	37	Administrator	MBA	Married	Yes	No
Participant 5	43	Educationist	MSc Degree	Married	Yes	No
Participant 6	34	Teacher	Diploma	Married	No	Conceived twice but lost all
Participant 7	37	General manager	MBA	Single	No	No
Participant 8	35	Business woman	Diploma	Married	Yes	No
Participant 9	40	Trader	SHS graduate	Married	Yes	No
Participant 10	34	Banker	Master’s degree	Married	Yes	No
Participant 11	38	Trader	SHS graduate	Married	Yes	No
Participant 12	40	Trader	SHS graduate	Married	Yes	No
Participant 13	40	Trader	SHS graduate	Married	Yes	No
Participant 14	35	Teacher	Diploma	Married	No	No
Participant 15	34	Banker	MBA	Married	Yes	No